| Literature DB >> 33149711 |
Wenyu Lin1,2, Liqing Lin3, Binhua Dong2,4, Lihua Chen1, Huifang Lei1,2, Yuqin Gao1,2, Yaojia Chen1,2, Pengming Sun1,2,4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of postpartum pelvic organ prolapse (POP) relies on symptoms combined with pelvic organ prolapse-quantification (POP-Q) and lacks serological indicators. The objective of this study was to assess serum elastin, type I collagen, miRNA-30d, and miRNA-181a in the early postpartum period to identify hematologic predictors of POP.Entities:
Keywords: elastin; miRNA-181a; miRNA-30d; pelvic organ prolapse; type I collagen
Year: 2020 PMID: 33149711 PMCID: PMC7604264 DOI: 10.2147/RMHP.S268235
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Risk Manag Healthc Policy ISSN: 1179-1594
Figure 1Flow chart of the patients included.
Characteristics of Study Population
| POP Group (N=699) | Non-POP Group (N=314) | P | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | |||
| <35 | 604(86.40%) | 284(90.40%) | 0.042* |
| ≥35 | 95(13.60%) | 30(9.60%) | |
| Constipation | |||
| yes | 60((8.6%) | 9(2.9%) | <0.001* |
| no | 639(91.4%) | 305(97.1%) | |
| Chronic cough | |||
| yes | 15(2.2%) | 3(0.9%) | 0.184 |
| no | 684(97.8%) | 311(99.1%) | |
| Pregnancy | |||
| ≤ 2 | 215(30.80%) | 146(46.50%) | <0.001* |
| >2 | 484(69.20%) | 168(53.50%) | |
| Number of deliveries | |||
| ≤2 | 320(45.80%) | 197(62.70%) | <0.001* |
| >2 | 379(54.20%) | 117(37.30%) | |
| Delivery route | |||
| Vaginal | 574(82.10%) | 188(59.90%) | <0.001* |
| Cesarean section | 114(16.30%) | 117(37.30%) | |
| Vaginal delivery to cesarean section | 11(1.60%) | 9(2.90%) | |
| Episiotomy | |||
| yes | 87(12.4%) | 21(6.7%) | 0.006* |
| no | 612(87.6%) | 293(93.3%) | |
| Perineal tear | |||
| yes | 413(59.1%) | 79(25.2%) | <0.001* |
| no | 286(40.9%) | 235(74.8%) | |
| Birthweight (kg) | |||
| <4.0 | 665(95.10%) | 310(98.07%) | 0.003* |
| ≥4.0 | 34(4.90%) | 4(1.3%) | |
| Postnatal BMI (kg/m2) | |||
| <24 | 425(60.80%) | 251(79.90%) | <0.001* |
| ≥24 | 274(39.20%) | 63(20.10%) | |
| Pelvic floor muscle strength | |||
| <3 | 645(92.30%) | 130(41.40%) | <0.001* |
| ≥3 | 54(7.7%) | 184(58.60%) | |
| Second stage of labor | |||
| ≤30min | 134(54.92%) | 81(67.50%) | 0.006* |
| 31–60min | 78(31.97%) | 35(29.17%) | |
| >60min | 32(13.11%) | 4(3.33%) | |
| Postpartum SUI | |||
| yes | 196(28.04%) | 52(16.40%) | <0.001* |
| no | 503(71.95%) | 262(83.60%) |
Notes: Results are presented as number (percent) using chi-square or Student’s t-test.*Statistically significant difference with p < 0.05
Abbreviations: POP, pelvic organ prolapse; BMI, body mass index.
Logistic Regression Analysis of Association Between Possible Risk Factors and Anatomic Pelvic Organ Prolapse (aPOP) at 6 Weeks Postpartum
| OR | 95% CI | p | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 1.489 | 0.965 | 2.298 | 0.015* |
| Pregnancy | 1.956 | 1.488 | 2.573 | <0.001* |
| Constipation | 1.572 | 1.370 | 1.984 | 0.018* |
| Number of deliveries | 1.994 | 1.518 | 2.620 | <0.001* |
| Delivery route | 2.751 | 1.855 | 4.081 | <0.001* |
| Birthweight (kg) | 4.832 | 1.373 | 17.290 | 0.014* |
| Postnatal BMI (kg/m2) | 4.402 | 2.657 | 6.148 | <0.001* |
| Pelvic floor muscle strength | 0.051 | 0.034 | 0.076 | <0.001* |
| SUI | 1.920 | 1.248 | 2.953 | 0.003* |
Note: *Statistically significant difference with p < 0.05
Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; SUI, stress urinary incontinence; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.
Comparison of Elastin, Type I Collagen, miRNA-30d and miRNA-181a Expression Between POP and No POP Group at 6 Weeks Postpartum
| Variables | POP Group | No POP Group | t/Z | p |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elastin (ng/mL) | 2.63±0.09 | 2.60±0.11 | 1.28 | 0.26 |
| type I collagen (pg/mL) | 352.85 | 350.28 (300.21, 400.20) | −0.65 | 0.51 |
| miR-30d (pg/mL) | 3.63 (2.71, 5.18) | 2.05 (1.80, 3.33) | −2.88 | 0.004* |
| miR-181a (pg/mL) | 3.36 (2.62, 4.80) | 2.08 (2.00, 2.93) | −2.96 | 0.003* |
Notes: Quantitative data are mean ± SD or median (25th; 75th percentile); Student’s t-test or F-test was used according variable distribution. *Statistically significant difference with p < 0.05
Abbreviation: POP, pelvic organ prolapse.
Figure 2Scatter diagram illustrating the difference of elastin and type I collagen level between women with and without Prolapse. (A) The difference of elastin concentrations (ng/mL) between women with and without Prolapse. (B) The difference of type I collagen concentrations (pg/mL) between women with and without Prolapse.#P>0.05.
Figure 3Box-plot illustrating the difference of miRNA-30d and miRNA-181a level between women with and without Prolapse. (A) The difference of miRNA-30d (pg/mL) between women with and without Prolapse. (B) The difference of miRNA-181a concentrations (pg/mL) between women with and without Prolapse. *P<0.05.