Photoexcited dihydronicotinamides like NADH and analogues have been found to generate alkyl radicals upon reductive decarboxylation of redox-active esters without auxiliary photocatalysts. This principle allowed aliphatic photocoupling between redox-active carboxylate derivatives and electron-poor olefins, displaying surprising water and air-tolerance and unusually high coupling rates in dilute conditions. The orthogonality of the reaction in the presence of other carboxylic acids and its utility in the functionalization of DNA is presented, notably using visible light in combination with NADH, the ubiquitous reductant of life.
Photoexcited dihydronicotinamides like NADH and analogues have been found to generate alkyl radicals upon reductive decarboxylation of redox-active esters without auxiliary photocatalysts. This principle allowed aliphatic photocoupling between redox-active carboxylate derivatives and electron-poor olefins, displaying surprising water and air-tolerance and unusually high coupling rates in dilute conditions. The orthogonality of the reaction in the presence of other carboxylic acids and its utility in the functionalization of DNA is presented, notably using visible light in combination with NADH, the ubiquitous reductant of life.
Visible light is a
prime stimulus to control the conformation of
chemical bonds,[1] or their cleavage.[1a,2] The phototriggered formation of chemical bonds can enable frontier
research in medicine and biology,[3] but
their development is still a challenge in comparison to thermal click
reactions[4] due to the slower rate and the
need for UV-light and/or photocatalysts.[5] On one hand, photo-cross-linking methods still rely on unstable
precursors like azirines or cyclopropanones.[5a,6] On
the other hand, recent C–C coupling reactions using photobiocatalytic
systems have shown great promise but these are still limited to activated
substrates with auxiliary photosensitizers and electron donors.[7] As such, developments in self-sensitized, phototriggered,
and fast C–C photocoupling between simple functionalities are
still highly sought after (Scheme A).[8,9] Aliphatic linkages are particularly
attractive due to their small size, robustness, and flexibility, which
maximize the chances to obtain functional and metabolically stable
conjugates.[8]
Scheme 1
Approach Towards
Aliphatic Photo-Coupling with Native NADH Bio-Photoreductant
NAD, Nicotinamide Adenine
Dinucleotide; PET, Photoinduced Electron Transfer; 5 –
R = Ph, R’= H.
Approach Towards
Aliphatic Photo-Coupling with Native NADH Bio-Photoreductant
NAD, NicotinamideAdenine
Dinucleotide; PET, Photoinduced Electron Transfer; 5 –
R = Ph, R’= H.Decarboxylative radical
addition reactions (Scheme A) have recently emerged as prime tools to
create aliphatic ligations in biomolecules.[8,9] These
methods take advantage of the abundance of carboxylic acids[8,10] and the various technologies developed with Michael acceptors.[1b,11] Despite their success, radical addition reactions are slow (6–12
h) and require additional catalysts, inorganic reducing suspensions,
and/or additives that are not native to biological systems.[8] The abundance of endogenous carboxylic acids
in biomolecules or biomatrices poses a selectivity challenge for carboxylic
acid substrates (1), due to their similar oxidation potentials.[8c−8e] In contrast, the N-hydroxyphthalimide (NHPI) esters
(2) can be orthogonally activated in the presence of
other carboxylates via single-electron reduction.[8a,8b,8f−8l] Recent methods based on desymmetrization[8n] and late-stage carbene transfer[12] illustrate
the potential of redox-active esters to be introduced through strategies
unavailable to the parent carboxylic acids.During our synthetic
studies with redox-active carbenes,[12] we
recognized that the coupling of redox-active
esters and Michael acceptors[8a,8b,8f−8l] could significantly expand its capabilities with a suitable biocompatible
reductant (Scheme B). The reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NADH) would be
ideal because it is a native component of biological systems.The redox potential of NADH and its analogs (Eox{5} = 0.57 V vs Ag/Ag+) is insufficient
to activate redox-active esters (Ered{2} ∼
– 1.1 ± 0.1 V vs Ag/Ag+).[13] These dihydronicotinamides are potent single-electron reductants
in the excited state (Eox*{5} = −2.60 V vs Ag/Ag+),[14,15] but their short lifetimes in solution (τ{5*}
∼ 0.7 ns)[16] have limited their application
as autonomous photoreductants.[14,17,18] At the onset of our work, these reagents required additional (photo)catalysts[8f−8l,18,19] or enzymes[20] under rigorously anhydrous
and degassed conditions to drive reductive couplings. We reasoned
that the short-lived excited states of these systems would have a
minimal impact in photoinitiated reactions[21] and would avoid side-reactions in the presence of dioxygen derived
from triplet-sensitization. The transient generation of the powerful
photoreductant 5* would effectively circumvent the incompatibility
with oxygen and moisture of other ground state super electron donors.[22] Importantly, the expected byproducts of the
reaction would be biocompatible: the cofactor NAD+ (or
analogues thereof), CO2, and phthalimide (LD50{rat oral} > 5 g/kg).[23]
Results and Discussion
Toward this end, the reaction of the NADH model BNAH (5) with the redox-active ester 2a and the acrylate acceptor 3a was studied under blue light illumination (λ = 450
nm) without photocatalysts or additives (Scheme ).[8f−8l] To our delight, the desired decarboxylative coupling product 4a was obtained in high yield using DMSO as solvent (entry
1). The reaction was found to be surprisingly fast, reaching 66% yield
after 5 min of illumination (entry 2). Given the importance of maximizing
the reaction rate for its implementation at higher dilution,[3,4,4c−4i] we explored related photoreductants. It was found that the dihydronicotinamide
moiety is essential for high activity (entry 3) as well as the appropriate
substitution at the heterocyclic nitrogen (entries 4,5). In line with
seminal studies by Overman[8h] and recent
work by Shang,[24] the dihydropyridine 9 was found to promote the reaction, but it was slower and
less efficient than the more biocompatible dihydronicotinamides (entry
6).[25] Interestingly, the N-butyl dihydronicotinamideBuNAH (10), which is the
closest structural homologue to NADH among the photoreductants explored,
was optimal both in terms of yield and rate (entry 7). This result
can be rationalized by the slightly more reductive character of BuNAH
(10)[26] than the N-benzyl- and N-aryl-dihydronicotinamides 5,8. Moreover, the performance of BuNAH (10) is only marginally
affected by concentrations as low as 1 mM (entry 8). The system tolerates
water as cosolvent (50% v/v; entry 9) and air atmosphere (entry 10).
These are unique features that contrast with sensitive ground-state
organic reductants[22a,4b,4c,24,25] and other
photocatalyzed reactions.[8f,8h,18,19c,19d] Interestingly, BuNAH (10) can be prepared in multigram
amounts, stored indefinitely as a solid, and handled for more than
a week as a DMSO stock solution (see SI), thus enabling microdosing in high-throughput studies.
Scheme 2
Discovery
of the Photo-Coupling Promoted by BuNAH (10) and NADH (11)
Determined by 1H NMR using 1,1,2,2- tetrachloroethane as internal standard.
3 equiv used.
10 equiv used.
Discovery
of the Photo-Coupling Promoted by BuNAH (10) and NADH (11)
Determined by 1H NMR using 1,1,2,2- tetrachloroethane as internal standard.3 equiv used.10 equiv used.These results led us to explore the performance of NADH (11) due to its relevance as the native reductant in biological
systems. The photophysics of NADH (11) have additional
challenges due to its shorter excited state lifetime (τ{NADH}
∼ 0.4 ns) and the interaction between its dihydronicotinamide
and adenine moieties.[27] To our delight,
the commercial NADH disodium salt (11) promoted the coupling
reaction in a dilute mixture of water and DMSO (1–10 mM; entries
11,12). Unlike that of BuNAH (10), it was found that
the use of NADH (11) required inert atmosphere and larger
amounts for optimal results, probably due to its higher sensitivity
and/or less favorable photophysic properties.We set out to
explore the scope of the photocoupling using artificial
BuNAH (10; conditions A) or natural NADH (11; conditions B) as photoreductants in aqueous (50% H2O
in DMSO) and dilute conditions (1 mM; Scheme ) most relevant in Chemical Biology. Alternatively,
preparative scale reactions can be undertaken at higher concentrations
in DMSO (see SI for details). Various Michael
acceptors bearing electron-withdrawing groups such as ester (4a,b), amide (4c),[11c] aldehyde (4d), ketone (4e), nitrile (4f), or sulfone (4g) were accommodated. Among
these, acrolein was significantly less efficient as an acceptor, probably
due to degradation of the sensitive aliphatic aldehyde product 4c. The maleimide scaffold (4h) that is common
in bioconjugation reactions[1b,5e,11a,11b] was found to be very efficient.
In stark contrast, no coupling product was obtained using the dihydropyridine 9,[24,25] thus illustrating the superior
reactivity of BuNAH (10) or NADH (11) as
photoreductants.[24,25] High yields and fast reactions
also occur across a wide range of redox-active esters. Tertiary sites
are coupled efficiently, thus allowing interesting structures to be
functionalized, including bicyclic (4i), adamantyl (4j), piperidine (4k), cyclopropane (4l), and more complex scaffolds such as the drug gemfibrozil (4m,n). Secondary radical precursors are equally effective
in the reaction (4o,q).
Scheme 3
Scope Study
Yields were determined
by 1H NMR using an appropriate internal standard; for isolated
yields at preparative concentrations, see SI. HE; Hantzsch ester (9).
Ar atmosphere.
100 mM concentration.
DMSO was used as solvent.
Dihydropyridine 9 was used instead of BuNAH
(10) for comparison.
20 mM concentration.
Scope Study
Yields were determined
by 1H NMR using an appropriate internal standard; for isolated
yields at preparative concentrations, see SI. HE; Hantzsch ester (9).Ar atmosphere.100 mM concentration.DMSO was used as solvent.Dihydropyridine 9 was used instead of BuNAH
(10) for comparison.20 mM concentration.Interestingly,
the products 4q,q’ demonstrate
that the norbornenyl–nortricyclyl radical equilibrium[28] can be established before their capture by the
Michael acceptor. Primary carboxylate derivatives led to the products
(4r–u) featuring robust and flexible
alkyl-ligations. These include the cross-coupling of indole (4r), D-biotin (4s), a fatty
acid (4t), and pyridine (4u) derivatives.
Among those, the biotinylated product 4s displays an
easily oxidizable thioether, a polar urea, a secondary amide, and
an anomerically activated sugar.[29] Moreover,
the reaction was proven to be useful in the late-stage functionalization
of natural products, including the peptide model derived from alanine
(4w), and various densely functionalized terpenes with
unprotected ketone, enone, olefin, diene, alcohol, and ester functions
(4v,x-aa). The orthogonality between redox-active esters
and unprotected carboxylic acids is demonstrated on the products 4n,aa. These substrates would lead to mixtures of products
and/or polymers through existing coupling reactions based on oxidative
decarboxylation.[8c−8e] Furthermore, the coupling reactions were complete
in 10–75 min. This is substantially faster than previous methods
despite the dilute conditions. Particularly sensitive or apolar substrates
were understandably less efficient in the standard dilute aqueous
media of the reaction (i.e., 4d,s,u,v,y,z,aa). In these
cases, coupling efficiencies are enhanced simply by using higher concentration,
inert atmosphere, and DMSO as solvent. However, in more favorable
substrates, the reaction could operate even in pure water as solvent
with similar results (4r,w).The features of this
system in terms of rate, concentration, water
tolerance, and solubility of its components made it an ideal candidate
for the in vitro alkyl photocoupling on polar biomacromolecules.
To benchmark the performances of BuNAH (10) and NADH
(11) in this context against comparable decarboxylative
coupling methods, we set out to explore coupling reactions on DNA.[8b,8d] These are important in the synthesis of DNA-encoded libraries (DEL)[8b,8d,9e] yet challenging due to the complex
functionality of the substrates and low scale at which these reactions
need to occur. To our delight, DEL headpieces 12a,b were
coupled efficiently using either BuNAH (10) or NADH (11) and blue light at 10 nmol-scale to deliver “on-DNA”-functionalized
products 13aa-ae,ba-be (Scheme ). These reactions are generally completed
in 1 h with excellent yields despite the micromolar concentrations
(100 μM) in buffered media. Importantly, all the components
in this system can be handled as dilute solutions, thus facilitating
mixing in small reaction volumes (<300 μL). These features
are characteristic of this system and can facilitate the future implementation
of this reaction in automatic platforms.
Scheme 4
Alkyl Photo-Coupling
on DNA
Reaction time 2 h.
Reaction
time 4 h.
Buffer pH 5.5.
Coupling product was detected
by
MS but could not be quantified due to insufficient chromatographic
resolution. ND, Not Determined.
Alkyl Photo-Coupling
on DNA
Reaction time 2 h.Reaction
time 4 h.Buffer pH 5.5.Coupling product was detected
by
MS but could not be quantified due to insufficient chromatographic
resolution. ND, Not Determined.The kinetic
time-profile of the reaction with BuNAH (10) was obtained
using in situ no-D NMR monitoring.[30] Nondeuterated DMSO was used to prevent any potential
artifacts due to solvent isotopic effects in the propagation of the
radical chain. However, it was found that the reaction proceeds similarly
in DMSO and DMSO-d6, without any solvent-derived
byproducts (see SI). This way it was possible
to confirm that the reaction can be completed in 4.3 min at 100 mM
concentration (Scheme A; gray).[8f−8l] Moreover, 10-fold (10 mM) and even 100-fold (1 mM) dilutions resulted
in a surprising rate acceleration (Scheme A; blue traces). The reaction is completed
in just 80 s of illumination at 1–10 mM with identical efficiency.
To discern the origin of the acceleration, a control experiment was
run in the least favorable concentration (100 mM) using a thinner
reactor tube (1.25 mm diameter) to minimize the light path on the
system. This resulted in significantly faster kinetics (Scheme A; red). This result demonstrates
that the acceleration observed upon dilution stems from the attenuation
of the inner filter effect.[31] With the
usage of NADH (11) as photoreductant, the reaction is
slower (Scheme B)
but faster than previous decarboxylative coupling reactions.[8,24] The reaction is completed in 60 min (>80% in less than 25 min).
These results are remarkable considering the dilute conditions (20
mM) in the presence of only 1.5 equiv of the acceptor 3a and NADH (11). Importantly, the system is stable in
the absence of light (Scheme C). After a long dark period, the system was illuminated obtaining
an identical kinetic profile to that of a standard experiment, as
evidenced by the time-shifted overlay (Scheme D). This demonstrates the absence of static
deactivation in the dark, which may be relevant in cases where other
equilibria need to be established before the C–C coupling event
is phototriggered.[3,5,6]
Scheme 5
Kinetic Profiling of the Photo-Coupling by No-D 1H NMR
Absorption spectroscopy revealed that the light
absorption of BuNAH
(10) is similar to those of other dihydronicotinamides,[16] featuring a strong band at 350 nm that extends
into the visible region (Scheme A, left). In the presence of the redox-active ester 2a, which only absorbs below 350 nm, the absorption increases
marginally at 450 nm using concentrations as high as 0.1 M (12% increase; Scheme A, right), which
may indicate the formation of a donor–acceptor complex (EDA).[32,33] Thus, we set out to study the relevance of this possible EDA interaction
in the photoactivation of this reaction. Stern–Volmer studies
evidenced a linear quenching of the steady-state fluorescence of BuNAH
(10; Scheme B; blue) with increasing concentrations of the redox-active
ester 2a. Nevertheless, the linear decrease in luminescence
intensity is not a definitive proof of the mechanism by which this
phenomenon occurs.[34] Therefore, the fluorescence
lifetime of the excited state 10* (τ0(10*) = 1.08 ns) was measured using Time-Correlated
Single Photon Counting (TCSPC). This study revealed a decrease in
the lifetime of excited BuNAH (10*, Scheme B; purple) upon increase of
the concentration of redox-active ester 2a. However,
the significantly different slopes of the steady-state and lifetime
Stern–Volmer plots were not consistent with a conventional
dynamic quenching scenario.[34] Instead,
the data supports the formation of a nonemissive EDA complex 10·2 in equilibrium with the free 10 (Scheme B; right). The corresponding
equilibrium constant could be estimated through fitting of the steady-state
and lifetime data (Keq ∼ 7; see SI).[34] Consistently, no additional
luminescence bands corresponding to the EDA complex 10·2 could be observed in either excitation or emission spectra (see SI). At this point, it is unclear which of these
coexisting dynamic and static interactions between BuNAH (10) and the redox-active ester 2 are most important for
the reactivity. However, it is known that the formation of EDA complexes
is affected by changes in the substrate, solvent, concentration, and/or
temperature.[32] The fact that the reaction
is not inhibited in dilute conditions disfavors the EDA complex to
be critical in the photoactivation of this system.[24] In this sense, the direct reduction by photoexcited dihydronicotinamides
without engagement in donor–acceptor complexes[32,33] has been documented but only in the context of more activated alkyl
halide substrates.[17b]
Scheme 6
Mechanistic Studies
The expected intermediacy of free-diffusing
alkyl radicals was
demonstrated by the different ratios of the products 4ab,ab’ that were obtained using the 5-hexenyl radical clock precursor 2ab at different initial concentrations (Scheme C). To discern the fate of
the radical intermediate that would result from the addition of the
alkyl radical into the electron-deficient olefin, we conducted a series
of experiments with the dideuterated BuNAH derivative 10-d (Scheme D). These experiments revealed that hydrogen
atom transfer (HAT) from BuNAH (10) is the main process
to quench the putative radical addition product.[8g,8h,19c−19e] Further control experiments
confirmed that the solvents (DMSO and H2O) do not exchange
with 10-d under
the reaction conditions and do not have any relevant role in the HAT
process (see SI). The involvement of a
radical chain mechanism was studied measuring the average quantum
yield. This was determined in triplicate at 20–25% conversion
of 2a, obtaining a value of 2.9 ± 0.5, which points
to the propagation of a radical chain.[31]The mechanistic proposal in Scheme comprises the electron–proton–electron
transfer manifold that is typical in radical reductions mediated by
dihydronicotinamides[14,17,35] and our own experiments (Schemes and 6). Photoinduced electron
and proton transfer from dihydronicotinamide 10 to the
redox-active ester 2 through the dynamic and/or static
mechanisms discussed above (Scheme B) produces the carbon centered radical 14, a nicotinyl radical 15, phthalimide (16), and CO2. The radical 14 adds to the olefin 3 to produce the radical 17, which after concerted[8g] or stepwise[35] HAT
yields the coupling product 4 and the nicotinyl radical 15.[8g] The latter could reduce the
redox-active ester 2 to produce the pyridinium salt 18, CO2, and the alkyl radical 14 that
propagates the chain reaction (see Scheme C,D).[8g] The formation
of the pyridinium salts 18 derived from BuNAH (10) and NADH (11) and their kinetic correlation
with the formation of the product 4 has also been evidenced
by in situ NMR monitoring (see SI).
Scheme 7
Proposed Mechanism
Conclusions
Herein, we report that the dihydronicotinamidesBuNAH (10) and NADH (11) promote the photocoupling of redox-active
esters and Michael acceptors upon illumination with blue light. These
reactions do not require external photocatalysts or additives, have
no detectable background reactivity, can run in water, and have an
unusually high rate even at low concentration. This system has demonstrated
its utility in the functionalization of DNA macromolecules in extremely
dilute conditions. The mechanistic experiments demonstrate the multifaceted
role of these dihydropyridines as photoinitiators, reductants, and
hydrogen-atom donors to drive this fast photocoupling using a minimal
homogeneous system. This work introduces NADH (11) as
an autonomous photoreductant and opens prospects for new artificial
coupling reactions that our group is currently investigating.
Authors: Stefan J McCarver; Jennifer X Qiao; Joseph Carpenter; Robert M Borzilleri; Michael A Poss; Martin D Eastgate; Michael M Miller; David W C MacMillan Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2016-11-17 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Yinzhi Fang; Han Zhang; Zhen Huang; Samuel L Scinto; Jeffrey C Yang; Christopher W Am Ende; Olga Dmitrenko; Douglas S Johnson; Joseph M Fox Journal: Chem Sci Date: 2018-01-08 Impact factor: 9.825
Authors: Shorouk O Badir; Alexander Lipp; Matthias Krumb; María Jesús Cabrera-Afonso; Lisa Marie Kammer; Victoria E Wu; Minxue Huang; Adam Csakai; Lisa A Marcaurelle; Gary A Molander Journal: Chem Sci Date: 2021-08-05 Impact factor: 9.825