Literature DB >> 12359854

Randomized trial of breast self-examination in Shanghai: final results.

David B Thomas1, Dao Li Gao, Roberta M Ray, Wen Wan Wang, Charlene J Allison, Fan Liang Chen, Peggy Porter, Yong Wei Hu, Guan Lin Zhao, Lei Da Pan, Wenjin Li, Chunyuan Wu, Zakia Coriaty, Ilonka Evans, Ming Gang Lin, Helge Stalsberg, Steven G Self.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Among women who practice breast self-examination (BSE), breast cancers may be detected when they are at an earlier stage and are smaller than in women who do not practice BSE. However, the efficacy of breast self-examination for decreasing breast cancer mortality is unproven. This study was conducted to determine whether an intensive program of BSE instruction will reduce the number of women dying of breast cancer.
METHODS: From October 1989 through October 1991, 266,064 women associated with 519 factories in Shanghai were randomly assigned to a BSE instruction group (132,979 women) or a control group (133,085 women). Initial instruction in BSE was followed by reinforcement sessions 1 and 3 years later, by BSE practice under medical supervision at least every 6 months for 5 years, and by ongoing reminders to practice BSE monthly. The women were followed through December 2000 for mortality from breast cancer. Cumulative risk ratios of dying from breast cancer were estimated using Cox proportional hazards models. All statistical tests were two-sided.
RESULTS: There were 135 (0.10%) breast cancer deaths in the instruction group and 131 (0.10%) in the control group. The cumulative breast cancer mortality rates through 10 to 11 years of follow-up were similar (cumulative risk ratio for women in the instruction group relative to that in the control group = 1.04, 95% confidence interval = 0.82 to 1.33; P =.72). However, more benign breast lesions were diagnosed in the instruction group than in the control group.
CONCLUSIONS: Intensive instruction in BSE did not reduce mortality from breast cancer. Programs to encourage BSE in the absence of mammography would be unlikely to reduce mortality from breast cancer. Women who choose to practice BSE should be informed that its efficacy is unproven and that it may increase their chances of having a benign breast biopsy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12359854     DOI: 10.1093/jnci/94.19.1445

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  151 in total

1.  Breast self examination. Breast self examination provides entry strategy.

Authors:  Richard J Epstein
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-03-29

Review 2.  Improving outcomes in breast cancer for low and middle income countries.

Authors:  C H Yip; I Buccimazza; M Hartman; S V S Deo; P S Y Cheung
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Screening without evidence of efficacy.

Authors:  Malcolm Law
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-02-07

4.  Breast self examination.

Authors:  Joan Austoker
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-01-04

5.  Leading the way in breast cancer screening and prevention.

Authors:  Katrina Armstrong
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Practical Applications for Clinical Breast Examination (CBE) and Breast Self-Examination (BSE) in Screening and Early Detection of Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Anthony B Miller
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2008-02-08       Impact factor: 2.860

7.  The influence of breast self-examination on subsequent mammography participation.

Authors:  Susan E Jelinski; Colleen J Maxwell; Jay Onysko; Christina M Bancej
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Occupational exposure to magnetic fields and breast cancer among women textile workers in Shanghai, China.

Authors:  Wenjin Li; Roberta M Ray; David B Thomas; Michael Yost; Scott Davis; Norman Breslow; Dao Li Gao; E Dawn Fitzgibbons; Janice E Camp; Eva Wong; Karen J Wernli; Harvey Checkoway
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2013-09-15       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 9.  Screening for breast cancer.

Authors:  Joann G Elmore; Katrina Armstrong; Constance D Lehman; Suzanne W Fletcher
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-03-09       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Reproductive factors and risk of lung cancer in female textile workers in Shanghai, China.

Authors:  Lisa G Gallagher; Karin A Rosenblatt; Roberta M Ray; Wenjin Li; Dao L Gao; Katie M Applebaum; Harvey Checkoway; David B Thomas
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2013-04-13       Impact factor: 2.506

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.