Literature DB >> 33146417

Biomechanical evaluation of total ankle arthroplasty. Part I: Joint loads during simulated level walking.

Brett D Steineman1, Fernando J Quevedo González1, Daniel R Sturnick1, Jonathan T Deland2, Constantine A Demetracopoulos2, Timothy M Wright1.   

Abstract

In total ankle arthroplasty, the interaction at the joint between implant and bone is driven by a complex loading environment. Unfortunately, little is known about the loads at the ankle during daily activities since earlier attempts use two- or three-dimensional models to explore simplified joint mechanics. Our goal was to develop a framework to calculate multi-axial loads at the joint during simulated level walking following total ankle arthroplasty. To accomplish this, we combined robotic simulations of level walking at one-quarter bodyweight in three cadaveric foot and ankle specimens with musculoskeletal modeling to calculate the multi-axial forces and moments at the ankle during the stance phase. The peak compressive forces calculated were between 720 and 873 N occurring around 77%-80% of stance. The peak moment, which was the internal moment for all specimens, was between 6.1 and 11.6 N m and occurred between 72% and 88% of the stance phase. The peak moment did not necessarily occur with the peak force. The ankle joint loads calculated in this study correspond well to previous attempts in the literature; however, our robotic simulator and framework provide an opportunity to resolve the resultant three-dimensional forces and moments as others have not in previous studies. The framework may be useful to calculate ankle joint loads in cadaveric specimens as the first step in evaluating bone-implant interactions in total ankle replacement using specimen specific inputs. This approach also provides a unique opportunity to evaluate changes in joint loads and kinematics following surgical interventions of the foot and ankle.
© 2020 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ankle; biomechanics; joint reaction loads; musculoskeletal modeling; total ankle arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33146417      PMCID: PMC7749051          DOI: 10.1002/jor.24902

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  24 in total

1.  ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate system of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion--part I: ankle, hip, and spine. International Society of Biomechanics.

Authors:  Ge Wu; Sorin Siegler; Paul Allard; Chris Kirtley; Alberto Leardini; Dieter Rosenbaum; Mike Whittle; Darryl D D'Lima; Luca Cristofolini; Hartmut Witte; Oskar Schmid; Ian Stokes
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  The role of ankle ligaments and articular geometry in stabilizing the ankle.

Authors:  Kota Watanabe; Harold B Kitaoka; Lawrence J Berglund; Kristin D Zhao; Kenton R Kaufman; Kai-Nan An
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2011-10-13       Impact factor: 2.063

3.  Impact of complications in total ankle replacement and ankle arthrodesis analyzed with a validated outcome measurement.

Authors:  Fabian G Krause; Markus Windolf; Biraj Bora; Murray J Penner; Kevin J Wing; Alastair S E Younger
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Invasive in vivo measurement of rear-, mid- and forefoot motion during walking.

Authors:  P Lundgren; C Nester; A Liu; A Arndt; R Jones; A Stacoff; P Wolf; A Lundberg
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.840

5.  The three-dimensional determination of internal loads in the lower extremity.

Authors:  U Glitsch; W Baumann
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1997 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Fixed and mobile-bearing total ankle prostheses: Effect on tibial bone strain.

Authors:  Alexandre Terrier; Caroline Sieger Fernandes; Maïka Guillemin; Xavier Crevoisier
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 2.063

7.  Mechanical performance of cementless total knee replacements: It is not all about the maximum loads.

Authors:  Fernando J Quevedo González; Joseph D Lipman; Darrick Lo; Ivan De Martino; Peter K Sculco; Thomas P Sculco; Fabio Catani; Timothy M Wright
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2019-01-03       Impact factor: 3.494

8.  Force and motion analysis of the normal, diseased, and prosthetic ankle joint.

Authors:  R N Stauffer; E Y Chao; R C Brewster
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1977       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Risk Factors for Failure of Total Ankle Arthroplasty With a Minimum Five Years of Follow-up.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Cody; Lorena Bejarano-Pineda; James R Lachman; Michel A Taylor; Elizabeth B Gausden; James K DeOrio; Mark E Easley; James A Nunley
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2018-10-21       Impact factor: 2.827

10.  A Patient-Specific Foot Model for the Estimate of Ankle Joint Forces in Patients with Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis.

Authors:  Joe A I Prinold; Claudia Mazzà; Roberto Di Marco; Iain Hannah; Clara Malattia; Silvia Magni-Manzoni; Maurizio Petrarca; Anna B Ronchetti; Laura Tanturri de Horatio; E H Pieter van Dijkhuizen; Stefan Wesarg; Marco Viceconti
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 3.934

View more
  1 in total

1.  Do Metaphyseal Cones and Stems Provide Any Biomechanical Advantage for Moderate Contained Tibial Defects in Revision TKA? A Finite-Element Analysis Based on a Cadaver Model.

Authors:  Fernando J Quevedo González; Kathleen N Meyers; Nicholas Schraut; Kapil G Mehrotra; Joseph D Lipman; Timothy M Wright; Michael P Ast
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 4.755

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.