Literature DB >> 33157093

The opportunities and challenges of machine learning in the acute care setting for precision prevention of posttraumatic stress sequelae.

Katharina Schultebraucks1, Bernard P Chang2.   

Abstract

Personalized medicine is among the most exciting innovations in recent clinical research, offering the opportunity for tailored screening and management at the individual level. Biomarker-enriched clinical trials have shown increased efficiency and informativeness in cancer research due to the selective exclusion of patients unlikely to benefit. In acute stress situations, clinically significant decisions are often made in time-sensitive manners and providers may be pressed to make decisions based on abbreviated clinical assessments. Up to 30% of trauma survivors admitted to the Emergency Department (ED) will develop long-lasting posttraumatic stress psychopathologies. The long-term impact of those survivors with posttraumatic stress sequelae are significant, impacting both long-term psychological and physiological recovery. An accurate prognostic model of who will develop posttraumatic stress symptoms does not exist yet. Additionally, no scalable and cost-effective method that can be easily integrated into routine care exists, even though especially the acute care setting provides a critical window of opportunity for prevention in the so-called golden hours when preventive measures are most effective. In this review, we aim to discuss emerging machine learning (ML) applications that are promising for precisely risk stratification and targeted treatments in the acute care setting. The aim of this narrative review is to present examples of digital health innovations and to discuss the potential of these new approaches for treatment selection and prevention of posttraumatic sequelae in the acute care setting. The application of artificial intelligence-based solutions have already had great success in other areas and are rapidly approaching the field of psychological care as well. New ways of algorithm-based risk predicting, and the use of digital phenotypes provide a high potential for predicting future risk of PTSD in acute care settings and to go new steps in precision psychiatry.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artificial intelligence; Digital health; Digital phenotyping; Emergency medicine; Individualized treatment selection; Machine learning; Posttraumatic stress disorder; Risk stratification; digital biomarkers

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33157093      PMCID: PMC7856033          DOI: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2020.113526

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Neurol        ISSN: 0014-4886            Impact factor:   5.330


  69 in total

1.  Digital approaches for mental health in the age of covid-19.

Authors:  Bernard P Chang; Ronald C Kessler; Harold A Pincus; Matthew K Nock
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2020-06-29

2.  Changes to the Psychiatric Chatbot Landscape: A Systematic Review of Conversational Agents in Serious Mental Illness: Changements du paysage psychiatrique des chatbots: une revue systématique des agents conversationnels dans la maladie mentale sérieuse.

Authors:  Aditya Nrusimha Vaidyam; Danny Linggonegoro; John Torous
Journal:  Can J Psychiatry       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 4.356

3.  High-Risk Breast Lesions: A Machine Learning Model to Predict Pathologic Upgrade and Reduce Unnecessary Surgical Excision.

Authors:  Manisha Bahl; Regina Barzilay; Adam B Yedidia; Nicholas J Locascio; Lili Yu; Constance D Lehman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Early intervention may prevent the development of posttraumatic stress disorder: a randomized pilot civilian study with modified prolonged exposure.

Authors:  Barbara Olasov Rothbaum; Megan C Kearns; Matthew Price; Emily Malcoun; Michael Davis; Kerry J Ressler; Delia Lang; Debra Houry
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2012-07-04       Impact factor: 13.382

5.  Tracking human activity and well-being in natural environments using wearable sensors and experience sampling.

Authors:  Sean T Doherty; Christopher J Lemieux; Culum Canally
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 4.634

6.  Facial expression and emotional face recognition in schizophrenia and depression.

Authors:  W Gaebel; W Wölwer
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 5.270

7.  Voice pitch measurements in schizophrenia and depression.

Authors:  J Leff; E Abberton
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  1981-11       Impact factor: 7.723

Review 8.  Inflammation in Fear- and Anxiety-Based Disorders: PTSD, GAD, and Beyond.

Authors:  Vasiliki Michopoulos; Abigail Powers; Charles F Gillespie; Kerry J Ressler; Tanja Jovanovic
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 7.853

9.  Utilization of machine learning for prediction of post-traumatic stress: a re-examination of cortisol in the prediction and pathways to non-remitting PTSD.

Authors:  I R Galatzer-Levy; S Ma; A Statnikov; R Yehuda; A Y Shalev
Journal:  Transl Psychiatry       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 6.222

10.  Evaluating a screener to quantify PTSD risk using emergency care information: a proof of concept study.

Authors:  Willem F van der Mei; Anna C Barbano; Andrew Ratanatharathorn; Richard A Bryant; Douglas L Delahanty; Terri A deRoon-Cassini; Betty S Lai; Sarah R Lowe; Yutaka J Matsuoka; Miranda Olff; Wei Qi; Ulrich Schnyder; Soraya Seedat; Ronald C Kessler; Karestan C Koenen; Arieh Y Shalev
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2020-03-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.