Amelia Weber Hall1,2,3,4,5,6, Mark Chaffin1,2,3,4,5,6, Carolina Roselli1,2,3,4,5,6, Honghuang Lin1,2,3,4,5,6, Steven A Lubitz1,2,3,4,5,6, Valerio Bianchi1,2,3,4,5,6, Geert Geeven1,2,3,4,5,6, Kenneth Bedi1,2,3,4,5,6, Kenneth B Margulies1,2,3,4,5,6, Wouter de Laat1,2,3,4,5,6, Nathan R Tucker1,2,3,4,5,6, Patrick T Ellinor1,2,3,4,5,6. 1. Cardiovascular Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston (A.W.H., S.A.L., N.R.T., P.T.E.). 2. Cardiovascular Disease Initiative, The Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA (A.W.H., M.C., C.R., S.A.L., N.R.T., P.T.E.). 3. Masonic Medical Research Institute, Utica, NY (N.R.T.). 4. Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, MA (H.L.). 5. Oncode Institute, Hubrecht Institute-KNAW, University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands (V.B., G.G., W.d.L.). 6. Penn Cardiovascular Institute, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (K.B., K.B.M.).
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) often arises from structural abnormalities in the left atria (LA). Annotation of the noncoding genome in human LA is limited, as are effects on gene expression and chromatin architecture. Many AF-associated genetic variants reside in noncoding regions; this knowledge gap impairs efforts to understand the molecular mechanisms of AF and cardiac conduction phenotypes. METHODS: We generated a model of the LA noncoding genome by profiling 7 histone post-translational modifications (active: H3K4me3, H3K4me2, H3K4me1, H3K27ac, H3K36me3; repressive: H3K27me3, H3K9me3), CTCF binding, and gene expression in samples from 5 individuals without structural heart disease or AF. We used MACS2 to identify peak regions (P<0.01), applied a Markov model to classify regulatory elements, and annotated this model with matched gene expression data. We intersected chromatin states with expression quantitative trait locus, DNA methylation, and HiC chromatin interaction data from LA and left ventricle. Finally, we integrated genome-wide association data for AF and electrocardiographic traits to link disease-related variants to genes. RESULTS: Our model identified 21 epigenetic states, encompassing regulatory motifs, such as promoters, enhancers, and repressed regions. Genes were regulated by proximal chromatin states; repressive states were associated with a significant reduction in gene expression (P<2×10-16). Chromatin states were differentially methylated, promoters were less methylated than repressed regions (P<2×10-16). We identified over 15 000 LA-specific enhancers, defined by homeobox family motifs, and annotated several cardiovascular disease susceptibility loci. Intersecting AF and PR genome-wide association studies loci with long-range chromatin conformation data identified a gene interaction network dominated by NKX2-5, TBX3, ZFHX3, and SYNPO2L. CONCLUSIONS: Profiling the noncoding genome provides new insights into the gene expression and chromatin regulation in human LA tissue. These findings enabled identification of a gene network underlying AF; our experimental and analytic approach can be extended to identify molecular mechanisms for other cardiac diseases and traits.
BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) often arises from structural abnormalities in the left atria (LA). Annotation of the noncoding genome in human LA is limited, as are effects on gene expression and chromatin architecture. Many AF-associated genetic variants reside in noncoding regions; this knowledge gap impairs efforts to understand the molecular mechanisms of AF and cardiac conduction phenotypes. METHODS: We generated a model of the LA noncoding genome by profiling 7 histone post-translational modifications (active: H3K4me3, H3K4me2, H3K4me1, H3K27ac, H3K36me3; repressive: H3K27me3, H3K9me3), CTCF binding, and gene expression in samples from 5 individuals without structural heart disease or AF. We used MACS2 to identify peak regions (P<0.01), applied a Markov model to classify regulatory elements, and annotated this model with matched gene expression data. We intersected chromatin states with expression quantitative trait locus, DNA methylation, and HiC chromatin interaction data from LA and left ventricle. Finally, we integrated genome-wide association data for AF and electrocardiographic traits to link disease-related variants to genes. RESULTS: Our model identified 21 epigenetic states, encompassing regulatory motifs, such as promoters, enhancers, and repressed regions. Genes were regulated by proximal chromatin states; repressive states were associated with a significant reduction in gene expression (P<2×10-16). Chromatin states were differentially methylated, promoters were less methylated than repressed regions (P<2×10-16). We identified over 15 000 LA-specific enhancers, defined by homeobox family motifs, and annotated several cardiovascular disease susceptibility loci. Intersecting AF and PR genome-wide association studies loci with long-range chromatin conformation data identified a gene interaction network dominated by NKX2-5, TBX3, ZFHX3, and SYNPO2L. CONCLUSIONS: Profiling the noncoding genome provides new insights into the gene expression and chromatin regulation in human LA tissue. These findings enabled identification of a gene network underlying AF; our experimental and analytic approach can be extended to identify molecular mechanisms for other cardiac diseases and traits.
Authors: Lu Zhang; Aya Nomura-Kitabayashi; Nishat Sultana; Weibin Cai; Xiaoqiang Cai; Anne M Moon; Chen-Leng Cai Journal: Dev Biol Date: 2014-03-05 Impact factor: 3.582
Authors: Nynke L van Berkum; Erez Lieberman-Aiden; Louise Williams; Maxim Imakaev; Andreas Gnirke; Leonid A Mirny; Job Dekker; Eric S Lander Journal: J Vis Exp Date: 2010-05-06 Impact factor: 1.355
Authors: Andrew D Hoffmann; Xinan Holly Yang; Ozanna Burnicka-Turek; Joshua D Bosman; Xiaomeng Ren; Jeffrey D Steimle; Steven A Vokes; Andrew P McMahon; Vladimir V Kalinichenko; Ivan P Moskowitz Journal: PLoS Genet Date: 2014-10-30 Impact factor: 5.917
Authors: Diane E Dickel; Iros Barozzi; Yiwen Zhu; Yoko Fukuda-Yuzawa; Marco Osterwalder; Brandon J Mannion; Dalit May; Cailyn H Spurrell; Ingrid Plajzer-Frick; Catherine S Pickle; Elizabeth Lee; Tyler H Garvin; Momoe Kato; Jennifer A Akiyama; Veena Afzal; Ah Young Lee; David U Gorkin; Bing Ren; Edward M Rubin; Axel Visel; Len A Pennacchio Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2016-10-05 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Stephan Nothjunge; Thomas G Nührenberg; Björn A Grüning; Stefanie A Doppler; Sebastian Preissl; Martin Schwaderer; Carolin Rommel; Markus Krane; Lutz Hein; Ralf Gilsbach Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2017-11-21 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Siang-Yun Ang; Alec Uebersohn; C Ian Spencer; Yu Huang; Ji-Eun Lee; Kai Ge; Benoit G Bruneau Journal: Development Date: 2016-03-01 Impact factor: 6.868
Authors: Chukwuemeka G Anene-Nzelu; Mick C J Lee; Wilson L W Tan; Albert Dashi; Roger S Y Foo Journal: Nat Rev Cardiol Date: 2021-08-11 Impact factor: 32.419
Authors: Marcos Rubio-Alarcón; Anabel Cámara-Checa; María Dago; Teresa Crespo-García; Paloma Nieto-Marín; María Marín; José Luis Merino; Jorge Toquero; Rafael Salguero-Bodes; Juan Tamargo; Jorge Cebrián; Eva Delpón; Ricardo Caballero Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2021-12-02 Impact factor: 5.923