Joseph Friedman1, Jennifer L Syvertsen2, Philippe Bourgois1, Alex Bui3, Leo Beletsky4, Robin Pollini5. 1. Center for Social Medicine and Humanities, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, United States. 2. Department of Anthropology, University of California, Riverside, California, United States. 3. Department of Radiological Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, California, United States. 4. School of Law, Department of Health Sciences, and Health in Justice Action Lab, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts, United States. 5. Department of Behavioral Medicine and Psychiatry, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, United States; Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation, Beltsville, Maryland, United States. Electronic address: robin.pollini@hsc.wvu.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Abusive and violent policing is an important determinant of health for people who inject drugs (PWID), which has been linked to structural vulnerability. However, further exploration of the intersectional nature of this vulnerability is warranted. California's Central Valley is a largely rural/suburban and politically conservative area, with high rates of injection drug use and overdose mortality, where rates of abusive policing of PWID have not been characterized. METHODS: We assessed self-reported experiences of abusive policing using a sequential mixed-methods approach, consisting of n = 54 in-depth qualitative interviews followed by a respondent driven survey of n = 494 PWID. Qualitative conclusions were used to guide the development a novel quantitative framework to explore intersectional structural vulnerability, drawing on UpSet visualization and multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: Qualitative analysis suggests that abusive policing is not random or isolated; instead it can be understood in the context of routinized police harassment of PWID, which can escalate into physical or other forms of violence. These cycles are mediated by various forms of social disadvantage-often articulated through the frame of "looking like a drug user"-with deep connections to markers of race, class, gender, occupation and other elements of personal identity. Quantitative results confirm high frequency of abusive encounters with police, including physical violence (42%), verbal abuse (62%), sexual violence (9%), and the confiscation of new/unused syringes (39%). Females report higher rates of sexual violence and exploitation (aOR= 4.2; 95% CI: 2.1-9.0) and males report higher rates of physical violence (aOR=3.6; 95% CI: 2.4-5.6) and all other outcomes. Experiencing homelessness, having traded sex, and living in a rural zip code, are independently associated with numerous forms of police abuse. Intersectional analysis reveals clusters of individuals with highly elevated vulnerability, and in general, having a greater number of vulnerability factors was associated with increased odds of police abuse. CONCLUSIONS: We find that structural vulnerability is linked-in a highly intersectional manner-with experiencing abusive police encounters among PWID in California's Central Valley. Monitoring, prevention, and response to deleterious law enforcement practices must be integrated into structural interventions to protect vulnerable groups. Reform is especially urgent in rural/suburban areas that are increasingly important focal points to reduce social and health harms associated with injection drug use.
BACKGROUND: Abusive and violent policing is an important determinant of health for people who inject drugs (PWID), which has been linked to structural vulnerability. However, further exploration of the intersectional nature of this vulnerability is warranted. California's Central Valley is a largely rural/suburban and politically conservative area, with high rates of injection drug use and overdose mortality, where rates of abusive policing of PWID have not been characterized. METHODS: We assessed self-reported experiences of abusive policing using a sequential mixed-methods approach, consisting of n = 54 in-depth qualitative interviews followed by a respondent driven survey of n = 494 PWID. Qualitative conclusions were used to guide the development a novel quantitative framework to explore intersectional structural vulnerability, drawing on UpSet visualization and multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: Qualitative analysis suggests that abusive policing is not random or isolated; instead it can be understood in the context of routinized police harassment of PWID, which can escalate into physical or other forms of violence. These cycles are mediated by various forms of social disadvantage-often articulated through the frame of "looking like a drug user"-with deep connections to markers of race, class, gender, occupation and other elements of personal identity. Quantitative results confirm high frequency of abusive encounters with police, including physical violence (42%), verbal abuse (62%), sexual violence (9%), and the confiscation of new/unused syringes (39%). Females report higher rates of sexual violence and exploitation (aOR= 4.2; 95% CI: 2.1-9.0) and males report higher rates of physical violence (aOR=3.6; 95% CI: 2.4-5.6) and all other outcomes. Experiencing homelessness, having traded sex, and living in a rural zip code, are independently associated with numerous forms of police abuse. Intersectional analysis reveals clusters of individuals with highly elevated vulnerability, and in general, having a greater number of vulnerability factors was associated with increased odds of police abuse. CONCLUSIONS: We find that structural vulnerability is linked-in a highly intersectional manner-with experiencing abusive police encounters among PWID in California's Central Valley. Monitoring, prevention, and response to deleterious law enforcement practices must be integrated into structural interventions to protect vulnerable groups. Reform is especially urgent in rural/suburban areas that are increasingly important focal points to reduce social and health harms associated with injection drug use.
Authors: Anne E Fehrenbacher; Ju Nyeong Park; Katherine H A Footer; Bradley E Silberzahn; Sean T Allen; Susan G Sherman Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2020-01 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Lisa Bowleg; Ana Maria Del Río-González; Mary Mbaba; Cheriko A Boone; Sidney L Holt Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2020-01 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Andrea M Lopez; Matthew Thomann; Zena Dhatt; Julieta Ferrera; Marwa Al-Nassir; Margaret Ambrose; Shane Sullivan Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2022-04 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Mohammad Karamouzian; Hamid Sharifi; Mehrdad Khezri; Mostafa Shokoohi; Ali Mirzazadeh; Fatemeh Tavakoli; Nima Ghalekhani; Ghazal Mousavian; Soheil Mehmandoost; Parvin Afsar Kazerooni; Ali Akbar Haghdoost Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2022-02-23