Literature DB >> 33150556

An Evaluation of Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening Outcomes in an Education and Patient Navigation Program in Rural and Border Texas.

Derek Falk1, Kristie Foley2, Kathryn E Weaver3,2, Barbara Jones4,5,6, Catherine Cubbin4,6.   

Abstract

This study examines breast and cervical cancer screening uptake in a cancer education and patient navigation (PN) program for residents of rural and border counties in Texas by level of participation (education only, PN only, or education and PN). Data collected from March 1, 2012, to November 5, 2016, included 6663 follow-up surveys from participants aged 21-74. Logistic regression models assessed program participation on the odds of completing breast or cervical cancer screening. For women aged 40-74 years (N = 4942; mean age = 52 years), 58.4% reported a mammogram within 6 months on average from initial contact. In the breast cancer screening model, women who only received PN (OR: 6.06, CI: 4.87-7.53) or who participated in both the education plus PN program (OR: 3.33, CI: 2.77-4.02) had higher odds of mammogram screening compared to women who only received education. For women aged 21-64 years (N = 6169; mean age = 46 years), 37.7% received a Papanicolaou (Pap) test within 6 months on average from initial contact. In the Pap screening model, both education and PN (OR: 3.23, CI: 2.66-3.91) and PN only (OR: 2.35, CI: 1.88-2.93) groups had higher odds of screening for cervical cancer compared to those only receiving education. Graphed predicted probabilities examined significant interactions between race/ethnicity/language and program participation (P < 0.0001) for both screenings. PN, solely or in combination with education, is an effective strategy to increase screening for breast and cervical cancer, beyond educational outreach efforts alone, among un-/underserved, racially/ethnically diverse women in rural and border Texas counties.
© 2020. American Association for Cancer Education.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer screening; Evaluation; Health disparities; Health education; Patient navigation

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33150556      PMCID: PMC8096853          DOI: 10.1007/s13187-020-01918-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Educ        ISSN: 0885-8195            Impact factor:   1.771


  20 in total

1.  A Promotora-administered group education intervention to promote breast and cervical cancer screening in a rural community along the U.S.-Mexico border: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Tomas Nuño; Maria Elena Martinez; Robin Harris; Francisco García
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2010-12-24       Impact factor: 2.506

2.  Patient navigation: a community based strategy to reduce cancer disparities.

Authors:  Harold P Freeman
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.671

3.  A randomized community trial to increase mammography utilization among low-income women living in public housing.

Authors:  J S Slater; C N Ha; M E Malone; P McGovern; S D Madigan; J R Finnegan; A L Casey-Paal; K L Margolis; N Lurie
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1998 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.018

Review 4.  Effect of rurality on screening for breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing mammography.

Authors:  J Leung; S McKenzie; J Martin; D McLaughlin
Journal:  Rural Remote Health       Date:  2014-06-23       Impact factor: 1.759

5.  The efficacy and cost-effectiveness of patient navigation programs across the cancer continuum: A systematic review.

Authors:  Brittany M Bernardo; Xiaochen Zhang; Chloe M Beverly Hery; Rachel J Meadows; Electra D Paskett
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Trends Over Time in Pap and Pap-HPV Cotesting for Cervical Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Kathy L MacLaughlin; Robert M Jacobson; Carmen Radecki Breitkopf; Patrick M Wilson; Debra J Jacobson; Chun Fan; Jennifer L St Sauver; Lila J Finney Rutten
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 2.681

7.  Measuring the impact and potential of patient navigation: proposed common metrics and beyond.

Authors:  Angelina Esparza; Elizabeth Calhoun
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Effectiveness of Cultivando la Salud: a breast and cervical cancer screening promotion program for low-income Hispanic women.

Authors:  María E Fernández; Alicia Gonzales; Guillermo Tortolero-Luna; Janet Williams; Monica Saavedra-Embesi; Wenyaw Chan; Sally W Vernon
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2009-03-19       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 9.  Patient navigation: state of the art or is it science?

Authors:  Kristen J Wells; Tracy A Battaglia; Donald J Dudley; Roland Garcia; Amanda Greene; Elizabeth Calhoun; Jeanne S Mandelblatt; Electra D Paskett; Peter C Raich
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 10.  Effect of cervical cancer education and provider recommendation for screening on screening rates: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jonah Musa; Chad J Achenbach; Linda C O'Dwyer; Charlesnika T Evans; Megan McHugh; Lifang Hou; Melissa A Simon; Robert L Murphy; Neil Jordan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  The Effect of Peer-Led Navigation Approach as a Form of Task Shifting in Promoting Cervical Cancer Screening Knowledge, Intention, and Practices Among Urban Women in Tanzania: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Joanes Faustine Mboineki; Panpan Wang; Kamala Dhakal; Mikiyas Amare Getu; Changying Chen
Journal:  Cancer Control       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 2.339

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.