Literature DB >> 21813690

Mirror-image sensitivity and invariance in object and scene processing pathways.

Daniel D Dilks1, Joshua B Julian, Jonas Kubilius, Elizabeth S Spelke, Nancy Kanwisher.   

Abstract

Electrophysiological and behavioral studies in many species have demonstrated mirror-image confusion for objects, perhaps because many objects are vertically symmetric (e.g., a cup is the same cup when seen in left or right profile). In contrast, the navigability of a scene changes when it is mirror reversed, and behavioral studies reveal high sensitivity to this change. Thus, we predicted that representations in object-selective cortex will be unaffected by mirror reversals, whereas representations in scene-selective cortex will be sensitive to such reversals. To test this hypothesis, we ran an event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging adaptation experiment in human adults. Consistent with our prediction, we found tolerance to mirror reversals in one object-selective region, the posterior fusiform sulcus, and a strong sensitivity to these reversals in two scene-selective regions, the transverse occipital sulcus and the retrosplenial complex. However, a more posterior object-selective region, the lateral occipital sulcus, showed sensitivity to mirror reversals, suggesting that the sense information that distinguishes mirror images is represented at earlier stages in the object-processing hierarchy. Moreover, one scene-selective region (the parahippocampal place area or PPA) was tolerant to mirror reversals. This last finding challenges the hypothesis that the PPA is involved in navigation and reorientation and suggests instead that scenes, like objects, are processed by distinct pathways guiding recognition and action.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21813690      PMCID: PMC3160766          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1935-11.2011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  47 in total

Review 1.  Topographical disorientation: a synthesis and taxonomy.

Authors:  G K Aguirre; M D'Esposito
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 13.501

2.  Failure at object identification improves mirror image matching.

Authors:  E K Warrington; J Davidoff
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  Mental navigation in humans is processed in the anterior bank of the parieto-occipital sulcus.

Authors:  Tadashi Ino; Yumiko Inoue; Masato Kage; Syuichi Hirose; Tooru Kimura; Hidenao Fukuyama
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2002-04-12       Impact factor: 3.046

4.  Viewpoint-specific scene representations in human parahippocampal cortex.

Authors:  Russell Epstein; Kim S Graham; Paul E Downing
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2003-03-06       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  Why do children make mirror errors in reading? Neural correlates of mirror invariance in the visual word form area.

Authors:  Stanislas Dehaene; Kimihiro Nakamura; Antoinette Jobert; Chihiro Kuroki; Seiji Ogawa; Laurent Cohen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-09-19       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Functional compartmentalization and viewpoint generalization within the macaque face-processing system.

Authors:  Winrich A Freiwald; Doris Y Tsao
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-11-05       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Size and position invariance of neuronal responses in monkey inferotemporal cortex.

Authors:  M Ito; H Tamura; I Fujita; K Tanaka
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 8.  The retrosplenial contribution to human navigation: a review of lesion and neuroimaging findings.

Authors:  E A Maguire
Journal:  Scand J Psychol       Date:  2001-07

9.  Using functional magnetic resonance imaging to assess adaptation and size invariance of shape processing by humans and monkeys.

Authors:  Hiromasa Sawamura; Svetlana Georgieva; Rufin Vogels; Wim Vanduffel; G A Orban
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-04-27       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Different roles of the parahippocampal place area (PPA) and retrosplenial cortex (RSC) in panoramic scene perception.

Authors:  Soojin Park; Marvin M Chun
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-05-04       Impact factor: 6.556

View more
  60 in total

1.  Deconstructing visual scenes in cortex: gradients of object and spatial layout information.

Authors:  Assaf Harel; Dwight J Kravitz; Chris I Baker
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Hierarchical processing of face viewpoint in human visual cortex.

Authors:  Vadim Axelrod; Galit Yovel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Places in the Brain: Bridging Layout and Object Geometry in Scene-Selective Cortex.

Authors:  Moira R Dillon; Andrew S Persichetti; Elizabeth S Spelke; Daniel D Dilks
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 4.  Scene Perception in the Human Brain.

Authors:  Russell A Epstein; Chris I Baker
Journal:  Annu Rev Vis Sci       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 6.422

5.  Functional correlates of likelihood and prior representations in a virtual distance task.

Authors:  Martin Wiener; Kelly Michaelis; James C Thompson
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Coding of navigational affordances in the human visual system.

Authors:  Michael F Bonner; Russell A Epstein
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-04-17       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Conjoint representation of texture ensemble and location in the parahippocampal place area.

Authors:  Jeongho Park; Soojin Park
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 8.  Neural evidence supports a novel framework for spatial navigation.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Chrastil
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-04

9.  Origins of landmark encoding in the brain.

Authors:  Ryan M Yoder; Benjamin J Clark; Jeffrey S Taube
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2011-10-06       Impact factor: 13.837

10.  Two scenes or not two scenes: The effects of stimulus repetition and view-similarity on scene categorization from brief displays.

Authors:  Martin J Goldzieher; Sally Andrews; Irina M Harris
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2017-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.