Literature DB >> 33152146

Diagnostic accuracy of serological tests and kinetics of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 antibody: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Daniel Mekonnen1,2,3, Hylemariam Mihiretie Mengist1,2, Awoke Derbie3,4, Endalkachew Nibret5, Abaineh Munshea5, Hongliang He1,2, Bofeng Li2,6, Tengchuan Jin1,2.   

Abstract

This study aimed to assess the diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-COV-2) serological test methods and the kinetics of antibody positivity. Systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guideline. We included articles evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of serological tests and the kinetics of antibody positivity. MEDLINE through PubMed, Scopus, medRxiv and bioRxiv were sources of articles. Methodological qualities of included articles were appraised using QUADAS-2 while Metandi performs bivariate meta-analysis of DTA using a generalized linear mixed-model approach. Stata 14 and Review Manager 5.3 were used for data analysis. The summary sensitivity/specificity of chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA), enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA) were 92% (95% CI: 86%-95%)/99% (CI: 97%-99%), 86% (CI: 82%-89%)/99% (CI: 98%-100%) and 78% (CI: 71%-83%)/98% (95% CI: 96%-99%), respectively. Moreover, CLIA-based assays produced nearly 100% sensitivity within 11-15 days post-symptom onset (DPSO). Based on antibody type, the sensitivity of ELISA-total antibody, CLIA-IgM/G and CLIA-IgG gauged at 94%, 92% and 92%, respectively. The sensitivity of CLIA-RBD assay reached 96%, while LFIA-S demonstrated the lowest sensitivity, 71% (95% CI: 58%-80%). CLIA assays targeting antibodies against RBD considered the best DTA. The antibody positivity rate increased corresponding with DPSO, but there was some decrement when moving from acute phase to convalescent phase of infection. As immunoglobulin isotope-related DTA was heterogeneous, our data have insufficient evidence to recommend CLIA/ELISA for clinical decision-making, but likely to have comparative advantage over RT-qPCR in certain circumstances and geographic regions.
© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  SARS-CoV-2; diagnostic accuracy; kinetics of antibody; serological tests

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33152146     DOI: 10.1002/rmv.2181

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Med Virol        ISSN: 1052-9276            Impact factor:   6.989


  16 in total

1.  When might host heterogeneity drive the evolution of asymptomatic, pandemic coronaviruses?

Authors:  Kenichi W Okamoto; Virakbott Ong; Robert Wallace; Rodrick Wallace; Luis Fernando Chaves
Journal:  Nonlinear Dyn       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 5.741

2.  Assessment of automated high-throughput serological assays for prediction of high-titer SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody.

Authors:  Giovanna Moscato; Paola Mazzetti; Ersilia Lucenteforte; Alfredo Rosellini; Alice Cara; Paola Quaranta; Valerio Mainardi; Pietro Villa; Daniele Focosi; Maria Lanza; Irene Bianco; Alessandro Mazzoni; Marco Falcone; Francesco Menichetti; Fabrizio Maggi; Michele Lai; Giulia Freer; Mauro Pistello
Journal:  J Clin Virol Plus       Date:  2021-05-04

Review 3.  Convalescent Plasma for the Treatment of Severe COVID-19.

Authors:  Massimo Franchini; Giancarlo Maria Liumbruno
Journal:  Biologics       Date:  2021-02-04

Review 4.  The Utility of Specific Antibodies Against SARS-CoV-2 in Laboratory Diagnosis.

Authors:  Yu Fu; Yunbao Pan; Zhiqiang Li; Yirong Li
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 5.640

5.  Clinical Value of SARS-CoV2 IgM and IgG Antibodies in Diagnosis of COVID-19 in Suspected Cases.

Authors:  Yangchun Feng
Journal:  J Inflamm Res       Date:  2020-12-10

6.  Seroprevalence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 in Slovenia: results of two rounds of a nationwide population study on a probability-based sample, challenges and lessons learned.

Authors:  Mario Poljak; Anja Oštrbenk Valenčak; Erik Štrumbelj; Polona Maver Vodičar; Vasja Vehovar; Katarina Resman Rus; Miša Korva; Nataša Knap; Katja Seme; Miroslav Petrovec; Blaž Zupan; Janez Demšar; Slavko Kurdija; Tatjana Avšič Županc
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 8.067

Review 7.  Advances in airborne microorganisms detection using biosensors: A critical review.

Authors:  Jinbiao Ma; Manman Du; Can Wang; Xinwu Xie; Hao Wang; Qian Zhang
Journal:  Front Environ Sci Eng       Date:  2021-04-05

Review 8.  Clinical Application of Antibody Immunity Against SARS-CoV-2: Comprehensive Review on Immunoassay and Immunotherapy.

Authors:  Zhangkai J Cheng; Bizhou Li; Zhiqing Zhan; Zifan Zhao; Mingshan Xue; Peiyan Zheng; Jiali Lyu; Chundi Hu; Jianxing He; Ruchong Chen; Baoqing Sun
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  2022-01-15       Impact factor: 8.667

9.  Prevalence, Persistence, and Factors Associated with SARS-CoV-2 IgG Seropositivity in a Large Cohort of Healthcare Workers in a Tertiary Care University Hospital in Northern Italy.

Authors:  Gitana Scozzari; Cristina Costa; Enrica Migliore; Maurizio Coggiola; Giovannino Ciccone; Luigi Savio; Antonio Scarmozzino; Enrico Pira; Paola Cassoni; Claudia Galassi; Rossana Cavallo
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 5.048

10.  Performance Comparison of Five SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Assays for Seroprevalence Studies.

Authors:  Younhee Park; Ki Ho Hong; Su-Kyung Lee; Jungwon Hyun; Eun-Jee Oh; Jaehyeon Lee; Hyukmin Lee; Sang Hoon Song; Seung-Jung Kee; Gye Cheol Kwon; Su Hwan Kim; Hyeon-Nam Do; Ah-Ra Kim; June-Woo Lee; Sung Soon Kim; Hyun Soo Kim
Journal:  Ann Lab Med       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 3.464

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.