| Literature DB >> 33122310 |
Alexander U Brandt1,2,3, Friedemann Paul4,2,5, Svenja Specovius1,2, Hanna G Zimmermann1,2, Frederike Cosima Oertel1,2, Claudia Chien1,2, Charlotte Bereuter1,2, Lawrence J Cook6, Marco Aurélio Lana Peixoto7, Mariana Andrade Fontenelle7, Ho Jin Kim8, Jae-Won Hyun8, Su-Kyung Jung9, Jacqueline Palace10, Adriana Roca-Fernandez11, Alejandro Rubio Diaz10, Maria Isabel Leite10, Srilakshmi M Sharma12, Fereshte Ashtari13, Rahele Kafieh14, Alireza Dehghani15, Mohsen Pourazizi15, Lekha Pandit16, Anitha Dcunha16, Orhan Aktas17, Marius Ringelstein17,18, Philipp Albrecht17, Eugene May19, Caryl Tongco19, Letizia Leocani20, Marco Pisa20, Marta Radaelli20, Elena H Martinez-Lapiscina21, Hadas Stiebel-Kalish22,23, Mark Hellmann22, Itay Lotan22, Sasitorn Siritho24, Jérôme de Seze25, Thomas Senger25, Joachim Havla26, Romain Marignier27, Caroline Tilikete28, Alvaro Cobo Calvo27, Denis Bernardi Bichuetti29, Ivan Maynart Tavares30, Nasrin Asgari31,32, Kerstin Soelberg31,32, Ayse Altintas33, Rengin Yildirim34, Uygur Tanriverdi35, Anu Jacob36, Saif Huda36, Zoe Rimler37, Allyson Reid37, Yang Mao-Draayer38, Ibis Soto de Castillo39, Michael R Yeaman40,41, Terry J Smith42,43.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Optical coherence tomography (OCT) captures retinal damage in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD). Previous studies investigating OCT in NMOSD have been limited by the rareness and heterogeneity of the disease. The goal of this study was to establish an image repository platform, which will facilitate neuroimaging studies in NMOSD. Here we summarise the profile of the Collaborative OCT in NMOSD repository as the initial effort in establishing this platform. This repository should prove invaluable for studies using OCT to investigate NMOSD. PARTICIPANTS: The current cohort includes data from 539 patients with NMOSD and 114 healthy controls. These were collected at 22 participating centres from North and South America, Asia and Europe. The dataset consists of demographic details, diagnosis, antibody status, clinical disability, visual function, history of optic neuritis and other NMOSD defining attacks, and OCT source data from three different OCT devices. FINDINGS TO DATE: The cohort informs similar demographic and clinical characteristics as those of previously published NMOSD cohorts. The image repository platform and centre network continue to be available for future prospective neuroimaging studies in NMOSD. For the conduct of the study, we have refined OCT image quality criteria and developed a cross-device intraretinal segmentation pipeline. FUTURE PLANS: We are pursuing several scientific projects based on the repository, such as analysing retinal layer thickness measurements, in this cohort in an attempt to identify differences between distinct disease phenotypes, demographics and ethnicities. The dataset will be available for further projects to interested, qualified parties, such as those using specialised image analysis or artificial intelligence applications. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.Entities:
Keywords: medical retina; neuro-ophthalmology; neurology; radiology & imaging
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33122310 PMCID: PMC7597491 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035397
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMJ Open ISSN: 2044-6055 Impact factor: 2.692
Figure 1Flow chart explaining the overall study design and information technology (IT) infrastructure. DCC, Data Coordinating Center; OCT, optical coherence tomography; REDCap, Research Electronic Data Capture; SAMIRIX is a custom-developed intraretinal segmentation pipeline55. OSCAR-IB are validated consensus quality criteria for retinal OCT reading53.
Figure 2Detailed study timeline including all study phases with start and end dates, as well as a brief description of each phase. eCRFs, electronic case report forms; OCT, optical coherence tomography.
Participating centres with number of patients, number of HCs and used OCT device
| Centre | Patients | HC | OCT device |
| Bangkok, Thailand | 25 | 0 | Cirrus |
| Barcelona, Spain | 13 | 13 | Spectralis or Cirrus |
| Belo Horizonte, Brazil | 57 | 0 | Spectralis |
| Berlin, Germany | 76 | 39 | Spectralis |
| Duesseldorf, Germany | 11 | 28 | Spectralis |
| Goyang-si, Korea | 50 | 0 | Topcon OCT |
| Isfahan, Iran | 40 | 18 | Spectralis |
| Istanbul, Turkey | 8 | 0 | Cirrus |
| Liverpool, UK | 8 | 0 | Spectralis |
| Lyon, France | 10 | 0 | Spectralis |
| Mangalore, India | 40 | 16 | Spectralis |
| Maracaibo, Venezuela | 3 | 0 | Spectralis |
| Michigan, USA | 5 | 0 | Spectralis |
| Milan, Italy | 30 | 0 | Spectralis |
| Munich, Germany | 11 | 0 | Spectralis |
| New York, USA | 6 | 0 | Spectralis and Cirrus |
| Odense, Denmark | 9 | 0 | Spectralis |
| Oxford, UK | 48 | 0 | Spectralis |
| Petah-Tikva, Israel | 25 | 0 | Cirrus |
| Sao Paulo, Brazil | 9 | 0 | Spectralis |
| Seattle, USA | 30 | 0 | Cirrus |
| Strasbourg, France | 25 | 0 | Spectralis |
HC, healthy control; OCT, optical coherence tomography.
Technical and scan specifications
| Protocol* | Axial resolution (µm) | Acquisition (A-scans/s) | n | B-scans | A-scans per B-scan | Size (mm)† |
| Spectralis Mac-1 | 3.9 | 40 000 | 651 | 61 | 768 | 6×6 |
| Spectralis Mac-2 | 240 | 25 | 512 | 6×6 | ||
| Spectralis Mac-3 | 225 | 25 | 1024 | 7.5×9 | ||
| Spectralis Ring-1 | 1143 | 1 | 1536 | 3.4 | ||
| Spectralis Ring-2 | 226 | 1 | 768 | 3.5 | ||
| Cirrus Mac | 5.0 | 27 000 | 293 | 128 | 512 | 6×6 |
| Cirrus Ring | 388 | 200 | 200 | 6×6/3.4‡ | ||
| Topcon Mac | 6.0 | 50 000 | 263 | 128 | 512 | 6×6 |
| Topcon Ring | 111 | 128 | 512 | 6×6/3.4‡ |
*Only protocols making up more than 5% of the total macular scan rates were considered.
†Scan size can vary as it depends on the eye length.
‡Peripapillary ring scan extracted from optic nerve head volume scan.
Mac, macular volume.
Cohort description
| Healthy controls | Patients | ||
| Subjects (n) | 114 | 539 | |
| Centres (n) | 5 | 22 | |
| Age (years; mean±SD) | 32.1±9.8 | 43.1±14.8 | |
| Sex (woman; n (%)) | 72 (63.2) | 444 (82.4) | |
| Time since disease onset (years; mean±SD) | – | 5.5±19.5 | |
| Age at initial symptom onset (years; mean±SD) | – | 36.2±15.1 | |
| Ethnicity | White or Middle Eastern | 96 (84.2) | 315 (58.4) |
| Asian | 17 (14.9) | 128 (23.7) | |
| Black or African American | 0 (0) | 27 (5.0) | |
| Hispanic or Latino | 1 (0.9) | 11 (2.0) | |
| Other | 0 (0) | 23 (4.3) | |
| Not reported | 0 (0) | 35 (6.5) | |
| Patients fulfilling the 2015 diagnostic criteria for NMOSD (fulfilled; n (%)) | – | 515 (95.5) | |
| AQP4-IgG seropositive NMOSD (n (%)) | – | 369 (68.5) | |
| MOG-IgG seropositive NMOSD (n (%)) | – | 54 (10.0) | |
| Double-negative NMOSD (n (%)) | – | 34 (6.3) | |
| NMOSD with unknown antibody-status (n (%)) | – | 58 (11.0) | |
| Patients with a history of optic neuritis (n (%)) | – | 400 (74.2) | |
| Patients with a history of myelitis (n (%)) | – | 410 (76.1) | |
AQP4-IgG, aquaporin-4 IgG antibodies; MOG-IgG, myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein IgG antibodies; NMOSD, neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders.