Literature DB >> 33133410

Comparison of Bone Preservation in Elderly Patients with Femoral Neck Fracture After Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty Using Shorter Femoral Stem and Standard Femoral Stem.

Jae-Young Lim1, Hyeong-Jun Park2, Young-Kyun Lee3, Yong-Chan Ha2, Kyung-Hoi Koo3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This randomized control study was designed to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes, including periprosthetic bone mineral density (BMD) changes, between the short and standard stems after using cementless hemiarthroplasty in elderly patients with femur neck fractures.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 2013 to May 2017, 151 patients (aged ≥ 65 years) underwent hemiarthroplasties due to femoral neck fractures. Patients were randomized into two groups; 77 patients in Group A implanting the short femoral stem and 74 patients in Group B implanting the standard femoral stem. Clinical and radiographic evaluations were performed in all patients.
RESULTS: 75 patients (40 patients in Group A and 35 patients in Group B) completed routine follow-up for a minimum of 2 years. The clinical outcomes, including ambulatory functions and thigh pain, were similar in both groups. All the femoral stems acquired radiologic stability. At postoperative one year, BMD values in Gruen zone (G) seven on the standard stem side were significantly lower than those on the short stem side (P = 0.038). At the second year of follow-up, the BMD values of Group A in G1, G3, G4, and G7 were significantly greater than those of Group B (P = 0.007, 0.032, 0.026, and P < 0.000, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Both the clinical outcomes and radiologic stability in both group demonstrated similar results in elderly patients with femoral neck fracture at the latest follow-up. In addition, the periprosthetic BMD of the short femoral stems demonstrated better periprosthetic bone preservation at a minimum of 2 years of follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCES: Therapeutic Level II. © Indian Orthopaedics Association 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Elderly; Femoral neck fracture; Hemiarthroplasty; Periprosthetic bone preservation; Short stem

Year:  2020        PMID: 33133410      PMCID: PMC7572964          DOI: 10.1007/s43465-020-00115-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Orthop        ISSN: 0019-5413            Impact factor:   1.251


  32 in total

1.  Results of a method of leg-length equalization for patients undergoing primary total hip replacement.

Authors:  S T Woolson; J M Hartford; A Sawyer
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  Comparison of two hydroxyapatite-coated femoral stems: clinical, functional, and bone densitometry evaluation of patients randomized to a regular or modified hydroxyapatite-coated stem aimed at proximal fixation.

Authors:  Judith C Sluimer; Nicolette H M Hoefnagels; Pieter J Emans; Roel Kuijer; Rudolph G T Geesink
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  Ambulatory ability after hip fracture. A prospective study in geriatric patients.

Authors:  K J Koval; M L Skovron; G B Aharonoff; S E Meadows; J D Zuckerman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  The uncemented porous-coated anatomic total hip prosthesis. Two-year results of a prospective consecutive series.

Authors:  J J Callaghan; S H Dysart; C G Savory
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  The porous-coated anatomic total hip prosthesis, inserted without cement. Results after five to seven years in a prospective study.

Authors:  R D Heekin; J J Callaghan; W J Hopkinson; C G Savory; J S Xenos
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  "Modes of failure" of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening.

Authors:  T A Gruen; G M McNeice; H C Amstutz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1979-06       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Late remodeling around a proximally HA-coated tapered titanium femoral component.

Authors:  William N Capello; James A D'Antonio; Rudolph G Geesink; Judy R Feinberg; Marybeth Naughton
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-10-11       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Hydroxyapatite does not improve the outcome of a bipolar hemiarthroplasty.

Authors:  Huub J Meijerink; Jean W M Gardeniers; Pieter Buma; J Albert M Lemmens; B Willem Schreurs
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Lower periprosthetic bone loss and good fixation of an ultra-short stem compared to a conventional stem in uncemented total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Mats Salemyr; Olle Muren; Torbjörn Ahl; Henrik Bodén; Thomas Eisler; André Stark; Olof Sköldenberg
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 3.717

10.  A comparison of a short versus a conventional femoral cementless stem in total hip arthroplasty in patients 70 years and older.

Authors:  Huachen Yu; Haixiao Liu; Man Jia; Yuezheng Hu; Yu Zhang
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 2.359

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Surgical interventions for treating intracapsular hip fractures in older adults: a network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sharon R Lewis; Richard Macey; Jamie Stokes; Jonathan A Cook; William Gp Eardley; Xavier L Griffin
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-02-14

Review 2.  Arthroplasties for hip fracture in adults.

Authors:  Sharon R Lewis; Richard Macey; Martyn J Parker; Jonathan A Cook; Xavier L Griffin
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-02-14

3.  Do Cementless Short Tapered Stems Reduce the Incidence of Thigh Pain After Hip Arthroplasty? Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Jun-Il Yoo; Yonghan Cha; Young-Kyun Lee; Yong-Chan Ha; Kyung-Hoi Koo
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 2.153

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.