BACKGROUND/AIM: The current study aimed to identify the safety and efficacy of Hartmann's procedure (HP) among elderly patients (age ≥80 years) with rectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data on surgical outcome, survival rate, and incidence of stoma reversal were retrospectively compared between patients aged over 80 years who underwent anterior resection (AR) and HP. RESULTS: In total, 79 elderly patients underwent rectal cancer surgery. Of these patients, 54 (68.4%) underwent AR and 25 (31.6%) HP. The two groups did not differ significantly in terms of age, nutrient status, and tumor characteristics. Eight (14.8%) patients who underwent AR and six (24.0%) who underwent HP presented with intra-abdominal complications (p=0.35). The overall survival and recurrent-free survival rates between the two groups did not differ. CONCLUSION: HP for elderly patients with rectal cancer has similar complication rates to AR, and achieved similar oncological outcomes. Copyright
BACKGROUND/AIM: The current study aimed to identify the safety and efficacy of Hartmann's procedure (HP) among elderly patients (age ≥80 years) with rectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data on surgical outcome, survival rate, and incidence of stoma reversal were retrospectively compared between patients aged over 80 years who underwent anterior resection (AR) and HP. RESULTS: In total, 79 elderly patients underwent rectal cancer surgery. Of these patients, 54 (68.4%) underwent AR and 25 (31.6%) HP. The two groups did not differ significantly in terms of age, nutrient status, and tumor characteristics. Eight (14.8%) patients who underwent AR and six (24.0%) who underwent HP presented with intra-abdominal complications (p=0.35). The overall survival and recurrent-free survival rates between the two groups did not differ. CONCLUSION: HP for elderly patients with rectal cancer has similar complication rates to AR, and achieved similar oncological outcomes. Copyright
Authors: E Kapiteijn; C A Marijnen; I D Nagtegaal; H Putter; W H Steup; T Wiggers; H J Rutten; L Pahlman; B Glimelius; J H van Krieken; J W Leer; C J van de Velde Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2001-08-30 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Christian D Klink; Kosta Lioupis; Marcel Binnebösel; Daniel Kaemmer; Ivanna Kozubek; Jochen Grommes; Ulf P Neumann; Marc Jansen; Stefan Willis Journal: Int J Colorectal Dis Date: 2011-01-11 Impact factor: 2.571
Authors: L Påhlman; M Bohe; B Cedermark; M Dahlberg; G Lindmark; R Sjödahl; B Ojerskog; L Damber; R Johansson Journal: Br J Surg Date: 2007-10 Impact factor: 6.939
Authors: Molly A Wasserman; Michael F McGee; Irene B Helenowski; Amy L Halverson; Anne-Marie Boller; Steven J Stryker Journal: Int J Colorectal Dis Date: 2015-11-25 Impact factor: 2.571
Authors: Emma Westerduin; Gijsbert D Musters; Anna A W van Geloven; Marinke Westerterp; Erwin van der Harst; Willem A Bemelman; Pieter J Tanis Journal: Int J Colorectal Dis Date: 2017-08-11 Impact factor: 2.571
Authors: Iris D Nagtegaal; Robert D Odze; David Klimstra; Valerie Paradis; Massimo Rugge; Peter Schirmacher; Kay M Washington; Fatima Carneiro; Ian A Cree Journal: Histopathology Date: 2019-11-13 Impact factor: 5.087