Literature DB >> 33157080

Rapid quantification of multi-cryoprotectant toxicity using an automated liquid handling method.

Ross M Warner1, Emi Ampo1, Dylan Nelson2, James D Benson3, Ali Eroglu4, Adam Z Higgins5.   

Abstract

Cryopreservation in a vitrified state has vast potential for long-term storage of tissues and organs that may be damaged by ice formation. However, the toxicity imparted by the high concentration of cryoprotectants (CPAs) required to vitrify these specimens remains a hurdle. To address this challenge, we previously developed a mathematical approach to design less toxic CPA equilibration methods based on the minimization of a toxicity cost function. This approach was used to design improved methods for equilibration of bovine pulmonary artery endothelial cells (BPAEC) with glycerol. To fully capitalize on the toxicity cost function approach, it is critical to describe the toxicity kinetics of additional CPAs, including multi-CPA mixtures that are commonly used for vitrification. In this work, we used automated liquid handling to characterize the toxicity kinetics of five of the most common CPAs (glycerol, dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), propylene glycol, ethylene glycol, and formamide), along with their binary and ternary mixtures for BPAEC. In doing so, we developed experimental methods that can be used to determine toxicity kinetics more quickly and accurately. Our results highlight some common CPA toxicity trends, including the relatively low toxicity of ethylene glycol and a general increase in toxicity as the CPA concentration increases. Our results also suggest potential new approaches to reduce toxicity, including a surprising toxicity neutralization effect of glycerol on formamide. In the future, this dataset will serve as the basis to expand our CPA toxicity model, enabling application of the toxicity cost function approach to vitrification solutions containing multiple CPAs.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Automated liquid handling; Cell viability; Cryoprotectants; Toxicity; Vitrification

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33157080      PMCID: PMC7897298          DOI: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2020.10.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cryobiology        ISSN: 0011-2240            Impact factor:   2.487


  49 in total

1.  Cryopreservation of organs by vitrification: perspectives and recent advances.

Authors:  Gregory M Fahy; Brian Wowk; Jun Wu; John Phan; Chris Rasch; Alice Chang; Eric Zendejas
Journal:  Cryobiology       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.487

2.  Physical problems with the vitrification of large biological systems.

Authors:  G M Fahy; J Saur; R J Williams
Journal:  Cryobiology       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 2.487

Review 3.  Membrane permeability modeling: Kedem-Katchalsky vs a two-parameter formalism.

Authors:  F W Kleinhans
Journal:  Cryobiology       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 2.487

4.  Evaluation of five additives to mitigate toxicity of cryoprotective agents on porcine chondrocytes.

Authors:  Kezhou Wu; Leila Laouar; Rachael Dong; Janet A W Elliott; Nadr M Jomha
Journal:  Cryobiology       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 2.487

Review 5.  Cryoprotectant toxicity and cryoprotectant toxicity reduction: in search of molecular mechanisms.

Authors:  G M Fahy; T H Lilley; H Linsdell; M S Douglas; H T Meryman
Journal:  Cryobiology       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 2.487

6.  Inhibition of apoptosis by caspase inhibitor Z-VAD-FMK improves cryotolerance of in vitro derived bovine embryos.

Authors:  Maria Elena Pero; Gianluigi Zullo; Luigi Esposito; Alessandra Iannuzzi; Pietro Lombardi; Carolina De Canditiis; Gianluca Neglia; Bianca Gasparrini
Journal:  Theriogenology       Date:  2017-12-02       Impact factor: 2.740

7.  Cryoprotectant agent toxicity in porcine articular chondrocytes.

Authors:  Nadr M Jomha; Andrew D H Weiss; J Fraser Forbes; Garson K Law; Janet A W Elliott; Locksley E McGann
Journal:  Cryobiology       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 2.487

8.  Cryoprotectant kinetic analysis of a human articular cartilage vitrification protocol.

Authors:  Nadia Shardt; Khaled K Al-Abbasi; Hana Yu; Nadr M Jomha; Locksley E McGann; Janet A W Elliott
Journal:  Cryobiology       Date:  2016-05-21       Impact factor: 2.487

9.  Modeling error in experimental assays using the bootstrap principle: understanding discrepancies between assays using different dispensing technologies.

Authors:  Sonya M Hanson; Sean Ekins; John D Chodera
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 3.686

10.  Toxicity Minimized Cryoprotectant Addition and Removal Procedures for Adherent Endothelial Cells.

Authors:  Allyson Fry Davidson; Cameron Glasscock; Danielle R McClanahan; James D Benson; Adam Z Higgins
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  4 in total

1.  General tissue mass transfer model for cryopreservation applications.

Authors:  Ross M Warner; Robyn Shuttleworth; James D Benson; Ali Eroglu; Adam Z Higgins
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2021-10-16       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Multiple cryoprotectant toxicity model for vitrification solution optimization.

Authors:  Ross M Warner; Kevin S Brown; James D Benson; Ali Eroglu; Adam Z Higgins
Journal:  Cryobiology       Date:  2022-09-13       Impact factor: 2.728

Review 3.  Chemical approaches to cryopreservation.

Authors:  Kathryn A Murray; Matthew I Gibson
Journal:  Nat Rev Chem       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 34.571

Review 4.  Vitrification Solutions for Plant Cryopreservation: Modification and Properties.

Authors:  Jiri Zamecnik; Milos Faltus; Alois Bilavcik
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-29
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.