| Literature DB >> 33138200 |
Yuliia Maslii1, Olena Ruban1, Giedre Kasparaviciene2, Zenona Kalveniene2, Anna Materiienko3, Liudas Ivanauskas4, Agne Mazurkeviciute5, Dalia M Kopustinskiene6, Jurga Bernatoniene2,6.
Abstract
The physicochemical properties, especially pH value of dental medicines, have significant influence on the health of oral cavity tissues. The pH of formulations should correspond to the value of saliva pH (5.5-8.0). For carbomer-based gels, the required pH value is obtained by neutralizing them with alkaline components, which leads to their structuring (thickening). This affects the physical properties of the gel, its residence time at the application site and the rate of release of active pharmaceutical ingredient. Therefore, the main purpose of this study is to evaluate the rheological, textural, and biopharmaceutical properties of Carbomer Polacril® 40P-based dental gel depending on the pH value. Evaluation of the rheological properties of gel preparations were performed by measuring the structural viscosity of the samples as a function of pH and temperature. The textural properties of the gel were evaluated by performing tests regarding back extrusion and spreadability. Carbomer Polacril® 40P-based gels haven't shown noticeable thixotropic behavior, and were characterized by plastic flow in the whole studied pH range. The structural viscosity at the selected average pH value hasn't differed at storage (25 °C) and application (37 °C) temperature. Texture studies of dental gels have shown a strong correlation with rheoparameters. Their rheological behavior and textural properties haven't changed significantly between the pH range of 5.5-6.6. The relatively narrow range of working pH values does not affect the change in the viscosity of the preparation significantly and, consequently, does not affect the release of APIs from the developed Carbomer Polacril® 40P-based dental gel.Entities:
Keywords: Carbomer Polacril® 40P-based gel; oral mucosa diseases; pH; periodontal tissue; release test; rheological studies; textural analysis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33138200 PMCID: PMC7663699 DOI: 10.3390/molecules25215018
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Representative rheogram of dental gel at pH 6.6 (1—up and 2—down curve).
Figure 2Dependence of structural viscosity on gel pH at shear rate 41.6 s−1 (n = 3).
Figure 3Comparison rheological parameters of gel samples with “Dentinox-gel N”.
Thermorheological characteristics of gel samples (n = 3).
| Gel Sample | Consistency Index ( | Flow Behavior Index ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25 °C | 37 °C | 25 °C | 37 °C | |
| pH 5.5 | 65.31 ± 2.36 | 58.26 ± 2.01 | 0.134 ± 0.005 | 0.132 ± 0.005 |
| pH 6.0 | 80.83 ± 1.58 | 78.83 ± 1.05 | 0.127 ± 0.002 | 0.124 ± 0.002 |
| pH 6.6 | 97.57 ± 2.04 | 95.27 ± 1.74 | 0.126 ± 0.004 | 0.123 ± 0.002 |
| Dentinox-N | 74.04 ± 1.75 | 70.04 ± 1.75 | 0.129 ± 0.004 | 0.125 ± 0.003 |
Figure 4Dependence of structural viscosity on shear rate at different temperatures (n = 3).
Figure 5The effect of pH on the gel characteristics during the determination of back extrusion: (a) on maximum compressing force; (b) on cohesiveness; (c) on adhesiveness; (d) on minimum retracting force.
Figure 6Comparison back extrusion test parameters of gel samples with “Dentinox-gel N” (n = 3).
Figure 7The effect of pH on the gel characteristics during the determination of spreadability: (a) on firmness; (b) on spreadability; (c) on adhesiveness; (d) on adhesive force.
Figure 8Comparative spreadability analysis of gel samples with “Dentinox-gel N” (n = 3).
Kinetics of APIs release depending on time in comparison with the control solution (n = 3).
| Gel Sample | API | Released amount of APIs, mg/cm3 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Samples Selection Time, h | |||||||
| 0.5 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 6 | ||
| pH 5.5 | ChSal | 1.350 ± 0.165 | 2.680 ± 0.730 | 7.491 ± 1.762 | 12.637 ± 2.025 | 17.350 ± 2.581 | 25.201 ± 2.780 |
| LidHyd | 0.233 ± 0.011 | 0.587 ± 0.027 | 0.793 ± 0.038 | 1.058 ± 0.047 | 1.212 ± 0.056 | 1.317 ± 0.061 | |
| pH 6.0 | ChSal | 1.055 ± 0.172 | 2.680 ± 0.331 | 7.215 ± 0.398 | 12.338 ± 0.606 | 16.884 ± 0.263 | 24.440 ± 0.360 |
| LidHyd | 0.203 ± 0.009 | 0.517 ± 0.025 | 0.748 ± 0.033 | 0.956 ± 0.041 | 1.145 ± 0.054 | 1.251 ± 0.059 | |
| pH 6.6 | ChSal | 1.105 ± 0.035 | 2.822 ± 0.429 | 7.194 ± 0.972 | 12.261 ± 1.019 | 16.663 ± 1.915 | 24.015 ± 2.744 |
| LidHyd | 0.215 ± 0.010 | 0.533 ± 0.026 | 0.764 ± 0.035 | 0.998 ± 0.044 | 1.154 ± 0.056 | 1.267 ± 0.060 | |
| Control | ChSal | 17.262 ± 0.141 | 31.630 ± 0.510 | 47.076 ± 1.044 | 50.545 ± 1.123 | 51.342 ± 1.811 | 51.671 ± 2.012 |
| LidHyd | 0.668 ± 0.029 | 1.191 ± 0.057 | 1.388 ± 0.066 | 1.437 ± 0.070 | 1.459 ± 0.071 | 1.481 ± 0.071 | |
Note. Number of tests n = 3 for each formulation, p < 0.05.
Figure 9Kinetics of choline salicylate release from gel samples in comparison with control solution (n = 3).
Figure 10Kinetics of lidocaine hydrochloride release from gel samples in comparison with control solution (n = 3).
Composition of the analyzed dental gel.
| Ingredients | Amount, % |
|---|---|
| Tincture “Phytodent” | 15.0 |
| Choline salicylate 80% | 8.0 |
| Lidocaine hydrochloride | 1.5 |
| Carbomer homopolymer (Polacril® 40P) | 1.5 |
| Sodium hydroxide (10% solution) | to the required pH |
| Vinyl methyl ether and maleic anhydride copolymer | |
| (OraRez® W-100L16) | 1.5 |
| Methyl parahydroxybenzoate | 0.15 |
| Propyl parahydroxybenzoate | 0.05 |
| Purified water | Up to 100.0 |
Figure 11Back extrusion graph during the texture analysis.
Figure 12Spreadability graph during the texture analysis.