Literature DB >> 36113568

Multiple cryoprotectant toxicity model for vitrification solution optimization.

Ross M Warner1, Kevin S Brown2, James D Benson3, Ali Eroglu4, Adam Z Higgins5.   

Abstract

Vitrification is a promising cryopreservation technique for complex specimens such as tissues and organs. However, it is challenging to identify mixtures of cryoprotectants (CPAs) that prevent ice formation without exerting excessive toxicity. In this work, we developed a multi-CPA toxicity model that predicts the toxicity kinetics of mixtures containing five of the most common CPAs used in the field (glycerol, dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), propylene glycol, ethylene glycol, and formamide). The model accounts for specific toxicity, non-specific toxicity, and interactions between CPAs. The proposed model shows reasonable agreement with training data for single and binary CPA solutions, as well as ternary CPA solution validation data. Sloppy model analysis was used to examine the model parameters that were most important for predictions, providing clues about mechanisms of toxicity. This analysis revealed that the model terms for non-specific toxicity were particularly important, especially the non-specific toxicity of propylene glycol, as well as model terms for specific toxicity of formamide and interactions between formamide and glycerol. To demonstrate the potential for model-based design of vitrification methods, we paired the multi-CPA toxicity model with a published vitrification/devitrification model to identify vitrifiable CPA mixtures that are predicted to have minimal toxicity. The resulting optimized vitrification solution composition was a mixture of 7.4 molal glycerol, 1.4 molal DMSO, and 2.4 molal formamide. This demonstrates the potential for mathematical optimization of vitrification solution composition and sets the stage for future studies to optimize the complete vitrification process, including CPA mixture composition and CPA addition and removal methods.
Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cryopreservation; Cryoprotectants; Optimization; Sloppy models; Toxicity; Vitrification

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 36113568      PMCID: PMC9529850          DOI: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2022.09.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cryobiology        ISSN: 0011-2240            Impact factor:   2.728


  34 in total

1.  Statistical mechanical approaches to models with many poorly known parameters.

Authors:  Kevin S Brown; James P Sethna
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2003-08-12

2.  Statistical prediction of the vitrifiability and glass stability of multi-component cryoprotective agent solutions.

Authors:  Andrew D H Weiss; J Fraser Forbes; Alex Scheuerman; Garson K Law; Janet A W Elliott; Locksley E McGann; Nadr M Jomha
Journal:  Cryobiology       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 2.487

Review 3.  Cryoprotectants: A review of the actions and applications of cryoprotective solutes that modulate cell recovery from ultra-low temperatures.

Authors:  Gloria D Elliott; Shangping Wang; Barry J Fuller
Journal:  Cryobiology       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 2.487

Review 4.  The promise of organ and tissue preservation to transform medicine.

Authors:  Sebastian Giwa; Jedediah K Lewis; Luis Alvarez; Robert Langer; Alvin E Roth; George M Church; James F Markmann; David H Sachs; Anil Chandraker; Jason A Wertheim; Martine Rothblatt; Edward S Boyden; Elling Eidbo; W P Andrew Lee; Bohdan Pomahac; Gerald Brandacher; David M Weinstock; Gloria Elliott; David Nelson; Jason P Acker; Korkut Uygun; Boris Schmalz; Brad P Weegman; Alessandro Tocchio; Greg M Fahy; Kenneth B Storey; Boris Rubinsky; John Bischof; Janet A W Elliott; Teresa K Woodruff; G John Morris; Utkan Demirci; Kelvin G M Brockbank; Erik J Woods; Robert N Ben; John G Baust; Dayong Gao; Barry Fuller; Yoed Rabin; David C Kravitz; Michael J Taylor; Mehmet Toner
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 5.  Cryoprotectant Toxicity: Facts, Issues, and Questions.

Authors:  Benjamin P Best
Journal:  Rejuvenation Res       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 4.663

6.  Dimethyl sulfoxide toxicity kinetics in intact articular cartilage.

Authors:  Heidi Y Elmoazzen; Anoop Poovadan; Garson K Law; Janet A W Elliott; Locksley E McGann; Nadr M Jomha
Journal:  Cell Tissue Bank       Date:  2006-10-25       Impact factor: 1.522

7.  Using engineering models to shorten cryoprotectant loading time for the vitrification of articular cartilage.

Authors:  Nadia Shardt; Zhirong Chen; Shuying Claire Yuan; Kezhou Wu; Leila Laouar; Nadr M Jomha; Janet A W Elliott
Journal:  Cryobiology       Date:  2020-01-15       Impact factor: 2.487

8.  Cryoprotectant agent toxicity in porcine articular chondrocytes.

Authors:  Nadr M Jomha; Andrew D H Weiss; J Fraser Forbes; Garson K Law; Janet A W Elliott; Locksley E McGann
Journal:  Cryobiology       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 2.487

9.  Vitrification of intact human articular cartilage.

Authors:  Nadr M Jomha; Janet A W Elliott; Garson K Law; Babak Maghdoori; J Fraser Forbes; Alireza Abazari; Adetola B Adesida; Leila Laouar; Xianpei Zhou; Locksley E McGann
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 12.479

10.  Universally sloppy parameter sensitivities in systems biology models.

Authors:  Ryan N Gutenkunst; Joshua J Waterfall; Fergal P Casey; Kevin S Brown; Christopher R Myers; James P Sethna
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2007-08-15       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.