Literature DB >> 33118177

Primary care quality and cost for privately insured patients in and out of US Health Systems: Evidence from four states.

Ruohua Annetta Zhou1, Nancy D Beaulieu2, David Cutler3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To characterize physician health system membership in four states between 2012 and 2016 and to compare primary care quality and cost between in-system providers and non-system providers for the commercially insured population. DATA SOURCES: Physician membership in health systems was obtained from a unique longitudinal database on health systems and matched at the provider level to 2014 all-payer claims data from Colorado, Massachusetts, Oregon, and Utah. STUDY
DESIGN: Using an observational study design, we compared physicians in health systems to non-system physicians located in the same state and geography on average cost of care (risk-adjusted using the Johns Hopkins' Adjusted Clinical Grouper), five HEDIS quality measures, one measure of developmental screening, and two Prevention Quality Indicator Measures. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION
METHODS: Patients in commercial health plans were attributed to a primary care physician accounting for the plurality of office visits. A cohort for each quality measure was constructed based on appropriate measure specifications. PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: The share of physicians in health systems increased steadily from 2012 to 2016 and ranged from 48% in Colorado to 63% in Utah in 2016. Compared to physicians not in a system, system physicians performed similarly on most HEDIS quality metrics compared to non-system physicians. Patients attributed to in-system physicians had about 40% higher rates (P < .05) of Ambulatory Care Sensitive Admissions (measured in admissions per 100 000:921.33 in-system vs 674.61 not-in-system for acute composite; 2540.91 in-system vs 1972.17 for chronic composite In-system providers were associated with $29 (P < .05) higher average per member per month costs (453.37 vs 432.93). Overall, differences in performance by system membership were relatively small compared to differences across states and geography.
CONCLUSION: A growing share of physicians is part of a health system from 2012 to 2016. Providers in health systems are not delivering primary care more efficiently than non-system providers for the commercially insured. © Health Research and Educational Trust.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cohort studies; geography; health care cost; ownership; primary care; quality of health care

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33118177      PMCID: PMC7720710          DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.13590

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  12 in total

1.  Changes in Quality of Health Care Delivery after Vertical Integration.

Authors:  Caroline S Carlin; Bryan Dowd; Roger Feldman
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-12-22       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Does Ownership Make a Difference in Primary Care Practice?

Authors:  Stephan Lindner; Leif I Solberg; William L Miller; Bijal A Balasubramanian; Miguel Marino; K John McConnell; Samuel T Edwards; Kurt C Stange; Rachel J Springer; Deborah J Cohen
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2019 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.657

3.  Producing comparable cost and quality results from all-payer claims databases.

Authors:  Maria de Jesus Diaz-Perez; Rita Hanover; Emilie Sites; Doug Rupp; Jim Courtemanche; Emily Levi
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 2.229

4.  The effect of hospital acquisitions of physician practices on prices and spending.

Authors:  Cory Capps; David Dranove; Christopher Ody
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2018-04-22       Impact factor: 3.883

5.  Total expenditures per patient in hospital-owned and physician-owned physician organizations in California.

Authors:  James C Robinson; Kelly Miller
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014 Oct 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Association of Primary Care Practice Location and Ownership With the Provision of Low-Value Care in the United States.

Authors:  John N Mafi; Christina C Wee; Roger B Davis; Bruce E Landon
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 21.873

7.  Trends in hospital ownership of physician practices and the effect on processes to improve quality.

Authors:  Tara F Bishop; Stephen M Shortell; Patricia P Ramsay; Kennon R Copeland; Lawrence P Casalino
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 2.229

8.  Primary care quality and cost for privately insured patients in and out of US Health Systems: Evidence from four states.

Authors:  Ruohua Annetta Zhou; Nancy D Beaulieu; David Cutler
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 3.402

9.  Association of Financial Integration Between Physicians and Hospitals With Commercial Health Care Prices.

Authors:  Hannah T Neprash; Michael E Chernew; Andrew L Hicks; Teresa Gibson; J Michael McWilliams
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 21.873

10.  Weighing the Effects of Vertical Integration Versus Market Concentration on Hospital Quality.

Authors:  Marah Noel Short; Vivian Ho
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2019-02-09       Impact factor: 3.929

View more
  5 in total

1.  Is Bigger Better?: A Closer Look at Small Health Systems in the United States.

Authors:  Tisamarie B Sherry; Cheryl L Damberg; Maria DeYoreo; Andy Bogart; Denis Agniel; M Susan Ridgely; José J Escarce
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 3.178

2.  Primary care quality and cost for privately insured patients in and out of US Health Systems: Evidence from four states.

Authors:  Ruohua Annetta Zhou; Nancy D Beaulieu; David Cutler
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Making integration work.

Authors:  David Blumenthal
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  The promise and peril of health systems.

Authors:  Richard Kronick
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  United, can we be stronger? Did French general practitioners in multi-professional groups provide more chronic care follow-up during lockdown?

Authors:  Anna Zaytseva; Pierre Verger; Bruno Ventelou
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 2.908

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.