| Literature DB >> 33152219 |
Jia Luo1,2, Linyuan Shen1,3, Mailin Gan1,3, Anan Jiang1,3, Lei Chen1,3, Jideng Ma1,3, Long Jin1,3, Yihui Liu4, Guoqing Tang1,3, Yanzhi Jiang5, Mingzhou Li1,3, Xuewei Li1,3, Shunhua Zhang1,3, Li Zhu1,3.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Investigation of muscle growth at different developmental stages is an appropriate strategy for studying the mechanisms underlying muscle development and differences in phenotypes. In particular, the muscle development mechanisms and the difference between the fastest and slowest growth rates.Entities:
Keywords: Growth Curve; Inflection Point; Metabolism; Muscle; QingYu Pig; lncRNA
Year: 2020 PMID: 33152219 PMCID: PMC8255898 DOI: 10.5713/ajas.20.0429
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Anim Biosci ISSN: 2765-0189
Figure 1The fitting growth curve of QingYu pig. (A) Growth curve of QingYu pig, four curves include one measured value and three curves fitted by three different models (Logistic, Gompertz and Von Bertalanffy). (B) Growth rates of QingYu pig.
The estimated value of growth curve and fitting degree of different models
| Models | k | a | b | R2 | GTPD (d) | GTPW (kg) | TPGR (g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Logistic | 135.63 | 22.075 | 0.017 | 0.999 | 182.03 | 67.72 | 576.4 |
| Von Bertalanffy | 198.903 | 0.826 | 0.005 | 0.998 | 181.49 | 58.93 | 442 |
| Gompertz | 165.829 | 4.141 | 0.008 | 0.996 | 185.6 | 61.01 | 488.08 |
k, the inherent relative growth rate at the start; a, the maximum size; b, the growth curve line constant; R2, the goodness-of-fit; GTPD, growth turning point day; GTPW, growth turning point weight; TPGR, the biggest growth rate.
Carcass, meat quality characteristics of QingYu pig at the inflection point (IP) and plateau phase (PP)
| Age/d | IP | PP | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Slaughter weight (kg) | 66.98±6.6 | 145.9±9.5 | <0.001 |
| Carcass weight (kg) | 44.64±3.99 | 112.97±8.55 | <0.001 |
| Dressing percentage (%) | 66.86±5.03 | 77.73±1.92 | <0.05 |
| Back fat (mm) | 33.28±5.4 | 52.29±9.03 | <0.05 |
| Eye muscle (cm2) | 17.84±3.67 | 19.46±5.26 | >0.05 |
| Lean percentage (%) | 43.32±2.94 | 35.54±2.00 | <0.05 |
| Leg hip ratio (%) | 25.64±0.76 | 25.73±2.02 | >0.05 |
| Marbling | 2.63±0.41 | 2.75±0.28 | <0.05 |
| Drip loss (%) | 1.90±0.50 | 1.75±0.28 | <0.05 |
| Cooking loss (%) | 66.03±2.29 | 70.48±1.49 | <0.05 |
| pH | 6.80±0.31 | 6.37±0.32 | <0.05 |
| Muscle color | 43.65±3.25 | 44.43±1.30 | >0.05 |
| Shear force | 6.05±2.67 | 6.07±1.47 | >0.05 |
| Intramuscular fat | 2.48±0.30 | 6.52±2.77 | <0.01 |
The significance of comparisons between the inflection point (IP) and plateau phase (PP) were calculated using a Student’s t-test.
p<0.05 was considered statistically significant, p<0.001 was considered statistically extremely significant, p>0.05 was considered statistically no significant.
Figure 2The fatty acid composition of QingYu pig at IP and PP, 5 pigs were used for the analysis. (A) Total muscle fatty acids content (mg/g). (B) Fatty acid composition. IP, the growth inflection point (day 178); PP, the plateau phase (day 395); PUFA, polyunsaturated fatty acid; MUFA, monounsaturated fatty acid; SFA, saturated fatty acid. ** p<0.01.
Figure 3The expression levels of mRNA between IP and PP. (A) The Ven diagram of mRNAs that identified in two development phases. (B) The number of differentially expressed mRNA between IP and PP. (C) The hierarchical cluster analysis for the differentially expressed mRNA. IP, the growth inflection point (day 178); PP, the plateau phase (day 395).
Figure 4The functional enrichment analysis of differentially expressed mRNA in different gene ontology terms.
Figure 5The functional enrichment analysis of differentially expressed mRNA in different Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes pathway.
Figure 6The functional enrichment analysis of cis-target genes by differentially expressed long non-coding RNAs. in different gene ontology terms.
Figure 7The functional enrichment analysis of cis-target genes by differentially expressed long non-coding RNAs in different Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes pathway.
Figure 8qRT-PCR validation of the differentially expressed genes. The differential expression of genes in muscle between IP and PP was validated by qRT-PCR, reference genes was glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase. qRT-PCR, quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction; IP, the growth inflection point (day 178); PP, the plateau phase (day 395).