Literature DB >> 33139954

Genome-wide detection of DNA double-strand breaks by in-suspension BLISS.

Britta A M Bouwman1, Federico Agostini2, Silvano Garnerone2, Giuseppe Petrosino3, Henrike J Gothe3, Sergi Sayols3, Andreas E Moor4, Shalev Itzkovitz5, Magda Bienko2, Vassilis Roukos3, Nicola Crosetto6.   

Abstract

sBLISS (in-suspension breaks labeling in situ and sequencing) is a versatile and widely applicable method for identification of endogenous and induced DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) in any cell type that can be brought into suspension. sBLISS provides genome-wide profiles of the most consequential DNA lesion implicated in a variety of pathological, but also physiological, processes. In sBLISS, after in situ labeling, DSB ends are linearly amplified, followed by next-generation sequencing and DSB landscape analysis. Here, we present a step-by-step experimental protocol for sBLISS, as well as a basic computational analysis. The main advantages of sBLISS are (i) the suspension setup, which renders the protocol user-friendly and easily scalable; (ii) the possibility of adapting it to a high-throughput or single-cell workflow; and (iii) its flexibility and its applicability to virtually every cell type, including patient-derived cells, organoids, and isolated nuclei. The wet-lab protocol can be completed in 1.5 weeks and is suitable for researchers with intermediate expertise in molecular biology and genomics. For the computational analyses, basic-to-intermediate bioinformatics expertise is required.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33139954     DOI: 10.1038/s41596-020-0397-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Protoc        ISSN: 1750-2799            Impact factor:   13.491


  64 in total

Review 1.  Chromosomal stability and the DNA double-stranded break connection.

Authors:  D C van Gent; J H Hoeijmakers; R Kanaar
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 2.  Mechanisms and Consequences of Double-Strand DNA Break Formation in Chromatin.

Authors:  Wendy J Cannan; David S Pederson
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 6.384

Review 3.  Endogenous DNA Damage as a Source of Genomic Instability in Cancer.

Authors:  Anthony Tubbs; André Nussenzweig
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 4.  Development and applications of CRISPR-Cas9 for genome engineering.

Authors:  Patrick D Hsu; Eric S Lander; Feng Zhang
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 5.  Defining and improving the genome-wide specificities of CRISPR-Cas9 nucleases.

Authors:  Shengdar Q Tsai; J Keith Joung
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 6.  The role of DNA breaks in genomic instability and tumorigenesis.

Authors:  Kevin D Mills; David O Ferguson; Frederick W Alt
Journal:  Immunol Rev       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 12.988

Review 7.  DNA strand break repair and human genetic disease.

Authors:  Peter J McKinnon; Keith W Caldecott
Journal:  Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 8.929

Review 8.  The biogenesis of chromosome translocations.

Authors:  Vassilis Roukos; Tom Misteli
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 28.824

Review 9.  Acceleration of cancer science with genome editing and related technologies.

Authors:  Tetsushi Sakuma; Takashi Yamamoto
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 6.716

10.  Nucleotide-resolution DNA double-strand break mapping by next-generation sequencing.

Authors:  Nicola Crosetto; Abhishek Mitra; Maria Joao Silva; Magda Bienko; Norbert Dojer; Qi Wang; Elif Karaca; Roberto Chiarle; Magdalena Skrzypczak; Krzysztof Ginalski; Philippe Pasero; Maga Rowicka; Ivan Dikic
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2013-03-17       Impact factor: 28.547

View more
  3 in total

1.  An atlas of endogenous DNA double-strand breaks arising during human neural cell fate determination.

Authors:  Roberto Ballarino; Britta A M Bouwman; Federico Agostini; Luuk Harbers; Constantin Diekmann; Erik Wernersson; Magda Bienko; Nicola Crosetto
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 8.501

Review 2.  Emerging Technologies for Genome-Wide Profiling of DNA Breakage.

Authors:  Matthew J Rybin; Melina Ramic; Natalie R Ricciardi; Philipp Kapranov; Claes Wahlestedt; Zane Zeier
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 4.599

3.  R-loop proximity proteomics identifies a role of DDX41 in transcription-associated genomic instability.

Authors:  Thorsten Mosler; Francesca Conte; Gabriel M C Longo; Ivan Mikicic; Nastasja Kreim; Martin M Möckel; Giuseppe Petrosino; Johanna Flach; Joan Barau; Brian Luke; Vassilis Roukos; Petra Beli
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 14.919

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.