Hannah L Morgan1, Arwa Aljumah2, Charlène Rouillon3, Adam J Watkins4. 1. Division of Child Health, Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK. Electronic address: hannah.morgan@nottingham.ac.uk. 2. Division of Child Health, Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK. 3. INRAE, Fish Physiology and Genomics, Bat 16A, Campus de Beaulieu, Rennes, France. 4. Division of Child Health, Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK; Aston Research Centre for Healthy Ageing, School of Life and Health Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, B4 7ET, UK(1).
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Paternal low-protein diet can alter sperm methylation status, fetal growth and program offspring ill-health, however its impact on the placenta remains poorly defined. Here we examine the influence paternal low-protein diet has on fetal and placental development and the additional impact of supplementary methyl-donors on fetoplacental physiology. METHODS: Male C57BL/6J mice were fed a control normal protein diet (NPD; 18% protein), a low-protein diet (LPD; 9% protein) or LPD with methyl-donor supplementation (MD-LPD; choline chloride, betaine, methionine, folic acid, vitamin B12) for a minimum of 8 weeks. Males were mated with 8-11 week old female C57BL/6J mice and fetal and placental tissue collected on embryonic day 17.5. RESULTS: Paternal LPD was associated with increased fetal weights compared to NPD and MD-LPD with 22% fetuses being above the 90th centile for fetal weight. However, LPD and MD-LPD placental weights were reduced when compared to NPD. Placentas from LPD fathers demonstrated a reduced junctional zone area and reduced free-fatty acid content. MD-LPD placentas did not mirror these finding, demonstrating an increased chorion area, a reduction in junctional-specific glycogen staining and reduced placental Dnmt3bexpression, none of which were apparent in either NPD or LPD placentas. DISCUSSION: A sub-optimal paternal diet can influence fetal growth and placental development, and dietary methyl-donor supplementation alters placental morphology and gene expression differentially to that observed with LPD alone. Understanding how paternal diet and micro-nutrient supplementation influence placental development is crucial for determining connections between paternal well-being and future offspring health.
INTRODUCTION: Paternal low-protein diet can alter sperm methylation status, fetal growth and program offspring ill-health, however its impact on the placenta remains poorly defined. Here we examine the influence paternal low-protein diet has on fetal and placental development and the additional impact of supplementary methyl-donors on fetoplacental physiology. METHODS: Male C57BL/6J mice were fed a control normal protein diet (NPD; 18% protein), a low-protein diet (LPD; 9% protein) or LPD with methyl-donor supplementation (MD-LPD; choline chloride, betaine, methionine, folic acid, vitamin B12) for a minimum of 8 weeks. Males were mated with 8-11 week old female C57BL/6J mice and fetal and placental tissue collected on embryonic day 17.5. RESULTS: Paternal LPD was associated with increased fetal weights compared to NPD and MD-LPD with 22% fetuses being above the 90th centile for fetal weight. However, LPD and MD-LPD placental weights were reduced when compared to NPD. Placentas from LPD fathers demonstrated a reduced junctional zone area and reduced free-fatty acid content. MD-LPD placentas did not mirror these finding, demonstrating an increased chorion area, a reduction in junctional-specific glycogen staining and reduced placental Dnmt3bexpression, none of which were apparent in either NPD or LPD placentas. DISCUSSION: A sub-optimal paternal diet can influence fetal growth and placental development, and dietary methyl-donor supplementation alters placental morphology and gene expression differentially to that observed with LPD alone. Understanding how paternal diet and micro-nutrient supplementation influence placental development is crucial for determining connections between paternal well-being and future offspring health.
Authors: Kevin D Sinclair; Cinzia Allegrucci; Ravinder Singh; David S Gardner; Sonia Sebastian; Jayson Bispham; Alexandra Thurston; John F Huntley; William D Rees; Christopher A Maloney; Richard G Lea; Jim Craigon; Tom G McEvoy; Lorraine E Young Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2007-11-27 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Tom P Fleming; Adam J Watkins; Miguel A Velazquez; John C Mathers; Andrew M Prentice; Judith Stephenson; Mary Barker; Richard Saffery; Chittaranjan S Yajnik; Judith J Eckert; Mark A Hanson; Terrence Forrester; Peter D Gluckman; Keith M Godfrey Journal: Lancet Date: 2018-04-16 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: R Lambrot; C Xu; S Saint-Phar; G Chountalos; T Cohen; M Paquet; M Suderman; M Hallett; S Kimmins Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2013 Impact factor: 14.919