Caitlin G Howe1,2, Birgit Claus Henn3, Sandrah P Eckel2, Shohreh F Farzan2, Brendan H Grubbs4, Thomas A Chavez2, Tahlia L Hodes2, Dema Faham2, Laila Al-Marayati4,5, Deborah Lerner5, Alyssa Quimby4,6, Sara Twogood4,6, Michael J Richards7, John D Meeker8, Theresa M Bastain2, Carrie V Breton2. 1. Department of Epidemiology, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA. 2. Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA. 3. Department of Environmental Health, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 4. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, USA. 5. Eisner Health, Los Angeles, California, USA. 6. Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA. 7. NSF International, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA. 8. Department of Environmental Health Sciences, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Reduced fetal growth increases the risk for adverse health outcomes. Growing evidence suggests that metal exposures contribute to reduced fetal growth, but little is known about the effects of complex metal mixtures. OBJECTIVES: We investigated the impact of a complex mixture of metals on birth weight for gestational age (BW for GA) in the Maternal and Developmental Risks from Environmental and Social Stressors study, a predominately lower-income Hispanic pregnancy cohort in Los Angeles, California. METHODS: Cadmium (Cd), cobalt (Co), mercury (Hg), nickel (Ni), molybdenum (Mo), lead (Pb), antimony (Sb), tin (Sn), and thallium (Tl) were measured by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) in maternal urine samples collected in early pregnancy (median GA: 13.1 wk). Speciated urinary arsenic (As) (inorganic+monomethyl+dimethyl As) was measured by high-performance liquid chromatography coupled to ICP-MS. Primary analyses focused on a mixture of seven metals that have previously been associated individually with fetal growth (i.e., As, Cd, Co, Hg, Ni, Pb, Tl) (n=262). In exploratory analyses, we additionally examined three metals that have been less studied in relation to fetal growth (i.e., Mo, Sb, Sn). Covariate-adjusted Bayesian kernel machine regression was used to investigate metal mixture associations with BW for GA z-scores. RESULTS: In primary analyses, Hg and Ni ranked highest as predictors of BW for GA. An inverse linear association was estimated for Hg, whereas a positive association was estimated for Ni at low-to-moderate concentrations. A potential interaction between Hg and Ni was also identified. In our exploratory analysis, Sb ranked highest as a predictor of BW for GA, followed by Hg and Ni. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that in this understudied population, Hg may reduce fetal growth, whereas Ni may promote fetal growth. We also identified Sb as a potential metal of concern for this population, which merits additional investigation. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP7201.
BACKGROUND: Reduced fetal growth increases the risk for adverse health outcomes. Growing evidence suggests that metal exposures contribute to reduced fetal growth, but little is known about the effects of complex metal mixtures. OBJECTIVES: We investigated the impact of a complex mixture of metals on birth weight for gestational age (BW for GA) in the Maternal and Developmental Risks from Environmental and Social Stressors study, a predominately lower-income Hispanic pregnancy cohort in Los Angeles, California. METHODS:Cadmium (Cd), cobalt (Co), mercury (Hg), nickel (Ni), molybdenum (Mo), lead (Pb), antimony (Sb), tin (Sn), and thallium (Tl) were measured by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) in maternal urine samples collected in early pregnancy (median GA: 13.1 wk). Speciated urinary arsenic (As) (inorganic+monomethyl+dimethyl As) was measured by high-performance liquid chromatography coupled to ICP-MS. Primary analyses focused on a mixture of seven metals that have previously been associated individually with fetal growth (i.e., As, Cd, Co, Hg, Ni, Pb, Tl) (n=262). In exploratory analyses, we additionally examined three metals that have been less studied in relation to fetal growth (i.e., Mo, Sb, Sn). Covariate-adjusted Bayesian kernel machine regression was used to investigate metal mixture associations with BW for GA z-scores. RESULTS: In primary analyses, Hg and Ni ranked highest as predictors of BW for GA. An inverse linear association was estimated for Hg, whereas a positive association was estimated for Ni at low-to-moderate concentrations. A potential interaction between Hg and Ni was also identified. In our exploratory analysis, Sb ranked highest as a predictor of BW for GA, followed by Hg and Ni. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that in this understudied population, Hg may reduce fetal growth, whereas Ni may promote fetal growth. We also identified Sbas a potential metal of concern for this population, which merits additional investigation. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP7201.
Birth weight (BW) is an indicator of cumulative fetal growth that has been closely related to health risk later in life (Barker and Thornburg 2013). Rates of low BW have been increasing in the United States (Martin et al. 2018; Womack et al. 2018). This may have important consequences for public health given that low BW is an established risk factor for a diverse number of adverse health outcomes, including morbidity and mortality in infancy (McCormick 1985), cognitive deficits (Oudgenoeg-Paz et al. 2017), and cardiovascular disease and metabolic syndrome in adulthood (Visentin et al. 2014). Fetal growth is impacted by a variety of maternal and environmental factors, such as maternal age, diet, and in utero tobacco smoke exposure (Nardozza et al. 2017), and a growing body of evidence indicates that prenatal exposure to toxic metals and metalloids (hereafter referred to collectively as metals), including arsenic (As), cadmium (Cd), mercury (Hg), lead (Pb), and thallium (Tl), also contributes to reduced fetal growth (Ballester et al. 2018; Hoffman 2000; Khoshhali et al. 2020; Kim et al. 2017; Kippler et al. 2010, 2012; Mikelson et al. 2019; Milton et al. 2017; Rabito et al. 2014; Ramón et al. 2009a; Rodosthenous et al. 2017; Thomas et al. 2015; Vejrup et al. 2014; Vigeh et al. 2018; Xia et al. 2016). In contrast, essential trace elements are important for normal fetal growth and development. For example, cobalt (Co) is a component of vitamin B12 that has been associated with higher BW (Mikelson et al. 2019). In addition, some metals, such asnickel (Ni) exhibit both toxic and nutritional properties (Nielsen 2012), and both adverse and protective effects have been reported in relation to fetal growth (Cabrera-Rodríguez et al. 2018; Deyssenroth et al. 2018; Jalali and Koski 2018; Pedersen et al. 2016; Sun et al. 2018; Vaktskjold et al. 2007).Although humans are typically exposed to a mixture of toxic and essential elements, most studies have evaluated metals individually in relation to fetal growth. Yet, in combination, certain metals may exert toxic effects even at relatively low levels of exposure owing to synergistic effects (Claus Henn et al. 2014), whereas other metals may act antagonistically by inhibiting each other’s absorption or tissue uptake (Davidson et al. 2015). Although several recent studies have begun examining simple mixtures (e.g., three elements) in relation to fetal growth (Cabrera-Rodríguez et al. 2018; Cassidy-Bushrow et al. 2019; Signes-Pastor et al. 2019), few studies have considered complex mixtures (Deyssenroth et al. 2018; Govarts et al. 2016), which are more representative of human exposures. This has been particularly understudied in minority populations in the United States. The objective of the present study was, therefore, to investigate the impact of early pregnancy exposure to a complex mixture of metals on fetal growth in a cohort of predominately lower-income Hispanic mother–newborn pairs in urban Los Angeles.
Methods
Study Population
The Maternal and Developmental Risks from Environmental and Social Stressors (MADRES) study is an ongoing, prospective pregnancy cohort, which began in November 2015 and has been described previously (Bastain et al. 2019). Briefly, participants are recruited from four prenatal care providers in Los Angeles, California, including two community health clinics, one county hospital prenatal clinic, and one private obstetrics and gynecology practice. A small number of participants are also recruited through self-referral from community meetings and local advertisements. Most of the participating clinics serve predominately lower-income Hispanic populations. Women are eligible to participate in the MADRES study if their pregnancy is at of gestation at the time of recruitment, they are , and they can speak either English or Spanish fluently. Exclusion criteria included the following: a) human immunodeficiency virus–positive status; b) having a physical, mental, or cognitive disability that would prevent participation in the study or the ability to provide informed consent; c) current incarceration; and d) multiple gestation. Informed consent was obtained from each participant at study entry, and the study was approved by the University of Southern California’s Institutional Review Board.Given evidence that fetal growth trajectories are largely determined by conditions in early pregnancy (Bloomfield et al. 2006) and evidence that early pregnancy may be a particularly sensitive window for metals exposures (Cheng et al. 2017; Rabito et al. 2014; Vigeh et al. 2018), the present study focused on participants who enrolled before 20 wk of gestation and provided a urine sample at their first study visit. We restricted our analyses to 262 participants who a) enrolled prior to urine metals analysis (fall 2019); b) had not withdrawn from the study; and c) had complete covariate information. Overall, this subset of 262 participants was similar to all MADRES study participants who enrolled prior to fall 2019 at of gestation although these participants were slightly older and there was a larger percentage of foreign-born Hispanic and a smaller percentage of non-Hispanic black participants (Table S1).
Urine Collection
Spot urine samples were collected by participants during their first study visit [median gestational age (GA): 13.1 wk] in a sterile specimen container. Samples were transported on ice to the laboratory within 1 h. One and one-half–milliliter aliquots were then stored at in sterile cryovials (VWR).
Urine Metals
Urine metals analysis was performed by NSF International in collaboration with the Children’s Health Exposure Analysis Resource (CHEAR). Metals were measured using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) based on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention method 3018.3, with modifications for the expanded metals panel and the Thermo Scientific iCAP™ RQ instrument (serial number RQ0029). The elements measured for this panel include the following: antimony (Sb), As, barium, beryllium, Cd, cesium, Co, copper, chromium, Hg, manganese, molybdenum (Mo), Ni, Pb, platinum, tin (Sn), Tl, tungsten, uranium, vanadium, and zinc. All quality control samples, blanks, and urine samples were diluted 10-fold in a diluent consisting of 2% nitric acid () solution containing the internal standards and gold. Standards were prepared in 1% trace metal–grade and diluted 10-fold with a diluent consisting of 2% solution containing the internal standards in order to minimize any matrix effect. The rinse solution for the instrument was 1% trace metal–grade . The samples were analyzed in two analysis modes: a) standard (default) for the majority of metals, and b) kinetic energy discrimination for vanadium, chromium, As, Mo, and Cd. Percentages of coefficient of variation were between 0.8% and 7.0% for all elements. Five field blanks were sent out for testing, and 96% of measures were below the limits of detection (LODs).For our primary analysis, we restricted to metals a) that were above the LOD for of participants and b) for which urine is considered an accepted matrix for assessing exposure (ATSDR 1992; Chou et al. 2007; Faroon et al. 2004, 2012; Fay and Ingerman 2005; Risher and DeWoskin 1999). Our primary analysis was further restricted to metals for which there was evidence that they may impact fetal growth (Cabrera-Rodríguez et al. 2018; Deyssenroth et al. 2018; Hoffman 2000; Jalali and Koski 2018; Khoshhali et al. 2020; Kim et al. 2017; Mikelson et al. 2019; Milton et al. 2017; Pedersen et al. 2016; Rabito et al. 2014; Rodosthenous et al. 2017; Sun et al. 2018; Vaktskjold et al. 2007; Vejrup et al. 2014; Vigeh et al. 2018). Six metals (As, Cd, Co, Hg, Ni, Tl) met all three criteria. We also included Pb in our primary analysis given its established toxicity, even though blood is the preferred matrix for exposure assessment (Sommar et al. 2014). In exploratory analyses, we included three additional metals that met the first two criteria: Mo, Sb, and Sn but that have been less studied in relation to fetal growth. Importantly, the As measure from the CHEAR metals panel is total As, which is composed of many different As species and metabolites, including arsenobetaine (AsB), which is a nontoxic form of As derived from fish and seafood (Tseng 2009). Therefore, we replaced the total As measure from this panel with total speciated urinary As data, as described in more detail in the next section. The number (percentage) of samples below the LOD for the elements retained from the metals panel were as follows: Cd: 85 (32.4%), Co: 3 (1.1%), Hg: 3 (1.1%), Mo: 2 (0.8%), Ni: 33 (12.6%), Pb: 46 (17.6%), Sb: 88 (33.6%), Sn: 36 (13.7%), and Tl: 65 (24.8%). Values below the LOD were replaced with the LOD divided by the square root of 2 given that this method has been recommended for measures that are not highly skewed (geometric standard deviations ) (Hornung and Reed 1990).
Speciated Urinary As
Speciated urinary As was measured by the Arizona Laboratory for Emerging Contaminants (Michel‐Ramirez et al. 2020), using methods previously described by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (Branch and Jones 2004). Briefly, arsenite (), arsenate (), monomethyl arsenic (MMA), dimethyl arsenic (DMA), and AsB were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography, using the Hamilton PRP-X100 column, coupled to ICP-MS. Working calibration standards were prepared daily for each As species at concentrations ranging from 0.2 to . For quality control, a mid-range calibration check sample was prepared using mixed species standard. For each batch of 30 samples, at least 3 samples were spiked with a low-to-mid–range standard to monitor As recovery for each species. Evaluation of recovery was calculated by comparing the sum of the individual species to the reported total As measure. Measures were considered acceptable if they were within of the total As concentration. LODs across four analytical runs ranged from 0.011 to for , 0.020 to for , 0.020 to for MMA, and 0.014 to for DMA. Values below the LOD were set to the LOD divided by the square root of 2. Total speciated urinary arsenic (i.e., excluding AsB) was calculated by summing the inorganic As metabolites (), MMA, and DMA. This variable was used as the primary As measure for all statistical analyses.
Specific Gravity
Urine specific gravity (SG) was measured by a refractometer (Itago), and urinary metal concentrations were adjusted for SG to account for urine dilution using the following formula: , where , , and (Boeniger et al. 1993).
BW for GA -Scores
To evaluate fetal growth, we calculated sex-specific BW for GA z-scores using a representative U.S. reference (Aris et al. 2019). This reference was selected because it uses obstetric estimates of GA at birth and was updated recently, reflecting current trends in obesity and gestational diabetes, which can impact fetal growth (Aris et al. 2019). BW measures were abstracted from medical records. If this information was missing (), BW values were filled in using proxy-reported information obtained from the mothers. Best estimates of GA at birth were ascertained using a hierarchy of methods. A first-trimester ( GA) ultrasound measurement of crown–rump length was considered the most preferred and was used if available (). If unavailable, a second-trimester ( GA) ultrasound measurement of fetal biparietal diameter was used (). If measures from an early ultrasound were unavailable, GA at birth was determined based on the physician’s best clinical estimate, abstracted from the medical records (). If none of these measures were available, GA at birth was estimated using self-reported last menstrual period dating ().
Covariates
Questionnaires were administered in either English or Spanish, depending on the participant’s preferred language. Maternal self-reported prepregnancy weight, race, ethnicity, and birth country were determined from a questionnaire that was administered during the first study visit. In this questionnaire, participants were also asked if they resided with a smoker during their pregnancy. In questionnaires administered during their first, second, and third trimesters, participants were additionally asked if they had ever smoked during the pregnancy. Maternal standing height was measured twice by stadiometer (Perspectives Enterprises; Model PE-AIM-101). Maternal prepregnancy body mass index (BMI) was calculated using the self-reported prepregnancy weight and measured height values (in kilograms per meter squared). Each participant’s age was determined using the date that she consented and her birth date. A combined variable indicating race by ethnicity and birth place was created based on the participant’s self-reported race (white, Asian, black or African American, Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander, American Indian or Alaska Native, more than one race), ethnicity (Hispanic vs. non-Hispanic), and birth country (United States vs. other). This variable was collapsed into five categories: non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic black, non-Hispanic other, Hispanic born in the United States, and Hispanic born outside the United States. A combined variable was also created for any smoke exposure during the pregnancy that was based on any self-reported maternal smoking during the pregnancy or the participant sharing a residence with a smoker during the pregnancy. Information on newborn sex was abstracted from medical records. If this information was missing from the maternal medical records, it was filled in using reports from a questionnaire administered to the mothers 7–14 d after birth. Maternal hemoglobin and hematocrit measures were also abstracted from medical records for the pregnancy period. Using GA-specific cutoffs for these measures (ACOG 2008), participants were classified as ever vs. never being anemic during the pregnancy.
Statistical Analyses
Statistical analyses were conducted in R (version 3.6.2; R Development Core Team). A priori, we hypothesized that toxic (e.g., As, Cd, Hg, Pb, Tl) and essential (e.g., Co) elements would act in opposing directions and further hypothesized that associations between essential/nutritional elements (e.g., Co, Ni) and BW for GA would be nonlinear. Therefore, we used Bayesian kernel machine regression (BKMR) (Bobb et al. 2015) as our primary mixture modeling approach because it is a flexible method that does not constrain associations to a single direction, accommodates nonlinear associations between exposures and outcomes, and evaluates all possible synergistic and antagonistic relationships between mixture components without specifying these a priori. Using the bkmr R package (Bobb et al. 2018), we chose the variable selection option and ran 200,000 Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) iterations using the default priors. The first half of iterations was used as burn-in. To reduce potential autocorrelation, we thinned the chains, selecting every 25th iteration. Model convergence was inspected using trace plots.For the primary analysis, we used a hypothesis-driven approach and collectively evaluated the seven selected urinary elements (As, Cd, Co, Hg, Ni, Pb, Tl) in relation to BW for GA z-scores, using the following model: , where function represents the exposure–response function using the Gaussian kernel machine representation, the coefficient represents effect estimates for the Cth covariate for the ith individual, and represents the model residuals. Metals were generally right-skewed and were, therefore, to reduce the influence of extreme values. In an exploratory analysis, we ran a similar BKMR model that included three additional metals that have been less studied in relation to fetal growth: Mo, Sb, and Sn. Three participants had unusually low urinary Mo concentrations () and were, therefore, excluded from the exploratory analysis. We also identified two extreme high outliers for urinary Sb () (Rosner 1983), who were also excluded. Hypothesized confounders and precision variables were identified using a directed acyclic graph (Figure S1) (Shrier and Platt 2008). Final models were adjusted for recruitment site, maternal age, prepregnancy BMI, race by ethnicity and birth place, any maternal anemia in pregnancy, any smoke exposure (maternal or other) in pregnancy, and urinary AsB [an objective biomarker of fish and seafood consumption (Navas-Acien et al. 2011)]. Because urinary AsB was right-skewed, it was to reduce the influence of extreme values. Given that the BW for GA z-scores were generated separately for male and female infants, infant sex was not included as a covariate in the model. We also examined whether results were sensitive to additional adjustment for the GA at urine collection. All metals and continuous covariates were centered and scaled. Metals that ranked highly based on their BKMR posterior inclusion probabilities (PIPs) were further investigated using generalized additive models (GAMs), using the mgcv R package (version 1.8-31; R Development Core Team) (Wood 2015). We also used GAMs to determine whether associations from the primary model were robust after a) excluding extreme metal outliers [identified by Rosner’s test (Rosner 1983)] and b) adjusting for SG as a covariate as an alternative approach to account for urine dilution.Although BKMR can identify potential interactions between pairs of mixture components, it does not generate PIPs for these interactions. Therefore, we also investigated possible synergistic and antagonistic relationships between the seven elements by applying a new method (Antonelli et al. 2020) that uses Bayesian semiparametric regression and sparsity-inducing priors to generate PIPs for interactions in addition to main effects. To conduct this analysis, we used the NLinteraction R package, specifying 200,000 MCMC iterations (half of which were removed for burn-in) and using the default options (Antonelli et al. 2020). For this method, the exposure–response relationships are modeled using natural cubic splines; 2 degrees of freedom were selected for these splines based on the Watanabe-Akaike information criterion (Antonelli et al. 2020).Given that both BKMR and NLinteraction are sensitive to the choice of model priors, we conducted sensitivity analyses for each approach. For BKMR, we compared results after varying the parameter , which controls the smoothness of the exposure–outcome relationships. We investigated both a lower () and higher () degree of smoothness. For NLinteraction, we examined the impact of varying the threshold parameter , which influences the likelihood of an exposure being included in the function, from the default of 0.10 to a less conservative value of 0.25. We also evaluated the NLinteraction results after manually changing the parameter, which controls the variance for the slab component of the prior, instead of estimating this parameter using the default empirical Bayes approach (Antonelli et al. 2020); we compared both a small (0.005) and larger (1) value for .
Results
Participant Characteristics
Characteristics of participants in the present study are shown side by side with all MADRES study participants who enrolled prior to fall 2019 at of gestation and the subset of participants who were excluded from this study (Table S1). Participants in the present study were between 18 and 45 years of age at study enrollment. The median (range) prepregnancy BMI was . The majority of participants were Hispanic (44.3% Hispanic and born outside the United States, 34.4% Hispanic and born in the United States). Approximately 33% of the participants experienced anemia during their pregnancy, and 8.0% reported either smoking during their pregnancy or residing with a smoker. Urinary AsB concentrations ranged from to with a median of . Urinary metal concentrations are shown in Table 1, and Pearson correlations between metals are shown in Figure 1. The majority of metals were positively correlated with each other, and the strongest positive correlation was between Co and Ni (, ). However, Co and Hg were significantly inversely correlated with each other (, ), as were Ni and Hg (, ).
Table 1
Specific gravity-adjusted urinary metal concentrations ().
Metals
Minimum
25th percentile
Median
75th percentile
Maximum
Metals included in primary analysis
As (μg/L)
1.09
4.50
5.81
8.09
325.97
Cd (μg/L)
<LOD
<LOD
0.14
0.26
1.07
Co (μg/L)
<LOD
0.39
0.59
0.98
7.51
Hg (μg/L)
<LOD
0.62
1.02
2.12
16.10
Ni (μg/L)
<LOD
1.94
2.88
4.38
34.91
Pb (μg/L)
<LOD
0.50
1.59
3.69
37.89
Tl (μg/L)
<LOD
0.03
0.07
0.14
0.59
Metals additionally evaluated in exploratory analysisb
Values below the LOD were imputed to the LOD divided by the square root of 2 for all statistical analyses.
.
Figure 1.
Pearson correlations between urinary metals (). Stronger correlations are indicated by darker shades and larger circles. *, . See Table S7 for corresponding numeric data. Note: As, arsenic; Cd, cadmium; Co, cobalt; Hg, mercury; Ni, nickel; Pb, lead; Tl, thallium.
Specific gravity-adjusted urinary metal concentrations ().Note: As, arsenic; Cd, cadmium; Co, cobalt; Hg, mercury; LOD, limit of detection; Mo, molybdenum; Ni, nickel; Pb, lead; Sb, antimony; Sn, tin; Tl, thallium.Values below the LOD were imputed to the LOD divided by the square root of 2 for all statistical analyses..Pearson correlations between urinary metals (). Stronger correlations are indicated by darker shades and larger circles. *, . See Table S7 for corresponding numeric data. Note: As, arsenic; Cd, cadmium; Co, cobalt; Hg, mercury; Ni, nickel; Pb, lead; Tl, thallium.
Primary Analysis
Using BKMR, Hg was estimated to have the highest PIP followed by Ni (Table 2). When setting all other metals to their median, a linear inverse association was estimated between urinary Hg and BW for GA (Figure 2), such that an increase from the 25th to 75th percentile was associated with a [95% credible interval (CI): , 0.09] standard deviation (SD) difference in BW for GA. Varying Ni from its 25th to 75th percentile was associated with a 0.10 (95% CI: , 0.35) SD difference in BW for GA (Figure 2). Visually, the Ni association with BW for GA appeared potentially nonlinear, with a positive association estimated at low-to-moderate concentrations only. However, the CIs were very wide at high levels of Ni, likely due to the small number of participants represented. For Hg and Ni, the estimates obtained after varying the smoothing parameter were very similar to those obtained using the default specifications (Figure S2). Although less pronounced, BKMR also identified inverse associations between both Pb and Tl with BW for GA, and a weak positive association for Co (Figure 2). The association between Cd and BW for GA appeared null, and a very weak inverted U-shaped relationship was estimated between As and BW for GA (Figure 2). Estimates for all metals obtained from the primary model were similar to those obtained by a model that additionally adjusted for the GA at urine collection (Figure S3).
Table 2
Individual metal posterior inclusion probabilities.
Metal
Primary analysis
Exploratory analysis
PIP
PIP
As
0.30
0.39
Cd
0.28
0.35
Co
0.31
0.38
Hg
0.40a
0.46a
Ni
0.35a
0.46a
Pb
0.29
0.41
Tl
0.29
0.38
Mo
—
0.41
Sb
—
0.58a
Sn
—
0.45
Note: PIPs from a Bayesian kernel machine regression model, which was adjusted for maternal age, prepregnancy BMI, recruitment site, race by ethnicity and birth place, any maternal anemia in pregnancy, tobacco smoke exposure in pregnancy, and urinary arsenobetaine. Metals and urinary arsenobetaine were . Metals and all continuous covariates were also centered and scaled. —, not applicable; As, arsenic; BMI, body mass index; Cd, cadmium; Co, cobalt; Hg, mercury; Mo, molybdenum; Ni, nickel; Pb, lead; PIP, posterior inclusion probability; Sb, antimony; Sn, tin; Tl, thallium.
The highest-ranking elements for each model.
Figure 2.
Univariate exposure–response functions for primary analysis (). Associations between each metal and BW for GA z-score (with corresponding 95% credible intervals) are shown setting all other metals to their median, adjusting for maternal age, prepregnancy BMI, recruitment site, race by ethnicity and birth place, any maternal anemia in pregnancy, tobacco smoke exposure in pregnancy, and urinary arsenobetaine (AsB). A rug plot showing the distribution of the specified metal is shown along the x-axis of each panel. Metals and urinary AsB were . Metals and all continuous covariates were also centered and scaled. Note: As, arsenic; BMI, body mass index; BW, birth weight; Cd, cadmium; Co, cobalt; GA, gestational age; Hg, mercury; Ni, nickel; Pb, lead; Tl, thallium.
Individual metal posterior inclusion probabilities.Note: PIPs from a Bayesian kernel machine regression model, which was adjusted for maternal age, prepregnancy BMI, recruitment site, race by ethnicity and birth place, any maternal anemia in pregnancy, tobacco smoke exposure in pregnancy, and urinary arsenobetaine. Metals and urinary arsenobetaine were . Metals and all continuous covariates were also centered and scaled. —, not applicable; As, arsenic; BMI, body mass index; Cd, cadmium; Co, cobalt; Hg, mercury; Mo, molybdenum; Ni, nickel; Pb, lead; PIP, posterior inclusion probability; Sb, antimony; Sn, tin; Tl, thallium.The highest-ranking elements for each model.Univariate exposure–response functions for primary analysis (). Associations between each metal and BW for GA z-score (with corresponding 95% credible intervals) are shown setting all other metals to their median, adjusting for maternal age, prepregnancy BMI, recruitment site, race by ethnicity and birth place, any maternal anemia in pregnancy, tobacco smoke exposure in pregnancy, and urinary arsenobetaine (AsB). A rug plot showing the distribution of the specified metal is shown along the x-axis of each panel. Metals and urinary AsB were . Metals and all continuous covariates were also centered and scaled. Note: As, arsenic; BMI, body mass index; BW, birth weight; Cd, cadmium; Co, cobalt; GA, gestational age; Hg, mercury; Ni, nickel; Pb, lead; Tl, thallium.Several potential interactions between pairs of metals were identified visually using BKMR (Figure 3). The positive association between Ni and BW for GA appeared to be attenuated at higher levels of Hg and Tl. In contrast, the inverse association between Hg and BW for GA appeared stronger at higher levels of Ni. In addition, the inverted U-shaped relationship between As and BW for GA varied by levels of Hg and Tl. For As concentrations below the inflection point, the positive association between As and BW for GA appeared stronger at lower quantiles of Hg and Tl. For As concentrations above the inflection point, the inverse association between As and BW for GA was stronger at higher quantiles of Hg and Tl. We also estimated a positive association for Cd at lower levels of Pb and Tl, a more pronounced inverse association for Pb and BW for GA at higher levels of Cd or lower levels of Hg or Ni and a stronger inverse association for Tl at higher levels of all metals except Co (Figure 3).
Figure 3.
Bivariate exposure–response functions for primary analysis (). Associations between each element (columns) and BW for GA z-score, setting a second element (rows) to its 25th, 50th, and 75th percentile and all other elements to their median, adjusting for maternal age, prepregnancy BMI, recruitment site, race by ethnicity and birth place, any maternal anemia in pregnancy, tobacco smoke exposure in pregnancy, and urinary arsenobetaine (AsB). Metals and urinary AsB were . Metals and all continuous covariates were also centered and scaled. Note: As, arsenic; BMI, body mass index; BW, birth weight; Cd, cadmium; Co, cobalt; GA, gestational age; Hg, mercury; Ni, nickel; Pb, lead; Tl, thallium.
Bivariate exposure–response functions for primary analysis (). Associations between each element (columns) and BW for GA z-score, setting a second element (rows) to its 25th, 50th, and 75th percentile and all other elements to their median, adjusting for maternal age, prepregnancy BMI, recruitment site, race by ethnicity and birth place, any maternal anemia in pregnancy, tobacco smoke exposure in pregnancy, and urinary arsenobetaine (AsB). Metals and urinary AsB were . Metals and all continuous covariates were also centered and scaled. Note: As, arsenic; BMI, body mass index; BW, birth weight; Cd, cadmium; Co, cobalt; GA, gestational age; Hg, mercury; Ni, nickel; Pb, lead; Tl, thallium.Using the novel NLinteraction method (Antonelli et al. 2020), we additionally estimated PIPs for pairwise interactions between element pairs. The interaction between Hg and Ni ranked highest of all possible metal pairs (Table S2). However, the PIPs for all pairwise interactions were very small. Compared with BKMR, the individual metalPIPs were also small when using the NLinteraction method, although the metal rankings were consistent across methods (Table S3). The individual metalPIPs and pairwise interaction PIPs were larger after increasing the NLinteraction threshold parameter from the default value of 0.10 to a less conservative value of 0.25 (Tables S3 and S4). However, metal rankings were similar, with Hg and Ni ranking highest both for their main effects and pairwise interaction. The individual metalPIPs and pairwise interaction PIPs also increased after setting to a very small value (0.005), instead of estimating this parameter using the default empirical Bayes approach (Table S3 and S5), but the metal rankings remained similar. In contrast, all PIPs approached 0 when manually setting this parameter to a higher value () (Tables S3 and S6).Given that a) the PIPs estimated for Hg and Ni ranked highest both when using BKMR and NLinteraction and b) the PIP for the interaction between Hg and Ni ranked highest of all possible pairwise interactions when using NLinteraction, we used GAMs to further investigate their associations with BW for GA. Similar to BKMR, GAMs estimated an inverse linear association between urinary Hg and BW for GA (approximate ) (Figure S4). They also estimated a positive association between urinary Ni and BW for GA at low-to-moderate concentrations (approximate ), with a wide degree of uncertainty at the high end of exposure owing to few participants falling in this range (Figure S5). Similar to the BKMR results, the inverse association between Hg and BW for GA appeared stronger among individuals with higher levels of Ni (Figure S4), and the positive association for Ni and BW for GA appeared to be attenuated in a dose-dependent manner with increasing levels of Hg (Figure S5) (approximate for tensor product smooth term for Hg and Ni ). On the log-scale, no extreme values were identified for urinary Hg using Rosner’s test. However, one extreme high value was identified for urinary Ni (). Results were similar after excluding this extreme outlier (Figures S4 and S5) and also after adjusting for SG as a covariate to account for urine dilution instead of applying an SG correction directly to the metal concentrations (Figures S6 and S7). However, in both sets of sensitivity analyses, the Ni–fetal growth relationship appeared linear across the full range of urinary Ni concentrations (Figures S5 and S7).
Exploratory Analysis
In an exploratory analysis that examined a larger mixture of metals, Sb ranked highest as a predictor of BW for GA, followed by Hg and Ni (Table 2). An inverse association was estimated between Sb and BW for GA at moderate-to-high concentrations (Figure 4). Results for Hg and Ni were consistent with the primary model (Figure 4). Although Sn did not rank as highly as these metals, an inverse and linear association was estimated with BW for GA (Figure 4). A very weak inverted U-shape association was identified for Mo and BW for GA (Figure 4).
Figure 4.
Univariate exposure–response functions for exploratory analysis (). Associations between each metal and BW for GA z-score (with corresponding 95% credible intervals) are shown setting all other metals to their median, adjusting for maternal age, prepregnancy BMI, recruitment site, race by ethnicity and birth place, any maternal anemia in pregnancy, tobacco smoke exposure in pregnancy, and urinary arsenobetaine (AsB). A rug plot showing the distribution of the specified metal is shown along the x-axis of each panel. Metals and urinary AsB were . Metals and all continuous covariates were also centered and scaled. Note: As, arsenic; BMI, body mass index; BW, birth weight; Cd, cadmium; Co, cobalt; GA, gestational age; Hg, mercury; Mo, molybdenum; Ni, nickel; Pb, lead; Sb, antimony; Sn, tin; Tl, thallium.
Univariate exposure–response functions for exploratory analysis (). Associations between each metal and BW for GA z-score (with corresponding 95% credible intervals) are shown setting all other metals to their median, adjusting for maternal age, prepregnancy BMI, recruitment site, race by ethnicity and birth place, any maternal anemia in pregnancy, tobacco smoke exposure in pregnancy, and urinary arsenobetaine (AsB). A rug plot showing the distribution of the specified metal is shown along the x-axis of each panel. Metals and urinary AsB were . Metals and all continuous covariates were also centered and scaled. Note: As, arsenic; BMI, body mass index; BW, birth weight; Cd, cadmium; Co, cobalt; GA, gestational age; Hg, mercury; Mo, molybdenum; Ni, nickel; Pb, lead; Sb, antimony; Sn, tin; Tl, thallium.
Discussion
Growing evidence suggests that toxic metal exposures adversely affect fetal growth (Ballester et al. 2018; Cabrera-Rodríguez et al. 2018; Deyssenroth et al. 2018; Hoffman 2000; Jalali and Koski 2018; Khoshhali et al. 2020; Kim et al. 2017; Kippler et al. 2010; Mikelson et al. 2019; Milton et al. 2017; Nielsen 2012; Pedersen et al. 2016; Rabito et al. 2014; Ramón et al. 2009a; Rodosthenous et al. 2017; Sun et al. 2018; Thomas et al. 2015; Vaktskjold et al. 2007; Vejrup et al. 2014; Vigeh et al. 2018), but the majority of studies have focused on individual metals. Because metals may behave differently in the presence of metalco-exposures owing to synergistic or antagonistic relationships (Claus Henn et al. 2014; Davidson et al. 2015), studies have begun investigating metal mixture impacts on fetal growth (Cabrera-Rodríguez et al. 2018; Cassidy-Bushrow et al. 2019; Deyssenroth et al. 2018; Govarts et al. 2016; Signes-Pastor et al. 2019). Using a novel mixture modeling method that can account for possible nonlinear relationships and interactions between mixture components (Bobb et al. 2015), we examined the impact of a complex mixture of seven elements on BW for GA. In our primary analysis, we focused on seven elements, selected based on prior evidence that they may influence fetal growth, and identified Hg and Ni as the highest-ranking predictors of BW for GA. Setting other metals to their median, an inverse linear association was estimated for Hg and BW for GA and a positive association was estimated for Ni at low-to-moderate concentrations. In an exploratory analysis that evaluated a larger panel of metals, Sb ranked highest as a predictor of BW for GA; an inverse linear association was estimated.Our findings for Hg are consistent with several previous studies that also reported inverse associations between Hg exposure and fetal growth (Ballester et al. 2018; Kim et al. 2017; Ou et al. 2015; Ramón et al. 2009a; Thomas et al. 2015; Vigeh et al. 2018). Although findings from previous studies on Ni and fetal growth have been mixed (Cabrera-Rodríguez et al. 2018; Deyssenroth et al. 2018; Jalali and Koski 2018; Sun et al. 2018; Vaktskjold et al. 2007), several studies have similarly reported that Ni may promote fetal growth, exhibited by greater increases in fetal head circumference (Jalali and Koski 2018) or a reduced odds of being small for GA (Deyssenroth et al. 2018; Vaktskjold et al. 2007). Ni is not an essential element, but it does have nutritional properties that may promote fetal growth (Nielsen 2012). For example, studies in both animal models (Stangl et al. 2000) and humans (Katko et al. 2008) have demonstrated that Ni supplementation can reverse vitamin B12deficiency and hyperhomocysteinemia, which are risk factors for low BW and fetal growth restriction (Hogeveen et al. 2012; McGee et al. 2018). Although the magnitudes of the associations for Hg and Ni were small, they were similar to effect estimates previously reported for other metals and BW for GA (Claus Henn et al. 2016; Rodosthenous et al. 2017).Using BKMR, we also identified a potential interaction between Hg and Ni, and we similarly identified a suggestive interaction () between this pair of metals when using GAMs. Both sets of results suggest that the positive association between Ni and BW for GA estimated at low-to-moderate concentrations may be attenuated by higher levels of Hg. It also suggests that the inverse association between Hg and BW for GA may be stronger at higher levels of Ni. The latter finding could be due to the apparent attenuation of the positive Ni–fetal growth association at high levels of Ni. However, there were very few participants with Ni concentrations at the high end of exposure, and the shape of the Ni–fetal growth relationship was sensitive to an extreme outlier for Ni and the method used to account for urine dilution. Future studies that span a wider range of urinary Ni levels are therefore needed to better understand the shape of this relationship, particularly at high concentrations. Importantly, one limitation of BKMR is that it does not quantify the importance of potential interactions. Therefore, we also applied a novel mixture modeling approach (NLinteraction) that can generate PIPs for interactions between mixture components (Antonelli et al. 2020). Using this method, we found the interaction between Hg and Ni to rank highest of all possible metal pairs. However, the PIP was extremely small. Thus, we cannot rule out the possibility that this may have been a chance finding.Although the magnitudes were small, the directions of associations for Co, Pb, and Tl with fetal growth were consistent with previous studies (Govarts et al. 2016; Hu et al. 2015; Mikelson et al. 2019; Rabito et al. 2014; Rodosthenous et al. 2017; Xia et al. 2016). The weak inverse association estimated for Pb may be explained in part by the use of urine as a matrix because blood concentrations are more sensitive to inter-individual differences in Pb exposure (Sommar et al. 2014). Given that urine is an accepted matrix for both Co and Tl (ATSDR 1992; Faroon et al. 2004), the weak associations estimated for these metals may be due to the particular levels represented in the MADRES study. For example, maternal urinary Tl levels were much lower [geometric mean (GM): ] in the MADRES study compared with a cohort of mother–newborn pairs in China (GM: ) that identified an association between Tl and risk of low BW (Xia et al. 2016).Although numerous studies have estimated inverse associations between Cd exposure and fetal growth (Khoshhali et al. 2020), the overall association between urinary Cd and BW for GA appeared null in the MADRES study. This could be due to the low urinary Cd concentrations in this population or to potential confounding from an unmeasured dietary factor given that diet is the main source of Cd exposure among nonsmokers (Faroon et al. 2012). For example, vegetable intake has been associated with both Cd exposure and increases in fetal growth (Faroon et al. 2012; Ramón et al. 2009b) and could induce a spurious positive association between these two variables. This is especially plausible for MADRES study participants because the prevalence of maternal smoking during pregnancy is very low in this population (2.7%), consistent with the overall prevalence among Hispanic women in the United States (1.8%) (Drake et al. 2018), and maternal environmental tobacco smoke exposure during pregnancy is also lower among Hispanic women (Hoshiko et al. 2019). Diet is, therefore, likely the main source of Cd exposure for this population.Similar to the findings for Cd, the overall association between urinary As and BW for GA also appeared null. This finding differs from those of most previous studies, which have estimated inverse associations between As exposure and fetal growth, even at low levels of exposure (Milton et al. 2017). In fact, in a previous study that compared multiple biomarkers of As exposure (Howe et al. 2020), we estimated an inverse association between maternal hair As and BW in the MADRES study but did not observe a similar trend for urinary As (Howe et al. 2020). This discrepancy may be due to the different arsenicals present in hair vs. urine. Although hair is thought to primarily reflect inorganic As, urine represents a complex mixture of arsenicals, with dimethyl arsenicals predominating (National Research Council 2013). These dimethyl arsenicals can reflect metabolized inorganic As, but they may also reflect As from dietary sources, such as metabolized arsenosugars and arsenolipids, which are derived from fish and seafood and thought to be nontoxic (Navas-Acien et al. 2011). Although models were adjusted for urinary AsB (Navas-Acien et al. 2011), a biomarker of fish and seafood consumption, we cannot rule out the possibility of residual confounding.Although most of the metals evaluated in this study were lower in MADRES study participants or were similar to concentrations reported for pregnant women in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) or other pregnancy cohorts, we found urinary Hg and Pb concentrations to be higher on average (Ashrap et al. 2020; Lewis et al. 2018; Watson et al. 2020). Fish/seafood is the main source of methylHg for most populations, and this form of Hg can be demethylated in the intestine and excreted into urine (Li et al. 2019). However, the majority of MADRES study participants reported rarely or never consuming fish/seafood (Farzan et al. 2020). Furthermore, the correlation between AsB, a biomarker of fish/seafood consumption (Navas-Acien et al. 2011), and urinary Hg was very weak (, ), which suggests that other sources of Hg exposure may be important. Another potential dietary source of Hg exposure could be rice (Davis et al. 2014) given that the majority of MADRES study participants reported consuming rice frequently (Farzan et al. 2020), whereas nondietary sources may include dental amalgams or the use of skin whitening/lightening creams (Copan et al. 2015; Peregrino et al. 2011). Although Pb exposure has declined in many parts of the world because of the removal of Pb additives from gasoline, exposure from industrial sources, such asPb smelters, is a growing concern in urban areas, including Los Angeles (Johnston and Hricko 2017). Pb-based paint, which is still prevalent in older homes in the United States (Kennedy et al. 2016), and certain imported food and spices, such as chili powder (Handley et al. 2017; Hore et al. 2019), may also contribute to exposure.In an exploratory analysis, we investigated a larger panel of metals, including Sb. Associations for Hg and Ni remained robust after accounting for these additional metals. However, Sb ranked highest as a predictor of BW for GA; an inverse association was estimated between Sb and BW for GA at moderate-to-high concentrations. Although few studies have investigated the impacts of Sb on fetal growth, we are aware of one previous study that similarly identified an association between cord blood Sb concentrations and risk for low BW (Cabrera-Rodríguez et al. 2018). Importantly, the urinary Sb concentrations in the MADRES study were comparable to levels reported for pregnant women in the NHANES (Watson et al. 2020). This suggests that Sb may adversely impact fetal growth even at relatively low levels of exposure, which merits additional investigation.The present study had many strengths, including the prospective design, the measurement of a multimetals panel to evaluate complex metal mixture exposures in early pregnancy, focusing on an understudied population at higher risk for multipollutant burdens (Cushing et al. 2015; Shim et al. 2017), the use of a mixture modeling approach that simultaneously accounts for nonlinear relationships and synergistic and antagonistic relationships (Bobb et al. 2015), and the application of a novel method that formally investigates interactions between mixture components (Antonelli et al. 2020). However, our study also had several important limitations. Most notably, we were underpowered to evaluate possible differences by fetal sex, which have been reported for certain metals (Cassidy-Bushrow et al. 2019; Govarts et al. 2016; Kippler et al. 2012; Milton et al. 2017; Signes-Pastor et al. 2019; Sun et al. 2018), and we measured urinary Pb concentrations to profile Pb exposure. Although urinary Pb does capture inter-individual differences in exposure, it is less sensitive than blood Pb (Sommar et al. 2014), which may have biased results toward the null. An additional limitation of our study was the use of a single spot urine sample to assess metals exposure, which may reflect only recent exposure for some metals (Wang et al. 2016). The use of a single urine measurement also precluded our ability to compare metal exposures across different windows in pregnancy. However, previous studies that measured metals at multiple time points in pregnancy have identified the early prenatal period as a particularly sensitive window (Cheng et al. 2017; Rabito et al. 2014; Vigeh et al. 2018). Another important consideration is that some metals are mobilized from bone or are metabolized more efficiently as the pregnancy progresses (Gardner et al. 2011; Gulson et al. 1997). However, our results were robust after adjusting for the GA at urine collection. Finally, we cannot rule out the possibility of unmeasured or residual confounding, particularly from diet, as detailed dietary information was not obtained for MADRES study participants in early pregnancy.Given that reduced fetal growth has been associated with a broad range of health consequences later in life (Barker and Thornburg 2013), identifying modifiable factors that impact fetal growth is critical. Of the seven elements evaluated in our primary analysis, urinary Hg was identified as the element of greatest concern because of its inverse association with fetal growth and possible antagonistic relationship with Ni. In exploratory analyses, Sb was found to be an even stronger predictor of reduced fetal growth. Identifying the major sources of Hg and Sb in this population is, therefore, essential. Although the downstream health consequences of our findings are currently unknown, the MADRES cohort was designed to follow children through the first 5 y of life. The impacts of prenatal exposure to these metals on early life growth, adiposity, and other outcomes can, therefore, be directly examined in future studies.Click here for additional data file.Click here for additional data file.
Authors: Lara Cushing; John Faust; Laura Meehan August; Rose Cendak; Walker Wieland; George Alexeeff Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2015-09-17 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Maria Kippler; A M Waheedul Hoque; Rubhana Raqib; Helena Ohrvik; Eva-Charlotte Ekström; Marie Vahter Journal: Toxicol Lett Date: 2009-10-23 Impact factor: 4.372
Authors: Caitlin G Howe; Shohreh F Farzan; Erika Garcia; Thomas Jursa; Ramsunder Iyer; Kiros Berhane; Thomas A Chavez; Tahlia L Hodes; Brendan H Grubbs; William E Funk; Donald R Smith; Theresa M Bastain; Carrie V Breton Journal: Environ Res Date: 2020-02-27 Impact factor: 6.498
Authors: Claudia P Peregrino; Myriam V Moreno; Silvia V Miranda; Alma D Rubio; Luz O Leal Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2011-06-23 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Marie Pedersen; Ulrike Gehring; Rob Beelen; Meng Wang; Lise Giorgis-Allemand; Anne-Marie Nybo Andersen; Xavier Basagaña; Claire Bernard; Marta Cirach; Francesco Forastiere; Kees de Hoogh; Regina Gražulevičvienė; Olena Gruzieva; Gerard Hoek; Aleksandra Jedynska; Claudia Klümper; Ingeborg M Kooter; Ursula Krämer; Jaakko Kukkonen; Daniela Porta; Dirkje S Postma; Ole Raaschou-Nielsen; Lenie van Rossem; Jordi Sunyer; Mette Sørensen; Ming-Yi Tsai; Tanja G M Vrijkotte; Michael Wilhelm; Mark J Nieuwenhuijsen; Göran Pershagen; Bert Brunekreef; Manolis Kogevinas; Rémy Slama Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2015-06-05 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Margaret A Handley; Kali Nelson; Eric Sanford; Cassidy Clarity; Sophia Emmons-Bell; Anuhandra Gorukanti; Patrick Kennelly Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2017-10-26 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Caitlin G Howe; Sara S Nozadi; Erika Garcia; Thomas G O'Connor; Anne P Starling; Shohreh F Farzan; Brian P Jackson; Juliette C Madan; Akram N Alshawabkeh; José F Cordero; Theresa M Bastain; John D Meeker; Carrie V Breton; Margaret R Karagas Journal: Environ Int Date: 2022-01-23 Impact factor: 9.621
Authors: Miguel García-Villarino; Antonio J Signes-Pastor; Margaret R Karagas; Isolina Riaño-Galán; Cristina Rodríguez-Dehli; Joan O Grimalt; Eva Junqué; Ana Fernández-Somoano; Adonina Tardón Journal: Environ Res Date: 2021-11-13 Impact factor: 6.498
Authors: Caitlin G Howe; Helen B Foley; Elizabeth M Kennedy; Sandrah P Eckel; Thomas A Chavez; Dema Faham; Brendan H Grubbs; Laila Al-Marayati; Deborah Lerner; Shakira Suglia; Theresa M Bastain; Carmen J Marsit; Carrie V Breton Journal: Epigenetics Date: 2021-03-18 Impact factor: 4.528
Authors: Pahriya Ashrap; Deborah J Watkins; Bhramar Mukherjee; Zaira Rosario-Pabón; Carmen M Vélez-Vega; Akram Alshawabkeh; José F Cordero; John D Meeker Journal: Environ Res Date: 2021-06-10 Impact factor: 8.431
Authors: E Colicino; F Ferrari; W Cowell; M M Niedzwiecki; N Foppa Pedretti; A Joshi; R O Wright; R J Wright Journal: Environ Int Date: 2021-07-10 Impact factor: 13.352
Authors: Caitlin G Howe; Helen B Foley; Shohreh F Farzan; Thomas A Chavez; Mark Johnson; John D Meeker; Theresa M Bastain; Carmen J Marsit; Carrie V Breton Journal: Epigenetics Date: 2021-10-30 Impact factor: 4.861
Authors: Mohammad L Rahman; Emily Oken; Marie-France Hivert; Sheryl Rifas-Shiman; Pi-I D Lin; Elena Colicino; Robert O Wright; Chitra Amarasiriwardena; Birgit G Claus Henn; Diane R Gold; Brent A Coull; Andres Cardenas Journal: Environ Int Date: 2021-06-17 Impact factor: 9.621
Authors: Kyle Dack; Matthew Fell; Caroline M Taylor; Alexandra Havdahl; Sarah J Lewis Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-07-03 Impact factor: 3.390