| Literature DB >> 33138860 |
Aurelie P Yougang1,2, Basile Kamgang3, Theodel A Wilson Bahun1,4, Armel N Tedjou1,2, Daniel Nguiffo-Nguete1,5, Flobert Njiokou2, Charles S Wondji1,6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Aedes borne viral diseases, notably dengue, are increasingly reported in Cameroon with Aedes aegypti being a major vector. Data on insecticide resistance of this vector and underlying mechanisms needed for outbreak preparedness remain scarce in Cameroon. Here, we present the nationwide distribution of insecticide resistance in Ae. aegypti and investigate the potential resistance mechanisms involved.Entities:
Keywords: Aedes aegypti; Arbovirus; Cameroon; Insecticide resistance; Kdr mutation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33138860 PMCID: PMC7607635 DOI: 10.1186/s40249-020-00769-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Infect Dis Poverty ISSN: 2049-9957 Impact factor: 4.520
Fig. 1Map of Cameroon showing the sampling sites
Larval bioassays with temephos against Aedes aegypti larvae
| Strain and Site | LC95 (mg/L) (95% | RR95 | LC50 (mg/L) (95% | RR50 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NO lab strain | 531 | 0.0046 (0.0042–0.0051) | – | 0.0026 (0.0025–0.0028) | – |
| Edéa | 531 | 0.0046 (0.0036–0.0094) | 1.00 | 0.0021 (0.0007–0.0028) | 0.80 |
| Douala | 483 | 0.0078 (0.0069–0.0092) | 1.68 | 0.0039 (0.0037–0. 0042) | 1.47 |
| Yaoundé | 537 | 0.0034 (0.00258–0.0069) | 0.74 | 0.0015 (0.0009–0.0020) | 0.59 |
n number of larvae tested; LC95 and LC50 95 and 50% lethal concentrations; CI Confidence interval; RR resistance ratio; NO New Orleans
Fig. 2Mortality rates of adult Aedes aegypti from 10 locations in Cameroon 24 h after exposure to insecticides alone or with 1 h pre-exposure to synergist. Error bars represent standard error of the mean. DDT Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane, PBO Piperonyl butoxide. a, Douala; b, Limbe; c, Edéa; d, Parc Benoué; e, Ngaoundéré; f, Maroua; g, Banyo; h, Tibati; i, Meiganga; j, Melong
Fig. 3Map showing the insecticide resistance status of Aedes aegypti in Cameroon. DDT: Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane
F1534C genotype numbers and the allelic frequency of the C mutation of Aedes aegypti
| Location | F1534 genotypes | FF + FC + CC | Allelic frequencies | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FF | FC | CC | % F | % C | ||
| Benoué national park | 24 | 0 | 0 | 24 | 100 | 0 |
| Maroua | 27 | 0 | 0 | 27 | 100 | 0 |
| Garoua | 30 | 0 | 0 | 30 | 100 | 0 |
| Mbé | 17 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 100 | 0 |
| Ngaoundéré | 25 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 100 | 0 |
| Banyo | 29 | 0 | 0 | 29 | 100 | 0 |
| Tibati | 26 | 0 | 0 | 26 | 100 | 0 |
| Meiganga | 24 | 0 | 0 | 24 | 100 | 0 |
| Edéa | 29 | 0 | 1 | 30 | 96.67 | 3.33 |
| Limbé | 27 | 0 | 0 | 27 | 100 | 0 |
| Douala | 8 | 8 | 2 | 18 | 66.67 | 33.33 |
| Melong | 24 | 0 | 0 | 24 | 100 | 0 |
| Yaoundé | 30 | 0 | 0 | 30 | 100 | 0 |
| Total | 320 | 8 | 3 | 331 | 97.89 | 2.11 |
F: phenylalanine; C: cysteine; F/F: absence of the F1534C mutation; F/C: presence of the F1534C mutation with 2 alleles: one resistant, allele C and another susceptible F allele; C/C: presence of the F1534C mutation with the 2 resistant alleles
Fig. 43: Sequencing of the portion of the voltage gated sodium channel gene spanning the F1534C mutation. a Sequence alignment of the voltage gated sodium channel gene at the F1534C point mutation in field collected adult mosquitoes (F0), b Chromatogram traces showing the three genotypes at the 1534 coding position
Genetic diversity parameters of F1534C mutation among Cameroonian Aedes aegypti populations
| Populations | 2N | S | Syn | Nsyn | π | H | Hd | D | Fu Fs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Benoué national park | 20 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0.006 | 6 | 0.726 | − 0.591 | − 1.874 |
| Maroua | 18 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0.006 | 5 | 0.745 | − 0.703 | − 0.945 |
| Garoua | 20 | 9 | 7 | 2 | 0.011 | 9 | 0.863 | − 0.592 | − 3.113* |
| Mbe | 18 | 9 | 8 | 1 | 0.014 | 9 | 0.922 | 0.023 | − 2.581* |
| Ngaoundéré | 20 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0.007 | 6 | 0.763 | − 0.479 | − 1.195 |
| Banyo | 16 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 0.012 | 9 | 0.908 | 0.318 | − 3.584* |
| Tibati | 20 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0.008 | 8 | 0.868 | 0.379 | − 3.062* |
| Meiganga | 20 | 12 | 11 | 1 | 0.013 | 9 | 0.847 | − 1.020 | − 2.544* |
| Douala | 20 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0.008 | 7 | 0.784 | − 0.122 | − 1.850 |
| Limbé | 20 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0.009 | 8 | 0.853 | 0.836 | − 2.590* |
| Melong | 14 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 0.011 | 6 | 0.813 | − 0.097 | − 0.787 |
| Yaoundé | 20 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0.006 | 7 | 0.800 | − 0.283 | − 2.653* |
| Edéa | 18 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 0.009 | 9 | 0.895 | − 0.740 | − 4.088* |
| Total | 244 | 25 | 18 | 8 | 0.010 | 38 | 0.879 | − 1.479 | 33.498*** |
2N, number of sequences; S, number of polymorphic sites; h, number of haplotypes; Hd, haplotype diversity; π, nucleotide diversity; Syn and Nsyn, synonymous and non-synonymous mutation; D and Fs, Tajima’s D and Fu Fs statistics, *degree of significance
Fig. 5Pattern of genetic variability and polymorphism of the voltage-gated sodium channel in Aedes aegypti. a Haplotype network for the VGSC sequence taking into account different populations; b Haplotype network for the VGSC sequences taking into account the resistance status; c) Phylogenetic tree of VGSC DNA sequences (fragment) by maximum-likelihood with Kimura model