| Literature DB >> 33129236 |
Moslem Afsharnezhad1, S Shirin Shahangian1, Behnam Rasti2, Mohammad Faezi Ghasemi2.
Abstract
Background: This study was devoted to assessing the inhibitory potential of acetone, methanol, and ethanol extracts of Acroptilon repens against disease-associated enzymes, as well as their antioxidant/antibacterial activity and phytochemical composition.Entities:
Keywords: Acroptilon repens; Antioxidants; Phytochemicals
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33129236 PMCID: PMC7748113 DOI: 10.29252/ibj.25.1.21
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Iran Biomed J ISSN: 1028-852X
TPC, TFC, and TAC of Acroptilon repens, extracted using various solvents
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Acetone | 3.44 ± 0.32a | 2.09 ± 0.2a | 0.26 ± 0.02c |
| Methanol | 2.45 ± 0.27b | 1.43 ± 0.15b | 0.59 ± 0.035a |
| Ethanol | 2.32 ± 0.31b | 1.02 ± 0.08c | 0.47 ± 0.03b |
Each value is expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3). Means, in the same column, with different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Effect of the extraction solvent on the antioxidant activities of Acroptilon repens
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acetone (70%) | 0.551 ± 0.1a | 0.74 ± 0.049a | 0.354 ± 0.01a | 30.06 ± 1.73a |
| Methanol (70%) | 0.756 ± 0.12b | 0.59 ± 0.033b | 0.425 ± 0.015b | 43.57 ± 2.23b |
| Ethanol (70%) | 0.918 ± 0.15c | 0.45 ± 0.044c | 0.528 ± 0.018c | 51.18 ± 2.87c |
| BHA | 0.03 ± 0.001 | - | - | - |
| Trolox | - | - | 0.012 ± 0.001 | - |
Each value is expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3). Means, in the same column, with different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Fig. 1DPPH radical scavenging activity of different extracts of Acroptilon repens. A 70% (acetone 70%), M 70% (methanol 70%), and E 70% (ethanol 70%).
Fig. 2(A). RP of different extracts (A 70%, acetone 70%; M 70%, methanol 70%; E 70%, ethanol 70%). Hydrogen peroxide scavenging ability of different extracts: (B) acetone, (C) methanol, and (D) ethanol. HP, hydrogen peroxide
Chemical composition of the essential oil of Acroptilon repens
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Decanal | 1198 | 0.5 |
| α-Cubebene | 1351 | 0.3 |
| Cyclosativene | 1367 | 0.1 |
| α-Copaene | 1378 | 10.1 |
| β-Cubebene | 1391 | 3.8 |
| α-Gurjunene | 1408 | 0.3 |
| α-Cedrene | 1411 | 2.7 |
| β-Caryophyllene | 1421 | 8.2 |
| α-Humulene | 1453 | 1.8 |
| γ-Muurolene | 1479 | 1.3 |
| Germacrene D | 1486 | 4.4 |
| Cadina-1,4-diene | 1503 | 0.8 |
| γ- Cadinene | 1516 | 1.7 |
| ∆-Cadinene | 1521 | 4.1 |
| δ- Cadinene | 1526 | 0.9 |
| Caryophyllene oxide | 1578 | 12.7 |
| 1- Heptadecene | 1691 | 3.1 |
| Aliphatic hydrocarbons | 7.0 | |
| Oxygenated sesquiterpenes | 17.3 |
RI, retention indices
Fig. 3The effect of various extracts of Acroptilon repens on (A) α-amylase and (B) AChE activity. A 70%, acetone 70%; M 70%, methanol 70%; E 70%, ethanol 70%
Enzyme inhibitory activity of different extracts of Acroptilon repens
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| α-amylase | 0.399 ± 0.016a | 0.579 ± 0.02b | 0.63 ± 0.028c |
| 0.023 ± 0.005 |
| Acetyl cholinesterase | 0.325 ± 0.026a | 0.448 ± 0.012b | 0.621 ± 0.022c | 0.018 ± 0.004 |
|
Each value is expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3). Means, in the same row, with different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Anti-bacterial activity of various extracts of Acroptilon repens at different concentrations against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacterial strains
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
| 25.0 ± 1.4a | 19.0 ± 1.4b | 15.0 ± 0.7c | 22.0 ± 1.4a | 17.0 ± 0.7b | 14.0 ± 0.7c | 18.0 ± 0.7a | 14.0 ± 0.3b | 12.0 ± 0.3c | ||
|
| 22.0 ± 0.7a | 17.0 ± 0.3b | 14.0 ± 0.3c | 19.0 ± 1.4a | 13.0 ± 0.7b | 10.0 ± 0.3c | 16.0 ± 0.7a | 11.0 ± 1.4b | 8.0 ± 1.4c | ||
|
| 19.0 ± 0.7a | 16.0 ± 0.3b | 13.0 ± .03c | 16.0 ± 0.7a | 12.0 ± 0.3b | 9.0 ± 0.3c | 14.0 ± 1.4a | 10.0 ± 0.7b | 7.0 ± 0.7c | ||
|
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
|
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
Each value is expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3). Different letters in different extracts within the same row indicate significant differences (p < 0.05). St., strains; BS, B. subtilis; SA, S. aureus; ML, M. luteus; EC, E. coli; P.a., P. aeruginosa
Correlation coefficients between the data obtained from different assays
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
| TPC | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
| TFC | 0.767* | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
| TAC | -0.799** | -0.679* | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
| DPPH | -0.841** | -0.917** | 0.662ns | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | ||
| FRAP | 0.802** | 0.932** | -0.663ns | -0.918** | 1 | - | - | - | - | ||
| IT50 | -0.831** | -0.928** | 0.691* | 0.951** | -0.972** | 1 | - | - | - | ||
| EC50 | -0.750* | -0.926** | 0.533ns | 0.944** | -0.944** | 0.959** | 1 | - | - | ||
| AAI | -0.915** | -0.930** | 0.810** | 0.937** | -0.916** | 0.939** | 0.905** | 1 | - | ||
| AChEI | -0.787* | -0.942** | 0.555ns | 0.953** | -0.961** | 0.969** | 0.982** | 0.904** | 1 | ||
*Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed); **Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed); ns, not significant