| Literature DB >> 33137093 |
Hang Jiang1, Aliang Xia1, Meng Ye1, Jingyi Ren1, Dongao Li1, Huiquan Liu1, Qinhu Wang1, Ping Lu1, Chunlan Wu1, Jin-Rong Xu2, Cong Jiang1.
Abstract
Histone acetylation, balanced by histone acetyltransferase (HAT) and <span class="Gene">histone deacetylase (Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33137093 PMCID: PMC7660929 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1009185
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS Genet ISSN: 1553-7390 Impact factor: 5.917
The wild type and transformants of Fusarium graminearum used in this study.
| Strain | Brief description | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| PH-1 | Wild-type | [ |
| FN3 | This study | |
| FG1 | This study | |
| SF1 | This study | |
| FGSF1 | This study | |
| EF1 | This study | |
| FGEF1 | This study | |
| FC1 | This study | |
| FCNR1 | This study | |
| FCPD1 | This study | |
| RP12 | This study | |
| FRP12 | This study | |
| RF5 | This study | |
| FRF5 | This study | |
| FCRR1 | This study | |
| RP2 | This study | |
| SIS18 | This study | |
| FSIS18 | This study | |
| SD38 | This study | |
| FDS38 | This study | |
| SD2 | This study | |
| SC1 | This study | |
| SCRR1 | This study |
Fig 1Fng1 is associated with FgEsa1 and required for H4 acetylation.
(A). Co-immunoprecipitation (co-IP) assays for the interaction between Fng1 and FgEsa1. Western blots of total protein isolated from transformants expressing the FNG1-GFP and/or FgESA1-3×FLAG (input) and proteins eluted from anti-GFP affinity beads (GFP IP) were detected with anti-FLAG and anti-GFP antibodies. (B). Co-IP assays for the interaction between Fng1 and FgSas3. Western blots of total protein isolated from transformants expressing the FNG1-GFP and/or FgSAS3-3×FLAG (input) and proteins eluted from anti-GFP affinity beads (GFP IP) were detected with anti-FLAG and anti-GFP antibodies. (C). Western blots of total proteins isolated from the wild type (PH-1) and fng1 mutant (FN3) were detected with the anti-H4ac, anti-H3ac, and H2AK5ac antibodies. Detection with the anti-H4, anti-H3, or anti-H2A antibodies was used as loading control. (D). Western blots of total proteins isolated from PH-1 and the fng1 mutant were detected with the antibodies specific for H4K5ac, H4K8ac, H4K12ac, and H4K16ac.
Growth, conidiation, and virulence of the fng1 mutant and fng1/FNG1ΔPHD transformant.
| Strains | Growth (mm/day) | Conidiation (×104 spores/ml) | Disease Index |
|---|---|---|---|
| PH-1 (WT) | 10.9±0.1A | 20.7±4.2A | 10.0±1.0A |
| FN3 ( | 0.6±0.0C | nd | nd |
| FC1 ( | 10.7±0.1A | 21.3±1.2A | 10.4±1.1A |
| FCPD1 ( | 9.6±0.1B | 8.5±0.5B | 3.6±0.7B |
a Average radial growth per day on PDA plates.
b Conidiation in 5-day-old CMC cultures.
c The number of diseased spikelets on each inoculated wheat head at 14 dpi.
The growth rate, conidiation and disease index were assayed with at least three independent replicates. Data were analyzed with Duncan’s pair-wise comparison. Different letters mark significant differences (P = 0.05)
nd, not detected
Fig 2Assays for the function of Fng1 in growth, reproduction, and pathogenesis.
(A). Three-day-old PDA cultures of the wild type (PH-1), fng1 mutant (FN3), and fng1/FNG1 transformant (FC1). (B). Perithecia from mating cultures of the same set of strains were examined at 8 dpf. Ascospore cirrhi are marked with arrows. Bar, 1 mm. (C). Wheat heads inoculated with the indicated strains were examined for head blight symptoms at 14 days post-inoculation (dpi). Black dots mark the inoculated spikelets. (D). Infection cushions formed by PH-1 and fng1 mutant FN3 on wheat lemma were examined by SEM under ×2,000 amplification at 2 dpi. Bar, 20 μm. (E). Wheat coleoptiles infected with PH-1 and FN3 were examined for invasive hyphae at 3 dpi after staining with Alexa Fluor 488. Bar, 20 μm.
Fig 3Subcellular localization of Fng1-GFP and chromosomal regions enriched for Fng1-dependent H4ac.
(A). Conidia and germlings of the FNG1-GFP transformant were stained with DAPI and examined by DIC and epifluorescence microscopy. Bar, 5 μm. (B). Germlings of the FNG1-GFP FgNOP1-RFP transformant (FCNR1) were stained with DAPI and examined by DIC and epifluorescence microscopy. Bar, 5 μm. The lower panels are close-up view of the indicated nuclei. (C). The distribution of DNA sequences co-immunoprecipitated with the anti-H4ac antibody in the wild-type strain PH-1 and fng1 mutant (chromosomes 1–4) was compared with chromosomal regions enriched for H3K27me3 and H3K4me2 in the genome of F. graminearum.
Fig 4The effects of PHD domain deletion on FNG1 functions.
(A). Schematic drawing of the Fng1 protein with the ING and PHD domains indicated by red arrow. (B). Three-day-old PDA cultures of PH-1 and fng1/FNG1ΔPHD transformant (FCPD1). (C). Mating cultures were examined for perithecium formation (left), ascospore discharge (middle), and asci with ascospores (right) at 8 dpf. Ascospore cirrhi are indicated by arrows. White bar, 1 mm; Black bar, 20 μm. (D). Wheat heads inoculated with the indicated strains were examined for head blight symptoms at 14 dpi. Black dots mark the inoculated spikelets. (E). Corn silks inoculated with culture blocks were photographed at 5 dpi.
Fig 5Spontaneous suppressors of the fng1 mutant.
(A). PDA cultures of the fng1 mutant strains after incubation for more than two weeks. Suppressor strains are indicated by the red arrows. (B). Four-day-old PDA cultures of the wild type (PH-1) and representative suppressor mutants which were divided into three types based on growth rate. (C). Mating cultures of PH-1 and indicated suppressor strains were examined at 8 dpf. Bar, 1 mm. Perithecia are indicated by arrows. (D). Flowering wheat heads were inoculated with PH-1 and indicated suppressor strains, and photographed at 14 dpi. Black dots mark the inoculated spikelets.
Mutations identified in suppressor strains.
| Suppressor strains | Nucleotide change | Amino acid changes | |
|---|---|---|---|
| FGRAMPH1_01G01959 ( | S1 | AG615 to AA (intron 2) | fs IR |
| S4 | T873TC to ATC | F252I | |
| S5 | ΔC1606 | P480fs | |
| S10 | TC742T to TTT | S208F | |
| S11 | G777GT to AGT | G220S | |
| S12 | TA862C to TGC | Y248C | |
| S16 | GAT1430 to GATT | V422fs | |
| S19 | CC407T to CTT | P112L | |
| S29 | AA1195 to AC (intron 3) | fs IR | |
| S44 | ΔGAGA2064-2067 | E633fs | |
| S47 | GA703G to GGG | E195G | |
| S50 | AAC1843 to AACAC | I560fs | |
| S52 | ΔGAGA1725-1728 | E519fs | |
| FGRAMPH1_01G27415 ( | S8 | TG3199G to TAG | W903 |
| S15 | C373AG to TAG | Q125 | |
| S18 | TG4468G to TAG | W1326 | |
| S23 | C115GA to TGA | R39 | |
| S34 | C109GA to TGA | R37 | |
| S37 | G4470T to AT (intron 5) | fs IR | |
| S40 | ΔC2704 | P738fs | |
| S41 | C508AA to TAA | Q170 | |
| S42 | G2919AG to AAG | E810K | |
| S43 | CG3175T to CAT | R895H | |
| FGRAMPH1_01G02071 ( | S24 | ΔC65 | P22fs |
| S25 | Δ-794 to -412 | promoter loss | |
| S26 | CAC560 to CACC | L168fs | |
| S31 | ΔT1336 | S425fs | |
| S33 | GGA155 to GGAA | D52fs | |
| S36 | ΔCA400-401 | Q134fs | |
| S38 | C310GA to TGA | R104 | |
| S46 | ΔAAGGCTCTTACGAGCAC544-560 | K162fs | |
| S49 | AG468 to AA (intron 1) | fs IR | |
| FGRAMPH1_01G22839 | S22 | ΔTC3185-3186 | A1023fs |
| S32 | C1413AA to TAA | Q431 |
# Numbered in the order of suppressor strain isolation
* stop codon; fs frame shift; IR, intron retention
Fig 6Suppressors identified in the RPD3 HDAC complex.
(A). Schematic diagrams showing components of the yeast Rpd3L and Rpd3S complexes with orthologs in F. graminearum. (B). Spontaneous suppressor mutations identified in FgRpd3. The histone deacetylase (HD) domain and transcription initiation factor IIF-alpha (TFα) domain are shaded in blue and red. Sequence alignments of the marked region of FgRpd3 with its orthologs from F. oxysporum (Fo), F. verticillioides (Fv), M. oryzae (Mo), N. crassa (Nc), A. nidulans (An), S. cerevisiae (Sc), and S. pombe (Sp). (C). Schematic drawing of FgSin3 and spontaneous suppressor mutations. Sequence alignments of the marked region of FgSin3 with its orthologs from Fo, Fv, Mo, Nc, An, Sc, and Sp. HID, histone deacetylase interacting domain; CD, C-terminal domain. (D). Schematic drawing of FgSds3 and spontaneous suppressor mutations. SLD, Sds3-like domain.
Fig 7Mutations in FgRPD3 suppressive to the growth defects of the fng1 mutant.
(A). Three-day-old PDA cultures of wild type (PH-1), fng1 mutant (FN3), FgRPD3Y248C (RP12), fng1 FgRPD3Y248C (FRP12), and S12. (B). Western blots of total proteins isolated from the indicated strains were detected with the anti-H4ac antibody. Detection with the anti-H4 antibody was used as a loading control. (C). Three-day-old PDA cultures of PH-1, FN3, FgRPD3Δ480–649 (RF5), fng1 FgRPD3Δ480–649 (FRF5), and S5. (D). Western blots of total proteins isolated from the indicated strains were detected with the anti-H4ac antibody. Detection with the anti-H4 antibody was used as a loading control.
Fig 8Localization of FgRpd3 and phenotypes of the Fgrpd3 deletion mutant.
(A). Germlings of the FNG1-GFP FgRPD3-RFP transformant (FCRR1) were examined by DIC and epifluorescence microscopy. The lower panels are close-up view of the indicated nuclei. Bar, 5 μm. (B). Three-day-old PDA cultures of PH-1, fng1 mutant (FN3), and Fgrpd3 mutant (RP2). (C). 8 days post-fertilization (dpf) mating cultures of the indicated strains. Bar, 1 mm. (D). Flowering wheat heads inoculated with PH-1, FN3, and RP2 were photographed at 14 dpi. Black dots mark the inoculated spikelets. (E). Western blots of total proteins isolated from PH-1, FN3, and RP2 were detected with an anti-H4ac antibody. Detection with the anti-H4 antibody was used as a loading control.
Fig 9Mutations in FgSIN3 suppress the growth defect of the fng1 mutant.
(A). Schematic drawing of different alleles of FgSIN3 and its transcripts. The longer (T1) and shorter (T2) transcripts were generated with alternative transcript initiation sites (P1 and P2) but the same termination site (T). While suppressor strain S18 had the non-sense mutation at W1326, the FgSIN3ΔCT mutant had the C-terminal 180 amino acid residues replaced with the hygromycin phosphotransferase (hph) cassette. HID, histone deacetylase-interacting domain; CD, C-terminal domain. (B). Three-day-old PDA cultures of wild type (PH-1), fng1 mutant (FN3), FgSIN3ΔCT (SIS18), fng1 FgSIN3ΔCT (FSIS18), and suppressor strain S18. (C). Western blots of total proteins isolated from the indicated strains were detected with an anti-H4ac antibody. Detection with the anti-H4 antibody was used as a loading control.
Fig 10Null mutations in FgSDS3 suppress the growth defect of the fng1 mutant.
(A). Schematic drawing of different alleles of FgSDS3. In suppressor strain S38, the nonsense mutation at R104 resulted in the truncation of part of the SLD (sds3-like domain) and the rest of FgSds3 protein. While the entire FgSDS3 gene was deleted in the Fgsds3 deletion, only the region after R104 was replaced with the hph cassette in the FgSDS3N103 mutant. (B). Three-day-old PDA cultures of PH-1, FN3, FgSDS3N103 (SD38), fng1 FgSDS3N103 (FSD38), and suppressor strain S38. (C). Western blots of total proteins isolated from the indicated strains were detected with an anti-H4ac antibody. Detection with the anti-H4 antibody was used as a loading control. (D). Three-day-old PDA cultures of the wild type (PH-1), Fgsds3 mutant (SD2), and Fgsds3/FgSDS3 transformant (SC1). (E). Germlings of the FgSDS3-GFP FgRPD3-RFP transformant (SCRR1) were examined by DIC and epifluorescence microscopy. The lower panels are close-up view of the indicated nuclei. Bar, 5 μm.
Fig 11RNA-seq analysis of fng1 mutant and suppressor strains S12 and S38.
(A). Venn diagram showing the numbers of genes down-regulated (left panel) and up-regulated (right panel) in the fng1 mutant, suppressor strain S12 and suppressor strain S38. (B). GO enrichment analysis of the down-regulated (DR12-38, left panel) and up-regulated (UR12-38, right panel) genes in fng1 mutant and recovered in both suppressor strains S12 and S38. BP, MF, and CC stand for biological process, molecular function, and cellular component, respectively. (C). Pie chart showing the proportion of genes (DR12-38 and UR12-38) with and without orthologs in budding yeast.