Literature DB >> 33158901

Airborne Disinfection by Dry Fogging Efficiently Inactivates Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), Mycobacteria, and Bacterial Spores and Shows Limitations of Commercial Spore Carriers.

Jan Schinköthe1, Hendrik A Scheinemann1, Sandra Diederich2, Holger Freese1, Michael Eschbaumer3, Jens P Teifke1, Sven Reiche4.   

Abstract

Airborne disinfection of high-containment facilities before maintenance or between animal studies is crucial. Commercial spore carriers (CSC) coated with 106 spores of Geobacillus stearothermophilus are often used to assess the efficacy of disinfection. We used quantitative carrier testing (QCT) procedures to compare the sensitivity of CSC with that of surrogates for nonenveloped and enveloped viruses, including severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), mycobacteria, and spores, to an aerosolized mixture of peroxyacetic acid and hydrogen peroxide (aPAA-HP). We then used the QCT methodology to determine relevant process parameters to develop and validate effective disinfection protocols (≥4-log10 reduction) in various large and complex facilities. Our results demonstrate that aPAA-HP is a highly efficient procedure for airborne room disinfection. Relevant process parameters such as temperature and relative humidity can be wirelessly monitored. Furthermore, we found striking differences in inactivation efficacies against some of the tested microorganisms. Overall, we conclude that dry fogging a mixture of aPAA-HP is highly effective against a broad range of microorganisms as well as material compatible with relevant concentrations. Furthermore, CSC are artificial bioindicators with lower resistance and thus should not be used for validating airborne disinfection when microorganisms other than viruses have to be inactivated.IMPORTANCE Airborne disinfection is not only of crucial importance for the safe operation of laboratories and animal rooms where infectious agents are handled but also can be used in public health emergencies such as the current severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic. We show that dry fogging an aerosolized mixture of peroxyacetic acid and hydrogen peroxide (aPAA-HP) is highly microbicidal, efficient, fast, robust, environmentally neutral, and a suitable airborne disinfection method. In addition, the low concentration of dispersed disinfectant, particularly for enveloped viral pathogens such as SARS-CoV-2, entails high material compatibility. For these reasons and due to the relative simplicity of the procedure, it is an ideal disinfection method for hospital wards, ambulances, public conveyances, and indoor community areas. Thus, we conclude that this method is an excellent choice for control of the current SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.
Copyright © 2021 Schinköthe et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bacillus subtilis; Geobacillus stearothermophilus; Indiana vesiculovirus (VSIV); Mycobacterium senegalense; airborne disinfection; dry fog; murine norovirus (MNV); peroxyacetic acid; room disinfection; severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33158901      PMCID: PMC7848922          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.02019-20

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  22 in total

Review 1.  Statistics for clinicians: 4: Basic concepts of statistical reasoning: hypothesis tests and the t-test.

Authors:  J B Carlin; L W Doyle
Journal:  J Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 1.954

2.  A study of conventional formaldehyde fumigation methods.

Authors:  V H Lach
Journal:  J Appl Bacteriol       Date:  1990-05

3.  Inactivation of stable viruses in cell culture facilities by peracetic acid fogging.

Authors:  Jens-Peter Gregersen; Bernhard Roth
Journal:  Biologicals       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 1.856

4.  Meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus is more resistant to vaporized hydrogen peroxide than commercial Geobacillus stearothermophilus biological indicators.

Authors:  T Pottage; S Macken; J T Walker; A M Bennett
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 3.926

5.  Decontamination of a BSL3 laboratory by hydrogen peroxide fumigation using three different surrogates for Bacillus anthracis spores.

Authors:  O Kaspari; K Lemmer; S Becker; P Lochau; S Howaldt; H Nattermann; R Grunow
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 3.772

6.  Decontamination assessment of Bacillus anthracis, Bacillus subtilis, and Geobacillus stearothermophilus spores on indoor surfaces using a hydrogen peroxide gas generator.

Authors:  J V Rogers; C L K Sabourin; Y W Choi; W R Richter; D C Rudnicki; K B Riggs; M L Taylor; J Chang
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.772

7.  Hydrogen peroxide vapour is an effective replacement for Formaldehyde in a BSL4 Foot and mouth disease vaccine manufacturing facility.

Authors:  M Vannier; J Chewins
Journal:  Lett Appl Microbiol       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 2.858

8.  Sporicidal activity of peracetic acid and beta-propiolactone at subzero temperatures.

Authors:  L A Jones; R K Hoffman; C R Phillips
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1967-03

9.  Controlled formaldehyde fumigation system.

Authors:  N R Ackland; M R Hinton; K R Denmeade
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 10.  Review of aerosol transmission of influenza A virus.

Authors:  Raymond Tellier
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 6.883

View more
  3 in total

1.  Ozone for SARS-CoV-2 inactivation on surfaces and in liquid cell culture media.

Authors:  Chedly Tizaoui; Richard Stanton; Evelina Statkute; Anzelika Rubina; Edward Lester-Card; Anthony Lewis; Peter Holliman; Dave Worsley
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 14.224

2.  Inactivation of SARS-CoV-2 and influenza A virus by dry fogging hypochlorous acid solution and hydrogen peroxide solution.

Authors:  Masahiro Urushidani; Akira Kawayoshi; Tomohiro Kotaki; Keiichi Saeki; Yasuko Mori; Masanori Kameoka
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Is Peracetic Acid Fumigation Effective in Public Transportation?

Authors:  Ewelina Kruszewska; Piotr Czupryna; Sławomir Pancewicz; Diana Martonik; Anna Bukłaha; Anna Moniuszko-Malinowska
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 3.390

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.