Literature DB >> 33122810

Recurrent microbial keratitis and endogenous site Staphylococcus aureus colonisation.

Tobi F Somerville1,2, Jayendra Shankar3, Sarah Aldwinckle3, Henri Sueke4,3, Timothy Neal5, Malcolm J Horsburgh6, Stephen B Kaye4,3.   

Abstract

This study investigated Staphylococcus aureus carriage in patients with microbial keratitis (MK). 215 patients with MK, 60 healthy controls and 35 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) were included. Corneal scrapes were collected from patients with MK. Conjunctival, nasal and throat swabs were collected from the non-MK groups on a single occasion and from the MK group at presentation and then at 6 and 12 weeks. Samples were processed using conventional diagnostic culture. 68 (31.6%) episodes of clinically suspected MK were classed as recurrent. Patients with recurrent MK had a higher isolation rate of S. aureus from their cornea than those with a single episode (p < 0.01) and a higher isolation rate of S. aureus from their conjunctiva compared to control participants, 20.6% (14/68) versus 3% (5/60) respectively (p = 0.01). Significantly more patients with recurrent MK (12/68, 17.6%) were found to have S. aureus isolated from both their conjunctiva and nose than those with a single episode of MK (7/147, 4.8% p = 0.002) and compared to patients in the control group (3/60, 5.0% p = 0.03). The results indicate that patients with recurrent MK have higher rates of carriage of S. aureus suggesting endogenous site colonisation as a possible source of recurrent infection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33122810      PMCID: PMC7596706          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-75821-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


Introduction

Microbial keratitis (MK) is a major cause of loss of vision worldwide with each episode leading to further corneal scarring and visual impairment[1-3]. Treatment involves managing any other associated ocular surface disease involvement, removing any known risk factors such as contact lens wear and aggressive topical antimicrobial therapy. The patient requires close treatment response monitoring, often including hospitalisation followed by frequent outpatient visits. The risk of developing MK and the severity of the disease depend on both the identity of the infecting organism and the condition of the ocular surface[4]. We recently carried out a retrospective case series that included 2418 patients with clinically suspected MK over a 16-year period. Twelve percent of patients were found to have at least two episodes, 3.68% at least three, 1.65% at least four and 0.91% five or more episodes. In patients who had recurrent episodes of MK, Staphylococcus aureus was isolated significantly more frequently than other pathogenic bacteria, possibly suggesting an endogenous source for the recurrent nature of S. aureus related MK[5]. S. aureus, is considered a pathogen in ocular surface infections in contrast to coagulase negative staphylococci (CNS), the predominant isolate cultured from healthy eyes[6,7]. S. aureus is a major human pathogen that can cause wound infections, bacteraemia and sepsis associated with a high mortality rate. The bacterium is a commensal of the moist squamous epithelium of the anterior nares with persistent carriage in 20% of the healthy human population[8]. A higher prevalence of S. aureus nasal colonisation has been found in patients with autoimmune diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA) then in the general population[9,10]. Previous studies have also revealed that nasal carriers are at increased risk of acquiring S. aureus related infections[8]. Many host and bacterial determinants for nasal carriage are defined but the underlying processes of how carriage is established and maintained are largely undefined[11]. A key feature of non-ocular S. aureus infection is its recurrence, which is seen in approximately 30% of all cases[12,13]. While recurrent or persistent carriage might predispose individuals to recurrent S. aureus keratitis, especially those with underlying ocular surface disease this link has yet to be demonstrated. Identification of endogenous host sites such as the conjunctiva, nose and throat are of particular importance for developing interventions to prevent further episodes of MK and subsequent vision loss, particularly since the emergence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). We therefore, investigated S. aureus carriage in the conjunctiva, nose or throat in patients with single episode and recurrent MK in comparison to control groups.

Results

In total, 215 patients with clinically suspected MK, 60 healthy controls and 35 patients with RA were included. 68 (31.6%) episodes of clinically suspected MK were recurrent within the study period. Baseline characteristics demographics and predisposing risk factors of the 215 patients with clinically suspected MK are presented in Table 1. Patients with recurrent MK had higher rates of risk factors such as RA, Sjogren’s syndrome, ectodermal dysplasia and ocular surface disease and were more likely to be on systemic immunosuppression (Table 1). Conversely, patients with single episode MK had higher rates of exogenous risk factors such as contact lens wear and corneal trauma (Table 1).
Table 1

Baseline demographics and predisposing risk factors of patients with clinically suspected MK.

Single episode MK (n = 147)Recurrent MK (n = 68)P-value
Age (median, IQR)48 years (30.5)54 years (19.3)0.21
Males79 (53.7%)30 (44.1%)0.19
Systemic risk factors
Diabetes mellitus10 (6.8%)6 (8.8%)0.60
Rheumatoid arthritis6 (4.1%)16 (23.5%) < 0.01*
Sjogren’s syndrome1 (0.7%)6 (8.8%)0.004*
Ectodermal dysplasia04 (5.9%)0.009*
Systemic immunosuppression5 (3.4%)13 (19.1%) < 0.001*
Ocular risk factors
Contact lens wear61 (42.5%)7 (10.3%) < 0.001*
Ocular surface disease64 (43.5%)46 (67.6%)0.001*
Corneal trauma20 (13.6%)2 (2.9%)0.02
Topical steroid prior to presentation12 (8.2%)12 (17.6%)0.06

MK microbial keratitis.

*Significant after Bonferroni correction.

Baseline demographics and predisposing risk factors of patients with clinically suspected MK. MK microbial keratitis. *Significant after Bonferroni correction. Corneal scrapes were obtained in 204/215 patients. The corneal scrape isolation rate was 25.5% (52/204). A topical antimicrobial had been used immediately prior to presentation in 83 (26.3%) of clinically suspected MK patients. The corneal scrape isolation rate was no different for patients who had or had not received an antimicrobial (21/80 (26.3%) and 31/124 (25.0%) (p = 0.84), respectively. The microbial isolates are shown in Table 2. Although there was no significant difference in the corneal scrape isolation rate between those that had recurrent MK and those who presented with a single episode (p = 0.53), recurrent MK patients were found to have significantly higher corneal scrape isolations of S. aureus than those MK patients presenting with a single episode, that is, 5/13 (38.5%) of positive scrapes in the recurrent MK group versus 2/39 (5.1%) positive scrapes in the single episode MK group (p = 0.001). Higher levels of Gram-negative bacilli, particularly Pseudomonas species were found in the single episode MK group, 12.9% versus 4.4% respectively (p = 0.055).
Table 2

Isolates from cases of presumed microbial keratitis grouped according to patients with recurrent episodes and those presenting with only a single episode.

Single episode MK (n = 146)Recurrent MK (n = 58)
Total number of positive samples39* (26.7%)13* (22.4%)
Gram-positive cocci19 (13.0%)10 (17.2%)
S. aureus2 (1.4%)5 (8.6%)
CNS11 (7.5%)3 (5.2%)
S. pneumoniae4 (2.7%)2 (3.4%)
Alpha-haemolytic streptococci2 (1.4%)1 (1.7%)
Gram-positive bacilli1 (0.7%)1 (1.7%)
Bacillus sp.01 (1.7%)
Diptheroids1 (0.7%)0
Gram-negative bacilli19 (13.0%)3 (5.2%)
Pseudomonas aeruginosa9 (6.1%)1 (1.7%)
Moraxella sp.4 (2.7%)0
Kingella1 (0.7%)0
Proteus01 (1.7%)
Citrobacter koseri1 (0.7%)0
Acinetobacter lwoffii1 (0.7%)0
Serratia marcescens1 (0.7%)0
E.coli1 (0.7%)1 (1.7%)
Other Enterobacteriaceae sp.1 (0.7%)0
Protozoa1 (0.7%)0
Acanthamoeba sp.1 (0.7%)0
Fungi1 (0.7%)0
Aspergillus sp.1 (0.7%)0

*The total number of isolates do not add up to 39 and 13 respectively because one recurrent patient had mixed infection with S. aureus, E.coli and S. pneumoniae and two single episode patients had mixed infection with Enterobacteriaeceae and Alpha-Haemolytic Streptococci, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Aspergillus sp, respectively.

MK microbial keratitis, CNS coagulase-negative Staphylococci.

Isolates from cases of presumed microbial keratitis grouped according to patients with recurrent episodes and those presenting with only a single episode. *The total number of isolates do not add up to 39 and 13 respectively because one recurrent patient had mixed infection with S. aureus, E.coli and S. pneumoniae and two single episode patients had mixed infection with Enterobacteriaeceae and Alpha-Haemolytic Streptococci, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Aspergillus sp, respectively. MK microbial keratitis, CNS coagulase-negative Staphylococci.

Conjunctival, nasal and throat S. aureus carriage

Patients with recurrent MK were found to have a significantly higher isolation rate of S. aureus from their conjunctiva on presentation compared to control participants, 20.6% (14/68) versus 3% (5/60) respectively (p = 0.01), Table 3. No difference was found between the isolation rates of S. aureus from the conjunctiva of patients with non-recurrent MK on presentation compared to control participants (p = 0.77). Isolation rates of S. aureus from the nose and throat were not found to be significantly higher in either the single or recurrent MK patient groups compared to controls, Table 3.
Table 3

Numbers of individuals in each group who had S. aureus isolated from their conjunctiva, nose and throat on presentation.

Control (n = 60)Single episode MK (n = 147)Recurrent MK (n = 68)MK with positive scrape (n = 52)
Conjunctiva3 (5.0%)9 (6.1%)P = 1.0014 (20.6%)P = 0.026 (11.5%)P = 0.30
Nose18 (30.0%)47 (32.0%)P = 0.6629 (42.6%)P = 0.1217 (32.7%)P = 0.66
Throat4 (6.8%)19 (12.9%)P = 0.3310 (14.7%)P = 0.269 (17.3%)P = 0.14

P-values represent comparisons of each group to the control group.

MK microbial keratitis.

Numbers of individuals in each group who had S. aureus isolated from their conjunctiva, nose and throat on presentation. P-values represent comparisons of each group to the control group. MK microbial keratitis. Significantly more patients in the recurrent MK group were found to have S. aureus isolated from both their conjunctiva and nose than patients in the single episode MK group, 12/68 (17.6%) versus 7/147 (4.8%) (p = 0.002) respectively and compared to patients in the control group (3/60, 5.0% p = 0.03). Conjunctival, nose and throat carriage of S. aureus was seen to significantly decline over the 3 visits only in the recurrent, clinically suspected bacterial keratitis group (Table 4). Of the 7 MK patients who had S. aureus isolated from their corneal scrape, 2 participants consistently had S. aureus isolated from their conjunctiva at all three visits.
Table 4

Microbial keratitis participants overall S. aureus carriage (total S. aureus conjunctival, nasal and throat carriage) at presentation (visit 1), 6 weeks post presentation (visit 2) and 12 weeks post presentation (visit 3).

Single episode MKRecurrent MKMK positive scrape episodesS. aureus MK episodes
Visit 175/441 (17.0%)53/204 (26.0%)32/156 (20.5%)6/21 (28.6%)
Visit 247/303 (15.5%)26/168 (15.5%)26/117 (22.2%)5/18 (27.8%)
Visit 340/237 (16.9%)26/141 (18.4%)17/96 (17.7%)4/12 (33.3%)
P value0.850.040.720.94

Values represent the total number of swabs obtained (nasal swabs were classified as one value and counted as positive regardless if one or both nares were positive). P-values calculated using repeated measures logistic regression (Wald Chi-Square) and represent change over time in S. aureus colonization prevalence for each of the four subject groups.

MK microbial keratitis.

Microbial keratitis participants overall S. aureus carriage (total S. aureus conjunctival, nasal and throat carriage) at presentation (visit 1), 6 weeks post presentation (visit 2) and 12 weeks post presentation (visit 3). Values represent the total number of swabs obtained (nasal swabs were classified as one value and counted as positive regardless if one or both nares were positive). P-values calculated using repeated measures logistic regression (Wald Chi-Square) and represent change over time in S. aureus colonization prevalence for each of the four subject groups. MK microbial keratitis. There was no difference in the isolation rate of S. aureus from the conjunctiva, nares and throat in patients who had or had not received an antimicrobial: 8/83 (9.6%) and 15/132 (11.4%) (p = 0.69); 29/83 (34.9%) and 47/132 (35.6%) (p = 0.92) and 11/83 (13.3%) and 18/132 (13.6%) (p = 0.94)), respectively.

Comparison between patients with RA and healthy controls

Twenty-nine of the 35 patients with RA were on systemic immunotherapy which included monotherapy or dual therapy with methotrexate (21), etanercept (3) and prednisolone (7). There was no statistically significant difference in the isolation rates of S. aureus from the conjunctiva, nose and throat between healthy controls and patients with RA (whether or not on systemic immunotherapy), Table 5. There was a non-significant trend (p = 0.06) for patients with RA on systemic immunotherapy to have more S. aureus nasal carriage then those patients with RA not on systemic immunotherapy, 13/29 (44.8%) versus 0 respectively, (Table 5).
Table 5

Numbers of individuals in the healthy control group versus patients with RA on systemic immunotherapy and patients with RA not on systemic immunotherapy who had S. aureus isolated from their conjunctiva, nose and throat.

Healthy controls (n = 60)Patients with RA on systemic immunotherapy (n = 29)Patients with RA not on systemic immunotherapy (n = 6)Difference between RA groups
Conjunctiva3 (5.0%)0P = 0.55a0P = 1.00b
Nose18 (30.0%)13 (44.8%)P = 0.17a0P = 0.18bP = 0.06
Throat4 (6.8%)3 (10.3%)P = 0.68a0P = 1.00bP = 1.00

aP-values represent comparison between patients with RA on systemic immunotherapy and healthy controls.

bP-values represent comparison between patients with RA not on systemic immunotherapy and healthy controls.

RA rheumatoid arthritis.

Numbers of individuals in the healthy control group versus patients with RA on systemic immunotherapy and patients with RA not on systemic immunotherapy who had S. aureus isolated from their conjunctiva, nose and throat. aP-values represent comparison between patients with RA on systemic immunotherapy and healthy controls. bP-values represent comparison between patients with RA not on systemic immunotherapy and healthy controls. RArheumatoid arthritis.

Discussion

Recurrent MK is common but little attention has been paid to potential reservoirs of infection and optimal management. This study is the first prospective study to establish a potential source of recurrent MK by comparing multiple endogenous site testing between MK patients and healthy controls over time. Similar to a previous study we found S. aureus to be the most frequently associated organism in recurrent MK[5]. We found that S. aureus was present in the conjunctiva significantly more frequently in patients who had recurrent MK compared to healthy controls or patients with RA. In addition, patients who had recurrent episodes of MK were found to have significantly more concurrent S. aureus conjunctiva and nasal carriage than patients who had single episode and also in comparison to patients in the healthy control group. This would suggest that the conjunctiva and nose and possibly other unidentified sites such as the lid margin may be endogenous sources of S. aureus in patients with recurrent MK. The pathogenicity of S. aureus is mediated by a multitude of factors including bacterial surface adhesins, immune evasive proteins and toxins including alpha-, beta- and gamma-toxin plus several leukocidins that mediate tissue damage and contribute towards the induction of the inflammatory response[15-18]. Modern molecular diagnostic tools such as PCR and genome sequencing have provided a better understanding of the composition of the ocular surface microbiome and how this changes with conditions such as: contact lens wear[19], antibiotic exposure[20], infectious states[21], atopic and dry eye disease[22-25] as well as the effects of age and gender[26]. Presence of S. aureus on the ocular surface has been associated with dry eye and atopia[22-25] which are both known risk factors for MK. In this study, we have demonstrated that patients with recurrent MK are more likely to have endogenous risk factors such as RA, Sjogren’s syndrome, ectodermal dyplasia, ocular surface disease and are more likely to be on systemic immunosuppression. These conditions may predispose to an increased risk of ocular surface S. aureus colonisation[27]. Patients with RA with corneal ulceration have an increased risk of mortality and eye morbidity from infection and a much poorer prognosis than patients with RA without corneal ulceration, and infection is a significant risk factor[14]. Although we did not find a significant difference in S. aureus nasal carriage in patients with RA between those with or without systemic immunotherapy, this may reflect that only 6 of the 35 patients with RA were not on immunotherapy. This trend would be consistent with Goodman et al., who found that patients with RA on biological drugs, such as etanercept in our study group, had a higher prevalence of S. aureus colonisation (37%) compared to those with RA on disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) alone (24%) or control subjects affected by osteoarthritis (20%)[27]. We identified no significant difference in S. aureus nasal and throat colonisation between patients with a single episode and recurrent keratitis and healthy controls, although it is possible that our sample size was too small to detect a difference between these groups for S. aureus nasal and throat carriage. In particular, one of the limitations of this study was the low isolation rate from corneal scrapes and it is therefore possible that other bacteria from the conjunctiva and nose were associated with MK. In this study we identified an increased isolation of S. aureus from endogenous sites in patients with recurrent MK compared to patients with a single episode of MK and this highlights the importance of collecting samples from the conjunctiva and nose in patients with recurrent keratitis. With the use of modern molecular diagnostic tools, it would be useful to examine whether the strains of S. aureus obtained from endogenous sites such as the conjunctiva, nose and skin are the same as those obtained from the corneal ulcer and whether patients with recurrent MK are persistently infected with the same strain of S. aureus or have intermittent carriage of different strains. A study in which volunteers were artificially inoculated nasally with a mixture of S. aureus strains showed that non carriers quickly eliminated the inoculated S. aureus strains whereas most persistent carriers selected their original resident S. aureus strain from the inoculation mixture[28]. The authors concluded that host characteristics substantially determine the S. aureus nasal carrier state and it this therefore likely that a similar process occurs in the conjunctiva. Collecting isolates from patients with recurrent MK and resolving their relatedness (comparative genomics) between episodes would enable the development of decolonisation strategies to reduce the risk of recurrent infection related visual loss.

Methods

All included patients provided informed consent. The study received prospective ethical approval from the Northwest NHS Research Ethics Committee and was conducted according to the ethical standards set out in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki, as revised in 2000. Consecutive patients presenting with suspected MK between January 2011 and November 2012 at The Royal Liverpool University Hospital were recruited and followed up at 6 and 12 weeks. Demographical and clinical information were collected through patient interview and medical notes review. Corneal scrapes were collected from the corneal ulcer at presentation. At presentation and at each subsequent visit conjunctival swabs from each eye, a nasal swab from each nostril and a throat swab were collected. All patients received a topical fluoroquinolone as initial treatment. A recurrent episode was defined as a prior or further episode of clinically suspected MK occurring in the same patient (in either eye) either more than 3 months before or after the index episode or within 3 months of the index episode if there was documentation that the corneal ulcer had healed in the interim. In addition to patients with MK, patients with no previous history of MK and current eye drop use, and patients with no previous history of MK and eye drop use but a history of RA, were recruited to a healthy control group and a RA group. These patients were recruited from patients attending for routine cataract surgery and from those attending a RA clinic. Conjunctival, nasal and throat swabs were collected from both the healthy and RA group on a single occasion.

Sampling and microbial processing

Corneal samples were taken by scraping the edges of the ulcer with a number 11 blade (Swann Morton, Sheffield, UK) whilst wearing sterile gloves, as previously described[29,30]. The blade was placed into enrichment culture broth (brain heart infusion, BHI) and transported to the microbiology laboratory at room temperature[29]. Conventional diagnostic culture was carried out as previously described[30]. Briefly, BHI bottles were vortexed for 5–10 s and 10 μl aliquots inoculated onto blood, chocolate, fastidious anaerobic and Sabouraud’s dextrose agar plates and Robertson’s cooked meat enrichment broth (Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK). For Acanthamoeba spp. culture, 20 μl of BHI was inoculated onto a non-nutrient agar (Oxoid) seeded with Escherichia coli. All plates were incubated overnight at 37 °C under both aerobic and enriched carbon dioxide (5%) atmospheric conditions. Agar plates and a 24 h subculture of the BHI broth in enrichment medium were examined for evidence of bacterial growth after 24 and 48 h incubation. All isolates were identified using matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time-of-flight mass spectrometry (Bruker, Bremen, Germany). Acanthamoeba plates were examined daily for 7 days for the characteristic appearances of acanthamoeba trophozoites and cysts[30]. Conjunctival, nasal and oral swabs were inoculated onto blood, chocolate, fastidious anaerobic and Sabouraud’s dextrose agar plates (Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK) and processed as above.

Statistical analysis

All data collected in the study were entered into an electronic database via Microsoft Excel 2016 and analysed using SPSS (version 26). The independent T-test was used to assess differences for normally distributed continuous variables and the χ2 was used as indicated for the analysis of categorical variables where the number of observations was 5 or larger. For small-sized samples (fewer than five observations), Fisher’s exact test was used. Repeated measures logistic regression was used to analyse the difference between swab results over the 3 visits.
  29 in total

Review 1.  Staphylococcus aureus: a well-armed pathogen.

Authors:  G L Archer
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 9.079

Review 2.  Recurrent infections and immune evasion strategies of Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Hwan Keun Kim; Vilasack Thammavongsa; Olaf Schneewind; Dominique Missiakas
Journal:  Curr Opin Microbiol       Date:  2011-11-14       Impact factor: 7.934

3.  Human factor in Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriage.

Authors:  Jan Nouwen; Hélène Boelens; Alex van Belkum; Henri Verbrugh
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.441

4.  The role of Staphylococcal enterotoxin in atopic keratoconjunctivitis and corneal ulceration.

Authors:  H Fujishima; N Okada; M Dogru; F Baba; M Tomita; J Abe; K Matsumoto; H Saito
Journal:  Allergy       Date:  2012-04-10       Impact factor: 13.146

Review 5.  The role of nasal carriage in Staphylococcus aureus infections.

Authors:  Heiman F L Wertheim; Damian C Melles; Margreet C Vos; Willem van Leeuwen; Alex van Belkum; Henri A Verbrugh; Jan L Nouwen
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 25.071

6.  Specific roles of alpha-toxin and beta-toxin during Staphylococcus aureus corneal infection.

Authors:  R J O'Callaghan; M C Callegan; J M Moreau; L C Green; T J Foster; O M Hartford; L S Engel; J M Hill
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 3.441

Review 7.  Corneal blindness: a global perspective.

Authors:  J P Whitcher; M Srinivasan; M P Upadhyay
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2003-07-07       Impact factor: 9.408

8.  Recurrent bacterial keratitis.

Authors:  Rebecca Kaye; Abigail Kaye; Henri Sueke; Timothy Neal; Craig Winstanley; Malcolm Horsburgh; Stephen Kaye
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 9.  Epidemiology of Staphylococcus aureus Nasal Carriage Patterns in the Community.

Authors:  Jaishri Mehraj; Wolfgang Witte; Manas K Akmatov; Franziska Layer; Guido Werner; Gérard Krause
Journal:  Curr Top Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 4.291

10.  Reclassification of Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriage types.

Authors:  Alex van Belkum; Nelianne J Verkaik; Corné P de Vogel; Hélène A Boelens; Jeroen Verveer; Jan L Nouwen; Henri A Verbrugh; Heiman F L Wertheim
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2009-06-15       Impact factor: 5.226

View more
  4 in total

1.  Categorization of the Ocular Microbiome in Japanese Stevens-Johnson Syndrome Patients With Severe Ocular Complications.

Authors:  Mayumi Ueta; Koji Hosomi; Jonguk Park; Kenji Mizuguchi; Chie Sotozono; Shigeru Kinoshita; Jun Kunisawa
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2021-11-19       Impact factor: 5.293

2.  An Evaluation of a Simplified Impression Membrane Sampling Method for the Diagnosis of Microbial Keratitis.

Authors:  Tobi F Somerville; Rose Herbert; Timothy Neal; Malcolm Horsburgh; Stephen B Kaye
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 4.241

3.  Development of a novel micro-bead force spectroscopy approach to measure the ability of a thermo-active polymer to remove bacteria from a corneal model.

Authors:  J Pattem; T Swift; S Rimmer; T Holmes; S MacNeil; J Shepherd
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 4.  Foundational concepts in the biology of bacterial keratitis.

Authors:  Lawson Ung; James Chodosh
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2021-06-05       Impact factor: 3.770

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.