Literature DB >> 3315712

How are the sub-unit pertussis vaccines to be evaluated?

D N Baxter1, A C Gibbs.   

Abstract

Although an effective whooping cough vaccine has been available in the UK since the 1950s, its current association with neurotoxicity has resulted in poor uptake: as a consequence major epidemics (with significant morbidity and mortality) are still being experienced. Component (sub-unit) vaccines, which incorporate those antigens thought to be concerned with generating a protective effect, have been developed and are now available for field testing. This paper addresses how such a vaccine might be evaluated, the organization of a trial and the difficulties to be expected.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3315712      PMCID: PMC2249297          DOI: 10.1017/s0950268800067984

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epidemiol Infect        ISSN: 0950-2688            Impact factor:   2.451


  12 in total

1.  Large-scale field trials of active immunizing agents; with special reference to vaccination against pertussis.

Authors:  W C COCKBURN
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  1955       Impact factor: 9.408

2.  Whooping-cough in Hertfordshire.

Authors:  N W Preston
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1979-09-22       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Progress towards a new pertussis vaccine.

Authors:  E Miller
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1986-05-24

4.  Recognising whooping cough.

Authors:  N W Preston
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1986-03-29

5.  An improved approximate formula for calculating sample sizes for comparing two binomial distributions.

Authors:  J T Casagrande; M C Pike
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1978-09       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Further experience of reactions, especially of a cerebral nature, in conjunction with triple vaccination: a study based on vaccinations in Sweden 1959-65.

Authors:  J Ström
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1967-11-11

7.  Symptoms after primary immunisation with DTP and with DT vaccine.

Authors:  T M Pollock; E Miller; J Y Mortimer; G Smith
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1984-07-21       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Pyrexia after diphtheria/tetanus/pertussis and diphtheria/tetanus vaccines.

Authors:  P A Waight; T M Pollock; E Miller; E M Coleman
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 3.791

Review 9.  An evaluation of pertussis vaccine.

Authors:  E A Mortimer; P K Jones
Journal:  Rev Infect Dis       Date:  1979 Nov-Dec

10.  Vaccination against whooping-cough. Efficacy versus risks.

Authors:  G T Stewart
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1977-01-29       Impact factor: 79.321

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.