| Literature DB >> 33142715 |
Yangyang Cai1,2,3, Jun Yan1,2,3, Li Zhu4, Hengliang Wang4, Ying Lu1,2,3.
Abstract
Hepatitis B is a globally prevalent viral infectious disease caused by the hepatitis B virus (HBV). In this study, an immunochromatographic assay (ICA) for the rapid detection of hepatitis B preS2 antigen (preS2Ag) was established. The magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) indirectly labelled with goat anti-mouse (GAM) secondary antibody were applied as a nanoprobe for free preS2 antibody (preS2Ab) capturing and signal amplification. By employing sample pre-incubation processing as well, preS2Ag-preS2Ab was sufficiently caught by the GAM-MNPs probe in 5 min. A qualitative sensitivity of 625 ng/mL was obtained by naked-eye observation within 15-20 min. A standard curve (0-5000 ng/mL) was established, with a quantitative limit of detection (LOD) of 3.6 ng/mL, based on the stability and penetrability of the magnetic signal characteristics. The proposed method for preS2Ag was rapid (~25 min, cf. ELISA ~4 h) and had a good accuracy, which was verified using an ELISA kit (relative error < 15%). Large equipment and skilled technicians were not required. The sensitivity and specificity of the developed GAM-MNPs-ICA method were 93.3% and 90% in clinical serum samples (n = 25), respectively. A good detection consistency (84%) was observed between the developed ICA method and 2 types of commercial ELISA kits, indicating that the GAM-MNPs-ICA has a potential application in large-scale screening for and point-of-care diagnosis of hepatitis B or other infectious diseases.Entities:
Keywords: hepatitis B; hepatitis B preS2 antigen; immunochromatographic assay; magnetic nanoparticles; rapid detection
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33142715 PMCID: PMC7692799 DOI: 10.3390/bios10110161
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biosensors (Basel) ISSN: 2079-6374
Figure 1Schematic illustration of GAM-MNPs-ICA for preS2Ag detection. (a) Preparation of the GAM-MNP probe using the EDC/NHS method. (b) Pre-incubation of preS2Ag, preS2Ab, and GAM-MNPs. (c) Structure of the test strip. (d) Judgment of the negative and positive results and qualitative and quantitative analysis methods.
Figure 2Characterization of conjugated antigen. (a) UV absorption spectrum. (b) SDS-PAGE. M: Marker; 1: preS2Ag; 2: BSA; 3: preS2Ag-BSA.
Figure 3Optimization of different T-line concentrations with 0, 50, 500, and 5000 ng/mL of preS2Ag. (a) Qualitative results. (b) Quantitative results. The error bars represented the standard deviation of three repeats (n = 3).
Figure 4Optimization of the secondary antibody amount coupled onto the surface of MNPs. The error bars represent the standard deviation of three repeats (n = 3).
Figure 5Qualitative results (a–c) and quantitative results (d) for different concentrations of preS2Ab antibody in sample pre-incubation. The error bars represent the standard deviation of three repeats (n = 3).
Figure 6Detection sensitivity of the GAM-MNPs-ICA for preS2Ag detection. (a) Qualitative detection results. (b) Quantitative standard curve. The error bars represent the standard deviation of three repeats (n = 3).
Figure 7Quantitative results of the specificity analysis. The error bars represent the standard deviation of three repeats (n = 3).
Accuracy validation of GAM-MNPs-ICA using the ELISA kit (n = 3).
| Spiked PreS2Ag Concentrations | GAM-MNPs-ICA | ELISA | Relative Error |
|---|---|---|---|
| PreS2Ag Concentrations | PreS2Ag Concentrations | ||
| 5 | 5.91 ± 1.68 | 5.16 ± 1.34 | 14.4 |
| 50 | 43.04 ± 6.35 | 48.27 ± 4.61 | 10.8 |
| 500 | 456.93 ± 59.76 | 505.64 ± 82.39 | 9.6 |
| 5000 | 4517.44 ± 787.50 | 4551.18 ± 753.04 | 7.4 |
Figure 8Stability evaluation of GAM-MNPs-ICA. The error bars represent the standard deviation of three repeats (n = 3).
Reproducibility evaluation of GAM-MNPs-ICA (n = 6).
| PreS2Ag Concentrations | Intra-Assay | Inter-Assay | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CV | CV | |||
| 0 | 1.000 ± 0.021 | 2.13% | 1.009 ± 0.025 | 2.46% |
| 50 | 0.928 ± 0.031 | 3.39% | 0.953 ± 0.045 | 4.74% |
| 500 | 0.247 ± 0.011 | 4.45% | 0.270 ± 0.030 | 11.29% |
| 5000 | 0.079 ± 0.007 | 9.07% | 0.092 ± 0.012 | 12.72% |
Detection results of the clinical serum sample using GAM-MNPs-ICA and 2 types of ELISA kits (n = 25).
| Serological Marker | Method | Positive Results | Negative Results | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TP | FP | Same Results | TN | FN | Same Results | ||
| PreS2Ag | GAM-MNPs-ICA | 14 | 1 | 12 | 9 | 1 | 9 |
| ELISA Kit 1 | 13 | 0 | 10 | 2 | |||
| HBsAg | ELISA Kit 2 | 15 | 0 | 10 | 0 | ||
Comparison of immunosensors for the quantitative detection of HBV serologic markers.
| Target | Method | Label Material | LOD | Detection Time | Quantitative Method | Sample | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HBsAg | ICA | Au@Pt/blue SiNPs | 0.13 ng/mL | 15 min | Camera/Image J | Spiked FCS | [ |
| ICA | Ultramarine blue particles | 0.37 ng/mL | 15 min | Camera/Image J | Spiked FCS | [ | |
| ICA | Red SiNPs | 0.97 ng/mL | 10 min | Camera/Image J | Spiked FCS | [ | |
| ICA | MNPs | 1 ng/mL | 20 min | Immuno-chromato Reader | Spiked PBS buffer with 1% BSA | [ | |
| ICA | Quantum dots | 0.075 ng/mL | 15 min | Fluorescence strip reader | Human serum | [ | |
| ECA | SPCE | 2.1 ng/mL | 25 min | EIS | Spiked acetate buffer | [ | |
| HBcAg | Hydrogel-based | Hydrogel based on PAAc | 0.6 mg/mL | 1 h | QCM | Spiked rabbit serum | [ |
| PreS1Ag | ECA | AuNPs modified glassy carbon electrode | 0.1 pM | 80 min | Electrochemical analyser | Human serum | [ |
| PreS2Ag | ICA | MNPs | 3.6 ng/mL | 25 min | Magnetic assay reader | Human serum | This work |
Abbreviations: FCS: fetal calf serum; ECA: electrochemical assay; SPCE: screen-printed carbon electrode; EIS: electrochemical impedance spectroscopy; QCM: quartz crystal microbalance; PAAc: poly (acrylic acid).