Literature DB >> 18379795

Relationship between multiple numbers of stapler firings during rectal division and anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic rectal resection.

Masaaki Ito1, Masanori Sugito, Akihiro Kobayashi, Yusuke Nishizawa, Yoshiyuki Tsunoda, Norio Saito.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We experienced some technical difficulty in dividing the middle and lower rectum through the right-lower quadrant intracorporeally. The aim of this study was to determine whether multiple stapler firings during rectal division are associated with anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic rectal resection.
METHODS: Laparoscopic anterior resection with double-stapling technique anastomosis was performed in 180 consecutive rectal cancer patients. We often used vertical rectal division through a suprapubic site instead of the standard transverse rectal division for laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (LapTME). We attempted to determine whether there was an association between the number of stapler firings and procedures in rectal division. Moreover, we identified risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic rectal resection by multivariate analysis.
RESULTS: Anastomotic leakage occurred in 5% of the subjects of this study. Vertical rectal division through the suprapubic site after Lap TME required fewer staples than transverse division through the right-lower port and a smaller percentage of patients required three or more staples for vertical rectal division than for transverse division (15% vs. 45%, p=0.03). In the multivariate analysis, TME and the number of staplers used for rectal division were the factors found to be associated with a significantly greater risk of subsequent leakage (odd's ratio=5.3; 95% CI 1.2-22.7 and odd's ratio=4.6; 95% CI 1.1-19.2).
CONCLUSION: TME and multiple stapler firings during distal rectal division were associated with anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic rectal resection. Vertical rectal division through a suprapubic site was a useful method of avoiding multiple stapler firings during laparoscopic TME.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18379795     DOI: 10.1007/s00384-008-0470-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  16 in total

1.  Prospective evaluation of laparoscopic surgery for rectosigmoidal and rectal carcinoma.

Authors:  Seiichiro Yamamoto; Masahiko Watanabe; Hirotoshi Hasegawa; Masaki Kitajima
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.585

2.  Laparoscopic resection of low rectal cancer with a mean follow-up of seven years.

Authors:  Claude Polliand; Christophe Barrat; Gerard Champault
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 1.719

3.  Laparoscopic and open anterior resection for upper and mid rectal cancer: an evaluation of outcomes.

Authors:  Wai Lun Law; Yee Man Lee; Hok Kwok Choi; Chi Leung Seto; Judy W C Ho
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 4.  Assessing obesity: classification and epidemiology.

Authors:  J C Seidell; K M Flegal
Journal:  Br Med Bull       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.291

5.  Laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer: a prospective analysis of thirty-month follow-up outcomes in 312 patients.

Authors:  Seon-Hahn Kim; In-Ja Park; Yong-Geul Joh; Koo-Yong Hahn
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-07-24       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Pelvic drainage and other risk factors for leakage after elective anterior resection in rectal cancer patients: a prospective study of 978 patients.

Authors:  Chien Yuh Yeh; Chung Rong Changchien; Jeng-Yi Wang; Jinn-Shiun Chen; Hong Hwa Chen; Jy-Ming Chiang; Reiping Tang
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after resection of rectal cancer.

Authors:  E Rullier; C Laurent; J L Garrelon; P Michel; J Saric; M Parneix
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  Mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.

Authors:  J K MacFarlane; R D Ryall; R J Heald
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1993-02-20       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Variations in pelvic dimensions do not predict the risk of circumferential resection margin (CRM) involvement in rectal cancer.

Authors:  G Salerno; I R Daniels; G Brown; A R Norman; B J Moran; R J Heald
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Surgical treatment of adenocarcinoma of the rectum.

Authors:  S Zaheer; J H Pemberton; R Farouk; R R Dozois; B G Wolff; D Ilstrup
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  83 in total

1.  Superiority of laparoscopic rectal surgery: Towards a new era.

Authors:  Yosuke Fukunaga
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-10-27

2.  Laparoscopic surgery for ulcerative colitis.

Authors:  Luca Stocchi
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2010-12

3.  Laparoscopic intracorporeal distal rectal transection with the CONTOUR(®) device.

Authors:  L Alevizos; M M Lirici
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2012-03-17       Impact factor: 3.781

4.  A novel single-port technique for transanal rectosigmoid resection and colorectal anastomosis on an ex vivo experimental model.

Authors:  Hemanga K Bhattacharjee; Gerhard F Buess; Francisco Cesar Becerra Garcia; Pirmin Storz; Mousumi Sharma; Sidonia Susanu; Andreas Kirschniak; Mahesh C Misra
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Is there anything we can modify among factors associated with morbidity following elective laparoscopic sigmoidectomy for diverticulitis?

Authors:  Jorge Silva-Velazco; Luca Stocchi; Meagan Costedio; Emre Gorgun; Hermann Kessler; Feza H Remzi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Rectal transection using a curved cutter stapler with an endo-Satinsky clamp during a laparoscopic low anterior resection.

Authors:  Tsukasa Hotta; Katsunari Takifuji; Shozo Yokoyama; Kenji Matsuda; Hiroki Yamaue
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2012-05-03       Impact factor: 3.445

7.  Comparison of intracorporeal single-stapled and double-stapled anastomosis in laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a case-control study.

Authors:  Hye Jin Kim; Gyu-Seog Choi; Jun Seok Park; Soo Yeun Park
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 8.  Emerging Trends in the Etiology, Prevention, and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Anastomotic Leakage.

Authors:  Sami A Chadi; Abe Fingerhut; Mariana Berho; Steven R DeMeester; James W Fleshman; Neil H Hyman; David A Margolin; Joseph E Martz; Elisabeth C McLemore; Daniela Molena; Martin I Newman; Janice F Rafferty; Bashar Safar; Anthony J Senagore; Oded Zmora; Steven D Wexner
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  A Y-shaped vinyl hood that creates pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery (Y-hood method.): a new technique for laparoscopic low anterior resection.

Authors:  Shoichi Fujii; Mitsuyoshi Ota; Shigeru Yamagishi; Chikara Kunisaki; Shunichi Osada; Hirokazu Suwa; Yasushi Ichikawa; Hiroshi Shimada
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-06-11       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  A novel approach of robotic-assisted anterior resection with transanal or transvaginal retrieval of the specimen for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Gyu-Seog Choi; In Ja Park; Byung Mo Kang; Kyoung Hoon Lim; Soo-Han Jun
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.