| Literature DB >> 33119652 |
Shanta Boddapati1, Jason Gilmore1, Kyle Boone1, John Bushey1, Jonathan Ross1, Brian Gfeller1, William McFee1, Romesh Rao1, Greg Corrigan2, Aaron Chen1, Howard Clarke1, John Valliere-Douglass1, Swapnil Bhargava1.
Abstract
With the advent of highly sensitive technologies such as tandem mass spectrometry and next-generation sequencing, recombinant antibodies are now routinely analyzed for the presence of low-level sequence variants including amino acid misincorporations. During mAb cell culture process development, we found that proline was replaced with the non-canonical amino acid, hydroxyproline, in the protein sequence. We investigated the relationship between proline content in the cell culture media and proline sequence variants and found that the proline concentration was inversely correlated with the amount of sequence variants detected in the protein sequence. Hydroxyproline incorporation has been previously reported in recombinant proteins produced in mammalian expression systems as a post-translational modification. Given the dependency on proline levels, the mechanism was then investigated. To address the possibility of co-translational misincorporation of hydroxyproline, we used tandem mass spectrometry to measure incorporation of stable-isotope labelled hydroxyproline added to the feed of a production bioreactor. We discovered co-translational misincorporation of labelled hydroxyproline in the recombinant antibody. These findings are significant, since they underscore the need to track non-canonical amino acid incorporation as a co-translational event in CHO cells. Understanding the mechanism of hydroxyproline incorporation is crucial in developing an appropriate control strategy during biologics production.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33119652 PMCID: PMC7595273 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241250
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Analysis of proline substitutions observed in recombinant antibodies produced in CHO cell lines.
(a) Sum of sequence variant percentages across all proline residues of the recombinant antibody sequence produced from four cell lines A, B, C and D. (b) Hydroxyproline substitution levels were directly proportional to the number of proline residues on peptides analyzed. (c) Alanine substitution levels were directly proportional to the number of proline residues on peptides analyzed. (d) Extracted ion chromatogram (XIC) chromatogram of a peptide showing proline sequence variants with hydroxyproline and alanine replacing proline.
Fig 2Analysis of cell culture performance and the relationship between proline amino acid levels and substitutions observed for cell line D.
Cell culture performance for a single production bioreactor is shown (a) Viable cell density, (b) Viability, (c) Titer. (d) Proline concentration and proline substitutions in the harvest cell culture fluid (HCCF) from the same bioreactor, measured at different time points across culture duration. (e) Relationship between proline substitutions and minimum proline concentration. Multiple bioreactor runs of cell line D were analyzed to derive this relationship.
Fig 3Cell culture performance of bioreactors treated with labeled hydroxyproline compared with other control conditions.
(a) Viable cell density (b) Viability (c) Titer (d) Integrated capillary electrophoresis and mass spectrometry analysis of cell culture samples from experimental bioreactors showing unlabeled and labeled hydroxyproline present in the media.
Fig 4Detection of labeled hydroxyproline in recombinant antibody sequence.
Hydroxyproline misincorporation was observed in the antibody as shown by the XIC ratios for a representative peptide (inset). Both unlabeled and labeled hydroxyproline were observed. MS analysis showed the presence of D5 and D4 hydroxyproline.
Percentage of labeled hydroxyproline misincorporations observed in a set of random peptides chosen from the recombinant antibody sequence.
| Peptide sequence | number of proline residues | labeled hyp bioreactor 1 | labeled hyp bioreactor 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| VEAEDVGVYYCSQSTHVPPTFGQGTK | 2 | 68.7 | 65.7 |
| TVAAPSVFIFPPSDEQLK | 3 | 69.4 | 68.8 |
| VYACEVTHQGLSSPVTK | 1 | 70.7 | 71 |
| GPSVFPLAPSSK | 2 | 70.9 | 71.1 |
| THTCPPCPAPELLGGPSVFLFPPKPK | 8 | 69.8 | 69.2 |
| TPEVTCVVVDVSHEDPEVK | 2 | 70.8 | 69.6 |
| ALPAPIEK | 2 | 70.5 | 71.4 |
| GFYPSDIAVEWESNGQPENNYK | 2 | 72.4 | 72.9 |
| TTPPVLDSDGSFFLYSK | 2 | 68.6 | 68.6 |