| Literature DB >> 33121535 |
Su-Hyun Lee1, Hwang-Jae Lee1,2, Youngbo Shim3, Won Hyuk Chang1, Byung-Ok Choi4, Gyu-Ha Ryu5,6, Yun-Hee Kim7,8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Gait dysfunction is common in post-stroke patients as a result of impairment in cerebral gait mechanism. Powered robotic exoskeletons are promising tools to maximize neural recovery by delivering repetitive walking practice.Entities:
Keywords: Cortical activation; Functional near infrared spectroscopy; Stroke; Wearable hip-assist robot
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33121535 PMCID: PMC7596937 DOI: 10.1186/s12984-020-00777-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Neuroeng Rehabil ISSN: 1743-0003 Impact factor: 4.262
Characteristics of participants
| Characteristics | Values |
|---|---|
| Sex (male/female) | 13/7 |
| Age, years | 61.74 (6.93) |
| Height, cm | 164.37 (7.06) |
| Weight, kg | 66 (9.12) |
| Stroke onset duration, month | 36.67 (26.61) |
| Handedness (right/left) | 20/0 |
| Etiology | |
| Ischemic/hemorrhagic | 6/14 |
| Stroke location | |
| Cortical/subcortical/mixed | 1/10/9 |
| Side of stroke | |
| Right/left | 12/8 |
| Functional ambulation categorical | 4.2 (0.83) |
| Berg balance scale | 38.5 (5.65) |
Values are expressed as mean (SD)
Fig. 1Gait Enhancing and Motivating System-Hip (GEMS-H)
Fig. 2a Experimental design: the block design time course, including baseline, walking, and resting periods. b Location of optodes. The fNIRS system consists of 16 light source (white) and 16 detector (black) fibers, resulting in a total of 49 channels distributed over left SMC (Channels 1, 9, 42), right SMC (Channels 3, 27, 32), left SMA (Channels 11, 12), right SMA (Channels 24, 25), left PMC (Channels 10, 13, 45), right PMC (Channels 23, 26, 36), left PFC (Channel 16), and right PFC (Channel 20). fNIRS functional near infrared spectroscopy, SMC primary sensorimotor cortex, SMA supplemental motor areas, PMC premotor cortex, PFC prefrontal cortex, GEMS-H walking with assistance of GEMS-H, NoGEMS-H walking without assistance of GEMS-H
The mean values of oxygenated hemoglobin concentration during each walking condition and phase
| (Unit: mol*10–3) | GEMS-H | NoGEMS-H | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ipsilesional SMC | |||
| Early phase | 0.29 (0.22) | 0.14 (0.19) | |
| Late phase | − 0.22 (0.14) | − 0.11 (0.10) | |
| Contralesional SMC | |||
| Early phase | 0.21 (0.15) | 0.11 (0.16) | |
| Late phase | − 0.14 (0.09) | − 0.08 (0.09) | 0.066 |
| Ipsilesional SMA | |||
| Early phase | 0.26 (0.19) | 0.17 (0.16) | 0.095 |
| Late phase | − 0.22 (0.10) | − 0.14 (0.13) | |
| Contralesional SMA | |||
| Early phase | 0.23 (0.17) | 0.18 (0.15) | 0.288 |
| Late phase | − 0.20 (0.12) | − 0.08 (0.11) | |
| Ipsilesional PMC | |||
| Early phase | 0.20 (0.13) | 0.21 (0.17) | 0.692 |
| Late phase | − 0.12 (0.12) | − 0.08 (0.13) | 0.334 |
| Contralesional PMC | |||
| Early phase | 0.16 (0.18) | 0.25 (0.25) | 0.200 |
| Late phase | − 0.11 (0.07) | − 0.08 (0.08) | 0.203 |
| Ipsilesional PFC | |||
| Early phase | 0.13 (0.08) | 0.17 (0.09) | 0.156 |
| Late phase | − 0.05 (0.06) | − 0.12 (0.06) | |
| Contralesional PFC | |||
| Early phase | 0.11 (0.14) | 0.19 (0.16) | 0.083 |
| Late phase | − 0.03 (0.10) | − 0.11 (0.08) | |
Values are presented as mean (SD)
*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01
SMC primary sensorimotor cortex, SMA supplemental motor areas, PMC premotor cortex, PFC prefrontal cortex, GEMS-H walking with assistance of GEMS-H, NoGEMS-H walking without assistance of GEMS-H
Fig. 3The average group changes in oxyHb concentrations in each ROI under GEMS-H and NoGEMS-H conditions. *P < 0.05. SMC, primary sensorimotor cortex; SMA, supplemental motor areas; PMC, premotor cortex; PFC, prefrontal cortex; GEMS-H, walking with assistance of GEMS-H; NoGEMS-H, walking without assistance of GEMS-H