Literature DB >> 22137066

Meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus is more resistant to vaporized hydrogen peroxide than commercial Geobacillus stearothermophilus biological indicators.

T Pottage1, S Macken, J T Walker, A M Bennett.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Vaporized hydrogen peroxide (VHP) is increasingly used in the decontamination of hospital isolation rooms. Commercially available bioindicators, most frequently Geobacillus stearothermophilus spores, are used to assess the efficacy of the decontamination phase. Staphylococcus aureus, including meticillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), produce catalase, which breaks down VHP, therefore potentially making it resistant to the decontamination phase. AIM: This investigation was designed to assess the resistance of meticillin-resistant S. aureus to VHP in comparison with commercially available biological indicators loaded with spores.
METHODS: Stainless steel indicators were prepared with the same loading of MRSA (NCTC 13142) as commercially available indicators of G. stearothermophilus (ATCC 7953) (∼3.1×10(6) spores) and both indicators were exposed to a vapour hydrogen peroxide cycle (750 ppm). At set time-points during the exposure period, indicators containing both organisms were removed for processing and enumeration to compare survivability.
FINDINGS: During the exposure period the recovery of MRSA from the coupons was between 1.5 and 3.5 log(10) higher than the recovery of G. stearothermophilus spores (P<0.05). This greater resistance may be due to the production of catalase which could break down the hydrogen peroxide, resulting in a reduction of the effectiveness of VHP.
CONCLUSION: These findings highlight that the reduction achieved with a commercially available biological indicator cannot always be extrapolated to other micro-organisms. It must be recognized that although gaseous decontamination is the final step of the decontamination process, pre-cleaning of surfaces must be carried out to reduce the microbial loading being exposed.
Copyright © 2011 The Healthcare Infection Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22137066     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2011.11.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hosp Infect        ISSN: 0195-6701            Impact factor:   3.926


  9 in total

Review 1.  Controlling hospital-acquired infection: focus on the role of the environment and new technologies for decontamination.

Authors:  Stephanie J Dancer
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 26.132

2.  Examination of Material Compatibilities with Ionized and Vaporized Hydrogen Peroxide Decontamination.

Authors:  Tohru Kimura; Hiroyuki Yahata; Yoshimichi Uchiyama
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2020-09-17       Impact factor: 1.232

Review 3.  The Hitchhiker's Guide to Hydrogen Peroxide Fumigation, Part 1: Introduction to Hydrogen Peroxide Fumigation.

Authors:  Daniel Kümin; Monika Gsell Albert; Benjamin Weber; Kathrin Summermatter
Journal:  Appl Biosaf       Date:  2020-12-01

Review 4.  A Systematic Review on the Efficacy of Vaporized Hydrogen Peroxide as a Non-Contact Decontamination System for Pathogens Associated with the Dental Environment.

Authors:  Rukshana Ahmed; Riaan Mulder
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Efficiency of hydrogen peroxide in improving disinfection of ICU rooms.

Authors:  Caroline Blazejewski; Frédéric Wallet; Anahita Rouzé; Rémi Le Guern; Sylvie Ponthieux; Julia Salleron; Saad Nseir
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2015-02-02       Impact factor: 9.097

6.  New Biocide Foam Containing Hydrogen Peroxide for the Decontamination of Vertical Surface Contaminated With Bacillus thuringiensis Spores.

Authors:  Esther Le Toquin; Sylvain Faure; Nicole Orange; Fabienne Gas
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-09-27       Impact factor: 5.640

7.  Validation of N95 Filtering Facepiece Respirator Decontamination Methods Available at a Large University Hospital.

Authors:  Krista R Wigginton; Peter J Arts; Herek L Clack; William J Fitzsimmons; Mirko Gamba; Katherine R Harrison; William LeBar; Adam S Lauring; Lucinda Li; William W Roberts; Nicole C Rockey; Jania Torreblanca; Carol Young; Loïc G Anderegg; Amy M Cohn; John M Doyle; Cole M Meisenhelder; Lutgarde Raskin; Nancy G Love; Keith S Kaye
Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis       Date:  2020-12-15       Impact factor: 3.835

8.  Airborne Disinfection by Dry Fogging Efficiently Inactivates Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), Mycobacteria, and Bacterial Spores and Shows Limitations of Commercial Spore Carriers.

Authors:  Jan Schinköthe; Hendrik A Scheinemann; Sandra Diederich; Holger Freese; Michael Eschbaumer; Jens P Teifke; Sven Reiche
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 9.  Review of aerosolized hydrogen peroxide, vaporized hydrogen peroxide, and hydrogen peroxide gas plasma in the decontamination of filtering facepiece respirators.

Authors:  Daniel Berger; Gabrielle Gundermann; Anjana Sinha; Morgan Moroi; Neerav Goyal; Anthony Tsai
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 2.918

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.