Literature DB >> 33130245

Presentation of self-detected breast mass in minority women with limited access to care: Can self-examination assist in early cancer detection?

Zi Zhang1, Ramya Rao2, Victoria L Mango3, Priscilla Wilson-Gardner2, Soumya Vempalle2, Oreoluwa Ojutiku2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The United States Preventive Services Task Force recommends against breast self-examination. However, racial disparities exist in mammogram screening. We aimed to evaluate the presentation of women with newly diagnosed breast cancer in the underserved African-American and Hispanic community to provide insight regarding breast cancer screening in this population.
METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included women newly diagnosed with breast cancer from 1/1/2016 to 1/1/2018 in an inner city public community hospital. Data was collected via chart review. Patients were divided based on whether they presented with self-detected breast mass. Logistic regression was used for analysis.
RESULTS: 59 women were newly diagnosed with breast cancer. 34 women (58%) were African-American, 20 (34%) were Hispanic, and 5 (8%) were other race. Of 59 women, 36 (61%) presented with self-detected breast mass, and only 21 (36%) reported prior mammography. For women who presented with breast mass, the odds of having prior mammography were 78% lower (OR = 0.22, 95% CI 0.07-0.69, p = 0.009), while the odds of having invasive ductal carcinoma were 4.33 times higher (OR = 4.33, 95% CI 1.09-17.25, p = 0.037), as compared to the odds for women not presenting with breast mass.
CONCLUSION: Many of our newly diagnosed breast cancer patients were African-American or Hispanic women presenting with self-detected breast mass without prior screening mammography. Further studies should evaluate whether supplemental screening methods, such as breast self-examination or clinical examination, can help with early breast cancer detection in minority women with limited access to care, and such disparities should be considered by organizations when creating screening guidelines.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  African American; Breast cancer; Breast self-examination; Hispanic; Screening

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33130245      PMCID: PMC7855496          DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2020.10.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Imaging        ISSN: 0899-7071            Impact factor:   1.605


  26 in total

Review 1.  Breast self-examination.

Authors:  C J Baines
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1992-04-01       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Assessing the efficacy of a peer education model in teaching breast self-examination to university students.

Authors:  Arzu Tuna Malak; Aklime Dicle
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2007 Oct-Dec

3.  Racial Disparities in Screening Mammography in the United States: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ahmed T Ahmed; Brian T Welch; Waleed Brinjikji; Wigdan H Farah; Tara L Henrichsen; M Hassan Murad; John M Knudsen
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 5.532

Review 4.  Effectiveness of Breast Cancer Screening: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis to Update the 2009 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation.

Authors:  Heidi D Nelson; Rochelle Fu; Amy Cantor; Miranda Pappas; Monica Daeges; Linda Humphrey
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Determinants of breast cancer screening among inner-city Hispanic women in comparison with other inner-city women.

Authors:  J P Fulton; W Rakowski; A C Jones
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1995 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.792

6.  A significant number of women present with palpable breast cancer even with a normal mammogram within 1 year.

Authors:  Danielle J Haakinson; Chee-Chee H Stucky; Amylou C Dueck; Richard J Gray; Nabil Wasif; Heidi A Apsey; Barbara Pockaj
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  The rational clinical examination. Does this patient have breast cancer? The screening clinical breast examination: should it be done? How?

Authors:  M B Barton; R Harris; S W Fletcher
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-10-06       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Socioeconomic disparities in preventive care persist despite universal coverage. Breast and cervical cancer screening in Ontario and the United States.

Authors:  S J Katz; T P Hofer
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1994-08-17       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Randomized trial of breast self-examination in Shanghai: final results.

Authors:  David B Thomas; Dao Li Gao; Roberta M Ray; Wen Wan Wang; Charlene J Allison; Fan Liang Chen; Peggy Porter; Yong Wei Hu; Guan Lin Zhao; Lei Da Pan; Wenjin Li; Chunyuan Wu; Zakia Coriaty; Ilonka Evans; Ming Gang Lin; Helge Stalsberg; Steven G Self
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2002-10-02       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  Clinical measures to assess the practice and efficiency of breast self-examination.

Authors:  J Philip; W G Harris; C Flaherty; C A Joslin
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1986-08-15       Impact factor: 6.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.