Literature DB >> 33126814

Differentiate responses of tetraploid and hexaploid wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) to moderate and severe drought stress: a cue of wheat domestication.

Yanwen Gui1, Mohamed S Sheteiwy2, Shuangguo Zhu1, Li Zhu1, Asfa Batool1, Tingting Jia3, Youcai Xiong1.   

Abstract

Differentiate mechanism of wheat species in response to contrasting drought stress gradients implies a cue of its long-term domestication. In the present study, three water regimes including well-watered control (WW, 80% field water capacity (FC)), moderate drought stress (MS, 50% FC,) and severe drought stress (SS, 30% FC) were designed to reveal different responses of eight wheat species (four tetraploid and four hexaploid) representing different breeding decades and genetic origins to drought stresses. The data indicated that 50% FC and 30% FC fell into the soil moisture threshold range of non-hydraulic and hydraulic root signal occurrence, respectively. In general, grain yield, grain number/spike weight per plant, aboveground biomass, harvest index (HI) and water use efficiency (WUE) were significantly higher in hexaploid species than those of tetraploid species under drought stress (P < .05). Particularly, non-hydraulic root signal was triggered and continuously operated under 50% FC, while hydraulic root signal was observed under 30% FC, respectively. Under 80% FC, the allometric exponent (ɑ) of Maboveground vs Mroot decreased from tetraploid to hexaploid (both were of <1), indicating that during the domestication, the hexaploid species allocated less biomass to root system. For the relationship of Mear vs Mvegetative, the ɑ value was significantly greater in the hexaploid species, showing that hexaploid wheat distributed more biomass to ear than tetraploid to improve yield. Under 50% FC, this trend was enhanced. However, under 30% FC, there was no significant difference in the ɑ value between two species. Additionally, correlation analyses on yield formation affirmed the above results. Therefore, drought tolerance tended to be enhanced in hexaploid species under the pressure of artificial selection than that of tetraploid species. When drought stress exceeded a certain threshold, both species would be negatively seriously affected and followed a similar mechanism for better survival.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Drought stress; biomass allocation; ploidy levels; water use efficiency; wheat; yield

Year:  2020        PMID: 33126814      PMCID: PMC7781840          DOI: 10.1080/15592324.2020.1839710

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Signal Behav        ISSN: 1559-2316


  26 in total

1.  How Do Chemical Signals Work in Plants that Grow in Drying Soil?

Authors:  W. J. Davies; F. Tardieu; C. L. Trejo
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 8.340

2.  The effects of domestication on the scaling of below- vs. aboveground biomass in four selected wheat (Triticum; Poaceae) genotypes.

Authors:  XiaoLiang Qin; Karl J Niklas; Lin Qi; YouCai Xiong; FengMin Li
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 3.844

Review 3.  Drought stress responses in crops.

Authors:  Arun K Shanker; M Maheswari; S K Yadav; S Desai; Divya Bhanu; Neha Bajaj Attal; B Venkateswarlu
Journal:  Funct Integr Genomics       Date:  2014-01-10       Impact factor: 3.410

4.  Physiological and biochemical responses of two spring wheat genotypes to non-hydraulic root-to-shoot signalling of partial and full root-zone drought stress.

Authors:  Asfa Batool; Nudrat Aisha Akram; Zheng-Guo Cheng; Guang-Chao Lv; Muhammad Ashraf; Muhammad Afzal; Jun-Lan Xiong; Jian-Yong Wang; You-Cai Xiong
Journal:  Plant Physiol Biochem       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 4.270

5.  Plant winners and losers during grassland N-eutrophication differ in biomass allocation and mycorrhizas.

Authors:  Nancy Collins Johnson; Diane L Rowland; Lea Corkidi; Edith B Allen
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 5.499

Review 6.  Drought Stress Tolerance in Wheat and Barley: Advances in Physiology, Breeding and Genetics Research.

Authors:  Ahmed Sallam; Ahmad M Alqudah; Mona F A Dawood; P Stephen Baenziger; Andreas Börner
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 7.  Transcription Factors Associated with Abiotic and Biotic Stress Tolerance and Their Potential for Crops Improvement.

Authors:  Elamin Hafiz Baillo; Roy Njoroge Kimotho; Zhengbin Zhang; Ping Xu
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 4.096

8.  GABA-Alleviated Oxidative Injury Induced by Salinity, Osmotic Stress and their Combination by Regulating Cellular and Molecular Signals in Rice.

Authors:  Mohamed S Sheteiwy; Hongbo Shao; Weicong Qi; Yousef Alhaj Hamoud; Hiba Shaghaleh; Nasr Ullah Khan; Ruiping Yang; Boping Tang
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 5.923

9.  Different mechanisms of adaptation to cyclic water stress in two South Australian bread wheat cultivars.

Authors:  Ali Izanloo; Anthony G Condon; Peter Langridge; Mark Tester; Thorsten Schnurbusch
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2008-08-13       Impact factor: 6.992

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.