Literature DB >> 33118123

The Mirror Generalization Process in Reading: Evidence from Korean Hangul.

Heather Winskel1, Tae-Hoon Kim2.   

Abstract

Mirror invariance or generalisation is the ability to recognise objects as being the same regardless of their spatial orientation. However, when, for example, learning to read Roman script, children need to hone these skills so that they can readily discriminate between mirror letters such as b/d or p/b. Korean Hangul makes a particularly interesting comparison as it has both lateral and vertical perceptually similar mirror letter pairs (i.e., ㅏㅓ, ㅑㅕ, ㅗㅜ, ㅛㅠ). In the current study, we investigated the mirror generalisation effect in native readers of Korean Hangul. We used a similar negative priming paradigm as used by (Ahr et al., Brain and Cognition 117:1-8, 2017) with Roman script readers. In contrast to their findings, we did not find evidence of negative priming due to either lateral (e.g., ㅏ + ㅓ) or vertical (e.g., ㅗ + ㅜ) mirror letter primes in Korean readers. One explanation for these results is that adult readers of Korean Hangul may not experience mirror invariance to the same extent as Roman script readers due to script-specific characteristics. Thus, learning to read this distinctive script may result in readers being less sensitive to mirror reversals than Roman script readers.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Korean hangul; Mirror invariance or generalisation; Mirror letters; Negative priming paradigm; Writing systems

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33118123     DOI: 10.1007/s10936-020-09736-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res        ISSN: 0090-6905


  13 in total

1.  How learning to read changes the cortical networks for vision and language.

Authors:  Stanislas Dehaene; Felipe Pegado; Lucia W Braga; Paulo Ventura; Gilberto Nunes Filho; Antoinette Jobert; Ghislaine Dehaene-Lambertz; Régine Kolinsky; José Morais; Laurent Cohen
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  The neural code for written words: a proposal.

Authors:  Stanislas Dehaene; Laurent Cohen; Mariano Sigman; Fabien Vinckier
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 3.  Cultural recycling of cortical maps.

Authors:  Stanislas Dehaene; Laurent Cohen
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2007-10-25       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  Mirror-image sensitivity and invariance in object and scene processing pathways.

Authors:  Daniel D Dilks; Joshua B Julian; Jonas Kubilius; Elizabeth S Spelke; Nancy Kanwisher
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Why do children make mirror errors in reading? Neural correlates of mirror invariance in the visual word form area.

Authors:  Stanislas Dehaene; Kimihiro Nakamura; Antoinette Jobert; Chihiro Kuroki; Seiji Ogawa; Laurent Cohen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-09-19       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Visual spatial skill: a consequence of learning to read?

Authors:  Catherine McBride-Chang; Yanling Zhou; Jeung-Ryeul Cho; Dorit Aram; Iris Levin; Liliana Tolchinsky
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2011-01-14

Review 7.  Illiterate to literate: behavioural and cerebral changes induced by reading acquisition.

Authors:  Stanislas Dehaene; Laurent Cohen; José Morais; Régine Kolinsky
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 34.870

8.  Through the looking-glass: mirror reading.

Authors:  Jon Andoni Duñabeitia; Nicola Molinaro; Manuel Carreiras
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-11-05       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Into the Looking Glass: Literacy Acquisition and Mirror Invariance in Preschool and First-Grade Children.

Authors:  Tânia Fernandes; Isabel Leite; Régine Kolinsky
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2016-06-02

10.  Does a visual-orthographic deficit contribute to reading disability?

Authors:  Nathlie A Badian
Journal:  Ann Dyslexia       Date:  2005-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.