Tara L Gruenewald1, Teresa E Seeman, Arun S Karlamangla, Catherine A Sarkisian. 1. Department of Medicine, Division of Geriatrics, Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, 10945 LeConte Ave, Suite 2339, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA. tgruenewald@mednet.ucla.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To examine the association between allostatic load (AL), an index of multisystem physiological dysregulation, and frailty development over a 3-year follow-up in a sample of older adults. DESIGN: Longitudinal cohort study. SETTING: Community. PARTICIPANTS: High-functioning men and women aged 70 to 79 at study entry. MEASUREMENTS: Multisystem physiological dysregulation, or AL, was assessed according to 13 biomarkers of cardiovascular, endocrine, immune, and metabolic function. An AL score was computed as the total number of biomarkers for which participant values fell into high-risk biomarker quartiles. Frailty status (not frail, intermediate frail, frail) was determined according to the total number of five indicators of frailty: weight loss, exhaustion, weak grip, slow gait, and low physical activity. The association between level of AL at baseline and frailty status 3 years later was examined using ordinal logistic regression in 803 participants not frail at baseline. RESULTS: In a multivariable model adjusting for sociodemographic, health, and behavioral characteristics, each 1-unit increase in AL at baseline was associated with a 10% greater likelihood of frailty at the 3-year follow-up (cumulative adjusted odds ratio=1.10, 95% confidence interval=1.03-1.19). CONCLUSION: These findings support the hypothesis that dysregulation across multiple physiological systems is associated with greater risk of frailty. Greater levels of multisystem physiological dysregulation may serve as a warning sign of frailty development in later life.
OBJECTIVES: To examine the association between allostatic load (AL), an index of multisystem physiological dysregulation, and frailty development over a 3-year follow-up in a sample of older adults. DESIGN: Longitudinal cohort study. SETTING: Community. PARTICIPANTS: High-functioning men and women aged 70 to 79 at study entry. MEASUREMENTS: Multisystem physiological dysregulation, or AL, was assessed according to 13 biomarkers of cardiovascular, endocrine, immune, and metabolic function. An AL score was computed as the total number of biomarkers for which participant values fell into high-risk biomarker quartiles. Frailty status (not frail, intermediate frail, frail) was determined according to the total number of five indicators of frailty: weight loss, exhaustion, weak grip, slow gait, and low physical activity. The association between level of AL at baseline and frailty status 3 years later was examined using ordinal logistic regression in 803 participants not frail at baseline. RESULTS: In a multivariable model adjusting for sociodemographic, health, and behavioral characteristics, each 1-unit increase in AL at baseline was associated with a 10% greater likelihood of frailty at the 3-year follow-up (cumulative adjusted odds ratio=1.10, 95% confidence interval=1.03-1.19). CONCLUSION: These findings support the hypothesis that dysregulation across multiple physiological systems is associated with greater risk of frailty. Greater levels of multisystem physiological dysregulation may serve as a warning sign of frailty development in later life.
Authors: Teresa E Seeman; Eileen Crimmins; Mei-Hua Huang; Burton Singer; Alexander Bucur; Tara Gruenewald; Lisa F Berkman; David B Reuben Journal: Soc Sci Med Date: 2004-05 Impact factor: 4.634
Authors: Jeremy Walston; Mary Ann McBurnie; Anne Newman; Russell P Tracy; Willem J Kop; Calvin H Hirsch; John Gottdiener; Linda P Fried Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2002-11-11
Authors: Teresa E Seeman; Burton H Singer; Carol D Ryff; Gayle Dienberg Love; Lené Levy-Storms Journal: Psychosom Med Date: 2002 May-Jun Impact factor: 4.312
Authors: Hélène Payette; Ronenn Roubenoff; Paul F Jacques; Charles A Dinarello; Peter W F Wilson; Leslie W Abad; Tamara Harris Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2003-09 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Sean X Leng; Anne R Cappola; Ross E Andersen; Marc R Blackman; Kathleen Koenig; Michael Blair; Jeremy D Walston Journal: Aging Clin Exp Res Date: 2004-04 Impact factor: 3.636
Authors: Erik J Rodriquez; Edward N Kim; Anne E Sumner; Anna M Nápoles; Eliseo J Pérez-Stable Journal: J Urban Health Date: 2019-03 Impact factor: 3.671
Authors: G Berrut; S Andrieu; I Araujo de Carvalho; J P Baeyens; H Bergman; B Cassim; F Cerreta; M Cesari; H B Cha; L K Chen; A Cherubini; M Y Chou; A J Cruz-Jentoft; L De Decker; P Du; B Forette; F Forette; A Franco; R Guimaraes; L M Guttierrez-Robledo; J Jauregui; V Khavinson; W J Lee; L N Peng; C Perret-Guillaume; M Petrovic; F Retornaz; K Rockwood; L Rodriguez-Manas; C Sieber; G Spatharakis; O Theou; E Topinkova; B Vellas; A Benetos Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2013 Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: Alan A Cohen; Emmanuel Milot; Qing Li; Véronique Legault; Linda P Fried; Luigi Ferrucci Journal: Exp Gerontol Date: 2014-05-05 Impact factor: 4.032