Literature DB >> 33125960

Effect of reaction condition on microstructure and properties of (NiCuZn)Fe2O4 nanoparticles synthesized via co-precipitation with ultrasonic irradiation.

Yuandong Peng1, Chao Xia2, Minghui Cui2, Zhixin Yao2, Xuwu Yi2.   

Abstract

Nano-spinel ferrites synthesized via chemical co-precipitation method are small in size and have serious agglomeration phenomenon, which makes separation difficult in the subsequent process. Ni0.4Cu0.2Zn0.4Fe2O4 ferrites nanoparticles were synthesized via co-precipitation assisted with ultrasonic irradiation produced by ultrasonic cleaner with 20 kHz frequency using chlorinated salts and KOH as initial materials. The effects of ultrasonic power (0, 40 W, 60 W, 80 W) and reaction temperature on the microstructure and magnetic properties of ferrite nanoparticles were investigated. The structure analyses via XRD revealed the successful formation of pure (NiCuZn)Fe2O4 ferrites nanospinel without any impurity. The crystallites sizes were less than 40 nm and the lattice constant was near 8.39 Å. The TEM showed ferrite particle polygonal. M-H analyses performed the saturation magnetization and coercivity of ferrite nanoparticles obtained at the reaction temperature of 25℃ were higher than at 50℃ with same power. The samples exhibited the highest values of Ms 55.67 emu/g at 25℃ and 47.77 emu/g at 50℃ for 60 W and the lowest values of Hc 71.23 Oe at 25℃ for 40 W and 52.85 Oe at 50℃ for 60 W. The squareness ratio (SQR) were found to be lower than 0.5, which revealed the single magnetic domain nature (NiCuZn)Fe2O4 nanoparticles. All the outcomes show the ultrasonic irradiation has positive effects on improving the microstructure and increasing magnetic properties.
Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Co-precipitation method; Magnetic properties; Nanoparticles; NiCuZn ferrite; Ultrasonic irradiation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33125960      PMCID: PMC7571381          DOI: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2020.105369

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrason Sonochem        ISSN: 1350-4177            Impact factor:   7.491


Introduction

In recent years, developments of magnetic nanoparticles have been receiving significant attention due to a wide range of potential applications and high absorption in the superparamagnetic characteristics, high surface-to-volume ratio, etc[1]. Spinel ferrites are the most attractive ferrite because of the presence of magnetic and electrical properties such as high saturation magnetization (Ms) as well as high dielectric properties and initial permeability, low eddy current loss[2], [3], [4]. they are used in broad applications such as biomedical imaging as MRI contrast agents[2], [5], drug delivery[2], [5], [6], diagnostic of COVID-19[7], wastewater treatment[8], nanofluids[9], visible light–enabled active photodegradation[10], gas sensing[5], energy storage[5], high-frequency antennas[5], electromagnetic interference (EMI) shielding[5], multilayer chip inductors (MLCIs)[4], etc. (NiCuZn)Fe2O4 spinel ferrite, developed on the basis of (NiZn)Fe2O4 ferrite ceramics is a great promising candidate material for core, switching, multilayer chip inductors (MLCI) applications because of its high resistivity, excellent magnetic properties and low sintering temperature[11], [12], [13]. Better magnetic properties of nanoferrites are essential for modern MLCIs to reduce the number of ferrite layer in the chip[14]. Therefore, with the development of miniaturization of components, the preparation of (NiCuZn)Fe2O4 powder with excellent properties has attracted extensive attention[15], [16]. Researchers have reported many methods about the synthesis of (NiCuZn)Fe2O4 nanoparticles such as solid-state reaction method[17], [18], co-precipitation[19], [20], egg-white method[21], hydrothermal synthesis[22], microwave synthesis[13] and sol–gel auto-combustion method[23], [24], [25]. Compared with other methods, chemical co-precipitation has the advantages of lower cost, faster reaction speed, lower requirements on reaction equipment, better performance of the prepared powder, high activity and purity, and is a common method for preparing nano-sized powder[19], [20]. (NiCuZn)Fe2O4 ferrite prepared by co-precipitation method can reach nano particles level, which is beneficial to the subsequent sintering process[26]. However, in the reaction process, products with uniform performance cannot be obtained due to the nonuniformity of the reaction. At the same time, ions prepared by co-precipitation method are small in size and have serious agglomeration phenomenon, which makes separation difficult in the subsequent process[27]. Ultrasonic wave is a high frequency wave with a frequency higher than 2000 Hz and has the advantages of good directivity, strong penetrating power, etc[28], [29]. It is envisaged that ultrasonic-assisted co-precipitation reaction is adopted to find a method for preparing nano (NiCuZn)Fe2O4 ferrite with uniform particle size distribution and excellent performance at lower temperature by Y. Slimani et al[30], [31] using nitrated salts and NaOH as initial materials and by Hassen Harzali et al[32], [33] using sulfated salts as raw materials. The experimental results shown that co-precipitation method coupled with ultrasound irradiation was favor in getting a single spinel phase, the uniformity of co-precipitation particles was significantly improved[28], [34]. Therefore, it can be seen that the introduction of ultrasound-assisted technology into the co-precipitation reaction can achieve excellent results. Despite such exploration, the effect of reaction condition including to ultrasound power and reaction temperature via using the chlorided salts and kOH as raw materials on microstructure and properties of (NiCuZn)Fe2O4 powder remain unclear. There is also a lack of study on the evolution process of the nano ferrite particles under ultrasound. In the present work, it is aimed at carrying out a systematic study of nano-sized Ni0.4Cu0.2Zn0.4Fe2O4 ferrites synthesized by co-precipitation method with the aid of ultrasound irradiation using the chlorided salts and kOH as raw materials. These microstructure and properties were examined using X-ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier transform spectroscopy (FTIR), scanning and transmission electron microscopy (SEM and TEM), and vibrating sample magnetometry (VSM). The effects of reaction condition including to ultrasound power and reaction temperature on microstructure and properties of (NiCuZn)Fe2O4 powder were investigated.

Experimental

Raw materials

The initial materials used in the experiment were commercial potassium hydroxide (KOH) and chlorinated salts including nickel chloride (NiCl2·6H2O), copper chloride (CuCl2·6H2O), zinc chloride (ZnCl2) and ferric chloride (FeCl3·6H2O) with analytical reagent grade purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd.. The weight ratios of various chlorinated salts were calculated according to the stoichiometry of Ni0.4Cu0.2Zn0.4Fe2O4. The precipitator of KOH was matched according to the reaction exceeding 20% in order to the salt completely precipitated.

Preparation of ferrite powder

Four kinds of chlorinated salts were weighed based on the molar ratio dictated by the chemical formula Ni0.4Cu0.2Zn0.4Fe2O4. The reactants were dissolved in proper deionized water to obtain Solution A with the concentration of 0.25 mol/L. Meanwhile, KOH was dissolved in proper deionized water to obtain Solution B with the concentration of 1 mol/L. A water bath was used to maintain the reaction temperature and ultrasonic wave by ultrasonic cleaner (KQ2200DE, frequency:20 kHz). Solutions A and B were then added dropwise into a three-necked flask placed into the water bath together and followed by indirect ultrasonic wave irradiation with a input power (0, 40 W, 60 W or 80 W) and mechanical stirring (300r/min) for 25 min at the set temperature (room temperature or 50℃). The flow rate of metal salt and KOH were controlled to be 10 ml/min and 8 ml/min, respectively. The reaction was continued for 1 h after the dropwise addition was completed. During dropping and subsequent reaction, the pH of the solution was detected with a pH meter every 10 min, controlled within the range of 10.5 ± 0.1, and the pH was adjusted with ammonia solution. After the precipitation reaction was completed, sample left for 48 h. The precipitation was left to separate into layers, the upper clear liquid was poured out, and the lower suspension was poured into a 15 ml centrifuge tube. Then the tube was placed in a high-speed centrifuge (L500) for centrifugation at a speed of 3900r/min for 5 min repeated for three times. Further washed with deionized water for the third time, a muddy product was obtained. The centrifuge tube was placed in a vacuum drying oven with temperature at 70℃ for 16 h, and the required precursor powder was obtained by taking out the dried product. The ferrite powder particles was obtained via the precursor powder calcined at 800℃ for 2 h and cooled with the furnace in an air atmosphere by a muffle furnace. The schematical representation of main synthesizing process shows in Fig. 1.
Fig. 1

Schematical representation of co-precipitation with ultrasonic irradiation synthesis of (NiCuZn)Fe2O4.

Schematical representation of co-precipitation with ultrasonic irradiation synthesis of (NiCuZn)Fe2O4.

Characterization

The phase structure of ferrite powders were analyzed by DX-2700B XRD diffractometer, and the crystal grain size, cell parameters and other structural information of the particles were calculated. The morphology of ferrite particles were observed by SEM (Quanta-200 FEI) and TEM (Tecnai G2 20 FEI). Fourier transform infrared spectra (FTIR; Nicolet 6700) recorded in the range of 400–4000 cm−1 at room temperature were used to investigate the chemical structure. The hysteresis loops of powder samples in the range of ± 1.5 T were measured by a Quantum Design vibrating sample magnetometer (QD-VSM; VLM468P).

Results and discussion

Structural analysis (XRD)

Fig. 2 is the XRD diffraction pattern of samples synthesized at room temperature (25℃) and 50℃ under different ultrasonic powers (0, 40 W, 60 W, 80 W). It can be seen from the figure that the reaction products have obvious diffraction peaks (1 1 1), (2 2 0), (3 1 1), (2 2 2), (4 0 0), (4 2 2), (5 1 1) and (4 4 0) regardless of whether there is ultrasonic assistance or not. Compared with the standard PDF card (JCPDS card No. 08–0234), it is a typical cubic spinel ferrite phase diffraction peak. And no obvious impurity peak is found in the x-ray diffraction pattern, indicating that the obtained spinel ferrite is relatively pure.
Fig. 2

XRD of ferrite particles synthesized with ultrasonic irradiation at (a) RT and (b) 50℃ under difference power.

XRD of ferrite particles synthesized with ultrasonic irradiation at (a) RT and (b) 50℃ under difference power. A simplified chemical pathway that leads to the formation of (NiCuZn)Fe2O4 cubic spinel ferrite particles might be summarized as follows[35]: when calcined at 800 ℃, In this case, the chemical formula of co-precipitation and calcined method is as follows: The chemical reactions described by Eqs. (1), (2) and (3) are actuated immediately once Solution A and Solution B are mixed, whereas the first KOH solution contains precursor cations. The reactions shown by Eqs. (4) and (5) describe the processing that lead to the formation of ferric ions and their precipitation. The reaction described by Eq.(6) is a final form of well-crystallized ferrite has a formula Ni0.4Cu0.2Zn0.4Fe2O4 which has a spinel structure. According to the obtained XRD diffraction pattern, the grain sizes and lattice parameters under different input powers were calculated. The grain sizes (D) of individual ferrite phase were evaluated based on their XRD patterns according to the Scherrer formula[6], [12], [36]: Where D is the crystallite size, λ is X-ray radiation wavelength (1.5418 Å for the Cu Kα radiation), θ is the Bragg angle and β is the full width at half maximum (FWHM) of all diffraction peaks. k is a constant related to crystallite shape, normally taken as 0.9. The grain sizes of (NiCuZn)Fe2O4 ferrites calculated according to (3 1 1) reflections are shown in Table 1.
Table 1

The grain sizes and lattice parameters of ferrite particles synthesized with difference ultrasonic input power.

Temperature(℃)Ultrasonic power(W)Crystallite sizes D(nm)Lattice parameters α(Å)X-ray densitydx (g/cm3)
25035.38.3885.3805
4040.18.3925.3728
6039.78.3965.3652
8038.48.3945.3690
50034.98.3885.3805
4036.58.3895.3786
6036.68.3875.3824
8033.58.3915.3748
The grain sizes and lattice parameters of ferrite particles synthesized with difference ultrasonic input power. Whereas the lattice parameter was investigated using the equation[6], [32]: Where α is the lattice parameter, d is the inter-planar distance and hkl are Miller indices. The calculated values are listed in Table 1. The X-ray density (ρx-ray) of synthesized (NiCuZn)Fe2O4 spinel ferrite nanoparticles at different sonication powers was determined by utilizing the following relation[37], [38]: Where, Z is the number of molecules per unit cell, Z is 8 for (NiCuZn)Fe2O4 ferrite. M is the molecular weight of Ni0.4Cu0.2Zn0.4Fe2O4 ferrite (2 3 8), NA is the Avogadro’s number (6.02 × 1023mol) and α is the lattice parameter of (NiCuZn)Fe2O4 ferrite nanoparticles prepared at different sonication power. The evaluated values of X-ray density of the prepared (NiCuZn)Fe2O4 spinel ferrite nanoparticles at different ultrasonic powers are tabulated in Table 1. It can be seen that the grain size of ferrite powder with ultrasonic assistance at 25℃ is significantly increased compared with that without ultrasonic assistance. The results of 40 W and 60 W are similar. The grain size of ferrite powder with ultrasonic assistance is decreased at 80 W, but it is still higher than that of samples without ultrasonic assistance. Lattice parameters also increase with the increase of input power, and reach the largest value 8.392Ǻ of lattice constant at 60 W. The change law of x-ray density is opposite to that of lattice constant. Further, the structural parameters such as the tetrahedral and octahedral site radii (rA and rB), hopping length in tetrahedral and octahedral site (dA and dB), tetrahedral and octahedral bond lengths (dAx and dBx), tetrahedral edge, shared and unshared octahedral edges (dAxE, dBxE and dBxEU) for sonochemically prepared (NiCuZn)Fe2O4 nanoparticles can be determined by using following equation[37], [39], [40]. where, a is the lattice parameter of spinel ferrite, u (=0.384 Å) is the oxygen positional parameter, and Ro (=1.32 Å) is the radius of oxygen. These calculated values of structural parameters for (NiCuZn)Fe2O4 nanoparticles prepared are listed in Table 2. The hopping length increases with the increase of input ultrasonic power, and reaches the largest value at 60 W power under room temperature. And the value of at room temperature is higher than at 50℃ react temperature. The variation law of other structural parameters is the same, because these parameters are dependent on the lattice constant. It implies that the distance between the magnetic ions in (NiCuZn)Fe2O4 nanoparticles prepared assisted with ultrasonic is related with the amplitude of input power and react temperature. The observed change in structural characteristics triggered by input power and react temperature can lead the change in properties characteristics of (NiCuZn)Fe2O4 nanoparticles prepared via sonochemistry.
Table 2

Ionic Radii, hopping length, tetrahedral bond, octahedral bond, tetrahedral edge, octahedral edge (shared and unshared) for (NiCuZn)Fe2O4 nanoferrites.

Temperature(℃)Ultrasonic power(W)Ionic RadiiHopping LengthTet. BondOct. BondTet. EdgeOct. Edge (Shared & Unshared)
rA(Å)rB(Å)dA(Å)dB(Å)dAx(Å)dBx(Å)dAxE(Å)dBxE(Å)dBxEU(Å)
2500.62600.70153.63202.96601.94602.02483.17912.75212.9694
400.62690.70253.63372.96741.94692.02583.18062.75342.9708
600.62790.70343.63552.96881.94792.02683.18212.75472.9722
800.62740.70303.63462.96811.94742.02633.18132.75412.9715
5000.62600.70153.63202.96601.94602.02493.17912.75212.9694
400.62620.70173.63242.96641.94622.02513.17942.75242.9697
600.62580.70133.63162.96561.94582.02463.17872.75182.9690
800.62670.70223.63332.96701.94672.02563.18022.75312.9704
Ionic Radii, hopping length, tetrahedral bond, octahedral bond, tetrahedral edge, octahedral edge (shared and unshared) for (NiCuZn)Fe2O4 nanoferrites. The inter-ionic distances including to [cations (metal ions)-anions (oxygen ions)] (p, q, r, s) and [cations (metal ions)-cations (metal ions)] (b, c, d, e, f) were calculated according to the below relations and the values are tabulated in Table 3.
Table 3

The values of interionic distances (p, q, r, s, b, c, d, e and f) for (NiCuZn)Fe2O4 nanoferrites.

Temperature(℃)Ultrasonic power(W)p(Å)q(Å)r(Å)s(Å)b(Å)c(Å)d(Å)e(Å)f(Å)
2502.02151.94693.72763.67562.96603.47773.63205.44805.1368
402.02251.94783.72943.67742.96743.47933.63375.45065.1393
602.02341.94873.73123.67912.96883.48103.63555.45325.1417
802.02301.94823.73033.67822.96813.48023.63465.45195.1405
5002.02151.94693.72763.67562.96603.47773.63205.44805.1368
402.02171.94713.72813.67612.96643.47813.63245.44875.1374
602.02131.94663.72723.67522.96563.47723.63165.44745.1362
802.02221.94763.72903.67692.96703.47893.63335.45005.1386
The values of interionic distances (p, q, r, s, b, c, d, e and f) for (NiCuZn)Fe2O4 nanoferrites. It is evidenced from Table 3, it is obvious of the variation of inter-ionic distances is consistent with that of the lattice constant a, because all these inter-ionic distances directly depend on the lattice constant values. Apart from this, the inter-ionic angles such as bond angles (including to θ1, θ2, θ3, θ4, θ5) were estimated by using the following formulas and the calculation results are summarized in Table 4.
Table 4

The values of bond angles (θ1, θ2, θ3, θ4 and θ5) for (NiCuZn)Fe2O4 nanoferrites.

Temperature(℃)Ultrasonic power(W)θ1 (degrees)θ2 (degrees)θ3 (degrees)θ4 (degrees)θ5 (degrees)
250122.399140.92294.38166.72271.964
40122.395140.91994.37866.72071.962
60122.403140.92194.38166.72171.964
80122.402140.91794.37666.72171.963
500122.399140.92294.38166.72271.964
40122.402140.92494.38566.72071.961
60122.394140.92094.37666.72171.964
80122.397140.92394.37966.72271.962
The values of bond angles (θ1, θ2, θ3, θ4 and θ5) for (NiCuZn)Fe2O4 nanoferrites. As seen from Table 4, the inter-ionic angles are affected by the ultrasonic input power and the reaction temperature. This changing nature of the ‘inter-ionic angles’ can be attributed to the intensification and weakening of the cationic interaction with anion i.e. (A)[B] and cationic interaction with cations i.e. [B][B] respectively. But the effect of ultrasonic and reaction temperature on the ionic interaction is much less than that of ion doping in ferrite[39], [40], [41]. The size control of materials is of great importance because the materials with different sizes have different physical properties and applications. Ultrasonic wave specific function is to provide reaction energy to reduce reaction temperature and disperse particles[28], [30], [34]. Previous study have shown that the dispersion rate of the produced particles increased with the increasing electric power for the ultrasonic irradiation[42]. A.L.Nikolaev, et al[43] researched results shown high power ultrasound regime provided smaller nucleation sites and smaller resulting particles, compared to vortices and particles obtained without ultrasound. Therefore, with the increase of ultrasonic power, the grain size of (NiCuZn)Fe2O4 ferrite nanoparticle decreases. This conclusion was also confirmed by Huang[44] in the preparation of Y2BaCuO5 nanoparticles by a co-precipitation process with the aid of ultrasonic irradiation. As can be seen from Table 1, with the increase of ultrasonic power, the grain sizes first increase and then decrease at 50℃ reaction temperature. When the input power is 60 W, the grain size is significantly larger than that of ferrite without ultrasonic assistance. When the power is increased to 80 W, the ferrite grain size is smaller than that without ultrasonic assistance. However, the lattice parameters of 60 W is the smallest (8.387 Å) and of 80 W is the largest (8.391 Å). On the contrary, X-ray densities are the largest at 60 W (5.3824 g/cm3) and the smallest at 80 W (5.3748 g/cm3). Comparing the ferrite powder prepared at 25℃ and 50℃, it can be seen that the grain size of ferrite powder prepared at 25℃ is smaller than that prepared at 50℃, which can be explained from the perspective of nucleation. According to liquid phase crystal growth theory, the crystal formation process is mainly divided into two stages: nucleation process and crystal growth[45]. The nucleation rate can be expressed as: Where, Ω is the constant number, σ is liquid interfacial energy, Vs is the molecular volume, k is the Boltzmann constant number, S is the supersaturation ratio and T is thermodynamic temperature. When the stable nucleus is formed, the crystal grows at a certain rate under affirmative temperature and supersaturation, and the growth rate can be expressed as: Where, F is the additional factor, which refers to the site fraction of molecules that can be adsorbed at the nuclear interface. λ is the distance between atoms, γ0 is the transition frequency, ΔGa is the activation energy, and ΔGv is the change of free energy per unit volume. So the final grain size is affected by the rate of these two processes. The nucleation rate and the growth rate of crystals are both related to the reaction temperature. For both the nucleation rate and the crystal growth rate, there is a maximum value at a certain temperature. Generally, the temperature required for the crystal nucleation rate to reach the maximum value is lower than the temperature required for the crystal growth rate to reach the maximum value. The nucleation rate is faster at low temperature and the crystal growth rate is faster at high temperature, and the final grain size is the result of the combined action of the two. In this study, the lower the preparation temperature was, the larger the grain size was instead of decreasing. This shows that the nucleation process was not only controlled by temperature, but also controlled by other factors. The nucleation rate was proportional to the supersaturation of the liquid according to the formula. That was, the larger the supersaturation, the faster the nucleation rate of the crystal, and the more grains formed per unit time, the larger the grain size. In analyzing the preparation process of the sample, a supersaturated solution was formed in the reaction instant by adopting a parallel feeding method. So the crystal grain nucleation process dominated the whole crystal grain formation process, and the crystal growth process was mainly in the calcination stage. The calcination temperature selected by the two reaction conditions was the same, so the crystal grain size difference was caused by different nucleation stage rates. Supersaturation was greatly controlled by temperature, and also affected by ultrasonic power. At lower temperature, supersaturation was significantly larger than at higher temperature. Therefore, the grain size of ferrite samples prepared at low temperature was larger than that at high temperature. This phenomenon has also been confirmed in the other research [33]. Supersaturation was also affected by ultrasonic power. The main function of ultrasonic applied in chemical reaction was that when interacting with liquid, the solubility of liquid was reduced due to the negative pressure generated locally in the liquid, so that gas escaped to form small bubbles[28]. At the same time, cavitation also promoted the generation of many small bubbles in the liquid, which made the particle size of reaction product more uniform. It might also explain why the grain size under ultrasonic wave was larger than that without ultrasonic wave.

Infrared spectroscopic analysis

Fig. 3 is the infrared spectrum of the sample synthesized with different input powers at 50℃. Each sample has an obvious absorption peak in 581–584 cm−1, which is related to the vibration of octahedral metal ion oxygen complex[33], [46]. All samples presented FTIR stretching bands at about 410 cm−1 (also due to Me-O stretching)[47]. The absorption peak with a wave number of 1630 cm−1 comes from H-O vibration in water, which is due to the small amount of crystal water in the sample. An absorption peak appears at 3430 cm−1, which comes from hydroxyl stretching vibration on ferrite surface[32]. Comparing the peaks of four samples prepared at different input powers, it can be seen that the absorption peak of octahedral metal ion oxygen complex slightly shifts with the increase of ultrasonic power, and the peak shift to the left is the most obvious at 60 W.
Fig. 3

Infrared spectrum of ferrite particles synthesized with difference ultrasonic power at 50℃ reaction temperature.

Infrared spectrum of ferrite particles synthesized with difference ultrasonic power at 50℃ reaction temperature. The absorption peak of infrared spectrum reflects the absorption of infrared light by the sample, which is not only related to the structure of the ferrite sample, but also affected by the other factor. The shift of position is related to the change of particle size[32]. According to XRD results, the grain size of the sample increases with the increase of ultrasonic power, but the increase of grain size is inhibited when the power exceeds a certain value. As can be seen from Fig. 4, under the same power condition and different preparation temperatures, the infrared spectrum peaks of ferrite samples also shift to a certain extent. similar to the previous analysis, this shift is mainly caused by changes in grain size.
Fig. 4

Infrared spectrum of ferrite particles synthesized with 60 W at difference reaction temperature.

Infrared spectrum of ferrite particles synthesized with 60 W at difference reaction temperature.

Morphological analysis

The powder samples prepared under the power of 40 W at the reaction temperature of 50℃ were selected for morphological characterization. Fig. 5 is the SEM obtained under a scanning electron microscope. As can be seen from the figure, because of the low magnification, the sample appears to be somewhat accumulated, and the formed particles have smaller particle sizes. The accumulated particles are roughly regular in shape, and the size distribution of the particles is relatively uniform. It is preliminarily judged that the particle size is below 100 nm, and the specific morphological characteristics and size information need to be further observed by high power electron microscopy.
Fig. 5

SEM of ferrite particles synthesized at 40 W input power under 50℃ reaction temperature.

SEM of ferrite particles synthesized at 40 W input power under 50℃ reaction temperature. The above sample was further observed under the transmission electron microscope. Fig. 6 shows the morphology characteristics of the ferrite powder particles under different multiples. As can be seen from Fig. 6, (NiCuZn)Fe2O4 ferrite particle is polygonal, with a size of less than 40 nm, but there are also a few particles with larger size. It is considered that some particles grow abnormally due to incomplete drying process and small amount of water remaining, but most of the particles are normal in size, proving that the prepared ferrite powder is nanoparticle and nanocrystalline. Compared with the calculated grain size, it can be found that the obtained small particles are of single crystal structure, i.e. each small particle contains only one crystal.
Fig. 6

TEM of ferrite particles synthesized at 40 W power under 50℃ reaction temperature with different magnification.

TEM of ferrite particles synthesized at 40 W power under 50℃ reaction temperature with different magnification. According to the sample preparation process, spinel phase formation mainly occurs during the calcination process of particles. The calcination temperature selected in this experiment was 800℃, at which the easy growth direction of crystal preferentially grew to obtain polyhedral crystal grains.

Magnetic properties of ferrite particles

Fig. 7 shows the hysteresis loops of (NiCuZn)Fe2O4 nanoparticles synthesized under different reaction conditions. As can be seen from the graph, the measured hysteresis loops are all s-shaped, indicating that the sample has good soft magnetic properties.
Fig. 7

Hysteresis loop of ferrite particles synthesized under difference ultrasonic powers at (a) 25℃ and (b) 50℃ reaction temperatures.

Hysteresis loop of ferrite particles synthesized under difference ultrasonic powers at (a) 25℃ and (b) 50℃ reaction temperatures. The saturation magnetization (Ms), remanent magnetization (Mr) and coercivity (Hc) of (NiCuZn)Fe2O4 nanoparticles synthesized at different powers were evaluated from the magnetic hysteresis curves and mentioned in Table 5. It can be seen from the Table 5 that the saturation magnetization increases first and then decreases with the increase of power, and the saturation magnetization of the sample is the largest 47.77 emu/g under the preparation condition of 60 W. It is obvious that under the condition of ultrasonic assistance, the saturation magnetization is greater than that without ultrasonic assistance.
Table 5

Magnetic properties of ferrite particles synthesized under difference ultrasonic power and reaction temperature.

Temperature(℃)Ultrasonic power (W)Ms(emu/g)Mr(emu/g)SQRHc(Oe)nBB)
25045.890.720.015779.531.96
4047.890.740.015471.232.04
6055.670.800.014471.822.37
8050.660.780.015482.562.16
50040.450.660.016366.781.72
4042.340.670.015854.871.80
6047.770.730.015352.852.04
8045.500.710.015664.251.94
Magnetic properties of ferrite particles synthesized under difference ultrasonic power and reaction temperature. Compared saturation magnetization and coercive force under different reaction conditions, it can be seen from the Table 5, the saturation magnetization generated at reaction temperatures of 25℃ is higher than that of ferrite samples at 50℃. Considering the factors affecting the saturation magnetization, the grain size information obtained by combining the previous XRD results is mainly due to the larger grain size of ferrite particles formed at 25℃, so its saturation magnetization is larger. Some main factors including the size of crystal grains, crystal lattice and distribution of various metal elements in the crystal structure affect saturation magnetization. From XRD results, it can be seen that the lattice constant of ferrite samples obtained with ultrasonic assistance of different powers has not changed much, but has a certain influence on the grain size. The grain size of ferrite powder at 60 W is the largest, and the corresponding saturation magnetization is also the largest. However, the saturation magnetization of ferrite powder particles prepared at 80 W is also higher than that without ultrasonic assistance, which indicates that ultrasonic wave not only has the influence on grain size, but also on the crystal structure. According to the change rule of saturation magnetization, it can be considered that this effect is beneficial and promotes the integrity of ferrite structure to some extent. As can be seen from Table 5, with the increase of ultrasonic power, the coercivity of the prepared ferrite samples first decrease and then increase. The coercivity of sample prepared at 60 W reached the smallest 52.85Oe. One reason is that its grain size is large and grain boundary is thin, on the other hand, its crystal structure is complete and its internal stress is small. It is obvious that the coercivity of samples prepared under ultrasonic assistance is smaller than that without ultrasonic assistance. Under the assistance of certain ultrasonic waves, the ferrite sample has a more uniform particle size distribution, a certain increase in grain size, more complete crystallization, fewer defects in the crystal structure, and easier movement of magnetic domain walls. So the magnetization process and demagnetization process are easier to carry out, and the coercivity is smaller. As can be seen from Table 5, the coercivity of ferrite powder produced at 50℃ is lower than that produced at 25℃. Coercive force is affected by many factors, not only crystal size but also crystal structure. The reason may be that the crystal structure of the sample at 50℃ is more complete and the coercivity is smaller. It is well-known that the Hc and Ms are related by the following expression[30]: Where, K is magneto-crystalline anisotropy constant, and μ0 is permeability of free space. The coercivity shows comparable variation tendency of crystallites size. The values of squareness ratio “SQR = Mr/Ms” are also calculated and listed in Table 5. Commonly, the nanoparticles are considered to be in multi-magnetic domain (MMD) and in single magnetic domain (SMD) when SQR ≥ 0.5 and SQR < 0.5, respectively [30], [46]. The observed SQR values reflect the MMD nature in the different spinel ferrites nanoparticles. The obtained SQRs values are lower than the value of 0.5, which can be ascribed to surface spin disorder effects. Furthermore, the magnetic moment (ηB) observed per unit formula in the Bohr Magneton (μB) for sonochemically prepared (NiCuZn)Fe2O4 spinel ferrite nanoparticles can be determined by using following relation [10], [47]: Where, M is the molecular weight (2 3 8) and Ms is the saturation magnetization of sonochemically prepared Ni0.4Cu0.2Zn0.4Fe2O4 nanoparticles. The evaluated value of magnetic moment of prepared (NiCuZn)Fe2O4 nanoparticles is shown in Table 5. The highest value of magnetic moment was 2.37μB for 60 W sample at room temperature. Compared to without ultrasound irradition sample, nB values initially increase with increasing input power up to 60 W and, then diminish for further to 80 W. A good agreement between nB and Ms variation tendency was observed. In addition, in order to understand the advantage of sonochemical synthesis method, a comparative property of (NiCuZn)Fe2O4 nanoparticles with different methods by other researchers are provided in Table 6[26], [27]. The performance of Ni0.4Cu0.2Zn0.4Fe2O4 ferrites prepared by the same ultrasonic method from different raw materials is also compared in Table 6. The Ms of reference[30] is lower than this work, and reference[32], [33] is similar, reference[31] is the highest. Although the use of nitrated salts is the best performance, followed by chlorided salts, but other preparation conditions are not the same. Therefore, it is difficult to determine the type of metal salt used that would have a significant impact on magnetic properties.
Table 6

Magnetic parameters of synthesized (NiCuZn)Fe2O4 ferrites with different methods and raw meterials.

Ferrite natureSynthesis methodRaw materialsSaturation magnetization MsReferences
Ni0.4Cu0.2Zn0.4Fe2O4Ultrasonic-assisted co-precipitationSalts chloride and KOH55.67 emu/gThis work
Ni0.4Cu0.2Zn0.4Fe2O4Ultrasonic-assisted co-precipitationSalts nitrate and NaOH36.9 emu/g[30]
Ni0.4Cu0.2Zn0.4Fe2O4Ultrasonic-assisted co-precipitationSalts sulfate and NaOH55.72 emu/g[32], [33]
Ni0.4Cu0.2Zn0.4Fe2O4Ultrasonic-assisted co-precipitationSalts nitrate and NaOH58.9 emu/g[31]
Ni0.4Cu0.2Zn0.4Fe2O4reversemicelle processSalts chloride and ammonium hydroxide44 emu/g[26]
Ni0.5Cu0.1Zn0.4Fe2O4co-precipitationSalts chloride23.87 emu/g[27]
Magnetic parameters of synthesized (NiCuZn)Fe2O4 ferrites with different methods and raw meterials.

Conclusions

The (Ni0.4Cu0.2Zn0.4)Fe2O4 ferrite nanoparticles with cubic spinel structure were synthesized by ultrasonic assisted chemical coprecipitation method using salts chloride and KOH as raw materials. The effects of ultrasonic power and reaction temperature on the microstructure and magnetic properties of ferrite nanoparticles were investigated. The crystallites sizes were less than 40 nm and the lattice constant was near 8.39 Å. The properties of ferrite nanoparticles were the best for ultrasound 60 W power at the reaction temperature of no matter room temperature or 50℃, with Ms 55.67 emu/g and Hc 71.82 Oe, and Ms 47.77 emu/g and Hc 52.85Oe, respectively. M−H analyses performed at RT and 50℃ showed soft ferromagnetic behaviors. The saturation magnetization and coercivity of ferrite nanoparticles obtained at the reaction temperature of room temperature were higher than at 50℃ with same power. The results showed that ultrasound had a positive effect on improving the magnetic properties. The ultrasonic irradiation method had a potential of industrial application for the controlled synthesis of nano-spinel ferrites.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
  8 in total

Review 1.  Spinel ferrite nanoparticles and nanocomposites for biomedical applications and their toxicity.

Authors:  Kebede K Kefeni; Titus A M Msagati; Thabo Ti Nkambule; Bhekie B Mamba
Journal:  Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 7.328

Review 2.  A review on the applications of ultrasonic technology in membrane bioreactors.

Authors:  Samira Arefi-Oskoui; Alireza Khataee; Mahdie Safarpour; Yasin Orooji; Vahid Vatanpour
Journal:  Ultrason Sonochem       Date:  2019-06-08       Impact factor: 7.491

3.  Structural, optical and magnetic properties of Tm3+ substituted cobalt spinel ferrites synthesized via sonochemical approach.

Authors:  M A Almessiere; Y Slimani; A D Korkmaz; S Guner; M Sertkol; Sagar E Shirsath; A Baykal
Journal:  Ultrason Sonochem       Date:  2019-02-25       Impact factor: 7.491

4.  Ni0.4Cu0.2Zn0.4TbxFe2-xO4 nanospinel ferrites: Ultrasonic synthesis and physical properties.

Authors:  Y Slimani; M A Almessiere; A Demir Korkmaz; S Guner; H Güngüneş; M Sertkol; A Manikandan; A Yildiz; S Akhtar; Sagar E Shirsath; A Baykal
Journal:  Ultrason Sonochem       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 7.491

5.  Comparison of dispersion behavior of agglomerated particles in liquid between ultrasonic irradiation and mechanical stirring.

Authors:  Syunsuke Sumitomo; Hayato Koizumi; Md Azhar Uddin; Yoshiei Kato
Journal:  Ultrason Sonochem       Date:  2017-08-26       Impact factor: 7.491

6.  Ultrasonic synthesis of hydroxyapatite in non-cavitation and cavitation modes.

Authors:  A L Nikolaev; A V Gopin; A V Severin; V N Rudin; M A Mironov; N V Dezhkunov
Journal:  Ultrason Sonochem       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 7.491

7.  Impact of sonochemical synthesis condition on the structural and physical properties of MnFe2O4 spinel ferrite nanoparticles.

Authors:  Raghvendra Singh Yadav; Ivo Kuřitka; Jarmila Vilcakova; Thaiskang Jamatia; Michal Machovsky; David Skoda; Pavel Urbánek; Milan Masař; Michal Urbánek; Lukas Kalina; Jaromir Havlica
Journal:  Ultrason Sonochem       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 7.491

8.  Sonochemical synthesis and physical properties of Co0.3Ni0.5Mn0.2EuxFe2-xO4 nano-spinel ferrites.

Authors:  M A Almessiere; Y Slimani; S Guner; M Sertkol; A Demir Korkmaz; Sagar E Shirsath; A Baykal
Journal:  Ultrason Sonochem       Date:  2019-06-22       Impact factor: 7.491

  8 in total
  1 in total

1.  Enhancement of Magnetic and Dielectric Properties of Ni0.25Cu0.25Zn0.50Fe2O4 Magnetic Nanoparticles through Non-Thermal Microwave Plasma Treatment for High-Frequency and Energy Storage Applications.

Authors:  Muhammad Adnan Munir; Muhammad Yasin Naz; Shazia Shukrullah; Muhammad Tamoor Ansar; Muhammad Umar Farooq; Muhammad Irfan; Salim Nasar Faraj Mursal; Stanislaw Legutko; Jana Petrů; Marek Pagáč
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-10-04       Impact factor: 3.748

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.