| Literature DB >> 33126577 |
Simon Keckstein1, Sophia Pritz1, Niklas Amann1, Sarah Meister1, Susanne Beyer1, Magdalena Jegen1, Christina Kuhn2, Stefan Hutter1,3, Julia Knabl1,4, Sven Mahner1, Thomas Kolben1, Udo Jeschke1,2, Theresa M Kolben1.
Abstract
Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is known to increase the risk for feto-maternal complications during pregnancy. A state of low-grade inflammation, with elevated levels of proinflammatory molecules, similar to patients with obesity or diabetes mellitus type 2 has also been partly described in GDM. The placenta, as unique interface between mother and fetus, is not only passively affected by changes in one of these organisms, but also acts as a modulator by expressing hormones and cytokines. This study aimed to investigate the expression of the proinflammatory cytokines Interleukin (IL) 7, 8 and 15 in GDM in placental tissue. A total number of 80 placentas were included (40 GDM/40 control group). The expression of IL-7, 8 and 15 was investigated in extravillous trophoblast (EVT) and syncytiotrophoblast (SCT) by immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence double staining. The immunohistochemical staining was evaluated with the semiquanitfied immunoreactive score (IRS). While the expression IL-15 was significantly upregulated in EVTs of women with GDM. The expression of IL-8 was significantly decreased in EVT of the GDM group. Furthermore, significant fetal sex specific differences were detectable in all three cytokines. Our findings suggest an involvement of the investigated cytokines in the maintenance of a state of chronic low-grade inflammation on placental level in patients suffering from GDM.Entities:
Keywords: cytokines; decidua; gestational diabetes; placenta; trophoblast
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33126577 PMCID: PMC7663521 DOI: 10.3390/ijms21218026
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1Representative immunohistochemical staining for IL-7 in extravillous trophoblast (EVT) in placentas of women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and the control group at a magnification of 10×. Staining of the EVT in a placenta affected by GDM (A) and of the control group (B). IL-7 expression of the syncytiotrophoblast (SCT) in placentas with GDM is demonstrated in image (C) and of the control group in image (D). The quantification of the IL-7 expression in placentas (with use of the IRS) of the study and control group and also their subgroups is shown in the box plots. Orange boxes represent the GDM group and blue boxes the control group. The range within the boxes represents the values between the 25th and 75th percentile with a horizontal line at the median. The T-bars extend 1.5 times of the interquartile range, or if no value is in that range, to the minimum or maximum value. The dots are marking the value of each data point. Significant results are linked with lines and marked with an asterisk (p < 0.05: *).
This table shows the median IRS values for both main groups and each subgroup in EVT and SCT. Furthermore, the respective interquartile range is indicated in the brackets.
| GDM Entire | Control Entire | GDM Male | GDM Female | Control Male | Control Female | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IL-7 | EVT | 8.0 (3.5) | 6.0 (4.5) | 7.0 (3.75) | 8.0 (6.5) | 4.0 (4.0) | 6.0 (5.0) |
| SCT | 9.0 (6.0) | 8.0 (9.0) | 10.5 (5.5) | 8.5 (5.5) | 4.0 (9.0) | 8.0 (4.75) | |
| IL-8 | EVT | 1.0 (1.25) | 2.0 (1.5) | 1.0 (2.0) | 1.0 (1.0) | 3.0 (1.0) | 2.0 (2.0) |
| SCT | 1.0 (2.0) | 1.0 (2.5) | 0.0 (1.75) | 2.0 (3.75) | 2.0 (3.0) | 1.0 (1.0) | |
| IL-15 | EVT | 6.0 (6.25) | 2.0 (3.5) | 6.0 (5.75) | 3.0 (6.0) | 2.0 (3.0) | 2.0 (2.75) |
| SCT | 4.5 (7.0) | 2.0 (5.0) | 6.0 (6.0) | 2.5 (8.0) | 2.0 (2.0) | 6.0 (4.0) |
Figure 2Representative immunohistochemical staining for IL-8 in EVT in placentas of women with GDM and the control group at a magnification of 10×. Staining of the EVT in a placenta affected by GDM (A) and of the control group (B). IL-8 expression of the SCT in placentas with GDM is demonstrated in image (C) and of the control group in image (D). The quantification of the IL-8 expression in placentas (with use of the IRS) of the study and control group and also their subgroups is shown in the box plots. Orange boxes represent the GDM group and blue boxes the control group. The range within the boxes represents the values between the 25th and 75th percentile with a horizontal line at the median. The T-bars extend 1.5 times of the interquartile range, or if no value is in that range, to the minimum or maximum value. The dots are marking the value of each data point. Significant results are linked with continuous or dashed lines and marked with an asterisk (p < 0.05: *; p < 0.01: **).
Figure 3Representative immunohistochemical staining for IL-15 in EVT in placentas of women with GDM and the control group at a magnification of 10×. Staining of the EVT in a placenta with GDM is shown in image (A) and of the control group in image (B). IL-15 expression of the SCT in placentas with GDM is demonstrated in image (C) and of the control group in image D. The quantification of the IL-15 expression in placentas (with use of the IRS) of the study and control group and also their subgroups is shown in the box plots. Orange boxes represent the GDM group and blue boxes the control group. The range within the boxes represents the values between the 25th and 75th percentile with a horizontal line at the median. The T-bars extend 1.5 times of the interquartile range, or if no value is in that range, to the minimum or maximum value. The dots are marking the value of each data point. Significant results are linked with lines and marked with an asterisk (p < 0.05: *; p < 0.01: **; p < 0.001: ***).
Linear Median Regression Models for Interleukin Expression Including BMI and GDM.
| Outcome Variable | Input Variable in Model of Median Regression | Coefficients | Estimate | Std. Error | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IL7 EVT | GDM | GDM pos. | 1.00000 | 0.64017 | 0.122 | |
|
| GDM pos. | 1.32075 | 0.58290 | 0.026 * | ||
| BMI | −0.12579 | 0.06127 | 0.043 * | |||
| GDM + BMI + GDM:BMI | 0.067 | GDM pos. | −1.60090 | 1.93476 | 0.410 | |
| BMI | −0.11211 | 0.06038 | 0.067 | |||
| GDM pos.:BMI | 0.11211 | 0.06038 | 0.067 | |||
| IL7 SCT | GDM | 0.010 * | GDM pos. | 0.50000 | 0.87660 | 0.570 |
| GDM+BMI | 0.071. | GDM pos. | 1.95906 | 0.90459 | 0.0336 * | |
| BMI | −0.29240 | 0.14451 | 0.046 * | |||
|
| 0.023 * | GDM pos. | −4.23119 | 2.69147 | 0.120 | |
| BMI | −0.09976 | 0.09253 | 0.284 | |||
| GDM pos.:BMI | 0.21470 | 0.09253 | 0.023 * | |||
| IL8 EVT |
| GDM pos. | −0.50000 | 0.20080 | 0.015 * | |
| GDM+BMI | 0.594 | GDM pos. | −0.50000 | 0.22848 | 0.032 * | |
| BMI | 0.00000 | 0.03716 | 1.000 | |||
| GDM + BMI + GDM:BMI | 0.330 | GMD pos. | −1.59677 | 0.95722 | 0.099 | |
| BMI | −0.04608 | 0.04581 | 0.318 | |||
| GDM pos.:BMI | 0.04608 | 0.04581 | 0.318 | |||
| IL8 SCT |
| 0.027 * | GDM pos. | 0.00000 | 0.32031 | 1.000 |
| GDM+BMI | 0.054. | GDM pos. | 0.46714 | 0.28318 | 0.103 | |
| BMI | −0.04695 | 0.02689 | 0.085 | |||
| GDM + BMI + GDM:BMI | 0.434 | GDM pos. | 0.91727 | 0.84417 | 0.280 | |
| BMI | −0.05591 | 0.02278 | 0.016 * | |||
| GDM pos.:BMI | −0.01789 | 0.02278 | 0.434 | |||
| IL15 EVT |
| 0.015 * | GDM pos. | 2.00000 | 0.64008 | 0.002 |
| GDM+BMI | 0.122 | GDM pos. | 2.00000 | 0.70699 | 0.006 | |
| BMI | 0.00000 | 0.08691 | 1.000 | |||
|
| 0.043 * | GDM pos. | 5.62674 | 2.24393 | 0.014 * | |
| BMI | 0.05811 | 0.07962 | 0.468 | |||
| GDM pos.:BMI | −0.16411 | 0.07962 | 0.043 * | |||
| IL15 SCT |
| 0.144 | GDM pos. | 2.00000 | 0.76082 | 0.010 * |
| GDM+BMI | 0.262 | GDM pos. | 2.00000 | 0.77757 | 0.012 * | |
| BMI | 0.00000 | 0.10292 | 1.000 | |||
| GDM + BMI + GDM:BMI | 0.107 | GDM pos. | 5.69877 | 2.88469 | 0.052 | |
| BMI | −0.00362 | 0.09952 | 0.971 | |||
| GDM pos.:BMI | −0.16235 | 0.09952 | 0.107 |
This table shows the results of the three models of linear median regression investigating the influence of the BMI regarding the interleukin expression. The first model investigates the sole effect being GDM on the interleukin expression. The second model investigates the effect of BMI and GDM without interaction of those variables, and the third model includes the interaction of BMI and GDM. The third column shows the p-value of this particular model compared to the previous less complex model. The choice of the ultimately chosen model depends on this value. The first model (GDM only) is compared to the respective mean of the interleukin expression. The column “estimate” shows the effect on each variable in changing the related input variable(s) by one unit. The column “standard error” refers to the estimation error in the effect estimate in the previous column. The p value given in the seventh column is related to the null hypothesis of no effect of the respective variable. The gray-shaded rows with variables in bold show the models of median regression which describes the data best. Significant results are linked with lines and marked with an asterisk (p < 0.05: *; p < 0.001: ***).
Figure 4This figure shows the respective interleukin expression depending on being GDM positive or negative and the maternal BMI before pregnancy. The y axis shows the respective interleukin expression using the IRS. The x axis shows the BMI. The regression lines of each model of median regression are orange for the GDM positive group and blue for the GDM negative control group. The 95% confidence interval of each group is in the same colors. Every dot describes one case. In the plots of IL7 SCT and IL15 EVT the statistically significant interaction of both variables is shown. The remaining four figures show the interleukin expression depending on the BMI without interaction of those two variables.
Demographic and clinical characteristics of the study population. The values are listed as mean ± SD. Significant p-values are written in bold.
| GDM | Control Group | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Maternal age (years) | 32.83 ± 4.56 | 31.15 ± 6.10 | 0.165 |
| Body mass index (BMI) | 28.13 ± 6.96 | 23.35 ± 6.21 |
|
| Gestational age (weeks) | 39.85 ± 1.29 | 39.78 ± 1.35 | 0.800 |
| Birth weight (g) | 3611.38 ± 0.08 | 3316.88 ± 501.73 |
|
| pH umbilical artery | 7.30 ± 0.08 | 7.29 ± 0.09 | 0.587 |
| Vaginal birth (%) | 67.5 | 79.5 | 0.171 |
| Contractions (%) | 85 | 82.5 | 0.727 |
This table shows the antibodies used for immunohistochemical characterization in this study.
| Antibody | Isotype | Clone | Dilution | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goat-Anti-Mouse Cy3 | Goat IgG | Polyclonal | 1:500 | Dianova, Hamburg Germany |
| HLA-G (FITC marked) | Mouse IgG | Monoclonal | 1:100 | Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, USA |
| IL-15 | Mouse IgG | Monoclonal | 1:1000 | Abcam, Cambridge, UK |
| IL-8 | Mouse IgG | Monoclonal | 1:250 | Abcam, Cambridge, UK |
| Il-7 | Mouse IgG | Monoclonal | 1:100 | R&D Systems, Minneapolis, USA |
Figure 5Double immunofluorescence staining was used for the simultaneous proof of the respective interleukin and HLA expression in cells of EVT. Cy3 marked antibodies (red staining) are showing the respective interleukin expression (first line of the figure). HLA-G antibodies (FITC marked) were used to picture the EVT in green (second line of the figure). Cell nuclei are stained with DAPI in blue.