Literature DB >> 12540979

Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors in patients with glioblastoma.

Johannes Lutterbach1, Willi Sauerbrei, Roland Guttenberger.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To identify prognostic factors for overall survival in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma undergoing radiation therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 1980 to June 2000, we treated 432 consecutive patients with glioblastoma at out institution. 17 patients were excluded from the analysis for various reasons. Mean age of the 415 patients who were included in the study was 59 years (19-81 years), Karnofsky performance status (KPS) was > or = 70 in 280 patients. 343 patients underwent resection, 72 had a biopsy. Various fractionation schemes were used (conventional fractionation, n = 112; hypofractionation, n = 94; accelerated hyperfractionation, n = 209). Survival probabilities were estimated using the method of Kaplan and Meier. Multivariate analysis was done with a Cox regression model.
RESULTS: By July 2001, 406 patients had died. Medial overall survival was 8.2 months. Of ten factors considered in a proportional hazards model stratified for treatment (fractionation scheme and type of surgery), significant variables in a multivariate model were age (50-64 years vs < 50 years [RR 1.35; 95% CI 1.02-1.78], > or = 65 years vs < 50 years [RR 2.08; 95% CI 1.54-2.81]), performance status (KPS < 70 vs > or = 70 [RR 1.53; 95% CI 1.23-1.90]), and central tumor location (yes vs no [RR 1.39; 95% CI 1.04-1.87]). Blood hemoglobin (Hb) values were available in 318 patients and serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels in 234 patients. 89 patients were anemic (Hb men < 13 g/dl, women < 12 g/dl), in 80 patients the LDH level was raised beyond the upper limit of the normal range (> 240 U/l). By including the three significant variables, both parameters had an additional significant effect with an estimated relative risk of about 1.4 in their corresponding subgroups.
CONCLUSION: Besides established prognostic factors, anemia and raised serum LDH levels may negatively influence outcome in glioblastoma patients. Our results from data-dependent modeling have to be confirmed by independent studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12540979     DOI: 10.1007/s00066-003-1004-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol        ISSN: 0179-7158            Impact factor:   3.621


  22 in total

1.  Reporting recommendations for tumor marker prognostic studies (REMARK): explanation and elaboration.

Authors:  Douglas G Altman; Lisa M McShane; Willi Sauerbrei; Sheila E Taube
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 8.775

2.  Reporting Recommendations for Tumor Marker Prognostic Studies (REMARK): explanation and elaboration.

Authors:  Douglas G Altman; Lisa M McShane; Willi Sauerbrei; Sheila E Taube
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 11.069

3.  Glioblastoma--the consequences of advanced patient age on treatment and survival.

Authors:  Andreas M Stark; Jürgen Hedderich; Janka Held-Feindt; H Maximilian Mehdorn
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2006-11-21       Impact factor: 3.042

4.  Treating high grade gliomas in the elderly: the end of ageism?

Authors:  Nitin Mukerji; Desiderio Rodrigues; Gill Hendry; Peter R C Dunlop; Fiona Warburton; Philip J Kane
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2007-11-17       Impact factor: 4.130

5.  Improved survival time trends for glioblastoma using the SEER 17 population-based registries.

Authors:  Matthew Koshy; John L Villano; Therese A Dolecek; Andrew Howard; Usama Mahmood; Steven J Chmura; Ralph R Weichselbaum; Bridget J McCarthy
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2011-10-09       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 6.  Treating glioblastoma patients with poor performance status: where do we go from here?

Authors:  Jaime Gállego Pérez-Larraya; François Ducray
Journal:  CNS Oncol       Date:  2014-05

7.  Association between hospital volume and receipt of treatment and survival in patients with glioblastoma.

Authors:  Matthew Koshy; David J Sher; Michael Spiotto; Zain Husain; Herb Engelhard; Konstantin Slavin; Martin K Nicholas; Ralph R Weichselbaum; Chad Rusthoven
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 4.130

8.  Prognostic impact of hemoglobin level and other factors in patients with high-grade gliomas treated with postoperative radiochemotherapy and sequential chemotherapy based on temozolomide: a 10-year experience at a single institution.

Authors:  Giampiero Ausili Céfaro; Domenico Genovesi; Annamaria Vinciguerra; Marianna Trignani; Maria Taraborrelli; Antonietta Augurio; Roberto Buonaguidi; Renato J Galzio; Marta Di Nicola
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2011-11-25       Impact factor: 3.621

9.  Decreased quality of life and depression as predictors for shorter survival among patients with low-grade gliomas: a follow-up from 1990 to 2003.

Authors:  Arja Mainio; Satu Tuunanen; Helinä Hakko; Asko Niemelä; John Koivukangas; Pirkko Räsänen
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2006-09-07       Impact factor: 5.270

10.  The importance of tumor volume in the prognosis of patients with glioblastoma: comparison of computerized volumetry and geometric models.

Authors:  Georgios Iliadis; Panagiotis Selviaridis; Anna Kalogera-Fountzila; Anna Fragkoulidi; Dimos Baltas; Nikolaos Tselis; Athanasios Chatzisotiriou; Despina Misailidou; Nikolaos Zamboglou; George Fountzilas
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 3.621

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.