Literature DB >> 33130864

Factors Associated With Home Visits in a 5-Year Study of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Survivors.

Lisa Aronson Friedman1, Daniel L Young2, Archana Nelliot3, Elizabeth Colantuoni4, Pedro A Mendez-Tellez5, Dale M Needham6, Victor D Dinglas7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Participant retention is vital for longitudinal studies. Home visits may increase retention, but little is known about the subset of patients they benefit.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate patient-related variables associated with home visits.
METHODS: In a 5-year, longitudinal, multisite, prospective study of 195 survivors of acute respiratory distress syndrome, in-person assessments were conducted at a research clinic. Home visits were offered to participants who could not attend the clinic. Associations between having a home visit, prior follow-up visit status, and baseline and in-hospital patient variables were evaluated with multivariable, random-intercept logistic regression models. The association between home visits and patients' posthospital clinical status was evaluated with a subsequent regression model adjusted for these variables.
RESULTS: Participants had a median age of 49 years and were 56% male and 58% White. The following had independent associations with home visits (adjusted odds ratio [95% CI]): age (per year: 1.03 [1.00-1.05]) and immediately preceding visit incomplete (2.46 [1.44-4.19]) or at home (8.24 [4.57-14.86]). After adjustment for prior-visit status and baseline and hospitalization variables, these posthospital patient outcome variables were associated with a subsequent home visit: instrumental activities of daily living (≥ 2 vs < 2 dependencies: 2.32 [1.29-4.17]), EQ-5D utility score (per 0.1-point decrease: 1.15 [1.02-1.30]), and 6-minute walk test (per 10-percentage-point decrease in percent-predicted distance: 1.50 [1.26-1.79]).
CONCLUSIONS: Home visits were important for retaining older and more physically impaired study participants, helping reduce selection bias caused by excluding them. ©2020 American Association of Critical-Care Nurses.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 33130864      PMCID: PMC7640764          DOI: 10.4037/ajcc2020966

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Crit Care        ISSN: 1062-3264            Impact factor:   2.228


  44 in total

1.  The changing epidemiology of mechanical ventilation: a population-based study.

Authors:  Shannon S Carson; Christopher E Cox; George M Holmes; Ann Howard; Timothy S Carey
Journal:  J Intensive Care Med       Date:  2006 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.510

2.  Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living.

Authors:  M P Lawton; E M Brody
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  1969

3.  Strategies for retaining study participants in behavioral intervention trials: retention experiences of the NIH Behavior Change Consortium.

Authors:  Mace Coday; Carla Boutin-Foster; Tamara Goldman Sher; Jennifer Tennant; Mary L Greaney; Sandra D Saunders; Grant W Somes
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2005-04

Review 4.  Long-term complications of critical care.

Authors:  Sanjay V Desai; Tyler J Law; Dale M Needham
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 5.  Retaining and tracking cohort study members.

Authors:  J R Hunt; E White
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 6.222

Review 6.  Systematic review identifies number of strategies important for retaining study participants.

Authors:  Karen A Robinson; Cheryl R Dennison; Dawn M Wayman; Peter J Pronovost; Dale M Needham
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2007-05-10       Impact factor: 6.437

7.  Participant retention practices in longitudinal clinical research studies with high retention rates.

Authors:  Martha Abshire; Victor D Dinglas; Maan Isabella A Cajita; Michelle N Eakin; Dale M Needham; Cheryl Dennison Himmelfarb
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2017-02-20       Impact factor: 4.615

8.  Implementation of an ICU Recovery Clinic at a Tertiary Care Academic Center.

Authors:  Rita N Bakhru; James F Davidson; Rebeca E Bookstaver; Michael T Kenes; Stephen P Peters; Kristin G Welborn; Oksana R Creech; Peter E Morris; D Clark Files
Journal:  Crit Care Explor       Date:  2019-08-09

9.  Attrition in longitudinal randomized controlled trials: home visits make a difference.

Authors:  Janey C Peterson; Paul A Pirraglia; Martin T Wells; Mary E Charlson
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2012-11-23       Impact factor: 4.615

10.  Long-term recovery following critical illness in an Australian cohort.

Authors:  Kimberley J Haines; Sue Berney; Stephen Warrillow; Linda Denehy
Journal:  J Intensive Care       Date:  2018-02-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.