Literature DB >> 29039725

High-Risk Breast Lesions: A Machine Learning Model to Predict Pathologic Upgrade and Reduce Unnecessary Surgical Excision.

Manisha Bahl1, Regina Barzilay1, Adam B Yedidia1, Nicholas J Locascio1, Lili Yu1, Constance D Lehman1.   

Abstract

Purpose To develop a machine learning model that allows high-risk breast lesions (HRLs) diagnosed with image-guided needle biopsy that require surgical excision to be distinguished from HRLs that are at low risk for upgrade to cancer at surgery and thus could be surveilled. Materials and Methods Consecutive patients with biopsy-proven HRLs who underwent surgery or at least 2 years of imaging follow-up from June 2006 to April 2015 were identified. A random forest machine learning model was developed to identify HRLs at low risk for upgrade to cancer. Traditional features such as age and HRL histologic results were used in the model, as were text features from the biopsy pathologic report. Results One thousand six HRLs were identified, with a cancer upgrade rate of 11.4% (115 of 1006). A machine learning random forest model was developed with 671 HRLs and tested with an independent set of 335 HRLs. Among the most important traditional features were age and HRL histologic results (eg, atypical ductal hyperplasia). An important text feature from the pathologic reports was "severely atypical." Instead of surgical excision of all HRLs, if those categorized with the model to be at low risk for upgrade were surveilled and the remainder were excised, then 97.4% (37 of 38) of malignancies would have been diagnosed at surgery, and 30.6% (91 of 297) of surgeries of benign lesions could have been avoided. Conclusion This study provides proof of concept that a machine learning model can be applied to predict the risk of upgrade of HRLs to cancer. Use of this model could decrease unnecessary surgery by nearly one-third and could help guide clinical decision making with regard to surveillance versus surgical excision of HRLs. © RSNA, 2017.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29039725     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2017170549

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  32 in total

Review 1.  Clinical applications of artificial intelligence and machine learning in cancer diagnosis: looking into the future.

Authors:  Muhammad Javed Iqbal; Zeeshan Javed; Haleema Sadia; Ijaz A Qureshi; Asma Irshad; Rais Ahmed; Kausar Malik; Shahid Raza; Asif Abbas; Raffaele Pezzani; Javad Sharifi-Rad
Journal:  Cancer Cell Int       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 5.722

2.  Can Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Increase or Predict the Success Rate of Testicular Sperm Aspiration in Patients With Azoospermia?

Authors:  Heng Xue; Shou-Yang Wang; Li-Gang Cui; Kai Hong
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Simultaneous spatiotemporal tracking and oxygen sensing of transient implants in vivo using hot-spot MRI and machine learning.

Authors:  Virginia Spanoudaki; Joshua C Doloff; Wei Huang; Samuel R Norcross; Shady Farah; Robert Langer; Daniel G Anderson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Machine Learning Applications in Orthopaedic Imaging.

Authors:  Vincent M Wang; Carrie A Cheung; Albert J Kozar; Bert Huang
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 3.020

5.  Will machine learning end the viability of radiology as a thriving medical specialty?

Authors:  Stephen Chan; Eliot L Siegel
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Kernel-Based Microfluidic Constriction Assay for Tumor Sample Identification.

Authors:  Xiang Ren; Parham Ghassemi; Yasmine M Kanaan; Tammey Naab; Robert L Copeland; Robert L Dewitty; Inyoung Kim; Jeannine S Strobl; Masoud Agah
Journal:  ACS Sens       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 7.711

Review 7.  Artificial Intelligence in Surgery: Promises and Perils.

Authors:  Daniel A Hashimoto; Guy Rosman; Daniela Rus; Ozanan R Meireles
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 8.  Artificial Intelligence: A Primer for Breast Imaging Radiologists.

Authors:  Manisha Bahl
Journal:  J Breast Imaging       Date:  2020-06-19

9.  Retraining an open-source pneumothorax detecting machine learning algorithm for improved performance to medical images.

Authors:  Gene Kitamura; Christopher Deible
Journal:  Clin Imaging       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 1.605

10.  Performance of a clinical and imaging-based multivariate model as decision support tool to help save unnecessary surgeries for high-risk breast lesions.

Authors:  Dogan S Polat; Jennifer G Schopp; Firouzeh Arjmandi; Jessica Porembka; Venetia Sarode; Deborah Farr; Yin Xi; Basak E Dogan
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020-10-03       Impact factor: 4.872

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.