Literature DB >> 33122310

Cohort profile: a collaborative multicentre study of retinal optical coherence tomography in 539 patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (CROCTINO).

Alexander U Brandt1,2,3, Friedemann Paul4,2,5, Svenja Specovius1,2, Hanna G Zimmermann1,2, Frederike Cosima Oertel1,2, Claudia Chien1,2, Charlotte Bereuter1,2, Lawrence J Cook6, Marco Aurélio Lana Peixoto7, Mariana Andrade Fontenelle7, Ho Jin Kim8, Jae-Won Hyun8, Su-Kyung Jung9, Jacqueline Palace10, Adriana Roca-Fernandez11, Alejandro Rubio Diaz10, Maria Isabel Leite10, Srilakshmi M Sharma12, Fereshte Ashtari13, Rahele Kafieh14, Alireza Dehghani15, Mohsen Pourazizi15, Lekha Pandit16, Anitha Dcunha16, Orhan Aktas17, Marius Ringelstein17,18, Philipp Albrecht17, Eugene May19, Caryl Tongco19, Letizia Leocani20, Marco Pisa20, Marta Radaelli20, Elena H Martinez-Lapiscina21, Hadas Stiebel-Kalish22,23, Mark Hellmann22, Itay Lotan22, Sasitorn Siritho24, Jérôme de Seze25, Thomas Senger25, Joachim Havla26, Romain Marignier27, Caroline Tilikete28, Alvaro Cobo Calvo27, Denis Bernardi Bichuetti29, Ivan Maynart Tavares30, Nasrin Asgari31,32, Kerstin Soelberg31,32, Ayse Altintas33, Rengin Yildirim34, Uygur Tanriverdi35, Anu Jacob36, Saif Huda36, Zoe Rimler37, Allyson Reid37, Yang Mao-Draayer38, Ibis Soto de Castillo39, Michael R Yeaman40,41, Terry J Smith42,43.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Optical coherence tomography (OCT) captures retinal damage in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD). Previous studies investigating OCT in NMOSD have been limited by the rareness and heterogeneity of the disease. The goal of this study was to establish an image repository platform, which will facilitate neuroimaging studies in NMOSD. Here we summarise the profile of the Collaborative OCT in NMOSD repository as the initial effort in establishing this platform. This repository should prove invaluable for studies using OCT to investigate NMOSD. PARTICIPANTS: The current cohort includes data from 539 patients with NMOSD and 114 healthy controls. These were collected at 22 participating centres from North and South America, Asia and Europe. The dataset consists of demographic details, diagnosis, antibody status, clinical disability, visual function, history of optic neuritis and other NMOSD defining attacks, and OCT source data from three different OCT devices. FINDINGS TO DATE: The cohort informs similar demographic and clinical characteristics as those of previously published NMOSD cohorts. The image repository platform and centre network continue to be available for future prospective neuroimaging studies in NMOSD. For the conduct of the study, we have refined OCT image quality criteria and developed a cross-device intraretinal segmentation pipeline. FUTURE PLANS: We are pursuing several scientific projects based on the repository, such as analysing retinal layer thickness measurements, in this cohort in an attempt to identify differences between distinct disease phenotypes, demographics and ethnicities. The dataset will be available for further projects to interested, qualified parties, such as those using specialised image analysis or artificial intelligence applications. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  medical retina; neuro-ophthalmology; neurology; radiology & imaging

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33122310      PMCID: PMC7597491          DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035397

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Open        ISSN: 2044-6055            Impact factor:   2.692


The Collaborative OCT in neuromyelitis optical spectrum disorders repository cohort comprises the largest number of retinal optical coherence tomography (OCT) images from patients with a neuromyelitis spectrum disorder, a rare autoimmune disease of the central nervous system. Besides imaging data, information on clinical and functional scores as well as laboratory parameters were assessed. We collect OCT images as original files, allowing for a detailed quality reading and standardised, device-independent OCT analysis. Despite standardised image analysis, the image heterogeneity due to different OCT machines and scan protocols remains a challenge.

Introduction

Neuromyelitis optical spectrum disorders (NMOSD) are rare autoimmune neuroinflammatory diseases spanning a broad age range. They are clinically characterised by recurrent attacks of optic neuritis (ON), myelitis and less frequently by the brainstem and cerebral attacks, and profoundly impact patients’ quality of life.1–4 The current concepts of NMOSD are rapidly changing. An international panel of experts published the latest NMOSD diagnostic criteria in 2015.5 Pathogenic serum autoantibodies against aquaporin-4 (AQP4-IgG), an astrocytic water channel protein, can be detected in 60%–80% of patients with NMOSD.6 7 The diagnostic criteria differentiate patients with positive or negative/unknown AQP4-IgG status. In the latter case, strict rules apply to the clinical presentation and paraclinical findings, in particular those from MRI for diagnosing NMOSD.5 8 In some AQP4-IgG seronegative patients within the NMO disease spectrum, for example with isolated recurrent ON or myelitis, serum antibodies against myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) can be detected.9–12 As a different cellular target is involved, most experts consider MOG-IgG autoimmunity, or MOG-IgG-associated encephalomyelitis, as a separate disease entity, pathogenetically distinct from classic AQP4-IgG-associated NMOSD.13–15 The term myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody disease has recently been proposed for this disorder.16 ON is one of the most common clinical manifestation of NMOSD. It frequently results in severe structural optic nerve damage and visual impairment, often occurs bilaterally, with common relapses.3 17 18 Patients often develop a visual disability as a result of decreased high-contrast visual acuity (HCVA) and low-contrast visual acuity, as well as colour and visual field defects. These functional limitations result in impaired vision-related quality of life and a high incidence of legal blindness.19–21 Optical coherence tomography (OCT) acquires high-resolution retinal images and plays an important role in assessing ON-associated damage in NMOSD22 and other neuroinflammatory disorders associated with ON.23 24 After transection of optic nerve axons following acute ON, retrograde neurodegeneration leads to neuroaxonal damage in the retina.25 Retinal post-inflammatory neuroaxonal degeneration typically progresses for about 6 months after the onset of acute idiopathic ON. It can be assessed by OCT as peripapillary retinal nerve fibre layer thickness (pRNFL) or ganglion and inner plexiform layer thickness (GCIP).26 Due to the rarity of NMOSD, adequate disease-specific studies on temporal ON dynamics are scant.27 Thus, it remains uncertain which time frame accurately reflects the disease. For example, in a recent population-based study of all acute ON in Southern Denmark, there was not a single AQP4-IgG seropositive case and only two with MOG-IgG in the 50 patients presenting with de novo acute ON during study duration.28 In MOG-IgG seropositive patients, ON appears to be milder than in patients with detectable AQP4-IgG29 and leads to a better outcome despite equally severe retinal thinning.30 However, MOG-IgG seropositive patients display a higher relapse frequency, potentially leading to comparable cumulative retinal damage and loss of vision in the two subgroups.31 32 Furthermore, MOG-IgG seropositive patients have a more pronounced pRNFL thinning in the temporal quadrant, while temporal and nasal quadrants are equally affected in AQP4-IgG positive disease.19 33 It is currently unclear, to what extent the retina and vision are affected by NMOSD independently of ON.22 In multiple sclerosis (MS), disease-associated and progressive neurodegeneration can occur in eyes unaffected by ON.34 35 Studies of NMOSD have led to conflicting results. ON in NMOSD tends to be more posterior and closer to the chiasm than that occurring in MS, and chiasmal affection could lead to carry-over effects in the less affected companion eye.36 37 However, recently described microstructural changes in the retina also suggest a primary retinopathy in NMOSD.38–41 This is potentially mediated by AQP4-expressing retinal Müller cells and could be independent of ON. Longitudinal data demonstrating progressive GCIP loss in AQP4-IgG positive patients with NMOSD independent of ON further supports this notion.42 43 These observations remain to be independently confirmed. In contrast, a recent exploratory longitudinal study in MOG-IgG seropositive patients suggested only progressive RNFL loss but not longitudinal GCIP reduction.44 Besides neuroaxonal damage, macroscopic retinal findings have been reported in NMOSD. Macular microcysts occur in the inner nuclear layer and are associated with severe ON in approximately 20% of patients with NMOSD.45–47 Pathology and clinical significance of macular microcysts, sometimes called microcystic macular oedema, remain unclear; however, macular processes appear to occur more frequently than other processes such as vitreous traction, which was found in one MOG-IgG positive patient with microcysts.48 Investigating OCT for clinically and pathologically meaningful information is hampered by the rareness and heterogeneity of NMOSD.49 In 2015, the Guthy Jackson Charitable Foundation International Clinical Consortium (GJCF-ICC) agreed to establish an image repository platform (neuromyelitis optical imaging repository (NOIR)), the purpose of which is to facilitate multinational and multicentre neuroimaging studies in NMOSD. NOIR is intended to help identify imaging pitfalls in NMOSD, develop and clinically validate imaging biomarkers of the disease, clinical disability and to define imaging endpoints for clinical trials. Here we report the outcome of the Collaborative OCT in NMOSD repository study (CROCTINO) as the initial effort in establishing a platform for investigating retinal abnormalities using OCT in NMOSD.

Cohort description

Study design

The study was designed as a multinational and multicentre repository study collecting longitudinal OCT data as well as relevant clinical data from patients with NMOSD and healthy controls (HCs). Participating centres were asked to contribute both retrospective and prospective data that was collected over a defined period extending from 2000 to 2018. Scientific coordination and OCT reading were performed at the Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin Translational Neuroimaging Group. Participating centres were mainly recruited from the GJCF-ICC, which includes international researchers and clinicians focusing on NMOSD. Additional experts who had previously published studies using OCT in NMOSD but who were not members of the GJCF-ICC were contacted and invited to participate. For this purpose, a questionnaire screening each centre for the number of eligible patients and the type of OCT instruments used at their site was sent to the entire GJCF-ICC and to other identified experts. Centres giving a positive response to the recruitment questionnaire received further instructions on how to contribute OCT images and the associated demographical and clinical data of their patients and HCs. The overall study design—including the workflow—is illustrated in figure 1.
Figure 1

Flow chart explaining the overall study design and information technology (IT) infrastructure. DCC, Data Coordinating Center; OCT, optical coherence tomography; REDCap, Research Electronic Data Capture; SAMIRIX is a custom-developed intraretinal segmentation pipeline55. OSCAR-IB are validated consensus quality criteria for retinal OCT reading53.

Flow chart explaining the overall study design and information technology (IT) infrastructure. DCC, Data Coordinating Center; OCT, optical coherence tomography; REDCap, Research Electronic Data Capture; SAMIRIX is a custom-developed intraretinal segmentation pipeline55. OSCAR-IB are validated consensus quality criteria for retinal OCT reading53.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Subjects were included with (a) a diagnosis of NMOSD as specified by the 2015 International Panel criteria5 or (b) longitudinal extensive transverse myelitis and/or (c) recurrent ON or (d) HCs (without matching requirements). OCT source data, demographic and clinical metadata from patients and HCs were required, including age, sex, disease subtype, autoantibody status and clinical history including details of ON.

Data collection and workflow

All demographic and clinical data were assessed in an electronic repository based on Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap),50 located at the University of Utah Data Coordination Center. OCT images were transferred by participating centres via TeamBeam (Skalio GmbH, Hamburg, Germany), a commercial web-based medical data exchange service certified for secure data transfer. OCT images were then stored and analysed using a secure server at Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany. Study preparation began in January 2016 by identifying potential participating centres, setting up the information technology (IT) infrastructure and developing the electronic case report forms (eCRFs) in REDCap. eCRFs were sent to all participants for review and were revised accordingly. The data collection was launched on 1 September 2016, when the final repository was released, and centres received REDCap accounts for data entry. Data collection officially closed on 30 September 2018. After a detailed plausibility check, identified missing data could be submitted until 31 December 2018. A detailed timeline is illustrated in figure 2.
Figure 2

Detailed study timeline including all study phases with start and end dates, as well as a brief description of each phase. eCRFs, electronic case report forms; OCT, optical coherence tomography.

Detailed study timeline including all study phases with start and end dates, as well as a brief description of each phase. eCRFs, electronic case report forms; OCT, optical coherence tomography.

Collected dataset

The data elements that were collected are listed in online supplemental file 1 (including indications of which data elements were mandatory or optional) and are summarised as follows:

Demographic and clinical data

In addition to age and sex, ethnicity was assessed based on published NIH categories (https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/not-od-15-089.html). Possible selections comprised ‘American Indian or Alaska Native’, ‘Asian’, ‘Black or African American’, ‘Hispanic or Latino’, ‘Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander’, ‘White’ and ‘Other’; up to two selections were possible. Height and weight were collected. Information concerning the presence of ophthalmological comorbidities other than those related to NMOSD was requested. The possible answers were: ‘Unknown’, ‘No (excluded by examination)’, ‘No (excluded by history taking)’ and ‘Yes’. In case of ‘Yes’, the condition had to be specified. Furthermore, the presence of other comorbidities was assessed. Information about NMOSD diagnosis was mandatory, with possible selections of ‘NMO (2006 criteria)’, ‘AQP4-IgG seropositive NMOSD (2015 criteria)’, ‘AQP4-IgG seronegative NMOSD (2015 criteria)’, ‘MOG-IgG-associated encephalomyelitis/NMOSD’, ‘RON/CRION (Recurrent Optic Neuritis)’, ‘LETM (Longitudinal Extensive Transverse Myelitis)’. We inquired about the AQP4 and MOG antibody statuses separately (both mandatory) with possible answers ‘Seropositive’, ‘Currently seronegative, but at least one previous test was positive’, ‘Seronegative’, ‘Not known/Never assessed’. Patients were considered to be seropositive for AQP4-IgG or MOG-IgG if antibodies were detected in at least one assay. Centres were also asked which assay they used for antibody testing. Provision of the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score was optional.51 History of clinical attacks was requested with a focus on ON. Information concerning each eye was recorded separately as was the number of ON attacks and date of last episode. History of other NMOSD defining attacks, such as transverse myelitis, area postrema syndrome, brainstem syndromes, symptomatic narcolepsy or acute diencephalic clinical syndrome with NMOSD-typical diencephalic MRI lesions, and symptomatic cerebral syndrome with NMOSD-typical brain lesions was requested without dates and with the option ‘unknown’. Immunotherapy was assessed with a selection of common NMOSD treatments52 and possible selections ‘Current’ and ‘Previous use’.

Optical coherence tomography

Scans from all common OCT machines were accepted, resulting in scans from three different types of machines: (a) Spectralis SD-OCT (Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany), (b) Cirrus HD-OCT (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, California, USA) and (c) Topcon 3D OCT-1 (Topcon, Tokyo, Japan). We requested that centres upload two scan types per eye from each visit: A peripapillary ring scan with 12° or approximately 3.4 mm diameter around the optic disc. For those using Cirrus and Topcon, an optic disc volume scan was uploaded since peripapillary data are extracted from this scan. A macular volume scan, centred on the fovea, with a minimum size of 20°×20° (approximately 6 mm×6 mm). There were no restrictions regarding OCT image averaging or quality. At least one scan per visit was required to be included in the repository. After images were transferred, their quality was assessed based on modified OSCAR-IB criteria.53 54 Modifications were made for better applicability to macular scans (see online supplemental file 2). pRNFL segmentation was performed with device-internal algorithms, intraretinal layer segmentation with a device-independent segmentation pipeline.55

Visual function

HCVA was requested with a selection menu ranging from 20/10 (−0.3 logMAR) to ‘no light perception’. Information on the method of testing was not requested, but details of whether testing was performed best corrected, habitually corrected or uncorrected were recorded. Monocular HCVA was mandatory while binocular HCVA was optional. Additionally, low contrast letter acuity (LCLA) from 2.5% contrast Sloan charts, normal/abnormal classifications of visual evoked potentials (VEP) P100 latencies and mean deficit and pattern standard deviation from visual fields could be entered as optional information.

Statistical analysis

Cohort and statistical description for this cohort profile were performed with R V.3.4.456 in R Markdown and RStudio (RStudio, Boston, Massachusetts, USA).

Cohort overview

Centres from North and South America, Asia and Europe participated in CROCTINO. In total, data from 539 patients from 22 centres and 114 HCs from 5 centres were collected. Centres and the size of their patient and HC cohorts are listed alphabetically in table 1.
Table 1

Participating centres with number of patients, number of HCs and used OCT device

CentrePatientsHCOCT device
Bangkok, Thailand250Cirrus
Barcelona, Spain1313Spectralis or Cirrus
Belo Horizonte, Brazil570Spectralis
Berlin, Germany7639Spectralis
Duesseldorf, Germany1128Spectralis
Goyang-si, Korea500Topcon OCT
Isfahan, Iran4018Spectralis
Istanbul, Turkey80Cirrus
Liverpool, UK80Spectralis
Lyon, France100Spectralis
Mangalore, India4016Spectralis
Maracaibo, Venezuela30Spectralis
Michigan, USA50Spectralis
Milan, Italy300Spectralis
Munich, Germany110Spectralis
New York, USA60Spectralis and Cirrus
Odense, Denmark90Spectralis
Oxford, UK480Spectralis
Petah-Tikva, Israel250Cirrus
Sao Paulo, Brazil90Spectralis
Seattle, USA300Cirrus
Strasbourg, France250Spectralis

HC, healthy control; OCT, optical coherence tomography.

Participating centres with number of patients, number of HCs and used OCT device HC, healthy control; OCT, optical coherence tomography. In total, we collected 1868 peripapillary ring scans/optic nerve volume scans and 1672 macular volume scans fulfilling defined specifications. Only scans with corresponding clinical data were considered. Device and scan specifications are depicted in table 2.
Table 2

Technical and scan specifications

Protocol*Axial resolution (µm)Acquisition (A-scans/s)nB-scansA-scans per B-scanSize (mm)†
Spectralis Mac-13.96240 00062651617686×6
Spectralis Mac-2240255126×6
Spectralis Mac-32252510247.5×9
Spectralis Ring-11143115363.4
Spectralis Ring-222617683.5
Cirrus Mac5.06327 000632931285126×6
Cirrus Ring3882002006×6/3.4‡
Topcon Mac6.06450 000642631285126×6
Topcon Ring1111285126×6/3.4‡

*Only protocols making up more than 5% of the total macular scan rates were considered.

†Scan size can vary as it depends on the eye length.

‡Peripapillary ring scan extracted from optic nerve head volume scan.

Mac, macular volume.

Technical and scan specifications *Only protocols making up more than 5% of the total macular scan rates were considered. †Scan size can vary as it depends on the eye length. ‡Peripapillary ring scan extracted from optic nerve head volume scan. Mac, macular volume. A cohort characterisation is depicted in table 3. The mean patient age (mean±SD) was 43.1±14.8 years with 444 (82%) women. The age of HCs (mean±SD) was 32.1±9.8 years with 72 (63%) women. The majority of patients were White or Middle Eastern (n=315), followed by Asian (n=128) and Black or African American (n=27).
Table 3

Cohort description

Healthy controlsPatients
Subjects (n)114539
Centres (n)522
Age (years; mean±SD)32.1±9.843.1±14.8
Sex (woman; n (%))72 (63.2)444 (82.4)
Time since disease onset (years; mean±SD)5.5±19.5
Age at initial symptom onset (years; mean±SD)36.2±15.1
Ethnicity(n (%))White or Middle Eastern96 (84.2)315 (58.4)
Asian17 (14.9)128 (23.7)
Black or African American0 (0)27 (5.0)
Hispanic or Latino1 (0.9)11 (2.0)
Other0 (0)23 (4.3)
Not reported0 (0)35 (6.5)
Patients fulfilling the 2015 diagnostic criteria for NMOSD (fulfilled; n (%))515 (95.5)
AQP4-IgG seropositive NMOSD (n (%))369 (68.5)
MOG-IgG seropositive NMOSD (n (%))54 (10.0)
Double-negative NMOSD (n (%))34 (6.3)
NMOSD with unknown antibody-status (n (%))58 (11.0)
Patients with a history of optic neuritis (n (%))400 (74.2)
Patients with a history of myelitis (n (%))410 (76.1)

AQP4-IgG, aquaporin-4 IgG antibodies; MOG-IgG, myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein IgG antibodies; NMOSD, neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders.

Cohort description AQP4-IgG, aquaporin-4 IgG antibodies; MOG-IgG, myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein IgG antibodies; NMOSD, neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders. Among all patients, 515 (95.5%) fulfilled the 2015 diagnostic criteria for NMOSD.5 Of those not meeting the 2015 criteria, 21 (3.9%) carried the diagnosis of LETM, and 3 (0.6%) recurrent ON. Among those fulfilling NMOSD diagnostic criteria, 369 (72%) were AQP4-IgG seropositive, leaving 146 (28%) with negative or unknown AQP4-IgG status. Among the AQP4-IgG seronegative patients, 54 (37%) were MOG-IgG seropositive, 34 (23%) were double-negative for AQP4-IgG and MOG-IgG and 58 (40%) had an unknown antibody status. In the entire cohort, 369 (68%) were AQP4-IgG seropositive, 54 (10%) MOG-IgG seropositive, 52 (10%) had double negative and 64 (12%) had an unknown antibody status. There were 400 (74%) patients with at least one episode of ON, and 410 (76%) patients with a history of myelitis. The mean time since disease onset (mean±SD) was 5.47±19.47 years and mean age at initial symptom onset (mean±SD) was 36.18±15.05 years. Information about current N, N-Dimethyltryptamine (DMT) was available in 398 (74%) patients. Ninety-seven patients (18.0%) received a combination of multiple DMTs. Most frequent DMT options comprised rituximab (n=128; 24%), azathioprine (n=121; 22%), oral prednisolone (n=98; 18%), mycophenolate mofetil (n=77; 14%) and methotrexate (n=11; 2%). The majority of the centres provided OCT source data from a Spectralis machine (17 centres), followed by Cirrus (6 centres) and one centre contributed Topcon OCT images (table 1). HCVA was available for 529 (98%) patients and 83 (73%) HCs. Most of the patients received best-corrected HCVA (47%), 28% were habitually corrected and 25% not corrected. LCLA was obtained from 99 (18%) patients and 40 (35%) HCs. VEP were available for 177 (33%), and visual fields for 90 (17%) patients applying devices at the discretion of each centre. Longitudinal data were available for 157 (29%) patients from 11 centres. Mean follow-up time (mean±SD) was 27±17 months.

Patient and public involvement

Patients and the Public were not explicitly involved in the design or conduct of this study. However, the results of this study will be presented on a Guthy-Jackson Charitable Foundation’s International NMO Patient Day, giving patients, relatives and researchers the opportunity to share ideas for projects based on this cohort.

Findings to date

To our knowledge, the CROCTINO repository comprises the largest dataset on retinal OCT in NMOSD. Cohort demographics are in line with previous epidemiological NMOSD studies: gender ratio, age at symptom onset and prevalence of AQP4-IgG and MOG-IgG antibodies are similar to previously published studies and suggest a cohort that is representative of the disease spectrum.57–59 OCT quality and quantitative analyses are currently being investigated as first scientific derivatives of the work and will be published in the near future. During the study, many challenges in conducting an investigator-driven academic repository study were experienced. First, this study was implemented without centre reimbursement. While we are unaware of specific guidelines in this regard, we felt that data quality would potentially be higher when centres receive no reimbursement. Although without reimbursement we expected a lower motivation for interested centres to participate at all, we reckoned that data quality might be higher from participating centres contributing out of sole scientific interest. Despite the absence of financial compensation, centre motivation was excellent, and we were able to include substantially more datasets (n=539) than initially anticipated (n=200). Lack of reimbursement did preclude the participation of some centres, particularly in North America. Sharing of data requires legal compliance, including the conclusion of data transfer agreements (DTA). Although we provided an initial DTA template for this study, almost all centres required modifications, the consequence of different legal systems in this multinational setting. This process resulted in a substantially delayed data collection. On the other hand, the DTA templates for each of the involved centres in combination with concluded DTA for this repository now provide a powerful platform and network for future studies in NMOSD. During the conduct of this study, we developed several technical solutions, which will be made available beyond the scope of this repository. First, the technical infrastructure and newly established workflows will be instrumental in conducting future neuroimaging studies in NMOSD. We further developed a device-independent intraretinal layer segmentation pipeline based on an established segmentation algorithm.60 This pipeline is capable of importing and segmenting OCT scans from all devices included in the study and will presumably lead to better comparability of OCT data obtained from different devices.55 Finally, we modified the widely used OSCAR-IB criteria53 for assessing OCT image quality to be applicable to macular volume scans and all OCT devices. The modified criteria will be validated using data from our repository.

Strengths and limitations

With 539 patients, CROCTINO comprises the largest dataset of OCT images from patients with NMOSD that we are aware of. The cohort resembles epidemiological studies published earlier and includes relevant demographic and clinical data. Further, the autoantibody status is available for many datasets, including not only AQP4-IgG but also MOG-IgG, thus distinguishing this cohort from many earlier studies where MOG-IgG was either unknown or unavailable. Inclusion of different ethnicities and geographical regions should allow analysis and comparison with patients with NMOSD in different cohorts, who are usually investigated only in smaller separate analyses from one or few centres. Finally, this study collected raw OCT imaging data thereby allowing detailed quality reading and image analysis, also with advanced technologies in the future. The study has several limitations, many of which are inherent to multicentre settings. First, the inclusion of retrospective data precluded application of a standardised, homogeneous imaging protocol. Heterogeneity in the dataset is further caused by (a) use of different OCT machines, (b) different scan protocols and (c) no homogeneous visual function measures. Several geographic regions are not represented in the repository (eg, Australia, Africa), and HC scans are not matched demographically and are only available for some ethnicities and from certain regions. Although great care was taken in collecting, completing and verifying the data, we could not ensure complete individual data set validity. For example, different methods for antibody testing61 with often uncertain sensitivity and specificity and a non-standardised documentation of patient-reported information could lead to some noise in respective analyses.

Collaboration and future directions

The study coordinating centre is pursuing several scientific projects based on the repository in collaboration with the participating centres, such as the analysis of pRNFL and intramacular layer thickness measurements in this cohort in an attempt to identify differences between distinct disease phenotypes, demographics and ethnicities. We encourage collaboration with interested researchers in additional scientific projects. The CROCTINO dataset will be made available to all participating centres and to qualified investigators on request (details see below). The study coordinators are also interested in further expanding the repository by including (a) additional data from currently underrepresented geographic regions, (b) additional HC data to provide expanded ethnicity comparators and (c) more prospective, longitudinal data, also extending already existing follow-up periods of the included patients. The established NOIR platform and the CROCTINO cohort will serve to investigate retinal imaging biomarkers in NMOSD in the future.
  60 in total

1.  Myelin-oligodendrocyte-glycoprotein (MOG) autoantibodies as potential markers of severe optic neuritis and subclinical retinal axonal degeneration.

Authors:  Joachim Havla; T Kümpfel; R Schinner; M Spadaro; E Schuh; E Meinl; R Hohlfeld; O Outteryck
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 4.849

2.  Distinguishing optic neuritis in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disease from multiple sclerosis: a novel magnetic resonance imaging scoring system.

Authors:  Mithu Storoni; Indran Davagnanam; Mark Radon; Ata Siddiqui; Gordon T Plant
Journal:  J Neuroophthalmol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.042

3.  Diagnostic procedures in suspected attacks in patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders: Results of an international survey.

Authors:  Marcus D'Souza; Athina Papadopoulou; Michael Levy; Anu Jacob; Michael R Yeaman; Tania Kümpfel; Romain Marignier; Friedemann Paul; Alexander U Brandt
Journal:  Mult Scler Relat Disord       Date:  2020-02-29       Impact factor: 4.339

4.  Subclinical primary retinal pathology in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder.

Authors:  In Hye Jeong; Ho Jin Kim; Nam-Hee Kim; Kyoung Sook Jeong; Choul Yong Park
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2016-05-03       Impact factor: 4.849

5.  Contrasting disease patterns in seropositive and seronegative neuromyelitis optica: A multicentre study of 175 patients.

Authors:  Sven Jarius; Klemens Ruprecht; Brigitte Wildemann; Tania Kuempfel; Marius Ringelstein; Christian Geis; Ingo Kleiter; Christoph Kleinschnitz; Achim Berthele; Johannes Brettschneider; Kerstin Hellwig; Bernhard Hemmer; Ralf A Linker; Florian Lauda; Christoph A Mayer; Hayrettin Tumani; Arthur Melms; Corinna Trebst; Martin Stangel; Martin Marziniak; Frank Hoffmann; Sven Schippling; Jürgen H Faiss; Oliver Neuhaus; Barbara Ettrich; Christian Zentner; Kersten Guthke; Ulrich Hofstadt-van Oy; Reinhard Reuss; Hannah Pellkofer; Ulf Ziemann; Peter Kern; Klaus P Wandinger; Florian Then Bergh; Tobias Boettcher; Stefan Langel; Martin Liebetrau; Paulus S Rommer; Sabine Niehaus; Christoph Münch; Alexander Winkelmann; Uwe K Zettl U; Imke Metz; Christian Veauthier; Jörn P Sieb; Christian Wilke; Hans P Hartung; Orhan Aktas; Friedemann Paul
Journal:  J Neuroinflammation       Date:  2012-01-19       Impact factor: 8.322

Review 6.  Optical coherence tomography in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders: potential advantages for individualized monitoring of progression and therapy.

Authors:  Frederike C Oertel; Hanna Zimmermann; Friedemann Paul; Alexander U Brandt
Journal:  EPMA J       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 6.543

7.  Does time equal vision in the acute treatment of a cohort of AQP4 and MOG optic neuritis?

Authors:  Hadas Stiebel-Kalish; Mark Andrew Hellmann; Michael Mimouni; Friedemann Paul; Omer Bialer; Michael Bach; Itay Lotan
Journal:  Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm       Date:  2019-05-21

8.  Collaborative International Research in Clinical and Longitudinal Experience Study in NMOSD.

Authors:  Lawrence J Cook; John W Rose; Jessica S Alvey; Anna Marie Jolley; Renee Kuhn; Brie Marron; Melissa Pederson; Rene Enriquez; Jeff Yearley; Stephen McKechnie; May H Han; Anna J Tomczak; Michael Levy; Maureen A Mealy; Jessica Coleman; Jeffrey L Bennett; Ruth Johnson; Myka Barnes-Garcia; Anthony L Traboulsee; Robert L Carruthers; Lisa Eunyoung Lee; Julia J Schubert; Katrina McMullen; Ilya Kister; Zoe Rimler; Allyson Reid; Nancy L Sicotte; Sarah M Planchon; Jeffrey A Cohen; Diane Ivancic; Jennifer L Sedlak; Ilana Katz Sand; Pavle Repovic; Lilyana Amezcua; Ana Pruitt; Erika Amundson; Tanuja Chitnis; Devin S Mullin; Eric C Klawiter; Andrew W Russo; Claire S Riley; Kaho B Onomichi; Libby Levine; Katherine E Nelson; Nancy M Nealon; Casey Engel; Mason Kruse-Hoyer; Melanie Marcille; Leticia Tornes; Anne Rumpf; Angela Greer; Megan Kenneally Behne; Renee R Rodriguez; Daniel W Behne; Derek W Blackway; Brian Coords; Terrence F Blaschke; Judy Sheard; Terry J Smith; Jacinta M Behne; Michael R Yeaman
Journal:  Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm       Date:  2019-06-28

9.  Peripherally derived macrophages as major phagocytes in MOG encephalomyelitis.

Authors:  Young Nam Kwon; Patrick J Waters; Moonhang Kim; Youn Soo Choi; Jin Wook Kim; Jung-Joon Sung; Sung-Hye Park; Sung-Min Kim
Journal:  Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm       Date:  2019-08-01

10.  Altered fovea in AQP4-IgG-seropositive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders.

Authors:  Seyedamirhosein Motamedi; Frederike C Oertel; Sunil K Yadav; Ella M Kadas; Margit Weise; Joachim Havla; Marius Ringelstein; Orhan Aktas; Philipp Albrecht; Klemens Ruprecht; Judith Bellmann-Strobl; Hanna G Zimmermann; Friedemann Paul; Alexander U Brandt
Journal:  Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm       Date:  2020-06-23
View more
  5 in total

1.  Astrocytic outer retinal layer thinning is not a feature in AQP4-IgG seropositive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders.

Authors:  Alexander U Brandt; Frederike Cosima Oertel; Angelo Lu; Hanna G Zimmermann; Svenja Specovius; Seyedamirhosein Motamedi; Claudia Chien; Charlotte Bereuter; Marco A Lana-Peixoto; Mariana Andrade Fontenelle; Fereshteh Ashtari; Rahele Kafieh; Alireza Dehghani; Mohsen Pourazizi; Lekha Pandit; Anitha D'Cunha; Ho Jin Kim; Jae-Won Hyun; Su-Kyung Jung; Letizia Leocani; Marco Pisa; Marta Radaelli; Sasitorn Siritho; Eugene F May; Caryl Tongco; Jérôme De Sèze; Thomas Senger; Jacqueline Palace; Adriana Roca-Fernández; Maria Isabel Leite; Srilakshmi M Sharma; Hadas Stiebel-Kalish; Nasrin Asgari; Kerstin Kathrine Soelberg; Elena H Martinez-Lapiscina; Joachim Havla; Yang Mao-Draayer; Zoe Rimler; Allyson Reid; Romain Marignier; Alvaro Cobo-Calvo; Ayse Altintas; Uygur Tanriverdi; Rengin Yildirim; Orhan Aktas; Marius Ringelstein; Philipp Albrecht; Ivan Maynart Tavares; Denis Bernardi Bichuetti; Anu Jacob; Saif Huda; Ibis Soto de Castillo; Axel Petzold; Ari J Green; Michael R Yeaman; Terry J Smith; Lawrence Cook; Friedemann Paul
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2021-10-28       Impact factor: 13.654

2.  BLK polymorphisms and expression level in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder.

Authors:  Bo-Wen Yin; Bin Li; Arshad Mehmood; Congcong Yuan; Shuang Song; Ruo-Yi Guo; Lu Zhang; Tianzhao Ma; Li Guo
Journal:  CNS Neurosci Ther       Date:  2021-10-12       Impact factor: 5.243

Review 3.  Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder: From Basic Research to Clinical Perspectives.

Authors:  Tzu-Lun Huang; Jia-Kang Wang; Pei-Yao Chang; Yung-Ray Hsu; Cheng-Hung Lin; Kung-Hung Lin; Rong-Kung Tsai
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 6.208

4.  Retinal Optical Coherence Tomography in Neuromyelitis Optica.

Authors:  Frederike Cosima Oertel; Svenja Specovius; Hanna G Zimmermann; Claudia Chien; Seyedamirhosein Motamedi; Charlotte Bereuter; Lawrence Cook; Marco Aurélio Lana Peixoto; Mariana Andrade Fontanelle; Ho Jin Kim; Jae-Won Hyun; Jacqueline Palace; Adriana Roca-Fernandez; Maria Isabel Leite; Srilakshmi Sharma; Fereshteh Ashtari; Rahele Kafieh; Alireza Dehghani; Mohsen Pourazizi; Lekha Pandit; Anitha D'Cunha; Orhan Aktas; Marius Ringelstein; Philipp Albrecht; Eugene May; Caryl Tongco; Letizia Leocani; Marco Pisa; Marta Radaelli; Elena H Martinez-Lapiscina; Hadas Stiebel-Kalish; Sasitorn Siritho; Jérome de Seze; Thomas Senger; Joachim Havla; Romain Marignier; Alvaro Cobo-Calvo; Denis Bichuetti; Ivan Maynart Tavares; Nasrin Asgari; Kerstin Soelberg; Ayse Altintas; Rengin Yildirim; Uygur Tanriverdi; Anu Jacob; Saif Huda; Zoe Rimler; Allyson Reid; Yang Mao-Draayer; Ibis Soto de Castillo; Axel Petzold; Ari J Green; Michael R Yeaman; Terry Smith; Alexander U Brandt; Friedemann Paul
Journal:  Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm       Date:  2021-09-15

Review 5.  Clinical and neuroimaging findings in MOGAD-MRI and OCT.

Authors:  Frederik Bartels; Angelo Lu; Frederike Cosima Oertel; Carsten Finke; Friedemann Paul; Claudia Chien
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2021-07-18       Impact factor: 4.330

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.