| Literature DB >> 33121927 |
Junke Song1, Li Zhang4, Yanfeng Xu3, Dezhi Yang2, Li Zhang4, Shiying Yang2, Wen Zhang1, Jinhua Wang1, Shuo Tian1, Shengqian Yang1, Tianyi Yuan1, Ailin Liu1, Qi Lv3, Fengdi Li3, Hongqi Liu5, Biyu Hou6, Xiaozhong Peng5, Yang Lu7, Guanhua Du8.
Abstract
Baicalein is the main active compound of Scutellaria baicalensis Georgi, a medicinal herb with multiple pharmacological activities, including the broad anti-virus effects. In this paper, the preclinical study of baicalein on the treatment of COVID-19 was performed. Results showed that baicalein inhibited cell damage induced by SARS-CoV-2 and improved the morphology of Vero E6 cells at a concentration of 0.1 μM and above. The effective concentration could be reached after oral administration of 200 mg/kg crystal form β of baicalein in rats. Furthermore, baicalein significantly inhibited the body weight loss, the replication of the virus, and relieved the lesions of lung tissue in hACE2 transgenic mice infected with SARS-CoV-2. In LPS-induced acute lung injury of mice, baicalein improved the respiratory function, inhibited inflammatory cell infiltration in the lung, and decreased the levels of IL-1β and TNF-α in serum. In conclusion, oral administration of crystal form β of baicalein could reach its effective concentration against SARS-CoV-2. Baicalein could inhibit SARS-CoV-2-induced injury both in vitro and in vivo. Therefore, baicalein might be a promising therapeutic drug for the treatment of COVID-19.Entities:
Keywords: Baicalein; COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2
Year: 2020 PMID: 33121927 PMCID: PMC7588320 DOI: 10.1016/j.bcp.2020.114302
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biochem Pharmacol ISSN: 0006-2952 Impact factor: 5.858
Fig. 1The pharmacokinetic study of baicalein and the comparison between crystal form α and β. (A) Scanning electron micrographs (SEM) of crystal forms α and β of baicalein. (B) Chemical structure of baicalein and baicalin. (C) Plasma concentration–time curve of baicalein after oral administration of crystal forms α and β of baicalein (200 mg/kg) in rats (n = 10). (D) Plasma concentration–time curve of baicalin after oral administration of crystal forms α and β of baicalein (200 mg/kg) in rats (n = 10). (E) Plasma concentration–time curve of baicalein and baicalin after intravenous injection of baicalein (10 mg/kg) in rats (n = 10). Results were shown as mean + SD.
Baicalein inhibited SARS-CoV-2-induced Vero E6 cell injury.
| Compound | Concentration (μM) | CPE result (n = 4) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baicalein | 0.3 | – | – | – | – |
| 0.1 | – | – | – | – | |
| 0.03 | – | + | + | + | |
| 0.01 | + | + | + | + | |
| 0.003 | + | + | + | + | |
| 0.001 | + | + | + | + | |
| 0.0003 | + | + | + | + | |
| Remdesivir | 0.1 | – | – | – | – |
| 0.03 | – | + | + | + | |
| Normal control | – | – | – | – | |
| Solvent control | – | – | – | – | |
| SARS-CoV-2 control | + | + | + | + | |
An observable CPE was recorded as “+”, no CPE was recorded as “−”.
Different concentrations of baicalein or remdesivir solution were pre-incubated with SARS-CoV-2 for 1 h, then the incubated solutions were added to the cells for the anti-virus study. The results showed that baicalein at the concentration range of 0.1–0.3 μM could completely protect cells against the SARS-CoV-2 induced injury, indicating that If an effective concentration of baicalein and virus are directly mixed in advance, the virus might be completely killed, thus protecting the cells from the subsequent damage caused by SARS-CoV-2.
Fig. 2Baicalein inhibited SARS-CoV-2-induced Vero E6 cell injury. The CPE assay was carried out in Vero E6 cells infected with SARS-CoV-2. Cells were pretreated with drugs for 1 h. Then SARS-CoV-2 virus (MOI = 0.05) was added and incubated for 1 h. After discarding the drug-virus mixture, the normal culture medium containing the drug was added, and the CPE was observed under a light microscope after 48 h. Baicalein showed cell-protective effects against SARS-CoV-2 in the concentration range of 0.1 to 50 μM. Scale bar = 25 μM.
Fig. 3Baicalein inhibited the loss of the body weight, reduced virus load and relieved lung injury in mice infected with SARS-CoV-2. (A) The average body weight change rate of mice in model and baicalein groups. Compared with the model group, the average body weight of mice in the baicalein group was significantly increased on the 1st (n = 6), 3rd (n = 6), and 5th (n = 3) day (P < 0.01, P < 0.001 and P < 0.001). Statistical significance was assessed using two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni's multiple comparisons test. (B) Baicalein significantly inhibited the virus load of the lung tissue on the 3rd and 5th days after infection (**P < 0.01 and *P < 0.05). Statistical significance was assessed using unpaired t test. (C) The baicalein relieved inflammatory cell infiltration of lung tissue caused by SARS-CoV-2, according to the results of H & E staining. Statistical significance of lung injury score was assessed using unpaired t test. The values are presented as mean ± SD. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.01 vs. SARS-CoV-2 infection model group (scale bar = 250 μm).
Fig. 4Baicalein alleviated LPS-induced acute lung function injury in mice. Baicalein was orally administrated at a dose of 50 mg/kg in mice. Lung function was monitored at 24 h after LPS stimulation. (A) Baicalein significantly shortened the EEP in mice with lung injury. (B) Baicalein significantly reduced the PEF/body weight of mice with lung injury. (C) Baicalein significantly reduced the enhanced pause (Penh) in mice with lung injury. (D) Baicalein increased the respiratory frequency of mice injured by LPS. (E) The treatment of baicalein reduced the lung cell infiltration compared with the LPS model group according to the results of H & E staining (scale bar = 50 μm). (F-H) Baicalein significantly reduced the total cell (F), neutrophils (G), and macrophages (H) in bronchial perfusion fluid. (I-K) Baicalein significantly reduced the concentrations of IL-1β (I) and TNF-α (J) in mice serum compared with the LPS model group. But no significant different was found on the concentration of IL-6 (K). The values are presented as mean + SD. Statistical significance was assessed using one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s multiple comparisons test. ##P < 0.01 and ###P < 0.001 vs. control group, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001 vs. LPS model group.