Literature DB >> 33150282

Empowering Clinician Education With Patient-outcome Feedback.

Kenneth V Iserson1.   

Abstract

Emergency physicians (EPs) often lack the information they need about their patients' outcomes so that they can both optimally adjust and refine their diagnostic and treatment processes and recognize their clinical errors. Patient-outcome feedback (POF) provides that information by informing clinicians about a patient's clinical course after that clinician's evaluation and treatment. This feedback may encompass the period after the EP has transferred a patient's care to another EP or after the patient has left the ED or hospital. EPs obtain POF through various active and passive methods, depending on their institutional and medical record systems. Active methods require that clinicians or others spend time and effort acquiring the information; passive methods deliver it automatically. POF is an excellent performance-based measurement that helps clinicians to stimulate their learning and to build their own validated mental library of outcomes with which to make clinical decisions, i.e., heuristics and System 1 thinking. POF offers especially useful feedback about patients who have been admitted, were referred to specialists, had major interventions, had potentially significant tests pending on discharge, or were handed off to another EP. The current health care system makes it difficult for EPs to discover their patients' outcomes, squandering significant educational opportunities. Three stimuli to improve this situation would be to require EPs to receive passive POF as part of hospital accreditation, for reviewing POF to be classified as a Category 1 Continuing Medical Education activity, and to reimburse clinicians for learning activities related to POF. Research indicates that our health care institutions and systems would be well served to provide clinicians with ongoing automatic information about their patients' outcomes.
© 2020 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 33150282      PMCID: PMC7592814          DOI: 10.1002/aet2.10489

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AEM Educ Train        ISSN: 2472-5390


  31 in total

Review 1.  Human error in emergency medicine.

Authors:  R Wears; L L Leape
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 5.721

2.  The processes and dimensions of informed self-assessment: a conceptual model.

Authors:  Joan Sargeant; Heather Armson; Ben Chesluk; Timothy Dornan; Kevin Eva; Eric Holmboe; Jocelyn Lockyer; Elaine Loney; Karen Mann; Cees van der Vleuten
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 6.893

3.  National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2007 emergency department summary.

Authors:  Richard Niska; Farida Bhuiya; Jianmin Xu
Journal:  Natl Health Stat Report       Date:  2010-08-06

Review 4.  Clinical, educational, and epidemiological value of autopsy.

Authors:  Julian L Burton; James Underwood
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2007-04-28       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  "I'll never play professional football" and other fallacies of self-assessment.

Authors:  Kevin W Eva; Glenn Regehr
Journal:  J Contin Educ Health Prof       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 6.  Does outcome feedback make you a better emergency physician? A systematic review and research framework proposal.

Authors:  Curtis F Lavoie; Howard Schachter; Aviva T Stewart; Jessie McGowan
Journal:  CJEM       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.410

Review 7.  The feedback sanction.

Authors:  P Croskerry
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.451

8.  Self-monitoring in clinical practice: a challenge for medical educators.

Authors:  Ronald M Epstein; Daniel J Siegel; Jordan Silberman
Journal:  J Contin Educ Health Prof       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.355

9.  Remember that patient you saw last week?

Authors:  Stephen Gildfind; Diana Egerton-Warburton; Simon Craig
Journal:  Emerg Med Australas       Date:  2014-04-10       Impact factor: 2.151

10.  Survey of follow-up systems in emergency medicine residencies: analysis and proposal.

Authors:  B Bentley; D D DeBehnke; O J Ma
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  1994 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.451

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.