Literature DB >> 33131988

Immediate dental and skeletal influence of distractor position on surgically assisted rapid palatal expansion with or without pterygomaxillary disjunction.

S C Möhlhenrich1, K Ernst2, F Peters2, K Kniha2, S Chhatwani3, A Prescher4, G Danesh3, F Hölzle2, A Modabber2.   

Abstract

The outcome of surgically assisted rapid palatal expansion (SARPE) can be affected by pterygomaxillary disjunction (PMD) and the distractor position. In this study, SARPE was performed, with or without PMD, in 20 fresh cadaver heads. Transverse expansion was conducted twice using a bone-borne distractor in the anterior and posterior positions, resulting in four groups (n=10). Cone beam computed tomography scans were completed before and after SARPE to evaluate maxillary changes. A comparative anterior decrease and posterior increase in midpalatal opening resulted from SARPE with PMD combined with a posteriorly placed distractor. Significant differences in the internal transverse changes were found between the two SARPE techniques combined with an anterior distractor at the level of the premolars and molars for alveolar ridge width (P=0.040, P=0.024), and at the level of the molars for the dental crown width (P=0.017) and corresponding tooth cusp width (P=0.018). In contrast, using a posteriorly placed distractor led to a significant difference for tooth cusp width only (P=0.050). No statistically significant differences were found between external transverse changes or between distractor positions. PMD is more important in achieving a more uniform and parallel transverse expansion pattern than the distractor position. However, a posterior distractor seems to intensify the effects of PMD.
Copyright © 2020 International Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  SARPE; distractor; orthodontics; pterygomaxillary disconnection; pterygomaxillary disjunction; surgically assisted rapid palatal expansion

Year:  2020        PMID: 33131988     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2020.10.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0901-5027            Impact factor:   2.789


  4 in total

1.  Significance of bone morphology and quality on the primary stability of orthodontic mini-implants: in vitro comparison between human bone substitute and artificial bone.

Authors:  Sachin Chhatwani; Ouafaa Kouji-Diehl; Kristian Kniha; Ali Modabber; Frank Hölzle; Jozsef Szalma; Gholamreza Danesh; Stephan Christian Möhlhenrich
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Age-dependent interactions of maxillary sutures during RME and their effects on palatal morphology : CBCT and dental cast analysis.

Authors:  Gero Stefan Michael Kinzinger; Jan Hourfar; Charlotte Buschhoff; Frank Heller; Heike Maria Korbmacher-Steiner; Jörg Alexander Lisson
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2022-10-07       Impact factor: 2.341

3.  Displacement and stress distribution of the craniomaxillofacial complex under different surgical conditions: a three-dimensional finite element analysis of fracture mechanics.

Authors:  Junjie Chen; Yuhan Xu; Chengri Li; Lingling Zhang; Fang Yi; Yanqin Lu
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2021-11-22       Impact factor: 2.757

4.  Evaluation of symmetry behavior of surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion with simulation-driven targeted bone weakening.

Authors:  S Chhatwani; K Schudlich; S C Möhlhenrich; A Pugachev; A Bicsak; B Ludwig; S Hassfeld; G Danesh; L Bonitz
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 3.573

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.