Literature DB >> 33154026

Caution in interpretation of abnormal carbon monoxide diffusion capacity in COVID-19 patients.

David G Chapman1,2, Tanya Badal1,3, Gregory G King1,4,5,6, Cindy Thamrin1,6.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33154026      PMCID: PMC7651835          DOI: 10.1183/13993003.03263-2020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Respir J        ISSN: 0903-1936            Impact factor:   16.671


× No keyword cloud information.
To the Editor: We read with much interest the recent findings published in the European Respiratory Journal of reduced gas transfer in patients following coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Mo et al. [1] investigated conventional pulmonary function in survivors of mild, moderate and severe COVID-19 approximately 20–30 days after onset of symptoms. While patients had relatively normal spirometry, diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) was reduced in 50% and DLCO/alveolar volume (VA) (or KCO, to avoid misinterpretation) reduced in 25%. These findings are welcome as they provide significant insight into the long-term lung function impairment associated with COVID-19. In response, Nusair [2] contributed the interpretation that “low DLCO is caused mainly by reduced alveolar volume, and not residual interstitial abnormalities or pulmonary vascular abnormalities caused by COVID-19”, i.e. normal capillary–alveolar units. However, we believe that this interpretation does not consider the complex relationship between VA, DLCO and KCO, and may prematurely rule out the presence of abnormal gas exchange. To demonstrate our point, figure 1 illustrates the expected effect of a reduction in VA on DLCO and KCO due to either suboptimal alveolar expansion or loss of alveolar units (with normal expansion in communicating alveoli) [3]. Firstly, it is evident that in the “severe pneumoniapatients in the study by Mo et al. [1], the impairment in DLCO [1] (represented by the star) is considerably greater than expected if a reduction in VA was the sole abnormality, regardless of the mechanism for the reduced VA. Secondly, a reduction in VA due to either aforementioned mechanism would be is associated with an increase in KCO, which is opposite to the reduced KCO in many of the discharged patients with severe COVID-19 [3]. This reduction in KCO suggests that loss of alveolar units is not sufficient to cause the observed impairment in DLCO.
FIGURE 1

The relationship between alveolar volume (VA) and, a) diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) and b) rate constant for carbon monoxide uptake (KCO), are plotted as a percentage of the value at total lung capacity (TLC). The relationships are shown for two situations that result in reduced VA: suboptimal alveolar expansion (DLCO and KCO measured at volumes below maximum TLC, solid line); and loss of alveolar units (e.g. theoretical removal of lobules or lobes with remaining lung expanded to its normal TLC, dashed line). The star represents the group mean data of the “severe pneumonia” from Mo et al. [1]. Mean VA was calculated as mean percent predicted DLCO/mean percent predicted KCO. The relationship between VA, DLCO and KCO was calculated using the equations as described in [3]; for suboptimal alveolar expansion, KCO = 0.43 + (0.57/VA); for loss of alveolar lung units, change in KCO = 0.4x + 2.1, where x is the proportion of volume diverted to the remaining lung; for both scenarios, DLCO = VA × KCO.

The relationship between alveolar volume (VA) and, a) diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) and b) rate constant for carbon monoxide uptake (KCO), are plotted as a percentage of the value at total lung capacity (TLC). The relationships are shown for two situations that result in reduced VA: suboptimal alveolar expansion (DLCO and KCO measured at volumes below maximum TLC, solid line); and loss of alveolar units (e.g. theoretical removal of lobules or lobes with remaining lung expanded to its normal TLC, dashed line). The star represents the group mean data of the “severe pneumonia” from Mo et al. [1]. Mean VA was calculated as mean percent predicted DLCO/mean percent predicted KCO. The relationship between VA, DLCO and KCO was calculated using the equations as described in [3]; for suboptimal alveolar expansion, KCO = 0.43 + (0.57/VA); for loss of alveolar lung units, change in KCO = 0.4x + 2.1, where x is the proportion of volume diverted to the remaining lung; for both scenarios, DLCO = VA × KCO. Thus, while the DLCO findings of Mo et al. [1] are partially explained by reduced VA, the reduction in KCO measured at that reduced VA also implicates abnormal gas exchange. Whether this is due to disruption of the alveolar–capillary barrier or abnormal pulmonary blood volume cannot be determined based on their data. Lung fibrosis associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome in COVID-19 patients [4] would likely damage alveolar–capillary units, leading to loss of alveolar units and impaired gas exchange. The result would be a reduction in both VA and KCO (for the reduced VA). There is increasing suggestion of altered pulmonary haemodynamics in COVID-19 patients [5], including vascular pruning and reduced pulmonary blood volume measured via high resolution computed tomography [6]. Use of more specific measures of the alveolar–capillary membrane, such as combined DLCO and diffusing capacity of the lung for nitric oxide measurements or advanced imaging techniques, are likely required to determine whether interstitial abnormalities or pulmonary vascular abnormalities contribute to reduced DLCO in patients who have recovered from COVID-19. This one-page PDF can be shared freely online. Shareable PDF ERJ-03263-2020.Shareable
  8 in total

Review 1.  [Pulmonary manifestations in long COVID].

Authors:  Natascha Sommer; Bernd Schmeck
Journal:  Inn Med (Heidelb)       Date:  2022-07-07

2.  Obese patients with long COVID-19 display abnormal hyperventilatory response and impaired gas exchange at peak exercise.

Authors:  Mickael Rejaudry Lacavalerie; Sandrine Pierre-Francois; Moustapha Agossou; Jocelyn Inamo; André Cabie; José Luis Barnay; Rémi Neviere
Journal:  Future Cardiol       Date:  2022-06-06

3.  Swiss Recommendations for the Follow-Up and Treatment of Pulmonary Long COVID.

Authors:  Manuela Funke-Chambour; Pierre-Olivier Bridevaux; Christian F Clarenbach; Paola M Soccal; Laurent P Nicod; Christophe von Garnier
Journal:  Respiration       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 3.580

4.  Analysis of clinical symptoms, radiological changes and pulmonary function data 4 months after COVID-19.

Authors:  Gonzalo Labarca; Mario Henríquez-Beltrán; Jaime Lastra; Daniel Enos; Faryd Llerena; Igor Cigarroa; Liliana Lamperti; Valeska Ormazabal; Carlos Ramirez; Eric Espejo; Nicole Canales; Fabiola Fuentes; Gloria Horta; Sebastian Fernandez-Bussy; Estefania Nova-Lamperti
Journal:  Clin Respir J       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 1.761

5.  European Respiratory Society statement on long COVID follow-up.

Authors:  Katerina M Antoniou; Eirini Vasarmidi; Anne-Marie Russell; Claire Andrejak; Bruno Crestani; Marion Delcroix; Anh Tuan Dinh-Xuan; Venerino Poletti; Nicola Sverzellati; Michele Vitacca; Martin Witzenrath; Thomy Tonia; Antonio Spanevello
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 33.795

6.  A cross-sectional study of quantitative CT measurements associated with the diffusion capacity of the lung in recovered COVID-19 patients with normalised chest CT.

Authors:  Han Wen; Shreya Kanth; Julio Huapaya Carrera; Junfeng Sun; Michael Do; Marcus Y Chen; Ashkan A Malayeri; Anthony F Suffredini
Journal:  medRxiv       Date:  2022-09-15

7.  Alterations in Respiratory Function Test Three Months after Hospitalisation for COVID-19 Pneumonia: Value of Determining Nitric Oxide Diffusion.

Authors:  Marta Núñez-Fernández; Cristina Ramos-Hernández; Francisco García-Río; María Torres-Durán; Andrés Nodar-Germiñas; Amara Tilve-Gómez; Paula Rodríguez-Fernández; Diana Valverde-Pérez; Alberto Ruano-Raviña; Alberto Fernández-Villar
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 8.  COVID-19 is a systemic vascular hemopathy: insight for mechanistic and clinical aspects.

Authors:  David M Smadja; Steven J Mentzer; Michaela Fontenay; Mike A Laffan; Maximilian Ackermann; Julie Helms; Danny Jonigk; Richard Chocron; Gerald B Pier; Nicolas Gendron; Stephanie Pons; Jean-Luc Diehl; Coert Margadant; Coralie Guerin; Elisabeth J M Huijbers; Aurélien Philippe; Nicolas Chapuis; Patrycja Nowak-Sliwinska; Christian Karagiannidis; Olivier Sanchez; Philipp Kümpers; David Skurnik; Anna M Randi; Arjan W Griffioen
Journal:  Angiogenesis       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 9.596

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.