Literature DB >> 20509787

Sexual violence, posttraumatic stress disorder, and the pelvic examination: how do beliefs about the safety, necessity, and utility of the examination influence patient experiences?

Julie C Weitlauf1, Susan M Frayne, John W Finney, Rudolf H Moos, Surai Jones, Kirsten Hu, David Spiegel.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sexual violence and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) have been linked to increased reports of distress and pain during the pelvic examination. Efforts to more fully characterize these reactions and identify core factors (i.e., beliefs about the examination) that may influence these reactions are warranted. AIMS: This descriptive, cross-sectional study examines the relationship between sexual violence, PTSD, and women's negative reactions to the pelvic examination. Additional analyses highlight how maladaptive beliefs about the safety, necessity, and utility of the pelvic examination may contribute to these reactions.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 165 eligible women veterans were identified via medical record review and mailed a survey that assessed: (1) background information; (2) history of sexual violence; (3) current symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder; (4) fear, embarrassment, distress, and pain during the pelvic examination; and (5) core beliefs about the examination. Ninety women (55% response rate) completed the survey.
RESULTS: Women with both sexual violence and PTSD reported the highest levels of examination related fear: chi(2) = 18.8, p < .001; embarrassment: chi(2) = 21.2, p < .001; and distress: chi(2) = 18.2, p < .001. Beliefs that the examination was unnecessary or unsafe or not useful were more commonly reported in this group and were associated with higher levels of examination-related fear and embarrassment.
CONCLUSION: Women with sexual violence and PTSD find the pelvic examination distressing, embarrassing, and frightening. Efforts to develop interventions to help reduce distress during the examination are warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20509787     DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2009.1673

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)        ISSN: 1540-9996            Impact factor:   2.681


  10 in total

1.  Receipt of cervical cancer screening in female veterans: impact of posttraumatic stress disorder and depression.

Authors:  Julie C Weitlauf; Surai Jones; Xiangyan Xu; John W Finney; Rudolf H Moos; George F Sawaya; Susan M Frayne
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2013 May-Jun

2.  Abuse in childhood and risk of uterine leiomyoma: the role of emotional support in biologic resilience.

Authors:  Renée Boynton-Jarrett; Janet W Rich-Edwards; Hee-Jin Jun; Eileen N Hibert; Rosalind J Wright
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.822

3.  Reproductive Health of Women Veterans: A Systematic Review of the Literature from 2008 to 2017.

Authors:  Jodie G Katon; Laurie Zephyrin; Anne Meoli; Avanthi Hulugalle; Jeane Bosch; Lisa Callegari; Ileana V Galvan; Kristen E Gray; Kristin O Haeger; Claire Hoffmire; Silvina Levis; Erica W Ma; Jennifer E Mccabe; Yael I Nillni; Suzanne L Pineles; Shivani M Reddy; David A Savitz; Jonathan G Shaw; Elizabeth W Patton
Journal:  Semin Reprod Med       Date:  2019-04-19       Impact factor: 1.303

4.  Reproductive and other health outcomes in Iraq and Afghanistan women veterans using VA health care: association with mental health diagnoses.

Authors:  Beth E Cohen; Shira Maguen; Daniel Bertenthal; Ying Shi; Vanessa Jacoby; Karen H Seal
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2012-09

5.  The Relationship Between Sexual Assault History and Cervical Cancer Screening Completion Among Women Veterans in the Veterans Health Administration.

Authors:  Elisheva R Danan; Julian Brunner; Alicia Bergman; Michele Spoont; Catherine Chanfreau; Ismelda Canelo; Erin E Krebs; Elizabeth M Yano
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 3.017

6.  The impact of sexual abuse in patients undergoing colonoscopy.

Authors:  Melianthe P J Nicolai; Josbert J Keller; Lieke de Vries; Andrea E van der Meulen-de Jong; Jan J Nicolai; James C H Hardwick; Hein Putter; Rob C M Pelger; Henk W Elzevier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  An Evidence Map of the Women Veterans' Health Research Literature (2008-2015).

Authors:  Elisheva R Danan; Erin E Krebs; Kristine Ensrud; Eva Koeller; Roderick MacDonald; Tina Velasquez; Nancy Greer; Timothy J Wilt
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Qualitative socioecological factors of cervical cancer screening use among transgender men.

Authors:  Michael Johnson; Chris Wakefield; KellyAnn Garthe
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2020-01-21

9.  Delayed Visits for Contraception Due to Concerns Regarding Pelvic Examination Among Women with History of Intimate Partner Violence.

Authors:  Hunter K Holt; George F Sawaya; Alison M El Ayadi; Jillian T Henderson; Corinne H Rocca; Carolyn L Westhoff; Cynthia C Harper
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 6.473

10.  A qualitative cancer screening study with childhood sexual abuse survivors: experiences, perspectives and compassionate care.

Authors:  Dionne Gesink; Lilian Nattel
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 2.692

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.