OBJECTIVE: Loss to follow-up threatens internal and external validity yet little research has examined ways to limit participant attrition. We conducted a systematic review of studies with a primary focus on strategies to retain participants in health care research. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTINGS: We completed searches of PubMed, CINAHL, CENTRAL, Cochrane Methodology Register, and EMBASE (August 2005). We also examined reference lists of eligible articles and relevant reviews. A data-driven thematic analysis of the retention strategies identified common themes. RESULTS: We retrieved 3,068 citations, 21 studies were eligible for inclusion. We abstracted 368 strategies and from these identified 12 themes. The studies reported a median of 17 strategies across a median of six themes. The most commonly reported strategies were systematic methods of participant contact and scheduling. Studies with retention rates lower than the mean rate (86%) reported fewer strategies. There was no difference in the number of different themes used. CONCLUSION: Available evidence suggests that investigators should consider using a number of retention strategies across several themes to maximize the retention of participants. Further research, including explicit evaluation of the effectiveness of different strategies, is needed.
OBJECTIVE: Loss to follow-up threatens internal and external validity yet little research has examined ways to limit participant attrition. We conducted a systematic review of studies with a primary focus on strategies to retain participants in health care research. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTINGS: We completed searches of PubMed, CINAHL, CENTRAL, Cochrane Methodology Register, and EMBASE (August 2005). We also examined reference lists of eligible articles and relevant reviews. A data-driven thematic analysis of the retention strategies identified common themes. RESULTS: We retrieved 3,068 citations, 21 studies were eligible for inclusion. We abstracted 368 strategies and from these identified 12 themes. The studies reported a median of 17 strategies across a median of six themes. The most commonly reported strategies were systematic methods of participant contact and scheduling. Studies with retention rates lower than the mean rate (86%) reported fewer strategies. There was no difference in the number of different themes used. CONCLUSION: Available evidence suggests that investigators should consider using a number of retention strategies across several themes to maximize the retention of participants. Further research, including explicit evaluation of the effectiveness of different strategies, is needed.
Authors: N A Hessol; M Schneider; R M Greenblatt; M Bacon; Y Barranday; S Holman; E Robison; C Williams; M Cohen; K Weber Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2001-09-15 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Rosalind J Carter; Reynold G B Senesi; Peter Dawson; Ibrahim Gassama; S A S Kargbo; Carey R Petrie; Mohamed Hashim Rogers; Mohamed Samai; Elizabeth T Luman Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2018-05-18 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: An-Wen Chan; Jennifer M Tetzlaff; Peter C Gøtzsche; Douglas G Altman; Howard Mann; Jesse A Berlin; Kay Dickersin; Asbjørn Hróbjartsson; Kenneth F Schulz; Wendy R Parulekar; Karmela Krleza-Jeric; Andreas Laupacis; David Moher Journal: BMJ Date: 2013-01-08
Authors: Shannon M Pretzel; Tara S Andrews; Karen Broski; Jeffery C Childs; Lisa H Gren; Sheryl L Ogden; Jerome Mabie; Brett Thomas; Heather M Rozjabek; Pamela M Marcus Journal: Clin Med Res Date: 2015-09-20
Authors: Christina C Norman; Kate McDonald; Amanda E Schneider; Igor Malinovsky; Emily Goldmann; Michael K Blauschild; Cynthia Driver Journal: Int J Methods Psychiatr Res Date: 2018-02-02 Impact factor: 4.035
Authors: Claudia E Bambs; Kevin E Kip; Suresh R Mulukutla; Aryan N Aiyer; Cheryl Johnson; Lee Ann McDowell; Karen Matthews; Steven E Reis Journal: Ann Epidemiol Date: 2013-03-25 Impact factor: 3.797
Authors: Deborah A DeVita; Mary C White; Xin Zhao; Zhanna Kaidarova; Edward L Murphy Journal: BMC Med Res Methodol Date: 2009-03-10 Impact factor: 4.615