Literature DB >> 33127425

An Industry Perspective on Compatibility Assessment of Closed System Drug-Transfer Devices for Biologics.

Ahmed Besheer1, Lori Burton2, Richard J Galas3, Kedar Gokhale4, Pierre Goldbach5, Qingyan Hu6, Ligi Mathews4, Kevin Muthurania4, Chakravarthy Narasimhan7, Shubhadra N Singh8, Elaine S E Stokes9, Sarah Weiser10, Camellia Zamiri11, Shuxia Zhou3.   

Abstract

The Formulation Workstream of the BioPhorum Development Group (BPDG), an industry-wide consortium, has identified the increased use of closed system drug-transfer devices (CSTDs) with biologics, without an associated compatibility assessment, to be of significant concern. The use of CSTDs has increased significantly in recent years due to the recommendations by NIOSH and USP that they be used during preparation and administration of hazardous drugs. While CSTDs are valuable in the healthcare setting to reduce occupational exposure to hazardous compounds, these devices may present particular risks that must be adequately assessed prior to use to ensure their compatibility with specific types of drug products, such as biologic drugs, which may be sensitive. The responsibility of ensuring quality of biologic products through preparation and administration to the patient lies with the drug product sponsor. Due to the significant number of marketed CSTD systems, and the large variety of components offered for each system, a strategic, risk-based approach to assessing compatibility is recommended herein. In addition to traditional material compatibility, assessment of CSTD compatibility with biologics should consider additional parameters to address specific CSTD-related risks. The BPDG Formulation Workstream has proposed a systematic risk-based evaluation approach as well as a mitigation strategy for establishing suitability of CSTDs for use.
Copyright © 2020 American Pharmacists Association®. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antibody drug(s); Biocompatibility; Cancer chemotherapy; Physical stability; Protein aggregation; Protein formulation(s)

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33127425     DOI: 10.1016/j.xphs.2020.10.047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharm Sci        ISSN: 0022-3549            Impact factor:   3.534


  2 in total

1.  Closed-system transfer device use with oncology biologics: A survey of Canadian healthcare practitioners.

Authors:  Manmeet Khaira; Allison L Guy
Journal:  J Oncol Pharm Pract       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 1.416

2.  Prevention of coronavirus contamination from the environment using an air-cleaning closed system drug-transfer device.

Authors:  Maya Amichay; Ortal Shimon; Eitan Raveh
Journal:  Pharm Pract (Granada)       Date:  2021-11-18
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.