Teratopyrones A-C, Dimeric Naphtho-γ-Pyrones and Other Metabolites from Teratosphaeria sp. AK1128, a Fungal Endophyte of Equisetum arvense.

Bioassay-guided fractionation of a cytotoxic extract derived from a solid potato dextrose agar (PDA) culture of Teratosphaeria sp. AK1128, a fungal endophyte of Equisetum arvense, afforded three new naphtho-γ-pyrone dimers, teratopyrones A-C (1-3), together with five known naphtho-γ-pyrones, aurasperone B (4), aurasperone C (5), aurasperone F (6), nigerasperone A (7), and fonsecin B (8), and two known diketopiperazines, asperazine (9) and isorugulosuvine (10). The structures of 1-3 were determined on the basis of their spectroscopic data. Cytotoxicity assay revealed that nigerasperone A (7) was moderately active against the cancer cell lines PC-3M (human metastatic prostate cancer), NCI-H460 (human non-small cell lung cancer), SF-268 (human CNS glioma), and MCF-7 (human breast cancer), with IC50s ranging from 2.37 to 4.12 μM while other metabolites exhibited no cytotoxic activity up to a concentration of 5.0 μM.

1. Introduction

Fungal endophytes constitute an abundant and underexplored group of fungi that inhabit plants in diverse natural and human-managed ecosystems [1,2]. These symbiotic fungi often produce bioactive metabolites, some of which may improve the growth or resiliency of the host plant [3]. Recent studies have demonstrated that fungal endophytes are rich sources of small-molecule natural products with novel structures and biomedical potential [4,5]. In our continuing search for bioactive and/or novel metabolites from endosymbiotic microorganisms [6], we have investigated a cytotoxic extract of the fungal endophyte, Teratosphaeria sp. AK1128, isolated from a photosynthetic stem of Equisetum arvense (field horsetail, Equisetaceae). Herein, we report cytotoxicity assay-guided fractionation of this extract, resulting in isolation and characterization of ten metabolites, including three new naphtho-γ-pyrone dimers, teratopyrones A–C (1–3), and the constituent responsible for cytotoxic activity, nigerasperone A (7). Teratosphaeria is a genus within the newly established fungal family Teratosphaeriaceae (Dothideomycetes, Ascomycota), which has been distinguished recently from Mycosphaerella (Mycosphaerellaceae) [7]. To the best of our knowledge, this constitutes the second report on metabolites of a fungal strain of the family Teratosphaeriaceae [8].

2. Results and Discussion

The EtOAc extract of a PDA (potato dextrose agar) culture of Teratosphaeria sp. AK1128 exhibiting cytotoxic activity, on bioassy-guided fractionation involving solvent-solvent partitioning, Sephadex LH-20 size-exclusion and silica gel chromatography followed by HPLC purification, afforded metabolites 1–10 (Figure 1). Of these, 4–10 were previously known and were identified as naphtho-γ-pyrones, aurasperone B (4) [9], aurasperone C (5) [10], aurasperone F (6) [11], nigerasperone A (7) [12], and fonsecin B (8) [9], and diketopiperazines, asperazine (9) [13] and isorugulosuvine (10) [14], by comparison of their spectroscopic (1H NMR, 13C NMR, and LR-MS) data with those reported.

Figure 1

Structures of metabolites isolated from Teratosphaeria sp. AK1128.

Spectroscopic (1H and 13C NMR, HRESIMS, and UV) data of teratopyrones A–C (1–3), together with their common molecular formula, C31H26O11, suggested that they are dimeric naphtho-γ-pyrones [11]. In their 1H and 13C NMR spectra, two sets of signals were observed in different intensity ratios and this was suspected to be due to the atropisomerism around the C7–C10′ axis [10] and/or the presence of C-2 and C-2′ hemi-ketal stereoisomeric mixtures as a result of non-enzymatic formation of this moiety during the biosynthesis of naphtho-γ-pyrones [15]. Although several recent publications on dimeric naphtho-γ-pyrones report only one set of the NMR data, careful examination of the spectra of these dimeric naphtho-γ-pyrones provided in the Supporting Information of these papers indicated the presence of two sets of signals, corresponding to two possible tautomers [16,17,18]. The atropisomerization around the C7–C10′ axis is known to be restricted under mild conditions [10], and the atropisomer ratio for a given dimeric naphtho-γ-pyrone may depend on its producer fungus [19]. Although it is not possible to obtain the atropisomer ratio directly, the use circular dichroism (CD) data for the assignment of stereochemistry of the binaphthyl moiety of the major atropisomer of dimeric naphtho-γ-pyrones by the exciton chirality method has been reported [20,21].

In its 1H NMR spectrum, teratopyrone A (1) exhibited signals due to two methyls (δH 1.43 (s) and 2.36 (s)), three methoxyls (δH 3.39 (s), 3.60 (s), and 3.90 (s)), five aromatic protons (δH 5.99 (s), 6.12 (br. s), 6.26 (br. s), 7.06 (s), and 7.07 (s)), and two hydrogen-bonded phenolic hydroxy groups (δH 14.48 (s) and 14.97 (s)). The 13C NMR spectrum of 1 (Table 1) contained 31 carbon signals due to its major tautomer and these were assigned with the help of HSQC and HMBC spectra. The two carbonyl signals at δC 197.9 and 184.6 revealed that 1 was made up of two naphtho-γ-pyrone monomers, of which one was hydrated at C2′–C3′. The HMBC data for 1 (Figure 2) revealed that the linkage of two monomers of 1 was the same as that of nigerasperone C (11; Figure 1)) in which the hydrated monomer consisted of the upper unit [12]. The 13C NMR data of 1 closely resembled those of 11 [12], except for the signals in the vicinity of C-5–C-8. However, some differences were observed for C-5 (δC 162.5 for 1; 166.1 for 11), C-6 (δC 107.1 for 1; 111.8 for 11), and C-8 (δC 157.3 for 1; 163.1 for 11), suggesting that 1 differed from 11 in the attachment of hydroxy/methoxy groups at C-6/C-8. The attachment of the methoxy group to C-8 in 1 was confirmed by the HMBC correlations of 8-OCH3 (δH 3.38) and H-9 (δH 7.06) to C-8 (δC 157.3). The ECD spectrum of 1 (Figure 3) showed Davydov-split Cotton effects as negative ([θ] −1.46 × 105, 289.5 nm) first and positive ([θ] +1.78 × 105, 272 nm) second, suggesting negative chirality [21] and M-configuration of the 7′–10′ bond [20]. Thus, the structure of teratopyrone A was determined as (10′S)-2′,5,5′′,6-tetrahydroxy-6′,8,8′-trimethoxy-2,2′-dimethyl-2′,3′-dihydro-4H,4′H-[7,10′-bibenzo[g] chromene]-4,4′-dione (1) (Figure 1).

Table 1

13C NMR data (100 MHz, δ) for teratopyrones A–C (1–3).

Position	1	2	3
	CDCl3	DMSO-d6	DMSO-d6
2	168.1 s	100.0 s	167.9/167.8 s
3	107.1 d	47.8 t	109.7 d
4	184.6 s	198.4 s	182.4/182.3 s
4a	104.2 s	103.0 s	107.9 s
5	162.5 s	163.0 4/163.98 s	155.2/155.0 s
5a (6) *	107.1 s	108.6 s	104.3 d
6 (6a) *	160.9 s	159.2 s	139.8 s
7	117.6 s	116.3 s	104.9 d
8	157.3 s	159.3 s	158.9 s
9	105.7 d	105.4 d	117.9 s
9a (10) *	142.3 s	142.2 s	156.9 s
10 (10a) *	101.2 d	101.4 d	106.6 s
10a (10b) *	152.8 s	153.3 s	154.8 s
2-Me	20.7 q	27.6 q	19.9 q
6-OMe			60.8 q
8-OMe	62.0 q	56.4 q
2′	100.2 s	167.9/167.8 s	100.3 s
3′	46.7 t	109.8 d	48.4 t
4′	197.9 s	182.3 s	198.4 s
4a′	103.5 s	107.6 s	102.7 s
5′	162.5 s	153.7 s	163.9 5
5a′	107.1 s	109.7 s	106.2/106.4 s
6′	161.8 s	159.0 s	160.7/161.5 s
7	96.1 d	96.4/96.3 d	94.9/95.1 d
8′	162.5 s	161.0 s	161.3/161.7 s
9′	96.5 d	97.0/96.8 d	96.9/97.6 d
9a′	140.2 s	140.2 s	142.3 s
10′	103.1 s	104.1 s	105.4/105.5 s
10a′	153.3 s	155.0 s	154.7 s
2′-Me	27.8 q	20.1 q	27.6/26.8 q
6′-OMe	56.0 q	55.2/55.1 q	56.1 q
8′-OMe	55.2 q	61.2/61.4 q	55.0/54.9 q

* The position number in parentheses is for teratopyrone C (3).

Figure 2

Selected HMBC correlations of teratopyrones A–C (1–3).

Figure 3

ECD spectra (A) and negative exciton chirality (B) of teratopyrones A–C (1–3).

Teratopyrone B (2) also exhibited UV adsorption bands at 202, 238, 281.5, and 386 nm typical for naphtho-γ-pyrones [11]. Similar to 1, the 1H NMR spectrum of 2 in DMSO-d6 solution showed two sets of signals due to the presence of two tautomeric forms in almost equal amounts (10:8 ratio) and these consisted of two methyl singlets (δH 1.65 (1.64 for the other conformer) and 2.55), three methoxy singlets (δH 3.41 (3.40), 3.60 (3.59), and 4.00), five aromatic signals (δH 6.19 (6.17), 6.55, 6.61 (2H), and 6.90), and two singlets due to hydrogen-bonded phenolic hydroxy groups (δH 14.27 (14.25), and 13.19 (13.18)). The 13C NMR spectrum of 2 (Table 1) resembled closely that of aurasperone F (6). The 13C NMR signals belonging to each of the conformers of 2 were recognized and assigned with the help of HSQC and HMBC data. The presence of two carbonyl signals at δC 198.4 and 182.3 indicated that 2 is a dimer consisting of a naphtho-γ-pyrone monomer and its hydrated form. The positions of attachment of OCH3 groups in 2 were determined by the analysis of its HMBC spectrum (Figure 2). The presence of 8-OCH3 in 2 was confirmed by the HMBC correlations of H-9 (δH 6.90) to C-8 (δC 159.3) and 8-OCH3 (δH 4.00) to C-8 (δC 159.3). The ECD spectrum of 2 (Figure 3) showed Davydov-split Cotton effects as negative ([θ] −5.70 × 104, 297 nm) first and positive ([θ] +1.63 × 105, 278 nm) second, suggesting the negative chirality [21] and M-configuration of the 7–10′ bond [20]. Therefore, the structure teratopyrone B was determined as (10′S)-2,5,5′,6-tetrahydroxy-6′,8,8′-trimethoxy-2,2′-dimethyl-2,3-dihydro-4H,4′H-[7,10′-bibenzo[g]chromene]-4,4′-dione (2) (Figure 1), suggesting that it is the isomer of aurasperone F (6) with different methyl ether positions at C-6 and C-8.

The 1H NMR spectrum of teratopyrone C (3) also exhibited two sets of signals belonging to two tautomers in the ratio 3:2 as a result of the hemi-ketal tautomerism and consisted of two methyl singlets (δH 1.40 (1.78 for another tautomer) and 2.47), three methoxy singlets (δH 3.46 (3.53), 3.55, and 3.91 (3.89)), five aromatic proton singlets (δH 5.99 (5.95), 6.44 (6.39), 6.50, 6.93, and 7.00 (7.02)), and two hydrogen-bonded phenolic hydroxy singlets (δH 14.23 and 12.89 (12.88)). The hydrogen-bonded phenolic hydroxy singlet at δH 12.89 (12.88) suggested the existence of an angular naphtho-γ-pyrone moiety [9]. The 13C NMR spectrum of 3 (Table 1) contained signals due to each tautomer that were assigned separately with the help of HSQC and HMBC data. The two carbonyl signals at δC 198.4 and 182.4 (182.3) indicated that 3 consisted of one each of naphtho-γ-pyrone and hydrated naphtho-γ-pyrone monomers. The positions of attachment of OCH3 groups in 3 were also determined by the analysis of its HMBC spectrum (Figure 2). The HBMC correlation of 5-OH (δH 12.89) to C-6 (δC 104.3), further supporting the existence of angular naphtho-γ-pyrone moiety, and the correlations of H-7 (δH 7.01) to C-8 (δC 158.9), H-7 (δH 7.01) to C-9 (δC 117.9), and 10-OCH3 (δH 3.53 (3.46)) to C-8 (δC 156.8) established the C9–C10′ linkage and 8-methoxyl group. The ECD spectrum of 3 (Figure 3) exhibited Davydov-split Cotton effects as negative ([θ] −5.14 × 104, 292 nm) first and positive ([θ] +8.82 × 104, 278 nm) second, suggesting the negative chirality [21] and M-configuration of the 9–10′ bond [20]. Therefore, the structure of teratopyrone C was determined as 9-((10R)-2,5-dihydroxy-6,8-dimethoxy-2-methyl-4-oxo-3,4-dihydro-2H-benzo[g]chromen-10-yl)-5,8-dihydroxy-10-methoxy-2-methyl-4H-benzo[h]chromen-4-one (3) (Figure 1).

Previous studies have shown that some naphtha-γ-pyrone dimers such as chaetochromins exhibit cytotoxic activity [22]. Thus, teratopyrones A–C and other metabolites encountered were evaluated for their cytotoxic activity, employing a panel of five cancer cell lines and normal cells. Among these, only nigerasperone A (7) showed cytotoxic activity at a concentration <5.0 μM. The IC50s of 7 for these cancer cell lines were determined as 4.12 ± 0.32 μM (PC-3M (human metastatic prostate cancer)), 3.01 ± 0.11 μM (NCI-H460 (human non-small lung cancer)), 2.37 ± 0.15 μM (SF-268 (human central nervous system glioma)), 3.90 ± 0.33 μM (MCF-7 (human breast cancer)), and >5.0 μM for MDA-MB-231 (human metastatic breast cancer) and WI-38 (normal human lung fibroblast cells). Interestingly, nigerasperone A (7) has been reported previously to be inactive against A549 (human alveolar adenocarcinoma) and SMMC-7721 (human hepatocellular carcinoma) cancer cell lines [12]. These and our data suggest that nigerasperone A (7) may be selectively cytotoxic against some cancer cell lines.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. General Procedures

Optical rotations were measured with a Jasco Dip-370 polarimeter (JASCO Inc., Easton, MD, USA.) using CHCl3 as solvent. ECD spectra were measured with JASCO J-810 (JASCO Inc., Easton, MD, USA). First, 1D and 2D NMR spectra were recorded in CDCl3 or DMSO-d6 with a Bruker Avance III 400 instrument (Bruker BioSpin Corporation, San Jose, CA, USA) at 400 MHz for 1H NMR and 100 MHz for 13C NMR using residual CHCl3 as the internal standard. Chemical shift values (δ) are given in parts per million (ppm) and the coupling constants are in Hz. Low-resolution and high-resolution MS were recorded on Shimadzu LCMS-DQ8000α (Shimadzu Scientific Instruments, Inc., Columbia, MD, USA) and Agilent G6224A TOF mass spectrometers (Agilent Technologies Co. Ltd., Beijing, China), respectively. HPLC (Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, USA) was carried out on a 10 × 250 mm Phenomenex Luna 5μ C18 (2) column with Waters Delta Prep system consisting of a PDA 996 detector.

3.2. Fungal Isolation and Identification

In June 2008, a healthy individual of Equisetum arvense was collected from Beringian tundra in the Seward Peninsula of Western Alaska (64°30′04″ N, 165°24′23″ W; 6 m.a.s.l.) [23]. The photosynthetic stem was washed in tap water and cut into ca. 2 mm2 segments that were surface-sterilized by agitating sequentially in 95% EtOH for 30 s, 0.5% NaOCl for 2 min, and 70% EtOH for 2 min [23]. Forty-eight tissue segments were surface-dried under sterile conditions and then placed individually onto 2% malt extract agar (MEA) in sterile 1.5 mL micro centrifuge tubes. Tubes were sealed with ParafilmTM and incubated under ambient light/dark conditions at room temperature (ca. 21.5 °C) for up to one year. Emergent fungi were isolated into pure culture on 2% MEA, vouchered in sterile water, and deposited as living vouchers at the Robert L. Gilbertson Mycological Herbarium at the University of Arizona. One fungus of interest, isolate AK1128, was used for the present study. This fungus has been deposited at the University of Arizona Robert L. Gilbertson Mycological Herbarium (accession number AK1128).

Total genomic DNA was isolated from fresh mycelium of the isolate AK1128 and the nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacers and 5.8s gene (ITS rDNA; ca. 600 base pairs (bp)) and an adjacent portion of the nuclear ribosomal large subunit (LSU rDNA; ca. 500 bp) was amplified as a single fragment by PCR. Positive amplicons were sequenced bidirectionally as described previously [23]. A consensus sequence was assembled and basecalls were made by phred [24] and phrap [25] with orchestration by Mesquite [26], followed by manual editing in Sequencher (Gene Codes Corp.). The resulting sequence was deposited in GenBank (accession JQ759476).

Because the isolate did not produce diagnostic fruiting structures in culture, two methods were used to tentatively identify isolate AK1128 via molecular sequence data. First, the LSU rDNA portion of the sequence was evaluated using the naïve Bayesian classifier for fungi [27] available through the Ribosomal Database Project (http://rdp.cme.msu.edu/). The Bayesian classifier estimated placement within the Capnodiales (Dothideomycetes) with high support, but placement at finer taxonomic levels was not possible. Therefore, the entire sequence was compared against the GenBank database using BLAST [28]. The top ten BLAST matches were to unidentified dothideomycetous endophytes or uncultured ascomycetous clones, except for two strains of Colletogloeopsis dimorpha (strains CBS 120085 and CBS 120086). The matches to Colletogloeopsis dimorpha had 97% coverage and a maximum identity of only 92%, and similar levels of match precision to other taxa restricted our taxonomic inference.

Therefore, to clarify the phylogenetic placement and taxonomic assignment of AK1128, two phylogenetic analyses were conducted. First, the top 99 BLAST matches were downloaded from GenBank, four problematic sequences for which quality was suspect were removed, and AK1128 and the resulting dataset was aligned automatically via MUSCLE (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/msa/muscle/) with default parameters. The alignment consisted of dothideomycetous endophytes as well as described species of Dothideomycetes that mostly comprised taxa affiliated with some lineages recognized within Mycosphaerella (e.g., Teratosphaeria, Colletogloeopsis, Catulenostroma, etc.). The alignment was trimmed so that starting and ending points were generally consistent with the sequence length for AK1128 and adjusted manually in Mesquite [26] prior to analysis. The final dataset consisted of 96 sequences and 1084 characters. This dataset was analyzed by maximum likelihood in GARLI (Zwickl, D. J. Genetic algorithm approaches for the phylogenetic analysis of large biological sequence datasets under the maximum likelihood criterion (Ph.D. Dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA, 2008) using the GTR + I + G model of evolution as determined by ModelTest [29]. The resulting topology indicated that AK1128 had an affinity for Teratosphaeria, Catenulostroma, and relatives but was not phylogenetically affiliated with Colletogloeopsis (data not shown). Because this analysis included many unknown taxa (endophytes) and we could not root the tree with certainty, the taxon sampling was found to be insufficient to infer with confidence the placement of the AK1128.

A second phylogenetic analysis was therefore conducted using taxa affiliated with Teratosphaeria, Catulenostroma, and relatives, as analyzed previously [30]. The alignment of ITS rDNA sequences from [30] was obtained from TreeBase and pruned to include only those taxa of interest based on our analysis above (i.e., the lower half of Figure 1 in [30] in a preliminary analysis, and then only those taxa most closely related within Teratosphaeria in the final analysis). The sequence for AK1128 was integrated into the pruned dataset and the data were realigned, adjusted, and analyzed as described above. The resulting dataset consisted of 79 sequences and 582 characters in the preliminary analysis. A bootstrap analysis with 1000 replicates was conducted to assess topological support and the topology was rooted with Devriesia strelitziae [30]. The resulting tree suggested that AK1128 is affiliated with Teratosphaeria species (data not shown).

Therefore, the dataset was pruned further, focusing only on those Teratosphaeria species suggested to be close relatives of AK1128. The final analysis included 42 terminal taxa and 554 characters and was rooted with Catulenostroma macowanii based on the topology of the preliminary analysis. The final tree with maximum likelihood bootstrap values is shown in Supplemental Figure S13. The final analysis placed AK1128 with certainty within the genus Teratosphaeria (Teratosphaeriaceae), likely in affiliation with T. associata (known from Eucalyptus [31] and Protea [30] from Australia). Given the distinctive geographical origin and host of AK1128, and the sister relationship of AK1128 to known strains of T. associata (Supplemental Figure S13), we designate the strain as Teratosphaeria sp. AK1128, affiliated with but distinct from known variants of T. associata.

3.3. Cultivation and Isolation of Metabolites

A culture of Teratosphaeria sp. AK1128 grown on PDA for two weeks was used for extraction. The PDA cultures from 20 T-flasks were combined and extracted with MeOH (5.0 L) in an ultrasonic bath for 1.0 h. After filtration, the MeOH solution was concentrated to around one-third of its volume in vacuo, and the resulting solution was extracted with EtOAc (3 × 700.0 mL). The EtOAc solution was concentrated in vacuo to afford the crude extract (1.223 g). The crude extract, which showed activity in cytotoxicity assay, was fractionated by solvent–solvent partitioning using 80% aq. MeOH (100.0 mL) and hexanes (3 × 100.0 mL), followed by 50% aq. MeOH (obtained from 80% aq. MeOH layer by adding calculated volume of water) and CHCl3 (3 × 100.0 mL) to afford hexanes, CHCl3, and 50% aq. MeOH fractions of which only the CHCl3 fraction was found to be cytotoxic. Therefore, the CHCl3 fraction (1.094 g) was subjected to gel-permeation chromatography on Sephadex LH-20 (50.0 g). The column was eluted with 250.0 mL each of 1:4 hexanes-CH2Cl2, 3:2 CH2Cl2-acetone, 1:4 CH2Cl2-acetone, and MeOH to give four fractions. The cytotoxic 3:2 CH2Cl2-acetone fraction (778.6 mg) was further fractionated by SiO2 gel (100.0 g) column chromatography using 95:5 CHCl3-MeOH as eluting solvent. Eight combined fractions (fractions 1–8) were obtained by combining the fractions based on their TLC profiles. Fraction 1 (12.5 mg) was separated by reversed-phase HPLC (70% aq. MeOH as eluant) to afford 1 (7.4 mg, tR 16.5 min) and 8 (2.7 mg, tR 10.5 min). Reversed-phase HPLC separation of a portion (55.6 mg) of fraction 2 (135.8 mg) using 65% aq. MeOH gave additional amounts of 8 (3.7 mg, tR 14.4 min) and 4 (29.6 mg, tR 25.6 min). Compounds 3 (16.9 mg, tR 26.2 min), 4 (10.8 mg, tR 18.1 min), and 7 (4.2 mg, tR 15.5 min) were obtained from fraction 3 (70.8 mg) by reversed-phase HPLC using 65% aq. MeOH as the eluent. Fraction 4 (29.1 mg) was further purified by reversed-phase HPLC (65% aq. MeOH) to afford 2 (8.3 mg, tR 27.7 min) and 6 (9.8 mg, tR 21.6 min). A portion (78.5 mg) of fraction 5 (299.7 mg) was subjected to reversed-phase HPLC. Elution with 65% aq. MeOH yielded metabolites 5 (54.5 mg, tR 15.3 min) and 6 (10.3 mg). Reversed-phase HPLC separation of fraction 6 (106.0 mg) using 60% aq. MeOH as eluent gave two crude fractions, A (tR 10.8 min) and B (tR 27.7 min). Further purification of fractions A and B by normal-phase SiO2 HPLC (eluent: 97.5:2.5 CHCl3-MeOH) afforded 10 (2.3 mg, tR 15.0 min) and 9 (26.0 mg, tR 17.5 min), respectively.

Teratopyrone A (1). Yellow amorphous solid; [α] −54.4 (c 0.1, CHCl3); UV (MeOH) λmax (log ε) 203 (4.45), 229 (4.63), 281.5 (4.84), 403 (4.09); ECD (MeOH) [θ] +1.78 × 105 (272 nm), −1.46 × 105 (289.5 nm); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 14.97 (s, 1H, 5-OH), 14.48 (s, 1H, 5′-OH), 7.08/7.03 (br s, 1H, H-10), 7.07/7.04 (br s, 1H, H-9), 6.26/6.28 (br s, 1H, H-7′), 6.12 (br s, 1H, H-9′), 5.98 (s, 1H, H-3′), 3.90/3.94 (s, 3H, 6′-OMe), 3.60/3.59 (s, 3H, 8′-OMe), 3.39/3.55 (s, 3H, 8-OMe), 3.35 (m, 1H, H-3′), 2.80/2.81 (m, 1H, H-3′), 2.35 (s, 3H, 2-Me), 1.42/1.47 (s, 3H, 2′-Me); 13C NMR data, see Table 1; HRESIMS m/z 575.1546 [M + H]+ (calcd. for C31H27O11, 575.1548).

Teratopyrone B (2). Yellow amorphous solid; [α] +39.7 (c 0.105, CHCl3); UV (MeOH) λmax (log ε) 202 (4.36), 238 (4.66), 281.5 (4.73), 386 (3.95); ECD (MeOH) [θ] + 1.63×105 (278 nm), −5.70 × 104 (297 nm); 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 14.27/14.25 (s, 1H, 5-OH), 13.19/13.18 (s, 1H, 5′-OH), 6.90/6.85 (br s, 1H, H-9), 6.61 (br s, 2H, H-10, H-7′), 6.54 (s, 1H, H-3′), 6.19/6.17 (d, 1H, J = 2.0, H-9′), 4.00 (s, 3H, 8-OMe), 3.60/3.59 (s, 3H, 8′-OMe), 3.41/3.40 (s, 3H, 6′-OMe), 3.25/3.23 (d, 1H, J = 12.6, H-3′), 2.78/2.79 (d, 1H, J = 12.6, H-3′), 2.55 (s, 3H, 2′-Me), 1.65/1.64/1.69 (s, 3H, 2-Me); 13C NMR data, see Table 1; HRESIMS m/z 575.1543 [M + H]+ (calcd. for C31H27O11, 575.1548).

Teratopyrone C (3). Yellow amorphous powder; [α] +19.3 (c 0.07, CHCl3); UV (MeOH) λmax (log ε) 204 (4.52), 237.5 (4.80), 281 (4.80), 395 (4.03); ECD (MeOH) [θ] +8.82 × 104 (278 nm), −5.14 × 104 (292 nm); 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 14.42 (s, 1H, 5′-OH), 12.89/12.88 (s, 1H, 5-OH), 7.00/7.02 (br s, 1H, H-7), 6.94 (br s, 1H, H-6), 6.50 (s, 1H, H-3), 6.44/6.39 (br s, 1H, H-7′), 5.99/5.95 (br s, 1H, H-9′) 3.91/3.89 (s, 3H, 6′-OMe), 3.55 (s, 3H, 8′-OMe), 3.46/3.53 (s, 3H, 10-OMe), 3.09 (m, 1H, H-3′), 2.86 (m, 1H, H-3′), 2.47 (s, 3H, 2-Me), 1.40/1.78 (s, 3H, 2′-Me); 13C NMR data, see Table 1; HRESIMS m/z 575.1551 [M + H]+ (calcd for C31H27O11, 575.1548).

3.4. Cytotoxicity Assay

A resazurin-based colorimetric (alamarBlue) assay was used for evaluating the cytotoxic activity of metabolites 1–10 against androgen-sensitive human prostate adenocarcinoma (LNCaP), metastatic human prostate adenocarcinoma (PC-3M), human breast (MCF-7), human non-small cell lung (NCI-H460), and human CNS glioma (SF-268) cancer cell lines and normal human lung fibroblast (WI-38) cells as described previously [32]. Doxorubicin and DMSO were used as positive and negative controls, respectively.

4. Conclusions

Ten metabolites, including three new dimeric naphtha-γ-pyrones, teratopyrones A–C (1–3), were isolated from a PDA culture of the endophytic fungus, Teratosphaeria sp. AK1128. This constitutes the second report of the occurrence of secondary metabolites in a fungus of the family Teratosphaeriaceae. The ECD spectra of teratopyrones A–C suggested that all three of them have negative exciton chirality. Cytotoxicity data for nigerasperone A (7) from this and previous studies suggest that it has selective activity for certain cancer cell lines.