BACKGROUND: Neighborhood-level characteristics, including police activity, are associated with HIV and Hepatitis C injection risk-behaviors among people who inject drugs (PWID). However, the pathways through which these neighborhood perceptions shape individual-level HIV risk behaviors are unclear. This study helps to explain perceived behaviors between perceived neighborhood police activity and HIV injection risk behavior (i.e., injection syringe/tool sharing in the previous 6 months). METHODS: A sample of (n = 366) PWIDs who self-reported recent use were recruited using community-based outreach methods in Baltimore, Maryland. Neighborhood police perceptions were assessed by asking participants whether they would (1) be more likely to ask others to share injection tools in the context of heightened police activity and (2) be less likely to carry syringes with them due to fear of arrest. Poisson regression with robust variance was used to identify statistical relationships. Recent police encounters, frequency of heroin injection, and sociodemographic characteristics were controlled for in the model. RESULTS: Neighborhood police perceptions shaped injection-risk behavior. Half of the sample (49%) reported an aversion of carrying personal syringes, due to fear of arrest. Those who agreed they would be more likely to ask others to share injection equipment in the context of heightened police activity were more likely to share syringes (21% vs. 3%, p <.01). Adjusted models showed that syringe sharing was independently associated with asking to borrow equipment in neighborhoods with perceived heightened police activity (aPR: 2.22, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.7, 3.0). CONCLUSION: This study sheds light on how police perceptions may influence injection risk behavior. While these relationships require further elucidation, this study suggests that public health interventions aiming to reduce HIV risk would benefit from improving community-police relationships.
BACKGROUND: Neighborhood-level characteristics, including police activity, are associated with HIV and Hepatitis C injection risk-behaviors among people who inject drugs (PWID). However, the pathways through which these neighborhood perceptions shape individual-level HIV risk behaviors are unclear. This study helps to explain perceived behaviors between perceived neighborhood police activity and HIV injection risk behavior (i.e., injection syringe/tool sharing in the previous 6 months). METHODS: A sample of (n = 366) PWIDs who self-reported recent use were recruited using community-based outreach methods in Baltimore, Maryland. Neighborhood police perceptions were assessed by asking participants whether they would (1) be more likely to ask others to share injection tools in the context of heightened police activity and (2) be less likely to carry syringes with them due to fear of arrest. Poisson regression with robust variance was used to identify statistical relationships. Recent police encounters, frequency of heroin injection, and sociodemographic characteristics were controlled for in the model. RESULTS: Neighborhood police perceptions shaped injection-risk behavior. Half of the sample (49%) reported an aversion of carrying personal syringes, due to fear of arrest. Those who agreed they would be more likely to ask others to share injection equipment in the context of heightened police activity were more likely to share syringes (21% vs. 3%, p <.01). Adjusted models showed that syringe sharing was independently associated with asking to borrow equipment in neighborhoods with perceived heightened police activity (aPR: 2.22, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.7, 3.0). CONCLUSION: This study sheds light on how police perceptions may influence injection risk behavior. While these relationships require further elucidation, this study suggests that public health interventions aiming to reduce HIV risk would benefit from improving community-police relationships.
Entities:
Keywords:
Drug use; HIV; drug policy; enforcement; hepatitis C; injection
Authors: Samuel R Friedman; Hannah Lf Cooper; Barbara Tempalski; Maria Keem; Risa Friedman; Peter L Flom; Don C Des Jarlais Journal: AIDS Date: 2006-01-02 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Cari L Miller; Michelle Firestone; Rebeca Ramos; Scott Burris; Maria Elena Ramos; Patricia Case; Kimberly C Brouwer; Miguel Angel Fraga; Steffanie A Strathdee Journal: Int J Drug Policy Date: 2007-11-09
Authors: Leo Beletsky; Alpna Agrawal; Bruce Moreau; Pratima Kumar; Nomi Weiss-Laxer; Robert Heimer Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2011-09-22 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Karin Elizabeth Tobin; Satoko Janet Kuramoto; Melissa Ann Davey-Rothwell; Carl Asher Latkin Journal: Addiction Date: 2010-11-04 Impact factor: 6.526
Authors: Alison R Ohringer; David P Serota; Rachel L McLean; Lauren J Stockman; James P Watt Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2021-07-21 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Oluwaseun Falade-Nwulia; Rachel E Gicquelais; Jacquie Astemborski; Sean D McCormick; Greg Kirk; Mark Sulkowski; David L Thomas; Shruti H Mehta Journal: Liver Int Date: 2020-10 Impact factor: 8.754
Authors: Katherine H A Footer; Bradley E Silberzahn; Sahnah Lim; Steven Huettner; Victor A Kumar; Derek Loeffler; Sarah M Peitzmeier; Susan G Sherman Journal: BMC Int Health Hum Rights Date: 2020-05-14
Authors: Katherine H A Footer; Ju Nyeong Park; Saba Rouhani; Noya Galai; Bradley E Silberzahn; Steven Huettner; Sean T Allen; Susan G Sherman Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-01-24 Impact factor: 3.240